Observing patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An overview of real world treatments and outcomes in Europe

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7626-7626
Author(s):  
H. G. Bischoff ◽  
H. Anderson ◽  
B. van den Borne ◽  
F. Langer ◽  
M. I. Leschinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Clinical Trial Results

7626 Background: ACTION (Assessment of Costs and ouTcomes of chemotherapy In an Observational setting in patients with advanced NSCLC) is a prospective, pan-European observational study. The objective of ACTION is to describe advanced NSCLC treatment in routine clinical practice. Methods: Chemonaive patients (pts) aged = 18 yrs with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC were observed for 18 months from presentation for initiation of chemotherapy (CT). All pt care, including CT given, was at the discretion of the pt/physician. Pts were excluded if participating in a clinical trial. Results: 975 pts [Germany (571), UK (193), Finland (99), Netherlands (76), Portugal (36)] were enrolled from April 2003 to September 2004 and observations completed June 2006. Median age was 65 yrs (32–90) with 28.3% of pts aged =70 yrs; 71.3% were male; 65.2% had stage IV disease. WHO performance status (PS) was 0/1 (86.2%), 2 (10.0%), 3/4 (3.8%). Of 487 pts who experienced weight loss, 172 (33.4%) lost >10% body weight in 4 weeks prior to start of CT. First-line CT given: gemcitabine (gem) 10.3%, vinorelbine (vin) 4.3%, gem+platinum 45.0%, vin+platinum 14.6%, taxane+platinum 11.7%, other 14.2%. Complete response (CR) to first-line CT was observed in 1.8% of pts, partial response (PR) 37.9%, stable disease (SD) 28.5%, progressive disease (PD) 17.8%, unknown 13.8%. Second-line CT was planned for 29.2% (285) pts. Median time from initiation of 1st-line to initiation of 2nd-line CT was 5.8 months. Median age was 62 yrs (32–84); 69.8% were male; WHO PS at initiation of 2nd line CT: 0/1 (79%), 2 (17%), 3/4 (4%). Best response to 2nd-line CT: CR 0.4%, PR 9.1%, SD 19.3%, PD 48.8%, unknown 14.3%. Unadjusted median survival time for all pts: 9.3 months (95% CI 8.6–10.3). Overall estimated 1-yr survival was 39.5%. Conclusions: ACTION was the first large-scale observational study in pts with advanced NSCLC in Europe. Overall response rates and survival were consistent with clinical trial results, even though approximately one- third of pts enrolled may have been excluded from clinical trials on the basis of their baseline demographics. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The quantification of the catalytic subunit of telomerase in plasma is a prognostic factor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7052-7052
Author(s):  
R. Sirera ◽  
C. Camps ◽  
L. Llobat ◽  
A. Berrocal ◽  
R. M. Bremnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Catalytic Subunit ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Circulating Dna ◽  
Nsclc Patients

7052 Background: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of circulating DNA in blood is a promising non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool. Our aim was to study the association between the free amount in plasma of the catalytic subunit of telomerase (hTERT) and several clinical variables in advanced NSCLC patients. Methods: We examined 451 NSCLC patients in stage IIIB and IV, treated with cisplatin and docetaxel. Blood samples were collected before chemotherapy, and circulating DNA was extracted from the serum using commercial adsorption columns. The amount of free hTERT in plasma was quantified by using RT-PCR. Results: Median age was 61 years [35–82] and 84% were males. 99% had performance status 0–1. 84% were in stage IV and 16% in stage IIIB. The histological subtypes were: 32% squamous cell carcinoma, 50% adenocarcinoma, 14% anaplastic large cell, and 4% undifferentiated. 41% of the patients received second line chemotherapy. 1% achieved complete response (CR), 36% partial response (PR), 35% had stable disease (SD) and 28% progressive disease (PD). Median hTERT value was 4856 ng/ml; for patients in IIIB was 4847 ng/ml [263–964826] and 4886 ng/ml [67–4373520] in stage IV (p = 0.75). There was not association between hTERT values and response to therapy, 20588 ng/ml [122–317251] in the CR+PR group vs 50204 ng/ml [67–4373520] in the SD+PD group (p = 0.09). hTERT values were not related with the localization of the metastasis. Dividing the cohort in two sets according to hTERT median we found two significantly different groups in terms of Overall Survival (OS) and Time To Progression (TTP). Patients with hTERT <4856 ng/ml had a median TTP of 5.3 months (m) [4.4–6.1] while for hTERT >4856 ng/ml was 4.1 m [3.5–4.6], (p = 0.0009). OS when hTERT <4856 ng/ml was 10.1m [4.9–11.3] and for hTERT >4856 ng/ml was 8.4 m [7.2–9.5], (p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, hTERT was an independent predictive variable for TTP (HR 1.39, CI 95% 1.1–1.7, p = 0.002) and OS (HR 1.27, CI 95% 1.1–1.6, p = 0.04). Conclusions: In advanced NSCLC patients, the quantification of free circulating hTERT in plasma is an affordable and valuable prognostic marker. High plasma hTERT levels are a poor prognostic indicator for TTP and OS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a performance status (PS) 2: CAPPA-2 study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8066-8066
Author(s):  
Alessandro Morabito ◽  
Vittorio Gebbia ◽  
Saverio Cinieri ◽  
Maria Grazia Viganò ◽  
Roberto Bianco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
First Line Treatment

