Comparison of the sensitivity to endocrine therapy of PR+/ER- patients and ER+/PR- patients with HER2+ breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11558-e11558
Author(s):  
X. Hao ◽  
Y. Liu ◽  
R. Hui ◽  
J. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Disease Free Survival Rate ◽  
Post Menopausal

e11558 Background: Her2 and PR expression are important indicators for prognosis of breast cancer. Aslo, it's proved that their expression could guide chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted therapy in many studies. Methods: Collected 3,677 primary breast cancer cases from 2002 to 2004 in Tianjin University Cancer Hospital. All of the cases were confirmed by pathohistological method. All patients are female, aged from 15 to 92 years old, with median age 50 years old. Median follow-up time is 40 months. Her-2, PR and ER expression were detected by immunohistochemical methods. Results: 1. With Her2+ breast cancer, 168 patients are PR+/ER- and 211 patients are ER+/PR-. 2. All patients treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy with 6 cycles and then given endocrine therapy: Pre-menopausal patients were given TAM (10mg P.O Bid); Post-menopausal patients were given AI (letrozole 2.5m po. bid or anastrozole 1 mg P.O Qd). Median follow-up time is 45 months. With Her2+ BC, 3-year DFS(disease-free survival rate) of PR+/ER- patients is 94.53%, higher than that of PR-/ER+ ones (91.81%).With Her2- BC, 3-year DFS of PR+/ER- patients is lower than that of PR-/ER+ (p<0.05). 3. Total of 1853 cases with 5-year followed up, and 1297 cases have been given endocrine therapy. 5-year overall survival rate was 83.41%. With Her2+ BC, it's significant difference that 5-year OS of PR+/ER- patients is higher than that of PR-/ER+ ones. However, there's no difference of 5- year OS between them with Her2- BC. Conclusions: With Her2+ breast cancer, 3-year DFS of PR+/ER- patients is higher than ER+/PR- and also PR+/ER- patients may more sensitive to endocrine therapy than ER+/PR- patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals SPECIAL APPROACHES TO BREAST CANCER HORMONAL THERAPY OF YOUNG PATIENTS

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
D N Kravchenko ◽  
A A Parokonnaya ◽  
M I Nechushkin ◽  
D E Avtomonov
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Ovarian Suppression ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Disease Free Survival Rate ◽  
Disease Free

Breast cancer is the most prevalent female malignancy. When diagnosed at young age (up to 40 years), negative clinical, morphological and prognostic features are noted. A non-randomized retrospective trial (n=500) was performed to evaluate different scenarios of breast cancer hormone therapy in young patients. Ovarian suppression in young patients is shown to statistically improve prognosis. Disease-free survival rate values are observed to decrease in patients without ovarian suppression in comparison with any type of ovarian suppression, especially at a remote follow-up (after 60 months). Menstrual function resumption and no amenorrhea after chemotherapy significantly decrease disease-free survival rate values in young patients.

Validation of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer and 0 to 3 Positive Lymph Nodes – Risk Pattern and Outcomes on a Community Level

Breast Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Braun ◽  
Antonia Kriegmair ◽  
Nina Szeterlak ◽  
Anne Andrulat ◽  
Simone Schrodi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Recurrence Score ◽  
Nodal Status ◽  
World Population ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Positive Lymph Nodes

