Study on external Chinese herbal medicine LC07 treating capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome in metastatic breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1088-1088
Author(s):  
L. Jia ◽  
Y. Lou ◽  
H. Tan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Chinese Herbs ◽  
Common Side Effect ◽  
Total Response ◽  
Total Response Rate ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

1088 Background: With the capecitabine being increasingly used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), the common side effect of capecitabine, hand-foot syndrome (HFS) has become a main problem which can distress both physicians and patients. Severe HFS such as severe pain can have a negative impact on quality of life (QOL) of these patients and cause reduced dosage or even stopping chemotherapy. No effective treatment for HFS can be available at present. Over the years we have used LC07, a kind of external agents from Chinese herbs (Herba Geranii, etc.), to treat capecitabine-induced HFS. In this study, the efficacy and safety of LC07 were evaluated in patients with MBC and HSF. Methods: Eligible patients includes patients with MBC, who had HFS (NCI-CTC grade ≥1) after receiving single capecitabine chemotherapy (1,250 mg/m2, PO, twice daily, cycled days 1–14, every 21 days). LC07 granules 10g was dissolved in 1,000mL of warm water (keep 34°C-37°C in a footbath), the patients soaked their feet and hands in this lotion for 20 minutes, twice daily for 7 days. An independent researcher assessed symptoms before and after treatment. Evaluation criteria, CR as symptom disappearing completely, PR as NCI-CTC grade for HFS decreasing by more than 1 level after treatment, the total response rate as CR+PR. The QOL of these patients were also evaluated before and after treatment using a FACT-B questionnaire (Version 4.0-Chinese). Results: 42 patients (pts) have been enrolled in this study. All of them are Asian and female. Media age 51.5 yrs (25–72). Grade 1 for HFS was seen in 8 pts, G2 in 19 pts, and G3 in 15 pts. The total response rate was 83.3% (35/42), CR 38.1% (16/42), PR 45.2% (19/42). The average time from therapy to pain relief was 1.8±0.8 days, the skin lesion of HFS including dermatitis, peeling, ulceration have been improved after treatment. The QOL scores before and after treatment were 77.24±25.69 and 109.17±20.53, respectively (p < 0.01). No side effects such as skin allergies related to LC07 was found in this study. Conclusions: In the treatment of capecitabine-induced HFS, the external Chinese medicine LC07 is fast effective for relieving pain, and it has the features of easy use and no skin allergies. Thus LC07 can improve the QOL of patients with MBC and HFS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Single arm, phase two study of low-dose metronomic eribulin in metastatic breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavani Chalasani ◽  
Kiah Farr ◽  
Vicky Wu ◽  
Isaac Jenkins ◽  
Alex Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Treatment options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. In a phase III trial, eribulin demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival compared to treatment of physician’s choice, but had limited tolerability because of neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. Based on prior studies of alternative treatment schedules with other therapies, we hypothesized that a low-dose metronomic schedule of eribulin would permit patients to remain on treatment more consistently without treatment delays, resulting in longer time to progression, and improved toxicity profile. Methods We conducted a multi-site single arm, phase II trial patients with MBC. All patients were treated with metronomic eribulin (0.9 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.) Treatment was continued until the patient developed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or chose to stop the study. Patients must have had prior taxane exposure. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary end points were overall survival, response rate, and clinical benefit rate. Exploratory biomarkers were performed to analyze change in levels of circulating endothelial cells (CECs), circulating endothelial precursors, and carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) with response to therapy. Findings We consented 86 patients and 59 were evaluable for final analysis. Median age was 59 years; 78% had HER2 negative tumors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months with overall survival (OS) of 14.3 months. Objective response rate was 15% with clinical benefit rate of 48%. Reported grade 3 neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were 18% and 5%, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was seen in 3% of patients. Interpretation Metronomic weekly low-dose eribulin is an active and tolerable regimen with significantly less myelosuppression, alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy than is seen with the approved dose and schedule, allowing longer duration of use and disease control, with similar outcomes compared to the standard dose regimen.

