Concomitant chemoradiation using gemcitabine in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15611-e15611
Author(s):  
A. I. Masood ◽  
A. A. Javed ◽  
A. Mateen ◽  
S. A. Gurchani
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Treatment Response Evaluation ◽  
Standard Management ◽  
Concomitant Chemoradiation ◽  
Grade 3

e15611 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most common malignancies in Pakistan. There is currently no standard management for advanced HCC. Non-surgical modalities have demonstrated minimal improvements in survival. The aim of present study is to assess response rate and toxicity of concomitant gemcitabine and external radiation therapy (ERT) in locally advanced HCC. Methods: Thirty three biopsy proven advanced HCC patients having Okuda stage I and II disease were enrolled. 70 mg/m2 gemcitabine was given once weekly for three weeks during ERT. Partial liver ERT was delivered with 60Co upto 30 gray (Gy), 1.8 Gy/fraction and five fractions in a week. Tumor response was assessed by computed tomography (CT) eight weeks after completion of treatment. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was used to assess complete and partial response (CR, PR); progressive and stable disease (PD, SD). Hematological [neutropenia and thrombocytopenia], gastrointestinal (vomiting and diarrhea) and liver [encephalopathy, bilirubin, alanine and aspartate transferases (ALT and AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)] toxicities were assessed weekly during treatment and then fortnightly upto 2 months according to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version (3.0). Primary end point was to assess response rate at eight weeks after completion of treatment and Grade 3 or 4 toxicity during this period. Results: 28/33 patients were evaluable. No CR was seen. PR, SD and PD (%) were seen in 36, 39 and 25 of patients respectively. No grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed. 7/28 (25%) of patients developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia during treatment and needed a delay of one week for gemcitabine administration. Grade 3/4 toxicity (%) related to vomiting, diarrhea, encephalopathy, bilirubin, ALT, AST and ALP was seen in 18, 29, 21, 18, 14, 29 and 32 of the patients. Conclusions: The study showed that concomitant chemoradiation using 70mg/m2 gemcitabine is a feasible option with acceptable toxicity in locally advanced HCC. A larger study will be appropriate to define its definite role. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II Trial of the Combination of Bevacizumab and Erlotinib in Patients Who Have Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 843-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie B. Thomas ◽  
Jeffrey S. Morris ◽  
Romil Chadha ◽  
Michiko Iwasaki ◽  
Harmeet Kaur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Advanced Hcc

Purpose The study objective was to determine the proportion of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with the combination of bevacizumab (B) and erlotinib (E) who were alive and progression free at 16 weeks (16-week progression-free survival [PFS16]) of continuous therapy. Secondary objectives included response rate, median PFS, survival, and toxicity. Patients and Methods Patients who had advanced HCC that was not amenable to surgical or regional therapies, up to one prior systemic treatment; Childs-Pugh score A or B liver function; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, or 2 received B 10 mg/kg every 14 days and E 150 mg orally daily, continuously, for 28-day cycles. Tumor response was evaluated every 2 cycles by using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group criteria. A total of 40 patients were treated. Results The primary end point of PFS16 was 62.5%. Ten patients achieved a partial response for a confirmed overall response rate (intent-to-treat) of 25%. The median PFSevent was 39 weeks (95% CI, 26 to 45 weeks; 9.0 months), and the median overall survival was 68 weeks (95% CI, 48 to 78 weeks; 15.65 months). Grades 3 to 4 drug-related toxicity included fatigue (n = 8; 20%), hypertension (n = 6; 15%), diarrhea (n = 4; 10%) elevated transaminases (n = 4; 10%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n = 5; 12.5%), wound infection (n = 2; 5%) thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 2.5%), and proteinuria, hyperbilirubinemia, back pain, hyperkalemia, and anorexia (n = 1 each). Conclusion The combination of B + E in patients who had advanced HCC showed significant, clinically meaningful antitumor activity. B + E warrant additional evaluation in randomized controlled trials.

Initial Experience of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Clinical Practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
TEIJI KUZUYA ◽  
NAOTO KAWABE ◽  
SENJU HASHIMOTO ◽  
RYOJI MIYAHARA ◽  
TAKUJI NAKANO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Response Evaluation ◽  
Modified Recist ◽  
Grade 3

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including those with disease refractory to lenvatinib, in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: Of 34 patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, a total of 23, including 16 with lenvatinib failure, were enrolled in this retrospective study. The adverse events, changes in liver function and antitumor responses at 6 weeks after starting therapy were evaluated. Results: The incidence of grade 3 adverse events was low, at 13.0%. Albumin–bilirubin scores did not worsen at 3 and 6 weeks compared to baseline. The objective response rate and disease control rate at 6 weeks were 17.4% and 78.3% according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and 30.4% and 78.3% according to modified RECIST, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that atezolizumab plus bevacizumab might have potential therapeutic safety and efficacy in patients with advanced HCC, including those with disease refractory to lenvatinib. Further studies are needed to confirm the outcomes of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab after lenvatinib failure.

