A phase I/II study of S-1 plus cisplatin alternating with S-1 plus docetaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 101-101
Author(s):  
A. Hosokawa ◽  
K. Ogawa ◽  
S. Kajiura ◽  
Y. Tsukioka ◽  
T. Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Grade 3

101 Background: S-1 plus cisplatin has been regarded as standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with AGC in Japan, and S- 1 plus docetaxel showed promising results for AGC in clinical trials. To investigate the usefulness of S-1 plus cisplatin alternating with S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment in patients with AGC, we conducted a phase I/II study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose (RD), preliminary efficacy and toxicity. Methods: Eligibility criteria included pathologically confirmed AGC; no prior chemotherapy; Age 20 to 74, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 to 2; adequate organ function; and written informed consent. Cisplatin was administered on day1 and the dose was escalated by 10 mg/m2 from starting dose of 40 mg/m2 in phase I part. S-1 was given orally at 80 mg/m2 on day1-14. Docetaxel was administered at 40 mg/m2 on day 22 in combination with S-1 80 mg/m2 on days 22-35. The treatment was repeated every 6 weeks. The RD was studied in every 3-6 patients cohort and determined according to the pre-defined DLTs. Primary endpoint of phase II was the response rate (RR). Results: Between Aug 2006 and Jul 2010, 33 pts were enrolled. Nine patients entered the phase I part and 24 enrolled in phase II part. In the phase I part, the MTD of cisplatin was presumed to be 50 mg/m2, because 50% of patients (3/6) developed DLTs. Therefore, the RD of cisplatin was estimated as 40 mg/m2, and the 27 patients received the treatment at RD level. Patients characteristics were as follows: median age=65 years (range 48-74), Male: female=21:6, PS 0:1:2=11:16:0, diffuse: intestinal=19:8, initially unresectable: recurrent=24:3. The RR was 59.2% (95% CI, 40.7-77.7). Median follow-up period was 14.6 months, median PFS was 7.9 months, and median survival time was 17.2 months, although survival data remain to be confirmed. Major grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (63%), leucopenia (41%), and anemia (33%). These toxicities were tolerable and manageable. No treatment-related death was observed. The updated analysis will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: This alternating treatment seems to be effective and well tolerated in the first-line treatments in patients with AGC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Combination of Oxaliplatin Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Gastrointestinal Tumors: Results of Two Independent Phase I Studies With Pharmacokinetics

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1751-1751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Wasserman ◽  
Caroline Cuvier ◽  
François Lokiec ◽  
François Goldwasser ◽  
Salima Kalla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase I Studies ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Minute Period ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Febrile Episodes

PURPOSE: Two phase I studies of the oxaliplatin and irinotecan combination were performed in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a performance status (PS) of ≤2 and normal hematologic, hepatic, and renal functions received oxaliplatin (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed 1 hour later by irinotecan administered over a 30-minute period, every 3 weeks. Dose levels that were explored ranged from 85 to 110 mg/m2 for oxaliplatin and 150 to 250 mg/m2 for irinotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, irinotecan, SN-38, and its glucuronide, SN-38G, were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas (24 with colorectal cancer [CRC], four with pancreas cancer, four with gastric cancer, three with hepatocarcinoma, and four with other) received 216 treatment cycles. Median age was 54 years (range, 21 to 72 years); 95% had PS of 0 to 1; all but six had failed fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The maximum-tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 200 mg/m2 in one study and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 250 mg/m2 in the other study. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia were dose-limiting toxicities; other toxicities included emesis and dose-cumulative neuropathy. Recommended dose for phase II studies is oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m2. At this dose (12 patients, 65 cycles), grade 3 and 4 toxicities per patient included the following: emesis in 42% of patients, neutropenia in 33% (febrile episodes in 17%), peripheral neuropathy in 25%, delayed diarrhea in 17%, and thrombocytopenia in 8%. Two patients with Gilbert's syndrome experienced severe irinotecan toxicity. No plasmatic pharmacokinetic interactions were detected. Seven partial responses were observed in 24 CRC patients. CONCLUSION: This combination is feasible, with activity in 5-FU–resistant CRC patients. Phase I studies that explore the every-2-weeks schedule, in addition to phase II studies of this schedule (as well as in combination with 5-FU) as second-line therapy of metastatic CRC, are ongoing.

