Colorectal cancer survival following adjuvant chemotherapy with weekly i.v. fluorouracil 425 mg/m2 and folinic acid 50mg

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15089-e15089
Author(s):  
M. B. Jameson ◽  
M. Head ◽  
S. Deva
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Folinic Acid ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Actuarial Survival ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer

e15089 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) using fluorouracil (5FU) and folinic acid (FA) has been proven effective and the QUASAR trial showed that a weekly administration schedule was as effective as, and less toxic than, the same daily doses delivered over 5 days every 4 weeks (the “Mayo regimen”). However the 5FU dose used (370 mg/m2) was lower than in some trials and a higher 5FU dose was considered desirable if tolerated. We therefore implemented a weekly regimen using 5FU 425 mg/m2 and DL-folinic acid 50mg in 2001 and retrospectively evaluated its efficacy and tolerability. Methods: Patients with non-metastatic CRC at assessment by medical oncologists in this institution between 2001 and 2004 were included in the analysis. Data was gathered on patient characteristics, duration of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival. Actuarial survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 417 patients (pts) were seen: 181 females, 236 males; median age 67 yrs (24–89); 291 with colon cancer, 126 with rectal cancer; 1 stage 1; 100 stage 2, 316 stage 3. Median follow-up was 6.2 years. 210 pts with colon cancer received adjuvant weekly 5FU/FA (32 stage 2, 178 stage 3) as did 58 pts with rectal cancer (50 of whom also received concurrent chemoradiation). 75% of pts with colon cancer received all 30 planned doses and 59% of rectal cancer pts received all 20 planned doses. 3 year survival for all pts treated with this regimen was 83.0% and for the subgroups with colon and rectal cancer it was 82.4% and 84.5% respectively. For stage 2 and 3 colon cancer pts treated with this regimen 3 year survival was 87.9% and 76.0% respectively; for stage III rectal cancer pts it was 84.1%. Conclusions: These outcomes compare favorably on indirect comparison with results from the QUASAR trial (which reported 3 year survival of 70.6%) and suggest that using a higher 5FU dose in this regimen is tolerable and may be advantageous. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur (UFT) for stage III colorectal cancer: Final results of randomized trials by the National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Colorectal Cancer (NSAS-CC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4049-4049 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hamaguchi ◽  
K. Shirao ◽  
Y. Moriya ◽  
S. Yoshida ◽  
S. Kodaira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Resected Stage

4049 Background: In the latter 1990s, no consensus was reached as to whether adjuvant chemotherapy was standard treatment for completely resected stage III colorectal cancer in Japan. At that time, we started two randomized controlled trials to clarify the role of adjuvant chemotherapy of stage III colon and rectal cancer in the same time. Methods: Patients with completely resected stage III cancer of the colon or rectum (PS, 0 to 2; age, 20 to 75 years; no other adjuvant therapy) were eligible for these trials. Patients were registered within 6 weeks after surgery and were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone (control group) or surgery followed by treatment with UFT (400 mg/m2/day), given for 5 consecutive days per week for 1 year (UFT group). The target number of patients was 500 for colon cancer and 400 for rectal cancer (hazard ratio = 0.67, one-sided a= 0.05, β= 0.2). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end point was overall survival (OS). Results: Between October 1996 and April 2001, a total of 334 patients with colon cancer and 276 with rectal cancer were enrolled. Four ineligible patients were excluded; data from the remaining 332 patients with colon cancer and 274 with rectal cancer were analyzed. The patients’ characteristics were similar in the groups. Analysis of the results of follow-up until March 2006, at least 5 years after surgery in all patients (median follow-up period, 6.2 years), showed no significant difference in RFS or OS in colon cancer. In rectal cancer, however, RFS and OS were significantly better in the UFT group than in the control group. The only grade 4 toxicity was diarrhea, occurring in 1 patient with colon cancer and 1 patient with rectal cancer. Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT is well tolerated and improved RFS and OS in patients with stage III rectal cancer. In colon cancer, the expected benefits were not obtained (hazard ratio = 0.67). [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Changes in the quality of care of colorectal cancer in Estonia: a population-based high-resolution study