Introduction The aim of the present study was to analyze the performance of Oncotype DX® multigene assay (ODX) in patients with 0-3 lymph nodes in a high volume community hospital. Methods Patients with non-metastatic HR+/HER2- EBC and 0-3 positive lymph nodes, who underwent primary surgery at the Red Cross Hospital Munich, Germany and consecutively had ODX testing were included in this retrospective study. The distribution of clinico-pathologic characteristics, recurrence score (RS) risk and use of systemic therapy were compared among patients without positive lymph nodes (N0) and patients with micrometastases or 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes (N1). Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. Results From 2012 to2017 ODX was consecutively performed in 575 (16.4%) of 3492 women with HR+/ HER- EBC, of which 553 were eligible for this analysis (N0: 60.8%; N1: 39.2%). Among the patients included, 441 (79.7%) had a RS of 0 to 25 and 112 (20.3%) had a RS of 26 or higher. In patients with RS 0 to 25 the rate of chemotherapy use was low, independent from nodal status (N0: 17.1% and N1: 19.1%) and 5y-DFS was 90.5% and 91.7% for N0 and N1 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in DFS (90.5% vs. 93.3%; p= 0.101) or OS (97.2% vs. 96.0%; p= 0.737) for patients with a RS 0 to 25 when treated with chemo-endocrine therapy or endocrine therapy alone, independent from nodal status. Conclusions The results of the study confirm the observations from randomized studies on the use of the ODX in a real world population in terms of risk distribution and patient outcome. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be safely omitted in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer with 0-3 positive lymph nodes and RS<25.

Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Patients with Small (≤ 1 Centimetre) Node-Negative HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Not Treated with Adjuvant Anti-HER2-Targeted Therapy: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study

Breast Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenni S. Liikanen ◽  
Marjut Leidenius ◽  
Heikki Joensuu ◽  
Tuomo J. Meretoja
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

Introduction Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is considered an unfavourable prognostic factor in early breast cancer when the patients are not treated with HER2-targeted therapy. However, the long-term prognostic importance of HER2-expression in small (≤1 cm, stage pT1a-b), node-negative HER2+ breast cancer is still incompletely known. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed based on a prospectively collected database including patients with pT1 breast cancer operated at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between March 2000 and April 2006. In this database, 44 patients with pT1a-bN0M0, HER2+ cancer, not treated with adjuvant anti-HER2-targeted therapy (the HER2+ group) and 291 pT1a-bN0M0, hormone receptor positive, HER2- negative cancers (the ER+/HER2- group) were identified and included in the study. Survival outcomes were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The median follow-up time was 9.7 years after primary breast surgery. Ten-year distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was 84.0% in the HER2+ group and 98.2% in the ER+/HER2- group (p < 0.001). Ten-year overall survival was only 78.5% in the HER2+ group, but 91.7% in the ER+/HER2- group (p = 0.09). Conclusions Cancer HER2-status is strongly associated with unfavourable DDFS during the first decade of follow-up in patients with small (pT1a-bN0M0) breast cancer when adjuvant anti-HER2-targeted treatment is not administered.

scholarly journals Local Disease-Free Survival Rate (LSR) Application to Personalize Radiation Therapy Treatments in Breast Cancer Models

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
Gaetano Savoca ◽  
Marco Calvaruso ◽  
Luigi Minafra ◽  
Valentina Bravatà ◽  
Francesco Paolo Cammarata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Breast Epithelial Cell ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Local Disease ◽  
Intrinsic Radiosensitivity ◽  
Disease Free Survival Rate ◽  
Disease Free

Cancer heterogeneity represents the main issue for defining an effective treatment in clinical practice, and the scientific community is progressively moving towards the development of more personalized therapeutic regimens. Radiotherapy (RT) remains a fundamental therapeutic treatment used for many neoplastic diseases, including breast cancer (BC), where high variability at the clinical and molecular level is known. The aim of this work is to apply the generalized linear quadratic (LQ) model to customize the radiant treatment plan for BC, by extracting some characteristic parameters of intrinsic radiosensitivity that are not generic, but may be exclusive for each cell type. We tested the validity of the generalized LQ model and analyzed the local disease-free survival rate (LSR) for breast RT treatment by using four BC cell cultures (both primary and immortalized), irradiated with clinical X-ray beams. BC cells were chosen on the basis of their receptor profiles, in order to simulate a differential response to RT between triple negative breast and luminal adenocarcinomas. The MCF10A breast epithelial cell line was utilized as a healthy control. We show that an RT plan setup based only on α and β values could be limiting and misleading. Indeed, two other parameters, the doubling time and the clonogens number, are important to finely predict the tumor response to treatment. Our findings could be tested at a preclinical level to confirm their application as a variant of the classical LQ model, to create a more personalized approach for RT planning.

