Prediction of PSA spikes by isotope and patient age following permanent prostate brachytherapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15535-15535
Author(s):  
C. Bostancic ◽  
G. S. Merrick ◽  
W. Butler ◽  
K. Wallner ◽  
Z. Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Prostate Brachytherapy ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Patient Âgé

15535 Background: To evaluate prostate specific antigen (PSA) spikes (bounces) following permanent prostate brachytherapy in low-risk patients randomized to Pd-103 or I-125. Methods: The study population consisted of 164 prostate cancer patients who were part of a prospective randomized trial comparing Pd-103 with I-125 for low-risk disease. Sixty-one patients (37.2%) received short course cytoreductive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). No patient received supplemental XRT. The median follow-up was 5.4 years. All patients were implanted at least 3 years prior to analysis. On average, 10.1 post-treatment PSA’s were obtained per patient. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined as a PSA = 0.40 ng/mL after nadir. A PSA spike was defined as a rise of = 0.2 ng/mL followed by a durable decline to pre- spike levels. Multiple clinical, treatment and dosimetric parameters were evaluated as predictors for a PSA spike. Results: Forty- four patients (26.9%) developed a PSA spike including 45.7% (21/46) of the hormone naïve I-125 patients and 14.0% (8/57) of the hormone naïve Pd-103 patients. In hormone naïve patients, the mean time between implant and spike was 22.6 months and 18.7 months for I-125 and Pd-103 patients, respectively. In patients receiving neoadjuvant ADT, the incidence of spikes was comparable between isotopes (28.1% for I- 125 and 20.7% for Pd-103). The incidence of spikes was substantially different in patients < 65 vs = 65 years of age (16.3% vs. 38.5%). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, patient age at implant (p < 0.001) and isotope (p = 0.002) were significant predictors for spike. Conclusions: In low-risk prostate cancer patients, PSA spikes are most common in patients implanted with I-125 and/or younger than 65 years of age. Differences in isotope-related spikes are most pronounced in hormone naïve patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Differences among Men on Active Surveillance for Very Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Detected Through Population-Based versus Opportunistic Prostate-Specific Antigen-Screening

2015 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-336
Author(s):  
Marco Randazzo ◽  
Josef Beatrice ◽  
Andreas Huber ◽  
Rainer Grobholz ◽  
Lukas Manka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Risk Prostate Cancer

Introduction: Very low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is being increasingly managed by active surveillance (AS). Our aim was to assess the influence of the origin of diagnosis on PCa characteristics and treatment rates among men with very low-risk PCa in our prospective AS cohort. Methods: Overall, 191 men with very low-risk PCa fulfilling Epstein-criteria underwent protocol-based AS. These men originated either from the prospective population-based screening program (P-AS) or were diagnosed by opportunistic screening (O-AS). Results: Overall, n = 86 (45.0%) originated from the P-AS group, whereas n = 105 (55.0%) from the O-AS group. On univariate Cox regression analysis, age (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.00; p = 0.05), origin of diagnosis (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.41-1.28; p = 0.001), number of positive cores (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.18-3.90; p = 0.01) and maximum core involvement (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.05; p = 0.05) were predictors for treatment necessity. On multivariate analysis, age (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-0.99; p = 0.05), number of positive cores (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.10-3.88; p = 0.02), maximum core involvement (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06; p = 0.04) but not origin of diagnosis were independent predictors for treatment necessity. Four men developed biochemical recurrence (all from O-AS group [p = 0.05]). Conclusion: The origin of PCa diagnosis in men undergoing AS had no influence on disease progression and treatment necessity.

scholarly journals Atrial High-Rate Event Incidence and Predictors in Patients With Permanent Pacemaker Implantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Hua Chen ◽  
Guo Yao Chen ◽  
Hong Zheng ◽  
Quan He Chen ◽  
Fa Yuan Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Permanent Pacemaker ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Atrial Pacing ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Patient Âgé

Objective: The present study aims to investigate the incidence and predictors of atrial high-rate events (AHREs) in patients with permanent pacemaker implants.Methods: A total of 289 patients who were implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker due to complete atrioventricular block or symptomatic sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and had no previous history of atrial fibrillation were included in the present study. AHREs are defined as events with an atrial frequency of ≥175 bpm and a duration of ≥5 min. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not AHREs were detected during the follow-up: group A (AHRE+, n = 91) and group N (AHRE–, n = 198).Results: During the 12-month follow-up period, AHREs were detected in 91 patients (31.5%). The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patient age [odds ratio [OR] = 1.041; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.018–1.064; and P &lt; 0.001], pacemaker implantation due to symptomatic SSS (OR = 2.225; 95% CI, 1.227–4.036; and P = 0.008), and the percentage of atrial pacing after pacemaker implantation (OR = 1.010; 95% CI, 1.002–1.017; and P = 0.016) were independent AHRE predictors.Conclusion: The AHRE detection rate in patients with pacemaker implants was 31.5%. Patient age, pacemaker implantation due to symptomatic SSS, and the percentage of atrial pacing after pacemaker implantation were independent AHRE predictors.