Phase III Study of Intravenous Vinorelbine in Combination With Epirubicin Versus Epirubicin Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403)

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2313-2320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
Henning T. Mouridsen ◽  
Sven T. Langkjer ◽  
Jorn Andersen ◽  
Johanna Sjöström ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To determine whether the addition of intravenous (IV) vinorelbine to epirubicin increased the progression-free survival in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 387 patients were randomly assigned to receive IV epirubicin 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Both regimens were given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 1 year but discontinued prematurely in the event of progressive disease or severe toxicity. In addition, epirubicin was discontinued at a cumulative dose of 1,000 mg/m2 (950 mg/m2 from June 1999). Prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was not allowed. Reported results were all based on intent-to-treat analyses. Results Overall response rates to vinorelbine and epirubicin, and epirubicin alone, were 50% and 42%, respectively (P = .15). The complete response rate was significantly superior in the combination arm (17% v 10%; P = .048) as was median duration of progression-free survival (10.1 months v 8.2 months; P = .019). Median survival was similar in the two arms (19.1 months v 18.0 months; P = .50). Leukopenia related complications, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the combination arm. The incidences of cardiotoxicity and constipation were similar in both arms. Conclusion Addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin conferred a significant advantage in terms of complete response rate and progression-free survival, but not in terms of survival.

Real-world Indian scenario of CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib and ribociclib) with endocrine therapy in upfront hormone positive metastatic breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13028-e13028
Author(s):  
Ajay Gogia ◽  
Shalabh Arora ◽  
Priyanshu Choudhary ◽  
Rakesh Kumar ◽  
Sanjay Thulkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Real World ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Common Side Effect ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Visceral Disease

e13028 Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKi), in combination with endocrine therapy (ET), has become the standard of care in the treatment of hormone positive (HR+)/ HER2 neu negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. We evaluated clinical outcomes and toxicity in MBC patients, who have received ET with two CDKi, namely palbociclib and ribociclib. Methods: This is an ambispective, single institutional analysis of de-novo HR+ MBC patients treated with CDKi (palbociclib 125 mg and ribociclib 600 mg once a day for 21 days /28 days cycle) from November 2016- October 2020 at AIIMS, New Delhi, India. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoint was response rate and toxicity. A total of 157 female patients were recruited in this study however the response and toxicity data were available in 120 cases. All premenopausal women received ovarian suppression or ovarian ablation. Results: A total of 120 patients were included in this study with a median age of 57 years (35-75) and 93 (77.5%) cases were postmenopausal. Twenty-three (19.1%) patients had a bone-only disease, 49 (40.9%) had bone and visceral disease and 48 (40%) had only visceral disease. In this study 91 (75.9%) patients received palbociclib and 29 (24.2%) received ribociclib. The median PFS was 18 months (4-36). Twenty four (20%) patients achieved a complete response, 69 (57.5%) patients attained partial response, 18(15%) patients had stable disease and 9 (7.5%) had disease progression. Grade 3–4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia were observed in 18(15%), 8 (6.7%), and 4 (3.3%) cases respectively. None of the patients developed febrile neutropenia. Cutaneous, renal, hepatic, and gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in 1,1,3,4 cases respectively. Prolonged QTc was observed in one case. Grade 3 fatigue was observed in 7 cases. Dose interruption/delay (mean dose delay of 7 days), dose modification, and drug discontinuation were observed in 24 (20%), 12 (10%), and 10 (8.3%) of cases respectively. Conclusions: This is one of the largest real-world Indian data on CDK4/6 inhibitors on upfront HR+ MBC. Side effects are less than published literature with similar efficacy. Neutropenia was the most common side effect which was managed by brief dose interruption.