Adjuvant CAF versus AC followed by paclitaxel for operable breast cancer with 4 or more involved axillary lymph nodes: Retrospective analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10610-10610
Author(s):  
J. Ahn ◽  
S. Kim ◽  
B. Son ◽  
S. Ahn ◽  
W. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Axillary Lymph Nodes ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Axillary Nodes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

10610 Background: Recently, adjuvant AC followed by paclitaxel has improved disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) of node-positive breast cancer. Although adjuvant TAC, as compared with FAC, significantly improves DFS and OS rate in node-positive breast cancer, AC→T has not been yet compared with FAC. Since 2001, we discussed the options of adjuvant CAF versus AC→T with patients who had 4 or more positive axillary nodes. We evaluated the efficacies of adjuvant CAF and AC→T, retrospectively. Methods: Between September 2001 and July 2004, a total of 1,394 patients underwent surgery and received adjuvant chemotherapy. Among them, 253 (18.1%) patients had 4 or more than axillary nodes and received either six cycles of CAF (n = 116) or 4 cycles of AC→T) (n = 137). The medical records and pathologic data of these patients were reviewed, retrospectively. Results: Median age of all patients was 46 years (range, 22∼76 years). The two groups were well balanced in terms of demographic and tumor characteristics. With a median follow-up period of 24 months (range, 6∼90 months), 49 (19.4%) patients had disease recurrence including 27 (23.3%) in CAF group and 22 (16.1%) in AC→T group (p = 0.155). The 3 year-DFS rate was 68.3% in CAF group and 71.1% in AC→T group (p = 0.9366), and the estimated 3-year OS rate was 90.3% and 92.3%, respectively (p = 0.8237). There was no significant difference in 3-year DFS rate according to hormone-receptor status. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 11 (9.6%) patients in CAF group and 7 (5.1%) patients in AC→T group (p = 0.222). Conclusion: Our data suggest that there is no significant difference in DFS or OS rates between six cycles of CAF and 4 cycles of AC followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with 4 or more than involved axillary nodes. However, long-term follow-up period and prospective studies are needed to define better regimen. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and trastuzumab in stage I-IIA breast cancer: Toxicity data from North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase III trial N9831

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 523-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Y. Halyard ◽  
T. M. Pisansky ◽  
L. J. Solin ◽  
L. B. Marks ◽  
L. J. Pierce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Concurrent Administration ◽  
Adjuvant Trastuzumab ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

523 Background: Adjuvant trastuzumab (Herceptin [H]) with chemotherapy improves outcome in HER2+ breast cancer (BC). Preclinical studies suggest H may enhance RT. We herein assess if H given with adjuvant RT increases adverse events (AE) after breast conserving surgery or mastectomy. Methods: N9831 randomized 3505 women with pT1–3N1–2M0, pT2–3N0M0, or pT1cN0M0 (ER/PR negative) HER2+ BC to doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) followed by weekly paclitaxel (T), AC→T→H, or AC→TH→H. Post-lumpectomy breast ± nodal RT was recommended, as was post-mastectomy chest wall + nodal RT (>3 nodes +); internal mammary RT was prohibited. RT started within 5 weeks of completion of T and allowed concurrently with H. 2324 eligible patients were enrolled on study prior to April 25, 2004: 1460 patients receiving RT are available for analysis of RT-associated AEs. Also, 1286 patients on +H arms who completed T (908 +RT and 378 -RT) are available for analysis of clinical cardiac events (CE). Rates of RT-associated AEs were compared across treatment arms, and rates of CE were compared for +RT vs -RT patients within +H arms. All reported p-values are for chi-squared statistics. Results: With a median follow-up of 1.5 years, significant differences among arms in RT-associated AEs were not identified. No significant differences across arms in +RT patients existed in the incidence of skin reaction (p=0.78), pneumonitis (p=0.78), dyspnea (p=0.87), cough (p=0.54), esophageal dysphagia (p=0.26), or neutropenia (p=0.16). There was a significant difference in +RT patients in the incidence of leukopenia (p=0.02) with higher incidence rates in the arms receiving H. RT did not increase the frequency of CE. In the AC→T→H arm, the incidence of CE was 2.2% in +RT patients versus 2.9% in -RT patients. In the AC→TH→H arm, the incidence of CE was 1.5% in +RT patients versus 6.3% in -RT patients. No difference in CE was seen between left- and right-sided RT fields in +RT patients in either +H arm. Conclusion: Concurrent administration of adjuvant RT with H in early stage breast cancer patients is not associated with an increased incidence of acute RT AEs. Further follow-up is required to assess late AEs. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase III study of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel given every 3 weeks or weekly in operable breast cancer: Results of Intergroup Trial E1199