YB-1 variant and androgen receptor axis-targeted agents in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (13) ◽  
pp. 919-928
Author(s):  
Ana Afonso ◽  
Jani Silva ◽  
Ana Rita Lopes ◽  
Sara Coelho ◽  
Ana Sofia Patrão ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Allelic Discrimination ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Increased Risk

Aim: To evaluate the influence of YB-1 rs10493112 variant as a genetic marker for response to second-generation androgen receptor axis-target agents. Methods: A hospital-based cohort study of 78 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was conducted. Genotyping was performed by TaqMan® allelic discrimination technology. Main results: In abiraterone-treated and high-risk patients, YB-1 rs10493112 AA genotype carriers showed lower progression-free survival than C allele genotype patients (4 vs 17 months; p = 0.009). For carriers of AA genotype, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a fivefold increased risk of progression (p = 0.035). Conclusion: The study findings suggest that, for metastatic and castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, this polymorphism might be a putative marker for the clinical outcome.

A national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 133-133
Author(s):  
Albert Kim ◽  
Robert Abouassaly ◽  
Simon P. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Radiation Oncologists ◽  
Patient Âgé

133 Background: Due to the growing concerns about over-diagnosis and overtreatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa), active surveillance (AS) has become an integral part of clinical practice guidelines. However, many men with low-risk PCa still receive primary therapy with surgery or radiation. Little is known about the barriers regarding the use of AS in clinical practice. To address this, we performed a national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists assessing the current attitudes and treatment for patients diagnosed with low-risk PCa. Methods: From January to July of 2017, 915 radiation oncologists and 940 urologists were surveyed about perceptions of AS for low-risk PCa. The survey queried respondents about their opinions and attitudes towards AS and treatment recommendations for a patient having low-risk PCa with clinical factors varying from patient age (55, 65 and 75 years old), PSA (4 and 8 ng per dl), and tumor volume for Gleason 3+3 disease (2, 4 and 6 cores). Pearson chi-square and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify respondent differences in treatment recommendations for low-risk PCa. Results: Overall, the response rate was 37.3% (n = 691) and similar for radiation oncologists and urologists (35.7% vs. 38.7%; p = 0.18). While both radiation oncologists and urologists viewed AS as effective for low-risk PCa (86.5% vs. 92.0%; p = 0.04), radiation oncologists were more likely to respond that AS increases patient anxiety (49.5% vs. 29.5%; p < 0.001). Overall, recommendations varied markedly based on patient age, PSA, number of cores positive for Gleason 3+3 prostate cancer and respondent specialty. For a 55-year-old male patient with a PSA 8 and 6 cores of Gleason 6 PCa, recommendations of AS were low for both radiation oncologists and urologists (4.4 % vs. 5.2%; adjusted OR: 0.6; p = 0.28). For a 75-year-old patient with a PSA 4 and 2 cores of Gleason 6 PCa, radiation oncologists and urologists most often recommended AS (89.6% vs. 83.4%; adjusted OR: 0.5; p = 0.07). Conclusions: While both radiation oncologists and urologists consider AS effective in the clinical management of low-risk PCa, its use varies markedly by patient age, PCa volume, PSA and physician specialty.

The influence of obesity on tumor recurrence in vulvar cancer patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17130-e17130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rüdiger Klapdor ◽  
Peter Hillemanns ◽  
Linn Lena Woelber ◽  
Julia Kathrin Jueckstock ◽  
Felix Hilpert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Vulvar Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