8066 Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) is the standard treatment for patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC, but the evidence of its efficacy among ECOG PS2 pts is weak, because these pts are usually excluded from clinical trials; concern exists about tolerability and feasibility of standard CT in these pts. No prospective randomized trial has tested the addition of cisplatin to single-agent CT in pts with advanced NSCLC and PS2. Methods: CAPPA-2 was a multicentre, randomized phase III study for first-line treatment of PS2 pts with advanced NSCLC. Patients, aged 18-70, were eligible if they had stage IV or IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or metastatic supraclavicular nodes (TNM VI ed.) and adequate organ function. Patients in standard arm received gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2 dd1 and 8.Patients in experimental arm received cispaltin 60 mg/m2 d1 plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 dd1 and 8. All treatments were repeated q3w, up to 4 cycles, unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). To have 80% power of detecting hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, corresponding to an increase in median OS from 4.8 to 6.8 months, 285 deaths were required. Results: The study was stopped in June 2012 after the enrolment of 57 pts, due to the slow accrual and the report of positive results from a similar study. Median OS was 3.0 months with single-agent gemcitabine and 5.9 months with cisplatin + gemcitabine (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.98, p=0.039). Combination CT produced longer PFS (median 1.7 vs. 3.3 months, HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89, p=0.017) and higher response rate (4% vs. 18%, p=0.19), without substantial increase in toxicity. Conclusions: Addition of cisplatin to single-agent gemcitabine improves survival as first-line treatment of PS2 patients with advanced NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT00526643.

Randomized phase II clinical trial comparing tremelimumab (CP-675,206) with best supportive care (BSC) following first-line platinum-based therapy in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8071-8071 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Zatloukal ◽  
D. S. Heo ◽  
K. Park ◽  
J. Kang ◽  
C. Butts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3

8071 Background: Pts diagnosed with advanced NSCLC with good performance status typically receive platinum-based chemotherapy; however, no approved maintenance therapy exists. Tremelimumab, a fully human anti-CTLA4 mAb, is associated with durable responses in some pts with metastatic melanoma. Methods: This open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase II clinical trial evaluating efficacy and safety of tremelimumab as maintenance therapy was conducted in pts with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with ECOG performance status ≤1. Pts treated with ≥4 cycles of first-line platinum-based therapy resulting in either stable disease (SD) or response per RECIST were eligible and were randomized 3–6 weeks after prior therapy. Pts received 15 mg/kg IV tremelimumab Q90D or BSC until disease progression. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate, and 1-year survival. Results: Eighty-seven pts received tremelimumab (n=44) or BSC (n=43). Nine (20.9%; 90% CI: 11.4%, 33.7%) pts receiving tremelimumab and 6 (14.3%; 90% CI: 6.4%, 26.3%) pts receiving BSC were progression free at 3 months. Among pts receiving tremelimumab, there were 2 (4.8%) partial responses and 7 (16.6%) SDs, compared with 0 and 6 (14.3%) pts receiving BSC, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were observed in 27 (61.4%) pts receiving tremelimumab and 3 (7.0%) receiving BSC. Nine pts (20.5%) receiving tremelimumab reported grade 3 or 4 AEs compared with 0 patients receiving BSC. The most common grade 3 or 4 AEs attributed to tremelimumab were diarrhea and colitis (n=4, 9.1%). Conclusions: In pts with advanced NSCLC and good performance status receiving platinum-based first-line therapy, single-agent tremelimumab was tolerable, with safety consistent with prior studies. Although PFS analysis did not demonstrate superiority of tremelimumab over BSC, the 4.8% objective response rate seen only in the investigational arm may support future combination studies. Analysis of 1-year survival is forthcoming. [Table: see text]