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e035556
Author(s):  
Heigo Reima ◽  
Jaan Soplepmann ◽  
Anneli Elme ◽  
Mari Lõhmus ◽  
Rena Tiigi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer ◽  
Incident Cases

ObjectivesLarge disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) management and survival have been observed across Europe. Despite recent increases, the survival deficit of Estonian patients with CRC persists, particularly for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to examine diagnostic, staging and treatment patterns of CRC in Estonia, comparing clinical data from 1997 and 2011.DesignNationwide population-based retrospective study.SettingEstonia.ParticipantsAll incident cases of colon and rectal cancer diagnosed in 1997 and 2011 identified from the Estonian Cancer Registry. Clinical data gathered from medical records.Outcome measuresDifferences in diagnostic, staging and treatment patterns; 5-year relative survival ratios.ResultsThe number of colon cancer cases was 337 in 1997 and 498 in 2011; for rectal cancer, the respective numbers were 209 and 349. From 1997 to 2011, large increases were seen in the use of colonoscopy and lung and liver imaging. Radical resection rate increased from 48% to 59%, but emergency surgeries showed a rise from 18% to 26% in colon and from 7% to 14% in rectal cancer. The proportion of radically operated patients with ≥12 lymph nodes examined pathologically increased from 2% to 58% in colon cancer and from 2% to 50% in rectal cancer. The use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy increased from 6% to 39% among stage II and from 20% to 50% among patients with stage III rectal cancer. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer increased from 42% to 63%. The 5-year RSR increased from 50% to 58% in colon cancer and from 37% to 64% in patients with rectal cancer.ConclusionsMajor improvements were seen in the diagnostics, staging and treatment of CRC in Estonia contributing to better outcomes. Increase in emergency surgeries highlights possible shortcomings in timely diagnosis and treatment.

Colorectal cancer under the age of 50 years in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: Is there a role of early screening?

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4072-4072
Author(s):  
Abdul Moiz Khan ◽  
Zainub Ajmal ◽  
Usman Naseer ◽  
Darren Gemoets ◽  
Syed Arzoo Mehdi
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
African Americans ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Early Screening ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer

4072 Background: While the overall incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is decreasing, the rate has increased in population under 50, with higher stages at diagnosis and a greater proportion of African Americans (AA). Hence, there is an ongoing debate about the age of CRC screening. These trends have not been studied in the VA population. Methods: ICD-10 codes C18-C20 were used to identify the cases of colon and rectal cancer in National VA Cancer Cube Registry. 43,544 cases of colon cancer, 1,278 below and 42,254 above age 50, and 19,815 cases of rectal cancer, 862 below and 18,948 above age 50 were identified between 2003-17. Younger age group was defined as patients less than 50 years old. IRB approval was obtained. Results: Our data comprised > 97% of male patients. In younger group, in the 5 year periods, 2003-07, 2008-12 and 2013-17, colon cancer rate increased from 2.59% to 2.79% to 3.59%, while for rectal cancer it increased from 3.5% to 4.3% to 5.3% (p < .0001). Blacks comprise 31.6% cases of colon cancer and 27.15% cases of rectal cancer in under 50 group, compared to 18.5% and 15.9% of cases in above 50 group respectively (p < .0001). For under 50 group, 48.6% cases of colon and 42.2% cases of rectal cancer were diagnosed in stage III or IV compared to 35.7% and 34.05% cases in above 50 group respectively (p < .0001). For colon cancer, 51.87% of patients in the younger group have a < 5 year survival, worse compared to 45.05% in 50-60 group (p < .0001) and similar to 49.3% in 60-70 group (p = .08). For rectal cancer, 5 year survival showed no difference between these groups. Stage specific survival shows no difference for either colon or rectal cancer across < 50, 50-60 and 60-70 age groups. Conclusions: Rate of CRC is rising in < 50 age group with more advanced stage at diagnosis and higher proportion of African Americans. For colon cancer, < 50 group has a worse 5 year survival as compared to 50-60 age group likely due to increased proportion of patients in stage III or IV, as there is no difference in stage specific survival. For rectal cancer, the 5 year survival or stage specific survival shows no difference in < 50, 50-60 and 60-70 groups. These results add to our understanding of the trends of CRC and should be accounted for in the screening guidelines.

Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Colorectal Cancer in a Population-Based Cohort

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1293-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Z. Ayanian ◽  
Alan M. Zaslavsky ◽  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Edward Guadagnoli ◽  
Cynthia M. Creech ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapies

Purpose: Randomized trials have demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival for patients with stage III colon cancer and that chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy improves survival for patients with stage II or III rectal cancer. This population-based study was designed to assess use of these treatments in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: From the California Cancer Registry, we identified all patients diagnosed during 1996 to 1997 with stage III colon cancer (n = 1,422) and stage II or III rectal cancer (n = 534) in 22 northern California counties. To supplement registry data on adjuvant therapies and ascertain reasons they were not used, we surveyed physicians or reviewed office records for 1,449 patients (74%). Results: Chemotherapy rates varied widely by age from 88% (age < 55 years) to 11% (age ≥ 85 years), and radiation therapy varied similarly. Adjusting for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics, chemotherapy was used less often among older and unmarried patients, and radiation therapy was used less often among older patients, black patients, and those initially treated in low-volume hospitals. Adjusted rates of chemotherapy varied significantly (P < .01) among individual hospitals: 79% and 51%, respectively, at one SD above and below average (67%). Physicians’ reasons for not providing adjuvant therapy included patient refusal (30% for chemotherapy, 22% for radiation therapy), comorbid illness (22% and 14%, respectively), or lack of clinical indication (22% and 45%, respectively). Conclusion: Use of adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer varies substantially by age, race, marital status, hospital volume, and individual hospital, indicating opportunities to improve care. With enhanced data on adjuvant therapies, population-based registries could become a valuable resource for monitoring the quality of cancer care.

Risk and predictors of suicide in colorectal cancer patients: A SEER analysis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9596-9596
Author(s):  
Haider Samawi ◽  
Abdel Aziz Shaheen ◽  
Patricia Tang ◽  
Daniel Yick Chin Heng ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Male Gender ◽  
White Race ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk

9596 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients have a higher risk of suicide as compared with the general population. Due to differences in the sites/morbidity of recurrences as well as ostomy rates, we sought to evaluate the distribution and predictors of suicide among patients with colon and rectal cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1973-2009. Patients included were >18yrs and had confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum. Results: Included in this analysis were 187,996 rectal cancer and 443,368 colon cancer patients. Colon cancer patients were older (median age 71 vs. 67 yrs, p <0.001) and included more females (51 vs. 43%, p <0.001) as compared to rectal cancer patients. Suicide rates were similar (611 [0.14%] vs. 337 [0.18%], p <0.001), as was the median time to suicide for colon vs. rectal cancer patients respectively (37 vs.32 months, p = 0.13). On univariate analysis, having rectal cancer was a predictor of suicide (HR 1.26; 95% CI: 1.10-1.43). However after adjustment for age, sex, race, marital, primary site surgery, stage and one primary, rectal cancer was not a predictor of suicide (HR 1.05; CI: 0.83- 1.33). In the combined CRC cohort, independent predictors of suicide included age >70 (HR 1.55; CI: 1.23-1.94), male gender (HR 7.56; CI: 5.34-10.70), being single (HR 1.56; CI: 1.14- 2.13), distant metastases at diagnosis (HR 1.58; CI: 1.13- 2.21), and white race (HR 3.21; CI: 1.75- 5.88). Also, lack of resection of primary tumor was associated with increased risk of suicide (HR 2.83; CI: 1.97- 4.05). Among colon cancer cohort, older age, male gender, and white race as well as lack of primary resection were independent predictors of suicide. Similarly, the aforementioned predictors as well as metastatic disease on presentation were the independent predictors of suicide in the rectal cohort. Conclusions: The suicide risk in CRC patients is low (< 0.2%) and no difference was found based on location of primary tumor. Gender, age, distant spread of disease, intact primary tumour and race are the main predictors of suicide among colorectal patients. Future studies and interventions are needed to target these high risk groups.

