Analysis of nerve growth factor (NGF) blood levels in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC): Its correlation with clinical outcome
17025 Background: Platinum compounds and taxanes have severe side effects in a dose and time-dependent manner, especially neurotoxicity. NGF plays an important role in growth and differentiation of neuronal components. Our goal was to study NGF levels in plasma and correlate it with patient’s clinico-pathologic characteristics. Methods: The study was performed with 451 patients with advanced NSCLC, stages IIIB-IV and treated with cisplatin and docetaxel. Peripheral blood was collected before therapy. NGF were assessed by commercial ELISA (detection limit, 5 pg/ml). Plasma from 32 age and gender-matched controls was used. Results: 91% of males, mean age 61 y [35–82]. 86 patients in ECOG PS 0–1 and 14 PS2. 71% in stage IV and 29% in IIIB. The histological subtypes were 38% squamous cell, 37% adenocarcinoma, 5% anaplasic large cell and 20% undifferentiated. 77.5% of the metastasis was out of the lung. Patients received a median of 6 cycles of chemotherapy [1–7]. 4% presented complete response (CR), 38% partial response (PR), 25% stable disease (SD) and 30% progressive disease (PD). Patient’s median plasma levels of NGF did not differ significantly from controls: 44 pg/ml [6–176] vs 31 pg/ml [14–144] respectively. There were not differences according to histology, site of metastasis and ECOG; however we could observe significant differences with stage: 25 pg/ml [10–70] in stage IIIB vs 47 pg/ml [6–176] in stage IV (p = 0.008). We could not observe any differences in response to therapy: CR+PR patients presented median NGF of 35 pg/ml [6–92] vs 39 pg/ml [10–165] in the SD+PD group. Splitting the cohort according to NGF median we found two significantly different groups in terms of Overall Survival (OS): patients with NGF <44 pg/ml had a median OS of 10.9 months (m) [7.9–13.9] vs 7.3 m [3–11.5] for patients with NGF >44 pg/ml (p = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis, NGF levels was not predictor for time to progression (TTP) and OS. Conclusions: NGF plasma levels did not differ in patients and controls. In our cohort with advanced NSCLC we have not found any relationship between NGF levels with histology, response, site of metastasis and TTP. By contrast NGF levels are higher in those patients in stage IV and in those presenting poorer OS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.