Phase I trial of metronomic cyclophosphamide (CTX) and lenalidomide (LEN) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 164-164
Author(s):  
Jue Wang ◽  
Timothy R. McGuire ◽  
James K. Schwarz ◽  
Jane L Meza ◽  
James E E Talmadge
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3

164 Background: Angiogenesis and suboptimal antitumor immune response are important in the progression of CRPC. Both LEN and metronomic CTX have known anti-angiogenic and immunomodulatory activities. A phase I study of a novel combination of metronomic CTX with LEN in patients with CRPC who have failed prior docetaxel therapy was initiated to assess safety and effects on potential biomarkers. Methods: CTX was given 50 mg PO QD(day 1-28) and LEN 10-25 mg PO QD(day 1-21) on a 28 day cycle. Dose limiting toxicity was defined as any treatment-related grade 4 hematologic event or grade 3 / 4 non-hematologic event during cycles one. Quantification of circulating tumor cells (CTC), plasma cytokines, analgesic consumption and quality of life assessments were performed. Measurement of Treg and MDSCs were performed in some patients. Results: 17 patients with CRPC have been enrolled in L0-4; all patients are evaluable for toxicity. Patient characteristics include: ECOG performance status 0/1= 4/13; median age=77 (range 50–86); median PSA=36.7 (range 1.36–2287). Dose level 1 (CTX 50 mg/d, LEN 10 mg/d) was expanded to 6 patients after one out of three initial patients was removed from the study for Gr 3 gastrointestinal bleeding (in cycle 1). Dose level 1 (CTX 25 mg/d, LEN 10 mg/d) had no DLT’s. The maximum tolerated dose has not yet been reached. Other Grade 3/4 toxicities observed after cycle 1 included grade 3 pain (N=1), grade 3 neutropenia (N=4), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (N=2), grade 4 neutropenia (N=2). Most frequent grade 1 and 2 toxicities included anemia, fatigue, neutropenia, and hypocalcemia. Overall, 9 of 14 patients (64%) have experienced a reduction in PSA. One patient had partial response after one cycle. Stable disease was documented in 5 of 14 (36%) evaluable patients. Two inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 (N = 19; r = 0.64; p = 0.0035) and IL-8 (N = 9; r = 0.86; p = 0.0028), were found to significantly correlated with PSA. Conclusions: The combination of metronomic CTX and LEN can be safely administered. Preliminary clinical activity was observed in this heavily-pretreated patient population. Enrollment to this study continues and clinical and biomarker studies are ongoing.

Safety and efficacy of capecitabine (C) plus bevacizumab (B) as first-line in metastatic breast cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1013-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Sledge ◽  
K. Miller ◽  
C. Moisa ◽  
W. Gradishar
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

1013 Background: C alone has good activity and tolerability in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and when combined with docetaxel improves response and survival. C combined with B in heavily pretreated MBC improved the response rate but not PFS. In untreated MBC, the addition of B to chemotherapy significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) which suggests that B, is most effective in early disease. Methods: Primary objective of this single-arm, 2-phase study, is to evaluate PFS in MBC patients receiving first-line treatment with C 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–15 (28 doses) and B 15 mg/kg on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 21 days until progression. Eligibility criteria included HER2-negative MBC previously untreated for metastatic disease; ECOG performance status =1; no prior anti-angiogenic or oral fluoropyrimidine therapy. A sample size of 109 patients (including dropouts) was required to give 90% power to test an improvement from 4 months median PFS to 5.6 months with the two-sided test (a 5%) Results: At data cut-off, 103 patients had received study medication. Present results are based on 103 patients (ITT population), except tumor response which is based on 91 patients who had response evaluation. The average # of cycles received in first phase is 6.8. 84 pts.are alive at this time. 38.5% (35/91) pts. have had a response: complete response 5.5%; partial response 33.0%. Stable disease is 42.9% with 81.4% clinical benefit. Planned dose received is 77.7 % for C and 99.0 % for B. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate. The most common grade 3 AEs were hand-foot syndrome (13%) and pain (10%); grade 4 pulmonary embolism occurred in 2% in the first phase of the study. Conclusions: Updated results with longer follow-up including toxicity, TTP and PFS will be presented at the meeting. It appears that in first-line C+B is active for MBC and is well tolerated, with few grade 3/4 toxicities. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of sorafenib in children with refractory solid tumors: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10012-10012 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. C. Widemann ◽  
E. Fox ◽  
P. C. Adamson ◽  
S. Baruchel ◽  
A. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Normal Alt ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