Sequential Phase I and II Trials of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (13) ◽  
pp. 1631-1639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Bujold ◽  
Christine A. Massey ◽  
John J. Kim ◽  
James Brierley ◽  
Charles Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Pugh Class ◽  
Prospective Trials ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To describe outcomes of prospective trials of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods Two trials of SBRT for patients with active HCC unsuitable for standard locoregional therapies were conducted from 2004 to 2010. All patients had Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A disease, with at least 700 mL of non-HCC liver. The SBRT dose range was 24 to 54 Gy in six fractions. Primary end points were toxicity and local control at 1 year (LC1y), defined as no progressive disease (PD) of irradiated HCC by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Results A total of 102 patients were evaluable (Trial 1, 2004 to 2007: n = 50; Trial 2, 2007 to 2010: n = 52). Underlying liver disease was hepatitis B in 38% of patients, hepatitis C in 38%, alcohol related in 25%, other in 14%, and none in 7%. Fifty-two percent received prior therapies (no prior sorafenib). TNM stage was III in 66%, and 61% had multiple lesions. Median gross tumor volume was 117.0 mL (range, 1.3 to 1,913.4 mL). Tumor vascular thrombosis (TVT) was present in 55%, and extrahepatic disease was present in 12%. LC1y was 87% (95% CI, 78% to 93%). SBRT dose (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; P = .02) and being in Trial 2 (HR = 0.38; P = .03) were associated with LC1y on univariate analysis. Toxicity ≥ grade 3 was seen in 30% of patients. In seven patients (two with TVT PD), death was possibly related to treatment (1.1 to 7.7 months after SBRT). Median overall survival was 17.0 months (95% CI, 10.4 to 21.3 months), for which only TVT (HR = 2.47; P = .01) and being in Trial 2 (HR = 0.49; P = .01) were significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusion These results provide strong rationale for studying SBRT for HCC in a randomized trial.

scholarly journals Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Hepatic Arterioportal Shunts: Combination Treatment of Transarterial Chemoembolization With Apatinib

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Sun ◽  
Yanqiao Ren ◽  
Xuefeng Kan ◽  
Lei Chen ◽  
Weihua Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3

Object: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combining with apatinib (TACE-apatinib) and TACE-alone for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with hepatic arterioportal shunts (APS).Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the medical records of patients with advanced HCC with APS who underwent TACE-apatinib or TACE-alone from June 2015 to January 2019. The occlusion of the shunt was performed during the TACE procedure. The time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of study patients were evaluated. The modified Response Evaluation Criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) was used to evaluate the treatment response. The apatinib-related adverse events were recorded.Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in this study. Twenty-seven patients underwent the treatment of TACE-apatinib, and 31 received TACE-alone treatment. The median overall survival (OS) and median time of tumor progression (TTP) in the TACE-apatinib group were significantly longer than those of the TACE-alone group (OS: 12.0 vs. 9.0 months, P = 0.000; TTP: 9.0 vs. 5.0 months, P = 0.041). Multivariate analysis revealed that TACE-apatinib was a protective factor for OS, and there was no independent risk factor for TTP. In the TACE-apatinib group, the grade 3 apatinib-related adverse events occurred in four patients.Conclusion: TACE-apatinib was an efficacious and safe treatment for patients with advanced HCC with APS, and apatinib improved the efficacy of TACE in the treatment of these patients.

Sorafenib-Regorafenib Sequential Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Institute Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Naoshi Nishida ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives: Previously, no therapeutic agent has been known to improve the overall survival compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who have progressed after sorafenib. In this patient population, regorafenib was first demonstrated to confer a survival benefit in the RESORCE trial, and subsequently it was approved as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. An open-label expanded access program (EAP) of regorafenib was implemented for compassionate use. We investigated the efficacy and safety of regorafenib based on our experience of the RESORCE trial and the EAP. Methods: Data from 5 patients from the RESORCE trial and 6 from the EAP were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had tolerated prior sorafenib and were progressing during sorafenib treatment. Results: The median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (95% CI 2.3-16.1). One patient achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 9.1%, and the disease control rate was 72.7%. No treatment-associated mortalities were observed. Grade 3 hypophosphatemia was observed in 2 patients, grade 2 anorexia was observed in 5 patients, and grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 2 patients. Grade 2 and grade 3 thrombocytopenia were observed in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. All treatment-related adverse events were improved by reduction or interruption of regorafenib. Five patients showed decreased serum albumin levels. Conclusion: Sorafenib and regorafenib sequential therapy presents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with advanced HCC.

