Phase II clinical study of combination therapy with irinotecan and S-1(IRIS) for inoperable recurrent advanced colorectal cancer (2nd report): For Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group (HGCSG)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4105-4105
Author(s):  
Y. Komatsu ◽  
S. Yuki ◽  
I. Iwanaga ◽  
M. Kudo ◽  
M. Tateyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Study

4105 Background: We planned to conduct a phase II clinical study of combination therapy with irinotecan and S-1, a new oral anticancer drug of the fluorinated pyrimidine type. We reported the interim reports of this study in colorectal cancer patients at ASCO 2006. Methods: The antitumor effect was the primary endpoint, while the safety, progression-free survival time, and median survival time were the secondary endpoints. The subjects were untreated patients with inoperable advanced colorectal cancer aged 20–75 years. Irinotecan was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 (on days 1 and 15) as an intravenous infusion over 90 minutes, and oral S-1 (40 mg/m2) was administered after breakfast and dinner and then withdrawn for 2 weeks. Results: Forty patients were enrolled in the present study. There were 23 men and 17 women. The median age was 62 years (range: 34 to 74 years). Two patients showed grade 4 neutropenia, but the next course could be given safely after dose reduction. Three patients had grade 3 diarrhea, but therapy could be continued with addition of an antidiarrhea drug. No other serious adverse reactions occurred (either hematological or non-hematological), and all patients could receive therapy safely on an outpatient basis. Forty pts. are evaluable for efficacy: RR was 52.5% (CR 1, PR 20, SD 17, PD 2, 95% CI, 37–68%) and Disease Control Rate (CR+PR+SD) was seen in 96.0% of pts. PFS of this regimen is 311 days. MST is not reached. Conclusions: IRIS therapy achieved a high response rate and could be given safely. These findings suggest that the therapy has potential as first-line treatment for inoperable advanced recurrent colorectal cancer. It seems that IRIS is a good treatment equal to FOLFIRI. Non-inferiority randomized phase III trial of IRIS vs. mFOLFOX6 (IFOX study) was planned, and it has been already started now. The latest data will be reported at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II clinical study of combination therapy with irinotecan and S-1(IRIS) for inoperable recurrent advanced colorectal cancer: Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group study HGCSG-0302)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3589-3589
Author(s):  
Y. Komatsu ◽  
S. Yuki ◽  
H. Akita ◽  
M. Kudo ◽  
M. Tateyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Study

3589 Background: We planned to conduct a phase II clinical study of combination therapy with irinotecan and S-1, a new oral anticancer drug of the fluorinated pyrimidine type. We reported the interium reports of this study in colorectal cancer patients at GI cancer Symposium 2006. Methods: The antitumor effect was the primary endpoint, while the safety, progression-free survival time, and median survival time were the secondary endpoints. The subjects were untreated patients with inoperable advanced colorectal cancer aged 20–75 years. Irinotecan was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 (on days 1 and 15) as an intravenous infusion over 90 minutes, and oral S-1 (40 mg/m2) was administered after breakfast and dinner and then withdrawn for 2 weeks. Results: Forty patients were enrolled in the present study. There were 23 men and 17 women. The median age was 62 years (range: 34 to 74 years). Two patient showed grade 4 neutropenia, but the next course could be given safely after dose reduction. Three patients had grade 3 diarrhea, but therapy could be continued with addition of an antidiarrheal drug. No other serious adverse reactions occurred (either hematological or non-hematological), and all patients could receive therapy safely on an outpatient basis. Interim analysis suggested excellent results, with a response rate of 50%. To date, 231 cycles (median 8, range 1–19) have been administered. Median relative dose intensity was 97% for S-1 and 87% for irinotecan. 36 pts are evaluable for efficacy: RR was 47.2% (95% CI, 30.9–63.5%) and Disease Control Rate (PR + SD) was seen in 94.4% of pts. PFS of this regimen is 320 days. MST is not reached. Conclusions: IRIS therapy achieved a high response rate and could be given safely. These findings suggest that the therapy has potential as first-line treatment for inoperable advanced recurrent colorectal cancer. It seems that IRIS is a good treatment equal to FOLFIRI. In addition, this regimen could qualify as a candidate for future combination therapy with a molecular-targeting drug. The latest data will be reported at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase II clinical study of famitinib in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 513-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui-hua Xu ◽  
Lin Shen ◽  
Keming Wang ◽  
Gang Wu ◽  
Chunmei Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Study ◽  
And Control

513 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in China. No standard care is available for patients with advanced CRC who failed the second-line treatment. Famitinib is a small-molecular, multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor which primarily acts against angiogenesis. This phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of famitinib in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical study (ClinicalTrials.gov Registration No.: NCT01762293). Totally 154 patients with advanced colorectal cancer who failed second or later-line treatments were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either famitinib or placebo at 25 mg each day in each treatment cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life (QoL) and safety. The statistical analyses of endpoints were using intent-to-treat population. Results: Of 154 patients randomized, the mPFS was 2.8 and 1.5 months in the treatment group and control group, respectively (p=0.0034; HR=0.58). The ORR was 2.02% and 0.00% (p=0.54) and the DCR was 57.58% and 30.91% (p=0.0023) in the treatment group and control group, respectively. Analysis of OS data is ongoing. The frequently reported adverse events (AEs) include neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome and were most grade 1/2. The incidences of serious adverse events (SAEs) for the famitinib and placebo groups were 11.11% and 9.09%, respectively (p=0.7884). Overall, famitinib was well tolerated and toxicities were manageable. Conclusions: Famitinib improved the PFS in patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer resulting in higher ORR and DCR in the treatment group with good safety and tolerability. Clinical trial information: NCT01762293.