10012 Background: Sorafenib, an oral multitargeted kinase inhibitor, is indicated for treatment of adults with refractory renal cell or hepatocelluar carcinoma. We performed a phase I trial to determine the toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of sorafenib in children with refractory solid tumors. Methods: Sorafenib was administered q12h for 28 consecutive day cycles. Cohorts of 3–12 patients were enrolled at 105, 130, 150, 200, and 250 mg/m2/dose dose levels. Results: 34 eligible pts [16M, median age 14.6 yrs, (range, 5–21)] with osteosarcoma (n = 8), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 3), other sarcomas (n = 13), hepatoblastoma (n = 3), or other solid tumors (n = 7) received 1–22 cycles (median 2). Grade 3 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in 4/6 pts at the starting dose (150 mg/m2) and included hypertension (n = 1), rash/urticaria (n = 1), back pain (n = 1), thrombocytopenia (n = 1) and ALT/AST (n = 1). No DLTs were observed at 105 (n = 6) or 130 (n = 3) mg/m2, and the dose was re-escalated to 150 mg/m2 with modified eligibility criteria (normal ALT) and revised guidelines for grading and management of hypertension. Gr 3 DLTs occurred in 1/6 pts (lipase) at 150 mg/m2 and 2/2 pts (hyponatremia, hand-foot syndrome) at 250 mg/m2. At 200 mg/m2 only 1/6 pts experienced DLT (gr 3 ALT). No objective responses were observed, but 2 pts had tumor shrinkage. Sorafenib AUC did not increase proportionally with dose - the mean AUC0–24h was similar at 150 mg/m2 (28±24 μg · h/mL, n = 9) and 200 mg/m2 (28±17 μg · h/mL, n = 4). Tmax was prolonged and variable (10±11 h, n = 19). Plasma VEGFR (n = 13) decreased from 9.9±1.6 ng/mL at baseline to 8.3±1.7 ng/mL by d 28 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The MTD of sorafenib in children with solid tumors is 200 mg/m2, similar to the adult recommended dose (400 mg). No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Maximum-tolerated dose defined for single-agent gemcitabine: a phase I dose-escalation study in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 310-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
F V Fossella ◽  
S M Lippman ◽  
D M Shin ◽  
P Tarassoff ◽  
M Calayag-Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Starting Dose

PURPOSE We conducted a phase I trial of the novel nucleoside analog, gemcitabine, in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and efficacy in this population. PATIENT AND METHODS Eligibility requirements included stage III or IV NSCLC, performance status < or = 1, and no prior chemotherapy. Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks. We enrolled patients at doses that ranged from 1,000 to 2,800 mg/m2/wk (three patients per cohort). Responses were assessed after every two courses (8 weeks). RESULTS We treated 33 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage III (n = 5) or IV (n = 28) NSCLC. Most had performance status 1, and 67% had adenocarcinoma. Eight of 32 assessable patients (25%) achieved a partial response. The projected median survival duration (all patients) is 49 weeks. The maximum-tolerated dose was 2,200 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks; dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression and reversible transaminase elevation. Other side effects were consistently mild. The maximum dose-intensity achieved with the first two cycles was 2,362 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks, which is a feasible phase II starting dose. CONCLUSION This study estimates a phase II starting dose of gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients to be 2,400 mg/m2/wk for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks; this is much higher than that previously reported in heavily pretreated patients. Twenty-five percent of patients with advanced NSCLC achieved a partial response to gemcitabine. This significant activity in conjunction with a very favorable toxicity profile supports the further evaluation of gemcitabine in combination with other active agents.