e17130 Background: Obesity is associated with worse patients’ survival in several cancer entities. Vulvar cancer as well as obesity show increasing incidence over the last years. The influence of obesity on prognosis of vulvar cancer patients is not clear. However, knowledge about this may have consequences on prevention, treatment, and follow-up. Methods: This is an analysis of the large AGO-CaRE-1 study. Patients suffering from squamous cell vulvar cancer (UICC stage IB and higher), treated in 29 cancer centers between 1998 and 2008, were categorized in a database, in order to analyze treatment patterns and prognostic factors in a retrospective setting. Results: In total, 849 patients with documented height and weight were divided into two groups depending on their body mass index (BMI, < 30 vs. ≥30 kg/m²). There was no difference in the baseline variables (age, tumor diameter, depth of infiltration, tumor stage, nodal invasion, tumor grade) between both groups (p > 0.05). However, we identified differences regarding ECOG status and preexistent comorbidities (cardiovascular, dementia) towards healthier patients with BMI < 30 kg/m². Treatment variables (R0 resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, continuation of adjuvant therapy) did not differ (p > 0.05). Patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m² underwent radical vulvectomy more often (61.1 % vs. 51.8%, p = 0.042). During follow-up, there was a higher recurrence rate in the group having a BMI ≥30 kg/m² (43.4%, vs. 28.3%, p < 0.01) due to an increased rate of local recurrences (33.3% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.01). The rate of groin and distant recurrences was similar between both groups (p > 0.05). Noteworthy, we observed a significantly shorter disease free survival (DSF) of the obese patients in univariate analysis (HR 1.362, 95%CI 1.093-1.696, p = 0.006). Even in multivariate Cox-regression analysis including age, ECOG, tumor stage, type of surgery, nodal invasion, tumor grade, and comorbidities patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m² had a significantly shorter DFS (HR 1.811, 95%CI 1.005-3.262, p = 0.048). Conclusions: In this first large study about the association between obesity and prognosis of vulvar cancer patients, we observed that a BMI ≥30kg/m² was associated with shorter DFS, mainly attributed to a higher risk for local recurrence.

Is patient age a factor in the occurrence of prostate-specific antigen bounce phenomenon after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer?

Urology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Rosser ◽  
Ashish M. Kamat ◽  
Xuemei Wang ◽  
Kim-Anh Do ◽  
Ricardo F. Sanchez-Ortiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Patient Âgé

Adjuvant treatment for resected rectal cancer: Effect of postoperative oxaliplatin added to 5-FU in the neoadjuvant era.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 672-672
Author(s):  
Benjamin Garlipp ◽  
Patrick Stuebs ◽  
Hans Lippert ◽  
Karsten Ridwelski ◽  
Henry Ptok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
The Impact

672 Background: Oxaliplatin (Ox) added to postoperative 5-fluorouracil (5FU) based adjuvant treatment has shown a survival benefit in colon cancer. For rectal cancer, the impact of Ox on survival has almost exclusively been tested in studies using 5FU +/- Ox both as a component of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and as adjuvant treatment. Only one study (NCT00807911) investigated adjuvant 5FU +/- Ox in patients undergoing preop 5FU based CRT without Ox. Thus, the evidence for the benefit of adding Ox to adjuvant 5FU in patients treated with preop 5FU based CRT is limited. Methods: Data from the prospective German multicenter Quality Assurance in Rectal Cancer observational trial involving more than 300 hospitals of all levels of care throughout Germany were retrospectively analyzed. Patients undergoing R0 total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant 5FU based treatment without oxaliplatin between 01/01/2008 and 12/31/2010 were included. Disease-free survival (DFS) in patients receiving adjuvant treatment with or without Ox was compared using the Kaplan Meier method. The impact of adjuvant treatment with 5FU with or without Ox on DFS was investigated in a Cox regression analysis including open vs. laparoscopic approach, pT stage, pN stage, tumor grading, TME quality grade, and presence of anastomotic leakage as potential confounding factors. Results: The entire data set included 1,861 patients. Data for all variables investigated were available for 599 patients of whom 512 (85%) and 89 (15%) received 5FU based adjuvant treatment without and with Ox, respectively. Mean DFS was not different in patients receiving 5FU only vs. 5FU with Ox (p=0.103). Cox regression analysis revealed no significant impact of adding Ox to adjuvant 5FU on DFS. Of all factors analyzed, only pN2 (vs. pN0) status had an independent adverse effect on DFS (Hazard ratio 4.22, p<0.001). Conclusions: These data indicate that adjuvant Ox added to 5FU does not provide a DFS benefit in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative 5FU based CRT under routine care conditions. Rectal cancer patients may be different from patients with colon cancer with respect to benefit from adjuvant Ox.