Randomized Phase II Trial of First-Line Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel and Capecitabine Compared With Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel inHER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Wardley ◽  
Xavier Pivot ◽  
Flavia Morales-Vasquez ◽  
Luis M. Zetina ◽  
Maria de Fátima Dias Gaui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate trastuzumab (H) and docetaxel (T) with or without capecitabine (X) as first-line combination therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to H (8 mg/kg loading; 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) plus T (75 mg/m2in HTX arm, 100 mg/m2in HT arm, every 3 weeks) with or without X (950 mg/m2twice per day on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR).ResultsIn 222 patients, median follow-up was approximately 24 months. ORR was high with both regimens (70.5% with HTX; 72.7% with HT; P = .717); complete response rate was 23.2% with HTX compared with 16.4% with HT. HTX demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival: median 17.9 months compared with 12.8 months with HT (hazard ratio, 0.72; P = .045), which translates to a gain of around 5 months. Two-year survival probability was 75% with HTX compared with 66% with HT. Febrile neutropenia (27% v 15%) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (77% v 54%) incidences were higher with HT than HTX. Treatment-related grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (17% v < 1%) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (11% v 4%) occurred more commonly with HTX than HT. One case of congestive heart failure occurred in each arm.ConclusionHTX is an effective and feasible first-line therapy for HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, although it should be reserved for patients with good performance status who are not receiving long-term steroids.

scholarly journals Effect and Safety of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Monotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yihang Qi ◽  
Xiangyi Kong ◽  
Xiangyu Wang ◽  
Jie Zhai ◽  
Yi Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Severe Grade

Abstract Background. Given that no approved targeted agents for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) and no opportunity of surgery for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), new treatment options are urgently to be discovered. The anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy may be effective, and what we should be aware of is the response rate and adverse events. Methods. The PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane and www.clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched to find potential studies using the following strategies: anti-PD-1/PD-L1; metastatic; breast cancer. R© package Meta was used to pool incidence. Results. Six studies including 586 advanced breast cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents were included in this meta-analysis. The anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents include pembrolizumab, atezolizumab and avelumab. Among these patients, CR was 1.26%, PR was 7.65%, ORR was 9.85% and DCR was 18.33%. We also found that the response rate was closely associated with the expression of PD-L1 biomarker (PD-L1+ vs PD-L1-): the CR was 2.71% vs 0.00%; the PR was 9.93% vs 2.69%; the ORR was 10.62% vs 3.07%; the DCR was 17.95% vs 4.71%. 1-year overall survival rate and 6-months progression-free survival rate were 43.34% and 17.24%. Respectively, the overall incidence of AEs was 64.18% in any grade and 12.94% in severe grade. The incidence of irAEs was 14.75%. Besides, the incidence of discontinue and death due to treatment-related AEs was about 3.06% and 0.31% respectively. When the detailed AEs were analyzed, most treatment-related AEs of any grade were arthraigia, asthenia, decreased appetite; most common treatment-related AEs of severe grade were anemia, autoimmune hepatitis, diarrhea; the most common irAEs were hypothyroidism , followed by hyperthyroidism, pneumonitis and infusion-related reaction. Conclusions. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy showed a manageable safety profile and had a durable anti-tumor clinical activity in a subset of patients with mTNBC or MBC. PD-L1 expression may be correlated to a higher probability of clinical response.

scholarly journals S-1-associated hand-foot syndrome as a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-13
Author(s):  
Akira Hirano ◽  
Akinori Hattori ◽  
Hiroaki Inoue ◽  
Kaoru Ogura ◽  
Fumie Okubo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

Phase I/II study of 72-hour infusional paclitaxel and doxorubicin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 774-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
J S Fisherman ◽  
K H Cowan ◽  
M Noone ◽  
A Denicoff ◽  
S Berg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Stimulating Factor ◽  
Doxorubicin Administration