A phase 1 study of weekly, divided dose perifosine in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13063-13063 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. C. Henderson ◽  
D. R. Spigel ◽  
J. J. Nemunaitis ◽  
D. A. Richards ◽  
J. E. Liebmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Nsclc Patients

13063 Background: Perifosine (P) is known to modulate signal transduction pathways, including Akt which is frequently constitutively activated in NSCLC. The half life of P is ∼100 hours and GI toxicities are dose limiting. Studies of a single dose weekly regimen found that the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 800 mg. This study was undertaken to see if a higher MTD could be reached using divided doses in NSCLC patients. Methods: Twenty NSCLC patients (pts) were given P, 300 mg, at intervals of 4–6 hours with no more than 4 doses in a 24 hour period. The starting dose was 900 mg and this was escalated by 300 mg/week in subsequent pts to an MTD of 1800 mg. Results: The median age of pts was 62 (range 39–79); 9 were male and median ECOG performance status was 1 (range 0–1). Nineteen pts had received prior chemotherapy (median 2 regimens) and 18 prior radiotherapy. Three pts were entered at each dose and the cohort expanded to 6 pts if 1 or more experienced a grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (DLT) during the first week of therapy. A dose level was toxic if 2 or more pts experienced a DLT. The median time on study was 8 weeks (range 2–28). Seventy-seven percent of pts had no dose reduction (85% of those on 900 mg, 95% on 1200, 72% on 1500, and 78% on 1800 mg). In cohort 1, one pt died within a week without toxicity from P and 1 pt experienced grade 3 nausea, so this cohort was expanded. The other pts in the cohort had no toxicity. In cohort 4 one pt. took 300 mg daily for 6 days and was considered inevaluable. In cohort 3, grade 3/4 toxicity was not observed until after day 28 in 3 pts. Fifteen pts were evaluable for response; 1 had an unconfirmed partial response and 2 had stable disease. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that higher doses of P can be administered on a weekly schedule with divided doses. Weekly doses of 900 and 1200 mg lead to almost no toxicity in most pts. This study has been expanded to a phase 2 trial with direct comparison of weekly and daily doses. The grade 3/4 toxicities for each cohort are given in the table below. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Phase I-II trial of irinotecan (CPT) and cisplatin (P) as concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) for patients (pts) with primary local advanced cervical cancer (LACC): A KCOG 0328 trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15002-15002
Author(s):  
K. Ito ◽  
M. Kita ◽  
K. Hosokawa ◽  
S. Toyoda ◽  
M. Kozuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Target Region ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Delay Of Treatment ◽  
Set Up

15002 Background: Though CCRT based on P is now recommended in LACC, there is no standard regimen. We conducted a phase I-II trial of CPT and P as CCRT in pts with primary LACC. Methods: Eligibility criteria: histologically confirmed primary LACC as FIGO stage III to IVb by para-aortic lymphnode (PAN) metastasis, age 16–75 years, ECOG performance status <2, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function, and written informed consent. Radiotherapy (RT) consisted of external beam 5040cGy in 28 fractions followed by single application brachytherapy, delivering 1800–2400 cGy to point A in 3–4 fractions. The doses of chemotherapy (CT) were set up as follows: dose level (DL) 0; CPT 20 mg/m2, P 30 mg/m2, DL1; CPT 25mg/m2, P 30 mg/m2, DL2; CPT 30 mg/m2, P 30 mg/m2, and the starting level was chosen DL1. CT was curried out weekly 5 cycles concurrently with RT. Toxicities were assessed according to NCI-CTC ver2.0J and responses were assessed according to RECIST. Results: So far 9 pts have been entered. The median age was 52 years (range 29 -73). All pts were FIGO stage IIIb and histrogically squamous cell carcinoma. Among the first 2 pts in DL1, 2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed (delay of treatment due to grade 3 diarrhea and nausea) resulting in dose reduction to DL0. In the next 3 pts in DL0, no DLTs were observed and the study is ongoing as phase II. All pts were evaluable for response and toxicity. Eight complete (CR) and 1 partial response (PR) were seen at target region of cervix. But 2 pts showed progressive disease (PD) at non-target region of PAN, lung and liver, then overall response rate assessed by RECIST was 77.8% (CR 7, PD 2). Now the median follow up period is 16 months (range 6 -30). So far 2 pts of PD died and 3 pts relapsed. The median survival time is 10+ months (range 6+ -30+). Toxicity in DL0 was observed febrile neutropenia in 1 pt only. Conclusions: The CCRT with CPT and P in DL0 is feasible and shows promising activity in pts with primary LACC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I results of the randomized, placebo controlled, phase I/II study of the novel oral c-Met inhibitor, ARQ 197, irinotecan (CPT-11), and cetuximab (C) in patients (pts) with wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have received front-line systemic therapy.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 527-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Eng ◽  
J. C. Bendell ◽  
A. Bessudo ◽  
N. Y. Gabrail ◽  
J. Diamond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Cell Migration ◽  
Arq 197 ◽  
Grade 3