Customized first-line chemotherapy according to ERCC1 and RRM1 SNPs in advanced NSCLC patients: A phase II study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18074-e18074
Author(s):  
Francesca Mazzoni ◽  
Fabiana Letizia Cecere ◽  
Giulia Meoni ◽  
Costanza Giuliani ◽  
Andrea Camerini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Docetaxel Treatment ◽  
Ecog Ps

e18074 Background: Excision repair cross complementing group 1 (ERCC1) and ribonucleotide reductase1 (RRM1) expression levels are predictive of CT efficacy in some malignancies. “Customized” CT has several advantages: (1) pts are more likely to be treated with agents that they will respond to, (2) pts can be spared the toxicity of agents that they are resistant to, (3) effective treatment can be delivered early in the course of disease. Methods: We planned a phase II multicentric open label study in two steps (based on Simon design) to evaluate ERCC1 SNPs (T118C and C8092A) and RRM1 SNPs (-37C>A and -524T>C) in advanced NSCLC pts. Here we report the first step for futility. Pts received first line CT according to the assessed ERCC1 and RRM1 SNPs status and the correlated expression levels: treatment A (low ERCC1 and low RRM1) Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine; treatment B (low ERCC1 and high RRM1) Cisplatin plus Docetaxel; treatment C (high ERCC1 and low RRM1) Gemcitabine plus Docetaxel; treatment D (high ERCC1 and high RRM1) Docetaxel plus Vinorelbine. Results: 42 pts were enrolled from Jan. 2010 to Oct. 201, 40 pts received at least 1 cycle of CT; median age was 66 yrs (range 47-73); 33 pts were males; 23(55%) pts were ECOG PS 0, 19(45%) PS 1; all pts had stage IV; 23(55%) pts had adenoca, 13(31%) squamous, 6(14%) other types; 25(62%) pts received treatment A, 3(8%) treatment B, 11(27%) treatment C, 1(3%) treatment D. As primary end-point we assessed the overall best response: 18(45%) pts achieved PR, 12(30%) SD, 8(20%) PD, 2(5%) pts were not evaluable. Updated information on OS and PFS will be presented. CT was well tolerated, there were no treatment related deaths. Conclusions: We observed an improved RR in this setting of NSCLC pts treated with CT according to ERCC1 and RRM1 SNPs status. We are planning to continue the second step of this trial (total 110 pts).

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

Combination of mitotane and locoregional treatments in low-volume metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Boileve ◽  
Elise Mathy ◽  
Charles Roux ◽  
Matthieu Faron ◽  
Julien Hadoux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adrenocortical Carcinoma ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
First Line ◽  
Chemotherapy Administration ◽  
Metastatic Sites

Abstract Purpose European and French guidelines for ENSAT stage IV low tumor burden or indolent adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) recommend combination of mitotane and locoregional treatments (LRT) in first-line. Nevertheless, the benefit of LRT combination with mitotane has never been evaluated in this selected group of patients. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed from 2003-2018 of patients with stage IV ACC with ≤2 tumoral organs who received mitotane in our center. Primary endpoint was the delay between mitotane initiation and first systemic chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from mitotane initiation. Adjusted analyses were performed on the main prognostic factors. Results Out of 79 included patients, 48 (61%) patients were female and median age at stage IVA diagnosis was 49.8 years (interquartile-range:38.8-60.0). Metastatic sites were mainly lungs (76%) and liver (48%). Fifty-eight (73%) patients received LRT including adrenal bed radiotherapy (14 patients, 18%), surgery (37 patients, 47%) and/or interventional radiology n(35,44%). Median time between mitotane initiation and first chemotherapy administration was 9 months (Interquartile-range:4-18). Median PFS1 (first tumor-progression) was 6.0 months (CI95%:4.5-8.6). Median OS was 46 months (CI95%:41-68). PFS1, PFS2 and OS were statistically longer in the mitotane plus LRT group compared to the mitotane-only group (Hazard ratio (HR)=0.39 (CI95%:0.22-0.68), HR=0.35 (CI95%:0.20-0.63) and HR=0.27 (CI95%:0.14-0.50) respectively). Ten (13%) patients achieved complete response, all from mitotane plus LRT group. Conclusion Our results endorse European and French guidelines for stage IV ACC with ≤2 tumor-organs and favor the combination of mitotane and LRT as first-line treatment. For the first time, a significant number of complete responses were observed. Prospective studies are expected to confirm these findings.

Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) versus chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 4-year update from CheckMate 227.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9016-9016
Author(s):  
Luis G. Paz-Ares ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Jong-Seok Lee ◽  
Laszlo Urban ◽  
Reyes Bernabe Caro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

9016 Background: 1L NIVO + IPI was shown to provide durable long-term overall survival (OS) benefit vs chemo regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC in CheckMate 227 Part 1 (NCT02477826); 3-year OS rates were 33% vs 22% in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.67–0.93]) and 34% vs 15% in pts with PD-L1 < 1% (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.51–0.81]). Here we report updated results from the study with 4 years’ minimum follow-up. Methods: Adults with previously untreated stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, no known EGFR/ ALK alterations , and ECOG performance status ≤ 1 were enrolled; pts were stratified by squamous (SQ) and non-squamous (NSQ) histology. Pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% (n = 1189) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W), NIVO alone (240 mg Q2W), or chemo. Pts with PD-L1 < 1% (n = 550) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive NIVO + IPI, NIVO (360 mg Q3W) + chemo, or chemo. OS with NIVO + IPI vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% was the primary endpoint. Results: With minimum follow-up of 49.4 months (database lock, Feb 18, 2021), pts were at least 2 years beyond the protocol-specified end of immunotherapy treatment. Pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% continued to show durable benefit with NIVO + IPI vs chemo (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65–0.90]); 4-year OS rates were 29% (NIVO + IPI), 21% (NIVO), and 18% (chemo). At 4 years, 14% (NIVO + IPI), 10% (NIVO), and 4% (chemo) remained progression free. Among responders, 34%, 30%, and 7% remained in response, respectively. In an exploratory analysis in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, 4-year OS rates were 37% (NIVO + IPI), 26% (NIVO), and 20% (chemo). In pts with PD-L1 < 1%, OS HR for NIVO + IPI vs chemo was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51–0.81); 4-year OS rates were 24% (NIVO + IPI), 13% (NIVO + chemo) and 10% (chemo). At 4 years, 12% (NIVO + IPI), 7% (NIVO + chemo), and 0% (chemo) remained progression free. Among responders, 31%, 13%, and 0% remained in response, respectively. Among pts who progressed on NIVO + IPI vs chemo, 7% vs 40% (PD-L1 ≥ 1%), and 9% vs 33% (PD-L1 < 1%), received subsequent immunotherapy. Benefit with NIVO + IPI vs chemo was observed for both SQ and NSQ histology (Table). With long-term follow-up, no new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: With 4 years’ minimum follow-up, 1L NIVO + IPI continued to provide durable, long-term OS benefit vs chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 expression or histology. Clinical trial information: NCT02477826. [Table: see text]

Update results from ALTER-C-001: Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus XELOX regimen as first-line treatment followed by maintenance monotherapy of anlotinib for patients with mCRC-A single-arm, multicenter, phase Ⅱ clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15550-e15550
Author(s):  
Jin Yan ◽  
Yunwei Han ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Yongdong Jin ◽  
Hao Sun
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
First Line Treatment

