Neoadjuvant versus concurrent chemotherapy in the management of carcinoma nasopharynx
e17053 Background: Chemotherapy is added to radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with advanced locoregional disease to enhance therapeutic gain. Thirty percent patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) still die of distant metastases despite concurrent chemoradiation being the standard of care. In this retrospective study we performed the pooled analysis of these patients to assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus the concurrent chemoradiation approach. Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2007, 45 patients of stage IIB- IVB nasopharyngeal were treated with 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5FU (n = 23) followed by conventional radical radiotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin (n = 22). Results: Total numbers of patients eligible for analyses were 45. Median age of the patients was 52 years (range 19–76 years). Median follow up was 17 months (range 6–60 months). At the time of last follow up, 13 patients (out of 23, i.e. 56.53%) were alive and disease free in the neoadjuvant group and 13 patients (out of 22, i.e. 59.1%) were alive and disease free in the concurrent chemoradiation group. The 2-year failure free survival in the concurrent chemoradiation arm was 63% versus 35% in the neoadjuvant arm (p = 0.197). Survival analyses adjusted for the gender male revealed 2-year failure free survival as 81% in the concurrent chemoradiation versus 44% in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group among male patients (p = 0.0143). On multivariate analysis age and stage were the two significant predictive factors for failure free survival. Conclusions: The neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to be at least as effective as concurrent chemoradiation in this small cohort of patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.