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Sparano ◽  
M. Wang ◽  
S. Martino ◽  
V. Jones ◽  
E. Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

516 Background: Evidence suggests that docetaxel is more effective than paclitaxel, and paclitaxel is more effective when given weekly than every 3 weeks in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Methods: Eligibility included axillary lymph node positive or high-risk (tumor at least 2 cm) node-negative BC. All patients received 4 cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks, followed by either: (1) paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks × 4 (P3), (2) paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly × 12 (P1), (3) docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks × 4 (D3), or (4) docetaxel 35 mg/m2 weekly × 12 (D1). The primary comparisons included taxane (P vs. D) and schedule (every 3 weeks vs. weekly), and secondary comparisons included P3 vs. other arms. The trial had 86% power to detect a 17.5% decrease in disease-free survival (DFS) for either primary comparison, and 80% power to detect a 22% decrease for the secondary comparisons (2-sided nomimal 5% level tests corrected for multiple comparisons). Results: A total of 4,950 eligible patients were accrued. There was no difference in the primary comparisons afer 856 DFS events and 483 deaths after a median follow-up of 46.5 months at the 4th interim analysis ( www.sabcs.org , abstract 48). This is the final pre-specified analysis for the primary comparisons after 1,042 DFS events and 650 deaths (with 1,020 DFS events at this time, to be updated at the meeting). After a median followup of 60.2 months, there remains no significant difference in the hazard ratio (HR) for the taxane (1.02; p=0.73) or schedule (1.07; p=0.30) (as in the first analysis). In secondary comparisons of the standard arm (P3) with the other arms (HR > 1 favoring the experimental arms), the HRs were 1.30 (p = 0.003) for arm P1, 1.24 (p=0.02) for arm D3, and 1.09 (p=0.33) for arm D1. Analysis of interaction by hormone-receptor status will be presented. The incidence of worst grade toxicity (grade 3/4) was 24%/6% for arm P3, 24%/3% for arm P1, 21%/50% for arm D3, and 38%/6% for arm D1. Conclusions: There were no differences in DFS when comparing taxane or schedule overall. DFS was significantly improved in the weekly paclitaxel and every 3-week docetaxel arms compared with the every 3-week paclitaxel arm. [Table: see text]

10-yr follow-up results of NSABP B-32, a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection (SNR) to conventional axillary dissection (AD) in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1000-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Julian ◽  
Stewart J. Anderson ◽  
David N. Krag ◽  
Seth P. Harlow ◽  
Joseph P. Costantino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
M Estimates