PURPOSE We conducted a phase I/II trial of concurrently administered 72-hour infusional paclitaxel and doxorubicin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer and bidimensionally measurable disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS We defined the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent paclitaxel and doxorubicin administration and then studied potential pharmacokinetic interactions between the two drugs. Forty-two patients who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer received 296 total cycles of paclitaxel and doxorubicin with G-CSF. RESULTS The MTD was determined to be paclitaxel 180 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 each by 72-hour infusion with G-CSF. Diarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of this combination, with three of three patients developing abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scan evidence of typhlitis (cecal thickening) at the dose level above the MTD. All patients developed grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 500 microL), generally less than 5 days in duration. This combination was generally safely administered at dose levels at or below the MTD. The overall response rate was 72% (28 of 39 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI], 55% to 85%), with 8% complete responses (CRs) (three of 39; 95% CI, 2% to 21%) and a median response duration of 9 months. The median overall survival time for all patients is 23 months, with a median follow-up duration of 28 months. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that administration of paclitaxel and doxorubicin together by 72-hour infusion did not affect the steady-state concentrations of either drug. CONCLUSION Concurrent 72-hour infusional paclitaxel and doxorubicin can be administered safely, but is associated with significant toxicity. The overall response rate of this combination in untreated metastatic breast cancer patients is similar to that achieved with other doxorubicin-based combination regimens. The modest complete response rate achieved suggests that this schedule of paclitaxel and doxorubicin administration does not produce significant additive or synergistic cytotoxicity against breast cancer.

Impact of selection process on response rate and long-term survival of potential high-dose chemotherapy candidates treated with standard-dose doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 3171-3177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z U Rahman ◽  
D K Frye ◽  
A U Buzdar ◽  
T L Smith ◽  
L Asmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Term Survival

PURPOSE Most of the data about high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) for metastatic breast cancer are derived from phase II studies. The interpretation of these data depends on comparisons with data from properly selected historical control patients treated with standard therapy under similar circumstances. We report the long-term results of patients with metastatic breast cancer who were eligible for HDCT but were treated with doxorubicin-containing standard-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospectively collected data from 18 successive doxorubicin-containing protocols for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer were evaluated. Using common eligibility criteria for HDCT, we identified patients who would have been candidates for HDCT. We analyzed response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for all patients, potential HDCT candidates, and noncandidates. RESULTS A total of 1,581 patients was enrolled onto the 18 studies. Six hundred forty-five were HDCT candidates, and 936 were noncandidates. The complete response rate was 27% for HDCT candidates and 7% for noncandidates; median PFS was 16 and 8 months and median OS was 30 and 17 months, respectively. Survival rates for HDCT candidates and noncandidates, respectively, were 21% and 6% at 5 years and 7% and 2% at 10 years. CONCLUSION This study suggests that encouraging results of single-arm trials of HDCT could partially be due to selection of patients with better prognoses and further stresses the importance of completing ongoing randomized trials of HDCT to assess the relative efficacy of HDCT in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Phase II trial of docetaxel in advanced anthracycline-resistant or anthracenedione-resistant breast cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2879-2885 ◽  
Author(s):  
P M Ravdin ◽  
H A Burris ◽  
G Cook ◽  
P Eisenberg ◽  
M Kane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Fluid Retention ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Median Response ◽  
High Level

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) resistant to doxorubicin or mitoxantrone. PATIENTS AND METHODS Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was administered as a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks to 42 patients registered at four centers. Patients must have received at least one but no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC (in addition to any prior adjuvant therapy). One of the regimens for metastatic breast cancer must have included an anthracycline or anthracenedione and the cancer must have progressed on that regimen. RESULTS Objective responses were seen in 20 of 35 assessable patients (three complete responses [CRs] and 17 partial responses [PRs]), for an objective response rate of 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39% to 74%) and in 21 of 42 registered patients (50% response rate [RR]; 95% CI, 34% to 66%) entered onto the trial. The median response duration was 28 weeks. The most common toxicity in this study was grade 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 95% of patients. Other clinically significant nonhematologic side effects included stomatitis, skin reactions, neurosensory changes, asthenia, and fluid retention. Patients who received dexamethasone premedication had a later onset of fluid retention than those who did not receive dexamethasone (onset at a median cumulative docetaxel dose of 503 mg/m2 and 291 mg/m2, respectively). CONCLUSION Docetaxel at this dose and schedule has a high level of antitumor activity in patients with treatment-refractory advanced breast cancer, and appears to be one of the most active agents for the treatment of this patient population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document