Analysis of a United States observational registry of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients (pts): reGISTry
20508 Background: Most data on treatment of GIST pts were derived from clinical studies, reflecting practice at academic referral centers. The reGISTry, an observational, internet-based database initiated in 2004, was designed to characterize evolving patterns of care for pts with GIST in both community and university practice settings. It also provides site feedback to allow comparison of site management practices to the aggregate reGISTry data. Methods: Physicians may serially enter data on any enrolled pt with confirmed GIST. Pts must give written informed consent. Collected data include pt demographics, clinical characteristics, clinical/economic outcomes and therapy provided for GIST. Analyses are performed every 6 months. Results: As of Oct 2006, there were 353 pts enrolled from 78 centers. 228 pts (65%) were from community-based practices; 184 pts (52%) were male, and 283 pts (80%) were Caucasian, with a median age of 65 years (range 18–92). Median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 1.1 years (range 0–11.7). At diagnosis, 282 pts (80%) had a localized tumor and 71 (20%) presented with metastatic disease. 335 pts (95%) had immunohistochemical KIT testing, and 1% had genotyping. 274 pts had surgery as first-line treatment (78%), including 84% of pts with primary disease and 52% with metastatic cancer. 14 % and 42% of pts with localized and metastatic disease respectively had systemic therapy as initial treatment. Of the 202 pts with follow-up, 170 (82%) retained the same primary decision-maker, usually the medical oncologist and/or surgeon (57%, 56% respectively). 3 patients reported missing days from work or school due to GIST in their first year since diagnosis. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed by tumor size on CT (53%), tumor size and radiodensity on CT (33%), clinical assessment only (14%) and PET (9%). 161 pts (46%) had been treated with imatinib mesylate and 20 pts (6%) sunitinib malate. Conclusions: The reGISTry remains a useful tool for determining evolving patterns in the management of GIST, and it points out important differences in official practice guidelines and community standards. KIT testing is common in the community, but mutational analysis is rare. Assessment by CT is customary, but PET imaging is rarely utilized in clinical practice. [Table: see text]