1000 Background: NSABP B-32, the largest surgical prospective randomized phase III trial was designed to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and morbidity between SNR alone vs SNR + AD in SN negative (-) pts. We present 10 yr outcome data for primary endpoints as well as updated data on the effect of occult metastases, found later in the SN by central, detailed pathologic analysis. Methods: 5,611 women with operable, clinically N0, invasive breast cancer were randomized to SNR + AD (Group [Grp] 1) or to SNR alone with AD only if SNs were positive (Grp2). 3,989 (71.1%) of 5,611 pts were SN-. 3,986 (99.9%) of these SN- pts had follow-up information: Grp 1: 1,975, Grp 2:2,011. Median time on study was 9.4 yrs. Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for study stratification variables were used to compare OS and DFS between the two groups. Two-sided p values were used. HR values > 1 indicate a more favorable outcome in Grp 1 Results: At 10 yrs, there continues to be no significant difference in OS between the two groups (HR: 1.11, p = 0.27). 10 yr Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimates for OS are 87.8% for SNR alone and 88.9% for SNR + AD. There continues to be no significant difference in DFS between the two groups (HR: 1.01, p=0.92). 10-yr K-M estimates for DFS were 76.9% for both groups. Occult nodal disease was originally detected in 3,884 pts (15.8%) with SN- on initial H and E analysis. Comparisons between the groups with and without occult disease yielded an adjusted HR for OS: 1.25 (p = 0.08) with an absolute difference at 10 yrs of 2.8% and a HR for DFS: 1.24 (p = 0.018) with an absolute difference of 4.1%. The cumulative incidences of local-regional events were low (10-yr values: SNR 4.0%, SNR+AD, 4.3%) and not significant (HR: 0.95, p = 0.77). Conclusions: At 10 yrs there continues to be no significant differences in OS and DFS between SNR and SNR + AD in pts with negative SN. The relative increase in risk of DFS and OS for pts with occult SN metastases remains stable. Support: PHS grants: NSABP: U10CA-12027, U10CA-37377, U10CA-69651, U10CA-69974; VT Ca Cntr: P30 CA22435; DNK: 5RO1CA074137 NCI Dpt HHS. Clinical trial information: NCT00003830.

Phase II study of preoperative chemotherapy versus standard postoperative chemotherapy in HR-negative HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12118-e12118
Author(s):  
Meng Xiu ◽  
Pin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Patients

e12118 Background: HR-/HER2+ breast cancer is a subtype with aggressive characteristic and poor survival. More clinical evidence are needed for choice of therapeutic strategies. Methods: Patients with T1-3N0-3M0 received preoperative chemotherapy (PTX 175 mg/m2, CBP AUC 4, q2w*6) combined with trastuzumab (2mg/kg qw) or standard postoperative chemotherapy such as ddAC-PH, AC-PH, TCH. The primary endpoint was RFS. Results: 86 patients were enrolled, 43 received preoperative chemotherapy (pre arm) and the other 43 received postoperative chemotherapy (post arm). There was no significant difference in baseline between the two arms. 22.1% of patients were stage IIA, 25.6% IIB, 34.9% IIIA, and 18.6% IIIC. At a median follow-up of 33.4 months, 16 patients had relapsed (pre arm 8, post arm 8). The median time from diagnosis to relapse was 22.8 months (7.1-49.2) and 23.8 months (11.4-37.4) in pre and post arm. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated that the 3-year RFS were similar (pre vs post: 73.4% vs 75.4%, p= 0.631). Only 1 death occurred in post arm. Table showed that in subgroups, there was no statistical difference in risk of recurrence between pre and post arms. In pre arm, ORR was 97.7% clinically, and pCR (ypT0/TisN0) was 39.0%. No patients achieved pCR relapsed, and the residual invasive lesions indicated poor prognosis. Table showed that Neo-Bioscore 4-5 was related to recurrence event significantly ( p= 0.021). The rate of breast-conserving in pre arm was higher (19.5% vs 9.3%), and PCb regiments every 2 weeks had similar adverse effects with standard chemotherapy, and less patients had dose reductions (18.6% vs 25.6%). Conclusions: Preoperative chemotherapy versus standard postoperative chemotherapy results in similar RFS among HR-/HER2+ patients. Preoperative chemotherapy can identify prognosis of patients early by Neo-Bioscore and adjuvant therapy should be strengthened for high-risk patients. PCb every 2 weeks combined with trastuzumab can be an option of preoperative therapy for HER2+ breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02934828. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document