e15550 Background: The combination of anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR targeted drugs with chemotherapy is the standard first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and the followed maintenance treatment is an optional approach to balance the efficacy and toxicity. However, studies regarding the maintenance strategies based on antiangiogenic TKIs are limited currently. Anlotinib, a novel oral multi-target TKI which can inhibit both tumor angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation simultaneously, substantially prolonged the PFS with manageable toxicity for refractory mCRC in the phase III ALTER0703 clinical trial. Here we report an update on the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib plus XELOX as first-line treatment followed by anlotinib monotherapy for mCRC. Methods: In this open label, single-arm, multicenter phase II clinical trial, 53 mCRC patients without prior systemic treated, aged 18-75 and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 were planned to recruit. Eligible patients received capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, po, d1-14, q3w) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, iv, d1, q3w) plus anlotinib (10mg, po, d1̃14, q3w) treatment for 6 cycles. After 6 cycles of inducing therapy, patients would receive anlotinib (12mg, po, d1̃14, q3w) as maintenance therapy until disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was PFS; Secondary endpoints included ORR, DCR, DOR and safety. Results: By the data analysis cutoff date of January 22, 2021, a total of 18 patients were enrolled, of which 12 patients were available for efficacy assessment. In best overall response assessment, there were 50.0% PR (6/12), 33.3% SD (4/12) and 16.7% PD (2/12). The ORR was 50.0% (95% CI, 21.1-78.9%) and DCR was 83.3% (95% CI, 51.5-97.9%). The longest duration of treatment was 8.8 months and the response was still ongoing. The median PFS was not reached. The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade (≥20%) were leukopenia, hypertension, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, hypertriglyceridemia. Grade 3/4 TRAEs included hypertension (22.2%), hypertriglyceridemia (11.1%), lipase elevated (11.1%) and neutropenia (5.6%). No grade 5 AEs occurred. Conclusions: The update results suggested that anlotinib combined with XELOX as first line regimen followed by anlotinib monotherapy showed promising anti-tumor activity and manageable safety for patients with mCRC. And the conclusions needed to be confirmed in trials continued subsequently. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900028417.

Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1342
Author(s):  
Irena Ilic ◽  
Sandra Sipetic ◽  
Jovan Grujicic ◽  
Milena Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction Almost half of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Our aim was to assess the effects of adding necitumumab to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Material and methods A comprehensive literature search was performed according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate and adverse events were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time-to-event data and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Results The meta-analysis included four randomized clinical trials with 2074 patients. The pooled results showed significant improvement for overall survival (HR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95), p = 0.004) when necitumumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No statistically significant improvement was noted for progression-free survival and objective response rate (HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.69–1.01), p = 0.06 and OR = 1.46 (95% CI 0.90–2.38), p = 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, there was no benefit in overall survival and objective response rate. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received necitumumab were at the highest odds of developing a skin rash (OR = 14.50 (95% CI 3.16–66.43), p = 0.0006) and hypomagnesaemia (OR = 2.77 (95% CI 2.23–3.45), p < 0.00001), while the OR for any grade ≥3 adverse event was 1.55 (95% CI 1.28–1.87, p < 0.00001). Conclusions The addition of necitumumab to standard chemotherapy in a first-line setting in patients with stage IV NSCLC results in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, while the results were not significant for progression-free survival and objective response rate.

scholarly journals Cisplatin-Based First-Line Treatment of Elderly Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Joint Analysis of MILES-3 and MILES-4 Phase III Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (25) ◽  
pp. 2585-2592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Gridelli ◽  
Alessandro Morabito ◽  
Luigi Cavanna ◽  
Andrea Luciani ◽  
Paolo Maione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Health Status Score

Purpose To test the efficacy of adding cisplatin to first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) within a combined analysis of two parallel phase III trials, MILES-3 and MILES-4. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC who were older than age 70 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 were randomly assigned to gemcitabine or pemetrexed, without or with cisplatin. In each trial, 382 events were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of death of 0.75, with 80% power and two-tailed α of .05. Trials were closed prematurely because of slow accrual, but the joint database allowed us to analyze the efficacy of cisplatin on the basis of intention-to-treat and adjusted by trial, histotype, non-platinum companion drug, stage, performance status, sex, age, and size of the study center. Results From March 2011 to August 2016, 531 patients (MILES-3, 299; MILES-4, 232) were assigned to gemcitabine or pemetrexed without (n = 268) or with cisplatin (n = 263). Median age was 75 years, 79% were male, and 70% had nonsquamous histology. At a median 2-year follow-up, 384 deaths and 448 progression-free survival events were recorded. Overall survival was not significantly prolonged with cisplatin (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; P = .14) and global health status score of quality of life was not improved, whereas progression-free survival (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.92; P = .005) and objective response rate (15.5% v 8.5%; P = .02) were significantly better. Significantly more severe hematologic toxicity, fatigue, and anorexia were found with cisplatin. Conclusion The addition of cisplatin to single-agent chemotherapy does not significantly prolong overall survival, and it does not improve global health status score of quality of life in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document