Correlation of efficacy between rash and lapatinib/capecitabine therapy in Japanese HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 62-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Nagai ◽  
K. Inoue ◽  
S. Kaneko ◽  
S. Uchida ◽  
T. Higuchi ◽  
...  

62 Background: Lapatinib (L) is an oral dual-tyrosine kinase inhibitor with specificity for both EGFR and HER2. A phase III randomized trial (EGF100151) demonstrated that L+ capecitabine (C) is superior to C alone in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer that progressed following prior therapy including trastuzumab. Although, Japanese phase I/II trial (EGF109749) demonstrated better response rate and higher rate of rash over a previous phase III trial. Recent reports demonstrated the correlation of efficacy between EGFR targeted therapy and rash in colon cancer. In lung cancer EGFR mutation, which are predominantly found in patients of East Asia origin are highly sensitive to EGFR-TKI. Analyzing correlation of efficacy between rash and EGFR targeted therapy is important in breast cancer. Methods: From June 2009 to February 2010, we treated 28 HER2-positive MBC patients who developed progression after anthracyclines, taxanes and trastuzumab based regimens with L 1,250 mg p.o. daily plus C 2,000 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-14 q 21 in Saitama Cancer Center. EGFR status was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. We analyzed the correlation among rash, clinical outcome and EGFR status. Results: Fourteen (50%) patients experienced rash, which were two grade 3, four grade 2 and eight grade 1. Rash experienced group showed superior response rate (77% : 24%, p<0.05) and median survival time (N/A: 259 days, p<0.05) over non-rash group. EGFR status has no correlation between rash and clinical outcome. Conclusions: According to our single institute experience, rash might be predictive factor in Japanese HER2 positive breast cancer patients treated with L+C therapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Di Lauro ◽  
Elena Torrisi ◽  
Ettore Bidoli ◽  
Daniela Quitadamo ◽  
Sara Cecco ◽  
...  

Trastuzumab-based regimes improved clinical outcome in women with overexpressing HER2 metastatic breast cancer, mainly due to the availability of different combination therapies, clinically active and well tolerated. In this study we retrospectively evaluated clinical activity and toxicity of trastuzuamb plus gemcitabine regimen in heavily pretreated HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Although the observed population was heavily pretreated, the evaluated regimen was notably effective in terms of response rate, time to progression and survival, with very mild toxicity. These data suggest that in over expressing HER2 metastatic breast cancer patients, sequential trastuzumab based chemotherapeutic regimens can achieve good response rate with prolonged TTP in responding patients, even after other target therapy such as lapatinib based combinations.


Breast Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takamichi Yokoe ◽  
Sasagu Kurozumi ◽  
Kazuki Nozawa ◽  
Yukinori Ozaki ◽  
Tetsuyo Maeda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer after taxane with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is standard therapy. However, treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 are still in development with insufficient evidence of their effectiveness. Here, we aimed to evaluate real-world treatment choice and efficacy of treatments after T-DM1 for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Methods In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study involving 17 hospitals, 325 female HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients whose post-T-DM1 treatment began between April 15, 2014 and December 31, 2018 were enrolled. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) of post-T-DM1 treatments. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS). Results The median number of prior treatments of post-T-DM1 treatment was four. The types of post-T-DM1 treatments included (1) chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (n = 102; 31.4%), (2) chemotherapy concomitant with trastuzumab (n = 78; 24.0%), (3), lapatinib with capecitabine (n = 63; 19.4%), and (4) others (n = 82; 25.2%). ORR was 22.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 18.1–28.0], DCR = 66.6% (95% CI 60.8–72.0), median PFS = 6.1 months (95% CI 5.3–6.7), median TTF = 5.1 months (95% CI 4.4–5.6), and median OS = 23.7 months (95% CI 20.7–27.4). Conclusion The benefits of treatments after T-DM1 are limited. Further investigation of new treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 is awaited for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3540
Author(s):  
Hamid Maadi ◽  
Mohammad Hasan Soheilifar ◽  
Won-Shik Choi ◽  
Abdolvahab Moshtaghian ◽  
Zhixiang Wang

Trastuzumab as a first HER2-targeted therapy for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer patients was introduced in 1998. Although trastuzumab has opened a new avenue to treat patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and other types of cancer, some patients are not responsive or become resistant to this treatment. So far, several mechanisms have been suggested for the mode of action of trastuzumab; however, the findings regarding these mechanisms are controversial. In this review, we aimed to provide a detailed insight into the various mechanisms of action of trastuzumab.


2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (20) ◽  
pp. 4150-4159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Berruti ◽  
Raffaella Bitossi ◽  
Gabriella Gorzegno ◽  
Alberto Bottini ◽  
Palmiro Alquati ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of the addition of either cisplatin (CDDP) or lonidamine (LND) to epirubicin (EPI) in the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-one metastatic breast cancer patients with no prior systemic chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomized to receive either EPI alone (60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 every 21 days), EPI and CDDP (30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 every 21 days), EPI and LND (450 mg orally daily, given continuously), or EPI, CDDP, and LND. Time to progression, response rates, side effects, and survival were compared according to the 2 × 2 factorial design of this study. RESULTS: The groups were well balanced with respect to prognostic factors. Time to progression did not differ in the comparison between CDDP arms and non-CDDP arms (median, 10.9 months v 9.4 months, respectively; P = .10) or between that of LND arms and non-LND arms (median, 10.8 months v 9.9 months, respectively; P = .47), nor did overall survival. The response rate did not significantly differ in the comparison between LND arms and non-LND arms (62.9% v 54.0%, P = .08). No difference in treatment activity was observed between CDDP arms and non-CDDP arms. Toxicity was significantly higher in the CDDP arms, leading to CDDP dose adjustment in 40% of cases. The most frequent side effects were of a hematologic and gastrointestinal nature. The addition of LND produced more myalgias and fatigue. CONCLUSION: Neither CDDP nor LND was able to significantly improve the time to progression obtained by EPI. CDDP, however, significantly worsened the drug’s tolerability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document