scholarly journals Risk and predictors of suicide in colorectal cancer patients: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 513 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.H. Samawi ◽  
A.A. Shaheen ◽  
P.A. Tang ◽  
D.Y.C. Heng ◽  
W.Y. Cheung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Nonparametric Tests ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer ◽  
End Results

Background The risk of suicide is higher for patients with colorectal cancer (crc) than for the general population. Given known differences in morbidity and sites of recurrence, we sought to compare the predictors of suicide for patients with colon cancer and with rectal cancer.Methods Using the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, adult patients with confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum during 1973–2009 were identified. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to assess selected variables, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine predictors of suicide.Results The database identified 187,996 patients with rectal cancer and 443,368 with colon cancer. Compared with the rectal cancer group, the colon cancer group was older (median age: 70 years vs. 67 years; p < 0.001) and included more women (51% vs. 43%, p < 0.001). Suicide rates were similar in the colon and rectal cancer groups [611 (0.14%) vs. 337 (0.18%), p < 0.001]. On univariate analysis, rectal cancer was a predictor of suicide [hazard ratio (hr): 1.26; 95% confidence interval (ci): 1.10 to 1.43]. However, after adjusting for clinical and pathology factors, rectal cancer was not a predictor of suicide (hr: 1.05; 95% ci: 0.83 to 1.33). In the colon cancer cohort, independent predictors of suicide included older age, male sex, white race, and lack of primary resection. The aforementioned predictors, plus metastatic disease, similarly predicted suicide in the rectal cancer cohort.Conclusions The suicide risk in crc patients is low (<0.2%), and no difference was found based on location of the primary tumour. Sex, age, race, distant spread of disease, and intact primary tumour were the main predictors of suicide among crc patients. Further studies and interventions are needed to target these high-risk groups.

scholarly journals Physicians' Beliefs About the Benefits and Risks of Adjuvant Therapies for Stage II and Stage III Colorectal Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e360-e367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony C. Wong ◽  
Shannon Stock ◽  
Deborah Schrag ◽  
Katherine L. Kahn ◽  
Talya Salz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapies ◽  
Stage Ii Colorectal Cancer

Physicians agreed that the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer and chemotherapy, and radiation for stage III rectal cancer, outweigh the risks, but were divided over the net benefit of adjuvant therapies for stage II colorectal cancer.

The 12-gene colon cancer assay validation and utility: Summary of clinical evidence.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 523-523
Author(s):  
Emily Burke ◽  
Haluk Tezcan ◽  
Margarita Lopatin ◽  
Kim Michelle Clark-Langone ◽  
Mark Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Clinical Validation ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer ◽  
Gene Assay

