scholarly journals Trastuzumab and Gemcitabine in Pretreated HER2 Overexpressing Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Retrospective Analysis of Our Series

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Di Lauro ◽  
Elena Torrisi ◽  
Ettore Bidoli ◽  
Daniela Quitadamo ◽  
Sara Cecco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

Trastuzumab-based regimes improved clinical outcome in women with overexpressing HER2 metastatic breast cancer, mainly due to the availability of different combination therapies, clinically active and well tolerated. In this study we retrospectively evaluated clinical activity and toxicity of trastuzuamb plus gemcitabine regimen in heavily pretreated HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Although the observed population was heavily pretreated, the evaluated regimen was notably effective in terms of response rate, time to progression and survival, with very mild toxicity. These data suggest that in over expressing HER2 metastatic breast cancer patients, sequential trastuzumab based chemotherapeutic regimens can achieve good response rate with prolonged TTP in responding patients, even after other target therapy such as lapatinib based combinations.

scholarly journals Clinical benefit of treatment after trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a real-world multi-centre cohort study in Japan (WJOG12519B)

Breast Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takamichi Yokoe ◽  
Sasagu Kurozumi ◽  
Kazuki Nozawa ◽  
Yukinori Ozaki ◽  
Tetsuyo Maeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Real World ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Trastuzumab Emtansine ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive

Abstract Background Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer after taxane with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is standard therapy. However, treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 are still in development with insufficient evidence of their effectiveness. Here, we aimed to evaluate real-world treatment choice and efficacy of treatments after T-DM1 for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Methods In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study involving 17 hospitals, 325 female HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients whose post-T-DM1 treatment began between April 15, 2014 and December 31, 2018 were enrolled. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) of post-T-DM1 treatments. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS). Results The median number of prior treatments of post-T-DM1 treatment was four. The types of post-T-DM1 treatments included (1) chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (n = 102; 31.4%), (2) chemotherapy concomitant with trastuzumab (n = 78; 24.0%), (3), lapatinib with capecitabine (n = 63; 19.4%), and (4) others (n = 82; 25.2%). ORR was 22.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 18.1–28.0], DCR = 66.6% (95% CI 60.8–72.0), median PFS = 6.1 months (95% CI 5.3–6.7), median TTF = 5.1 months (95% CI 4.4–5.6), and median OS = 23.7 months (95% CI 20.7–27.4). Conclusion The benefits of treatments after T-DM1 are limited. Further investigation of new treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 is awaited for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.

scholarly journals Effect and Safety of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Monotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yihang Qi ◽  
Xiangyi Kong ◽  
Xiangyu Wang ◽  
Jie Zhai ◽  
Yi Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Severe Grade

Abstract Background. Given that no approved targeted agents for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) and no opportunity of surgery for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), new treatment options are urgently to be discovered. The anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy may be effective, and what we should be aware of is the response rate and adverse events. Methods. The PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane and www.clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched to find potential studies using the following strategies: anti-PD-1/PD-L1; metastatic; breast cancer. R© package Meta was used to pool incidence. Results. Six studies including 586 advanced breast cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents were included in this meta-analysis. The anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents include pembrolizumab, atezolizumab and avelumab. Among these patients, CR was 1.26%, PR was 7.65%, ORR was 9.85% and DCR was 18.33%. We also found that the response rate was closely associated with the expression of PD-L1 biomarker (PD-L1+ vs PD-L1-): the CR was 2.71% vs 0.00%; the PR was 9.93% vs 2.69%; the ORR was 10.62% vs 3.07%; the DCR was 17.95% vs 4.71%. 1-year overall survival rate and 6-months progression-free survival rate were 43.34% and 17.24%. Respectively, the overall incidence of AEs was 64.18% in any grade and 12.94% in severe grade. The incidence of irAEs was 14.75%. Besides, the incidence of discontinue and death due to treatment-related AEs was about 3.06% and 0.31% respectively. When the detailed AEs were analyzed, most treatment-related AEs of any grade were arthraigia, asthenia, decreased appetite; most common treatment-related AEs of severe grade were anemia, autoimmune hepatitis, diarrhea; the most common irAEs were hypothyroidism , followed by hyperthyroidism, pneumonitis and infusion-related reaction. Conclusions. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy showed a manageable safety profile and had a durable anti-tumor clinical activity in a subset of patients with mTNBC or MBC. PD-L1 expression may be correlated to a higher probability of clinical response.

Docetaxel: Standard Recommended Dose of 100 mg/m2 Is Effective But Not Feasible for Some Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Heavily Pretreated With Chemotherapy—A Phase II Single-Center Study

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1127-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Salminen ◽  
M. Bergman ◽  
S. Huhtala ◽  
E. Ekholm
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

PURPOSE: Patients with metastatic breast cancer, especially those with progression after several prior chemotherapy treatments, need efficient chemotherapy. This study investigates the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients with previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one women (median age, 52 years; range, 40 to 65 years) treated for metastatic breast cancer with docetaxel were included. Eleven patients had one metastatic site, 10 patients had two, and 10 patients had three or more. The planned dose of docetaxel per course was the standard treatment of 100 mg/m2 (or 75 mg/m2 if liver enzyme levels were abnormal) every 3 weeks, given for six or eight cycles. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 48% (three complete responses [CR] and 11 partial responses [PR] ), and the median duration of response was 7 months (range, 2 to 16 months). Twenty patients (65%) experienced fatigue, and 27 patients (87%) had alopecia. Fifteen cases (48%) of grade 4 leukopenia were observed. Edema with a weight gain of 2 to 15 kg was seen in 12 patients (39%), and mucositis occurred in 20 patients (65%). Twenty-three patients (74%) interrupted treatment before reaching the planned number of courses, nine patients owing to progression of cancer and 14 owing to toxicity. Dose reduction was required in 18 (61%) of the patients. Only two patients were able to receive the planned eight courses without dose reduction. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is highly active in metastatic breast cancer, even as a third-line treatment, and can be considered as an efficient standard option in second-line treatment. The standard recommended dose level of 100 mg/m2 is not feasible in heavily pretreated patients; therefore, for such patients, an initial dose level not exceeding 75 mg/m2 is recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document