527 Background: ARQ 197 selectively inhibits the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), which has been implicated in tumor cell migration, invasion, proliferation, and angiogenesis. CPT-11 plus C is a standard of care for CPT-11-refractory mCRC pts with WT KRAS tumors. Resistance to C has been associated with activation of alternative RTK pathways including c-Met. We hypothesize that adding ARQ 197 to CPT-11 plus C may decrease resistance to C therapy and improve pt outcomes. Methods: The primary objectives of phase I were to evaluate safety and tolerability of ARQ 197 administered in combination with CPT-11 plus C, and to define a recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Pts with surgically unresectable locally advanced or mCRC who received at least 1 prior line of chemotherapy, KRAS WT and ECOG performance status < 2 were eligible. Cohorts of 3 pts each were treated with CPT-11 (180 mg/m2) and C (500 mg/m2) every 2 weeks along with escalating doses of ARQ 197 (120, 240, 360 mg) PO BID. Blood and tissue were collected for PK, biomarker, and other analyses. If no DLTs were observed during the first 28-day cycle in 3 pts treated in cohort 3, 360 mg BID would be defined as the RPTD. Responses were assessed every 8 weeks per RECIST v1.1. Results: Nine pts were treated in 3 cohorts. Median age: 53 yrs (range 30-77); ECOG PS 0/1: 4/5; median prior therapies: 2 (range 1-4). No DLTs were observed. The RPTD for ARQ 197 was 360 mg BID. To date, two pts have discontinued (1 disease progression and 1 withdrew consent after achieving complete response) and 7 pts remain on study. The reported grade 3/4 adverse events were: neutropenia (3/4: 1/1), and one case each of grade 3 fatigue, leucopenia, acneiform rash, vomiting, anemia and syncope. Preliminary efficacy data in 9 evaluable pts include 1 CR (after 4 cycles), 2 PR (after 2 cycles), 5 SD, and 1 PD as best response. Conclusions: The combination of ARQ 197 and CPT-11 plus C was well tolerated with encouraging preliminary antitumor activity. The RPTD for ARQ 197 was 360 mg BID. The randomized phase II portion of the study continues accrual. [Table: see text]

Dasatinib plus capecitabine (Cap) for progressive advanced breast cancer (ABC): Phase I study CA180004

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1012-1012
Author(s):  
G. Somlo ◽  
F. Atzori ◽  
L. Strauss ◽  
A. Rybicki ◽  
X. Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell Lines ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Study Laboratory