scholarly journals Axitinib in combination with radiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase I clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Lin Yang ◽  
Mau-Shin Chi ◽  
Hui-Ling Ko ◽  
Yi-Ying Huang ◽  
Su-Chen Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Normal Liver ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc

Abstract Background To investigate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of axitinib, a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1–3 inhibitor, in combination with radiotherapy (RT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods This phase I study followed the rule of traditional 3 + 3 design. Major eligibility included: (1) patients with advanced HCC unsuitable for surgery, radiofrequency ablation or transarterial chemoembolization, or who failed after prior local–regional treatment; (2) failure on sorafenib or no grant for sorafenib from health insurance system. Eligible patients with advanced HCC received axitinib for total 8 weeks during and after RT. Three cohorts with axitinib dose escalation were planned: 1 mg twice daily (level I), 2 mg twice daily (level II) and 3 mg twice daily (level III). The prescribed doses of RT ranged from 37.5 to 67.5 Gy in 15 fractions to liver tumor(s) and were determined based on an upper limit of mean liver dose of 18 Gy (intended isotoxic RT for normal liver). The primary endpoint was MTD of axitinib in combination with RT. The secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), RT in-field response rate, acute and late toxicities, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results Total nine eligible patients received axitinib dose levels of 1 mg twice daily (n = 3), 2 mg twice daily (n = 3) and 3 mg twice daily (n = 3). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) did not occur in the 3 cohorts; the MTD was defined as 3 mg twice daily in this study. ORR was 66.7%, including 3 complete responses and 3 partial responses, at 3 months after treatment initiation. With a median follow-up of 16.6 months, median OS was not reached, 1-year OS was 66.7%, and median PFS was 7.4 months. Conclusions Axitinib in combination with RT for advanced HCC was well tolerated with an axitinib MTD of 3 mg twice daily in this study. The outcome analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the small total cohort. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02814461), Registered June 27, 2016—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02814461

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma by placing a temporary catheter via the subclavian route

2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 734-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huei-Lung Liang ◽  
Jer-Shyung Huang ◽  
Yi-Huei Lin ◽  
Kwok-Hung Lai ◽  
Chien-Fang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy

Background: A permanent reservoir implantation is considered mandatory for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since treatment sessions of HAIC may be limited for these end-staged patients, a simple alternative technique for this treatment is desirable. Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of placing a temporary catheter for HAIC in advanced HCC patients. Material and Methods: 25 advanced HCC patients underwent HAIC with drugs delivered from a temporary catheter which was placed percutaneously by puncturing the left subclavian artery under ultrasound guidance. A course of chemotherapy consisted of five consecutive daily infusions of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, mitomycin C, and leucovorin. The catheter was removed on the 6th day. Therapy was repeated every 4–6 weeks with maximal number of courses of up to six. The total courses of HAIC in each patient, the catheter-placed-related complications, tumor response rate, and median survival of the patients were registered. Results: A total of 77 courses of HAIC were performed with 100% technical success of catheter placement (1–6 courses in each patient, average 3.1 courses). The overall response rate was 20%, with complete response in two patients and partial response in three patients. Eleven (55%) of the 20 non-responders died within 5 months (mean HAIC, two courses). None of the patients experienced complications such as catheter occlusion, hepatic arterial thrombosis, cerebral infarction, or local infection. Conclusion: With fewer catheter-related complications, HAIC by temporary catheter placement via subclavian puncture could be a treatment option.

scholarly journals Hypothyroidism Is a Predictive Factor for Better Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Lenvatinib Therapy

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3078
Author(s):  
Masako Shomura ◽  
Haruka Okabe ◽  
Emi Sato ◽  
Kota Fukai ◽  
Koichi Shiraishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Thyroid Hormone Replacement ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Therapy Initiation

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing molecular targeted therapy often experience non-negligible adverse events (AEs). Paradoxically, certain AEs are reportedly associated with a good prognosis. We aimed to identify factors predictive of treatment duration and overall survival (OS) in patients with HCC undergoing lenvatinib therapy. Forty-six consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received lenvatinib therapy from April 2018 to November 2019 were prospectively followed until November 2019. Treatment efficacy was assessed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for 2–3 months after therapy initiation. The disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the percentage of patients with a complete response, partial response, or stable disease. The DCR was 65.2%, with a median survival of 10.2 months. Grade 2/3 hypoalbuminemia resulted in shorter treatment duration. Factors predictive of longer OS were a Child-Pugh score of 5 at baseline and the occurrence of Grade 2/3 hypothyroidism. Conversely, Grade 2/3 hypoalbuminemia was associated with a poorer prognosis. An AE of Grade 2/3 hypothyroidism was associated with a better prognosis in patients receiving lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC. Continuing anticancer therapy with appropriate thyroid hormone replacement may contribute to longer OS.