Capecitabine, an Oral Fluoropyrimidine Carbamate With Substantial Activity in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase II Study

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1337-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Michael Findlay ◽  
Bruno Osterwalder ◽  
Walter Kocha ◽  
David Dalley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

PURPOSE: To evaluate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) three treatment regimens of oral capecitabine in order to select the most appropriate regimen for testing in phase III. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three capecitabine schedules were evaluated in a randomized phase II design: arm A, 1,331 mg/m2/d bid continuously; arm B, 2,510 mg/m2/d bid intermittently (2 weeks on/1 week off); and arm C, 1,657 mg/m2/d plus oral leucovorin 60 mg/d bid intermittently (2 weeks on/1 week off). RESULTS: One hundred nine patients were randomized; 39 patients were assessable for efficacy in arm A, 34 in arm B, and 35 in arm C. Patient characteristics were balanced in the arms. Confirmed tumor responses (partial response [PR] + complete response [CR]) were reported for eight patients with two CRs (21%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9% to 36%) in arm A, eight patients with one CR (24%; 95% CI, 11% to 41%) in arm B, and eight patients with two CRs (23%; 95% CI, 10% to 40%) in arm C. Median times to progression (TTP) in arms A, B, and C were 127, 230, and 165 days, respectively. Overall, more toxicity was seen with capecitabine plus leucovorin, particularly diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome. There was no grade 3 or 4 marrow toxicity. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine offers a new, effective treatment option as an oral single agent in advanced CRC. Promising overall response rates were reported for all three regimens. The addition of leucovorin to the intermittent regimen had no marked effect on tumor response or median TTP. The intermittent single-agent capecitabine schedule is proposed for phase III evaluation, based on considerations of toxicity, dose-intensity, response rate, and TTP.

A phase II study of combination therapy with irinotecan and S-1 (IRIS) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 987-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manabu Shiozawa ◽  
Makoto Akaike ◽  
Nobuhiro Sugano ◽  
Kazuhito Tsuchida ◽  
Naoto Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study

Phase II study of biweekly irinotecan and mitomycin C combination therapy in patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced colorectal cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadamichi Denda ◽  
Tomonori Ambo ◽  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
Yasuhide Yamada ◽  
Kuniaki Shirao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study

Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial of Two Different Schedules of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1307-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Gabriela V. Kornek ◽  
Markus Raderer ◽  
Birgit Schüll ◽  
Katharina Schmid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
To Receive

Purpose: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin, two new agents with potential synergistic activity, have demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Preclinical and clinical evidence indicating that dose intensification of the oral fluorouracil prodrug might result in improved therapeutic results led us to the present randomized multicenter phase II study. Patients and Methods: Eighty-nine patients with bidimensionally measurable ACC previously untreated for metastatic disease were randomly allocated to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1 plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/d days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks (arm A) or to receive oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 1 and 14 combined with capecitabine 3,500 mg/m2 days 1 to 7 and 14 to 21 every 4 weeks (arm B). In both treatment arms, chemotherapy was continued for a total of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progression of disease. Results: Patients allocated to the high-dose capecitabine combination arm B had a higher radiologically confirmed response rate (54.5% v 42.2%) and a significantly longer median progression-free survival time than those allocated to control arm A (10.5 v 6.0 months; P = .0013). Median overall survival times cannot be calculated for either treatment arm at this point. Despite a 34% higher dose intensity of capecitabine in arm B, there was no difference in hematologic toxicity between treatment arms (neutropenia/thrombocytopenia: 60%/43% in arm B v 56%/33% in arm A). Similarly, the incidence rate and degree of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable: The most commonly encountered symptoms (all grades, arm A and arm B) included nausea/emesis (A: 58%; B: 62%), diarrhea (A: 44%; B: 31%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (A: 80%; B: 83%), and fatigue (A: 40%; B: 50%). Conclusion: Results of this study indicate that both combination regimens are feasible, tolerable, and clinically active. The dose-intensified bimonthly capecitabine arm, however, seems to be more effective in increasing both response rate and progression-free survival time.

Phase II Trial of Cetuximab in Combination With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (33) ◽  
pp. 5225-5232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Eduardo Díaz-Rubio ◽  
Andrés Cervantes ◽  
Yves Humblet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
First Line Treatment

PurposeThis phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with standard oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin [FOLFOX-4]) in the first-line treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor–expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Patients and MethodsThe activity of cetuximab plus oxaliplatin was investigated in colon cancer cell lines and xenograft models. In the clinical study, patients with mCRC received on day 1 of a 14 day cycle, cetuximab (initial dose 400 mg/m2during week 1, then 250 mg/m2weekly) followed by FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2on day 1; leucovorin 200 mg/m2on days 1 and 2, followed by fluorouracil 400 mg/m2bolus then 600 mg/m2intravenous infusion during 22 hours on days 1 and 2).ResultsThe preclinical studies confirmed the supra-additive activity of cetuximab to oxaliplatin. In the clinical study, 43 patients were included, with a median age of 65 years (range, 43 to 78 years). Response rates (RRs) were 79% (unconfirmed) and 72% (confirmed), with 95% disease control. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median duration of response were 12.3 and 10.8 months, respectively. Ten patients (23%) underwent resection with curative intent of previously unresectable metastases. After a median follow-up of 30.5 months, median overall survival (mOS) was 30.0 months. Cetuximab did not increase the characteristic toxicity of FOLFOX-4 and was generally well tolerated.ConclusionCetuximab in combination with FOLFOX-4 is a highly active first-line treatment for mCRC, showing encouraging RR, mPFS, and mOS values. The treatment resulted in a high resectability rate, which could potentially result in an improved cure rate. This combination is under phase III development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document