1012 Background: SRC family kinases (SFK) mediate numerous signal-transduction pathways relevant to breast cancer as well as osteoclast function. Dasatinib, a potent oral inhibitor of SFK and other kinases has preclinical activity in breast models and in vitro synergy with Cap in some breast cancer cell lines (KPL-4 and HCC-70). A phase I trial of dasatinib plus Cap was conducted to define dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated (MTD), and recommended phase II (RP2D) doses. Methods: Sequential cohorts of pts with ABC were treated with Cap twice daily (BID) on days 1–14 and dasatinib daily in 21-day cycles using dose levels (DL) for Cap (mg/m2) and dasatinib (mg): DL1: Cap 825 + dasatinib 50 BID; DL2: Cap 825 + dasatinib 70 BID; DL3: Cap 1000 + dasatinib 70 BID; DL3a: Cap 1000 + dasatinib 100 once daily (QD). All pts had ECOG performance status 0–1, had prior anthracycline and/or taxane, and received ≤2 regimens in advanced setting. MTD was based on DLT in first cycle and RP2D also based on tolerability of additional cycles. Results: 31 pts with ABC, median age 53 years (range 36–78) were treated. Number of pts treated/evaluable for DLT/reported DLT (event) were DL1: 7/6/1 (headache, grade 3); DL2: 9/7/0; DL3: 6/6/1 (diarrhea, grade 3), and DL3a: 9/9/1 (pneumonia, grade 3). Most frequent AEs related to either drug and occurring at any time on study (n pts) were nausea (12), vomiting (7), diarrhea (6), abdominal pain (2), fatigue (8), headache (7), musculoskeletal pain (1), and pleural effusion (4); hand-foot syndrome (5) was as expected for Cap alone. 11 patients experienced a Grade 3–4 non-hematologic AE at some point during the study. Laboratory abnormalities were uncommon. To date, 20 pts have continued treatment for ≥6 weeks and 9 pts for ≥12 weeks. Number of pts who (at any time) reduced dasatinib/reduced Cap/discontinued for toxicity were DL1: 2/2/1; DL2 2/2/3; DL3: 2/1/2; DL3a: 0/1/1. Updated safety and efficacy data will be presented. Conclusions: Dasatinib + Cap was tolerated without unexpected combined-treatment toxicity; few pts required dose reduction in later cycles. The recommended phase II dose, Cap 1000 plus dasatinib 100 QD, is well tolerated and will be studied for efficacy in an expanded patient cohort. [Table: see text]

A phase I/II study of HB-201, an arenavirus-based cancer immunotherapy, alone, or in combination with anti-PD-1 in patients with HPV16+ cancers.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3171-TPS3171
Author(s):  
Bharat Burman ◽  
Jiaxin Niu ◽  
Rom S. Leidner ◽  
Ding Wang ◽  
Debra L. Richardson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Cancer Disease

TPS3171 Background: Human Papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) is linked to several cancer types; treatment options are limited for patients with HPV16+ recurrent or metastatic cancers. The generation and maintenance of the HPV16+ malignant state requires the stable expression of HPV16-specific E7 and E6 oncogenes, which can also serve as immunogenic tumor-associated antigens. HB-201 is a replication-competent live-attenuated vector based on the arenavirus LCMV encoding a non-oncogenic E7 and E6 fusion protein. In preclinical models, both intravenously (IV) and intratumorally (IT) administered HB-201 demonstrate potent immunogenicity by induction of HPV16-specific cytotoxic T cells and associated efficacy. Methods: This is a first in human, Phase I/II study of HB-201 monotherapy or in combination with PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-1) in HPV16+ confirmed recurrent/metastatic cancers. Phase I consists of 2 treatment groups, each conducted with a 3+3 dose escalation design. Group 1 is enrolling patients with HPV16+ head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who will receive HB-201 IV only. Group 2 is enrolling HPV16+ cancer patients with a safely accessible tumor site who will receive HB-201 IT for the first dose, followed by HB-201 IV for subsequent doses (IT-IV). HB-201 will be administered every 21 days. The Phase II component will be conducted with the recommended Phase II doses (RP2Ds) defined in Phase I and will consist of 3 groups: Group A (HB-201 IV only), Group B (HB-201 IV plus anti-PD-1), and Group C (HB-201 IT-IV). Key eligibility criteria include age > 18, ECOG performance status 0-1, confirmed HPV16+ recurrent or metastatic cancer, disease progression from at least 1 systemic standard of care therapy, and measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. The Phase I primary objective is to determine RP2Ds for IV and IT HB-201. The Phase II primary objective is to assess antitumor activity. Secondary endpoints for both phases include safety, tolerability, overall survival, progression-free survival, and duration of response. Exploratory objectives include characterization of immunogenicity of HB-201 and biomarkers associated with immune or antitumor response. Enrollment to Groups 1 and 2 began in December 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT04180215 .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document