523 Background: The 12-gene colon cancer assay is the first commercially available molecular assay to predict the risk of recurrence in stage II/III colon and rectal cancer. Rigorous evidence for clinical validity and utility of an assay is imperative since the result is used for treatment decision-making. This summary outlines the studies that meet an established definition of clinical validation and additional studies that support the utility of the assay. Methods: Prospectively designed studies using archival tissue with pre-specified methods, clinical outcomes, and analysis plan were considered clinical validation studies (Simon et al. JNCI 2009). Additional studies that demonstrated the utility of the assay in a clinical setting were considered supportive. Results: The assay has been clinically validated in four independent studies with 3315 patients (2390 stage II/628 stage III colon and 130 stage II/167 stage III rectal). All four studies demonstrated a significant association (p<0.05) between the result and outcome (e.g. recurrence risk and cancer specific survival). The score was examined in the context of other variables, including T and N stage, MMR status, number of nodes examined, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor grade; across all studies, the result consistently contributed to risk stratification beyond these variables. Three clinical utility studies with 502 patients showed that 29-45% of initial treatment recommendations in stage IIA colon cancer were changed, with a net reduction in use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Clinical validation of the 12-gene assay followed a now-standard approach of using archived tissue from multiple large, prospectively-designed studies with documented long-term outcomes; the 12-gene colon assay meets level IB evidence criteria. Subsequent studies showed the assay has impact on clinical practice. The underlying tumor biology assessed by the score is relevant in both colon (stage II and III) and rectal cancer, providing information beyond conventional features, and can help guide treatment decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adjuvant Systemic Therapies in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: An Audit on Clinical Practice in Italy

2005 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 472-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Fausto Roila ◽  
Benedetta Ruggeri ◽  
Enzo Ballatori ◽  
Lucio Patoia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Daily Clinical Practice ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Aims and Background Rarely are conclusions from clinical trials summarized in international consensus conferences and promptly transferred to patient care. The adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer used in daily clinical practice in Italy is described and compared with the recommendations of the 1990 NIH Consensus Conference. Patients and Methods We audited prescriptions of adjuvant systemic therapies for Italian colorectal cancer patients in 82 centers during a fixed one-week period. Results Among 434 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy there were 139 (42.5%) colon cancer patients with N- and 169 (51.7%) with N+ regional nodal involvement. Treatment at academic centers, a young age, T4 and a low total number of lymph nodes removed at surgery were the factors potentially justifying the decision for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer patients. The most common chemotherapy used was a bolus of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid for 6 months (75.8%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was not administered to 37 (38.5%) of 96 patients with stage II and III rectal cancer. Conclusions The study shows that a substantial proportion of patients on adjuvant treatment at a certain time point in a large enough sample of Italian centers are stage II (potential over-treatment) and that an under-treatment of stage II and III rectal cancer patients (lack of radiotherapy) occurs too often in daily clinical practice in this country.

scholarly journals Survival in colon and rectal cancers in Finland and Sweden through 50 years

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000644
Author(s):  
Kari Hemminki ◽  
Asta Försti ◽  
Akseli Hemminki
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Positive Development ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancers ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Survival Studies

ObjectivesGlobal survival studies have shown favourable development in colon and rectal cancers but few studies have considered extended periods or covered populations for which medical care is essentially free of charge.DesignWe analysed colon and rectal cancer survival in Finland and Sweden over a 50-year period (1967–2016) using data from the Nordcan database. In addition to the standard 1-year and 5-year survival rates, we calculated the difference between these as a novel measure of how well survival was maintained between years 1 and 5.ResultsRelative 1-year and 5-year survival rates have developed favourably without major shifts for men and women in both countries. For Finnish men, 1-year survival in colon cancer increased from 50% to 82%, and for rectal cancer from 62% to 85%. The Swedish survival was a few per cent unit better for 1-year survival but for 5-year survival the results were equal. Survival of female patients for both cancers was somewhat better than survival in men through 50 years. Overall the survival gains were higher in the early compared with the late follow-up periods, and were the smallest in the last 10 years. The difference between 1-year and 5-year survival in colon cancer was essentially unchanged over the 50-year period while in rectal cancer there was a large improvement.ConclusionsThe gradual positive development in survival suggests a contribution by many small improvements rather than single breakthroughs. The improvement in 5-year survival in colon cancer was almost entirely driven by improvement in 1-year survival while in rectal cancer the positive development extended to survival past year 1, probably due to successful curative treatments. The current challenges are to reinvigorate the apparently stalled positive development and to extend them to old patients. For colon cancer, survival gains need to be extended past year 1 of diagnosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document