Rapamycin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma progressing on prior antiangiogenic therapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 356-356
Author(s):  
Mohamed Bouattour ◽  
Johanna Wassermann ◽  
Chantal Dreyer ◽  
Valérie Vilgrain ◽  
Valerie Paradis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

356 Background: PI3K/Akt/mTOR is a critical survival pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often correlated with poor prognosis. Rapamycin (sirolimus) and its analogue everolimus, are specific mTOR inhibitors that showed promising antitumor activity in preclinical models and clinical cases of HCC Aims: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of rapamycin in patients (pts) with advanced HCC after failure or intolerance to prior antiangiogenic therapy Methods: In this retrospective cohort, we analyzed consecutive patients with progressive HCC after 1 to 3 lines of treatment including at least sorafenib. All pts received oral rapamycin at 20 to 30 mg once a week. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using NCI-CTCAE v3.0, and tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST criteria. Results: Nine patients (F/M: 1/8) with compensated liver cirrhosis (Child A, n = 6; Child B7, n = 2) or no cirrhosis (n=1) and histologically proven HCC were included in this study. Overall, therapy with rapamycin was well tolerated. Most common toxicities were asthenia (grade 1-2: 5 pts) anaemia (all grade: 5 pts; grade 3: 2 pts ) and thrombocytopenia (grade 1-2: 2 pts). Liver function deterioration was observed in 2 pts with advanced cirrhosis (Child B7). Radiological evaluation was available in 6 pts. No objective tumor response was observed however stable disease ≥ 3 months was observed in 4 cases. Moreover, 2 pts showed stable disease at 6 months. Prolonged stabilization under rapamycin was observed in pts who were previously controlled at least for 6 months with sorafenib. Rapamycin was discontinued due to disease progression in 7/8 pts, toxicity in 1/8 pts. One pt shows ongoing long-lasting disease stabilization (8 + months). Conclusions: Rapamycin displayed an acceptable safety profile and may achieved disease stabilization in patients with heavily pretreated advanced HCC.

Final phase Ib data for the oral c-Met inhibitor tepotinib in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15676-e15676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandrine J. Faivre ◽  
Jean-Frédéric Blanc ◽  
Philippe Merle ◽  
Angelica Fasolo ◽  
Angelo Iacobellis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Peripheral Edema ◽  
Met Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3

e15676 Background: The prognosis for patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after failure of sorafenib is poor, with few systemic therapy options. c-Met is a receptor tyrosine kinase implicated in the progression of HCC. Tepotinib, a highly selective c-Met inhibitor, has shown activity first-line in patients with c-Met+ HCC. We report final results of a phase Ib study of tepotinib in pts with advanced HCC after failure of first-line sorafenib. Methods: Eligible pts were ≥18 years with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh Class A, ECOG PS 0-1, and progression after ≥4 weeks of sorafenib. Tepotinib doses of 300 and 500 mg/day on a 21-day cycle were explored to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of tepotinib. Secondary objectives included antitumor activity by RECIST v1.1, biochemical response, and safety. Results: Seventeen pts were enrolled: 4 pts received tepotinib 300 mg/day and 13 pts 500 mg/day, confirmed as the RP2D. Fourteen pts experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), the most frequent being peripheral edema (n = 5, 2 grade 3), lipase increase (2, 1 grade 3), acute kidney injury (2, 1 grade 3), renal impairment (2, 1 grade 3), fatigue (2), nausea (2), asthenia (2). One pt with peripheral edema permanently discontinued treatment. No grade ≥4 TRAEs and no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported. The best overall response was partial response (PR) in 2 pts and stable disease (SD) in 4 pts. The duration of the PRs was 57 and 91 weeks. In the first of these pts, tumor size decreased by 55% and serum alfa-fetoprotein (AFP) levels had decreased from 15,923 μg/L at baseline to < 3,000 μg/L by day 15 of cycle 2 and remained at this level until progression. In the second pt, tumor size decreased by > 60% from baseline. No consistent change in AFP was seen in pts with SD. Median overall survival was 7.2 months (range 0.7–22.9 months). Conclusions: The RP2D of tepotinib as second-line therapy for pts with advanced HCC who progress after sorafenib treatment is 500 mg/day. Tepotinib was well tolerated at this dose and showed signs of activity. The ongoing phase II part of this trial is investigating the efficacy and safety of tepotinib 500 mg/day in pts with c-Met+ HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02115373.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document