scholarly journals Relationship between red cell distribution width and prognosis in patients with breast cancer after operation: a retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deshun Yao ◽  
Zhiwu Wang ◽  
Haifeng Cai ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Baosheng Li
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cell Distribution ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Large Tumor ◽  
Distribution Width ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract We retrospectively enrolled 825 breast cancer patients, who was primarily diagnosed in our hospital between January 2009 and December 2014 and explored the relationship between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and long-term prognosis in patients with breast cancer. There were 412 patients with high RDW (RDW > 13.82) and 413 patients with low RDW (RDW ≤ 13.82). Compared with low RDW group, the high w group has large tumor size (the rate of tumor size >2 cm: 60.7 vs 44.8%, P=0.013). The rate of lymph node metastases was higher in the high RDW group thaten that in the low RDW group (62.1 vs 45.8%, P=0.000). RDW was positively associated with tumor stage. The high RDW tended to be advanced stage (P=0.000). Compared with low RDW group, the high RDW group tended to be higher lymphocyte count (P=0.004), elevated fibrinogen (P=0.043), and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (P=0.000). The Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated elevated RDW was positively associated with disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.004) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.011). The multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the high RDW group had poorer OS (Hazard risk [HR] = 2.43; 95% CI: 1.62–3.21; P=0.024) and DFS (HR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.28–3.62; P=0.000) compared with low RDW group. The present study found that high pretreatment RDW levels in breast cancer patients were associated with poor OS and DFS. RDW could be a potential predictive factor in differential diagnosis of poor prognosis from all patients.

scholarly journals Preoperative parameters to predict incidental (T1a and T1b) prostate cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Sakamoto ◽  
Kazuhiro Matsumoto ◽  
Nozomi Hayakawa ◽  
Takahiro Maeda ◽  
Atsuko Sato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Incidental Prostate Cancer ◽  
Patient Âgé ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Introduction: Prostate cancer has been found incidentally in transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) specimens without prior diagnosis in 5% to 13% of the patients. We evaluated whether incidental prostate cancer (stages T1a and T1b) could be predicted preoperatively.Methods: TURP was performed in 307 patients between 2006 and 2011. Patient age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, total prostate volume, transitional zone volume, PSA density, history of needle biopsy, and pathological diagnosis on TURP specimen were assessed. We analyzed the association between these parameters and prostate cancer detection.Results: Incidental prostate cancer was found in 31 patients (10.1%), and 13 cases (4.2%) had cancer with T1b and/or Gleason ≥7. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.58, p = 0.022), prostate volume ≤50 cc (OR 4.11, p < 0.001), and the absence of preoperative needle biopsy despite PSA ≥4 ng/mL (OR 2.65, p = 0.046) were independent risk factors. In patients who had 2 or 3 of these risk factors, incidental prostate cancer and cancer with T1b and/or Gleason ≥7 were observed in 25% to 50% and 16% to 25% cases, respectively.Conclusions: Older patient age, small prostate volume, and the absence of previous needle biopsy (despite a high PSA level) might be independent risk factors for detecting incidental prostate cancer, although external validation is warranted to confirm our results.

scholarly journals PVT1 Expression Is a Predictor for Poor Survival of Prostate Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382097161
Author(s):  
Jianhua Liu ◽  
Yanqing Li ◽  
Qiqi Zhang ◽  
Chaoxiang Lv ◽  
Mingwei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Long Noncoding Rna ◽  
Noncoding Rna ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Molecular Therapy ◽  
Vital Status ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Objective: Dysregulation of long noncoding RNA is associated with a variety of cancers and LncRNA has anticancer or carcinogenic activities. PVT1, as a long noncoding RNA, plays an important role in the development of cancer. Methods: We use R to download and analyze the data in TCGA database. ROC curve is generated to evaluate the significance of PVT1 expression for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Chi-square test is used to test correlation between PVT1 expression and clinical pathological features. Survival curve and univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis is performed to compare differences in the effect on the survival rate between PVT1 high expression and low expression. Results: The expression of PTV1 in tumor tissues was significantly higher than that in normal tissues(P<2.2e-16). The difference of PTV1 expression was observed according to vital status (P = 0.0051) and Gleason score (P = 0.0012). The expression of PTV1 is significantly associated with T classification (P < 0.0001), N classification (P = 0.0499), PSA (P = 0.0001), Gleason Score (P < 0.0001), targeted molecular therapy (P = 0.0264) and vital status(P = 0.0036). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.860, which revealed PTV1 expression has excellent diagnostic value in prostate cancer. Patients with high PVT1 expression had a worse prognosis. Conclusions: PVT1 expression may be a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document