Dasatinib plus capecitabine (Cap) for progressive advanced breast cancer (ABC): Phase I study CA180004

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1012-1012
Author(s):  
G. Somlo ◽  
F. Atzori ◽  
L. Strauss ◽  
A. Rybicki ◽  
X. Wu ◽  
...  

1012 Background: SRC family kinases (SFK) mediate numerous signal-transduction pathways relevant to breast cancer as well as osteoclast function. Dasatinib, a potent oral inhibitor of SFK and other kinases has preclinical activity in breast models and in vitro synergy with Cap in some breast cancer cell lines (KPL-4 and HCC-70). A phase I trial of dasatinib plus Cap was conducted to define dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated (MTD), and recommended phase II (RP2D) doses. Methods: Sequential cohorts of pts with ABC were treated with Cap twice daily (BID) on days 1–14 and dasatinib daily in 21-day cycles using dose levels (DL) for Cap (mg/m2) and dasatinib (mg): DL1: Cap 825 + dasatinib 50 BID; DL2: Cap 825 + dasatinib 70 BID; DL3: Cap 1000 + dasatinib 70 BID; DL3a: Cap 1000 + dasatinib 100 once daily (QD). All pts had ECOG performance status 0–1, had prior anthracycline and/or taxane, and received ≤2 regimens in advanced setting. MTD was based on DLT in first cycle and RP2D also based on tolerability of additional cycles. Results: 31 pts with ABC, median age 53 years (range 36–78) were treated. Number of pts treated/evaluable for DLT/reported DLT (event) were DL1: 7/6/1 (headache, grade 3); DL2: 9/7/0; DL3: 6/6/1 (diarrhea, grade 3), and DL3a: 9/9/1 (pneumonia, grade 3). Most frequent AEs related to either drug and occurring at any time on study (n pts) were nausea (12), vomiting (7), diarrhea (6), abdominal pain (2), fatigue (8), headache (7), musculoskeletal pain (1), and pleural effusion (4); hand-foot syndrome (5) was as expected for Cap alone. 11 patients experienced a Grade 3–4 non-hematologic AE at some point during the study. Laboratory abnormalities were uncommon. To date, 20 pts have continued treatment for ≥6 weeks and 9 pts for ≥12 weeks. Number of pts who (at any time) reduced dasatinib/reduced Cap/discontinued for toxicity were DL1: 2/2/1; DL2 2/2/3; DL3: 2/1/2; DL3a: 0/1/1. Updated safety and efficacy data will be presented. Conclusions: Dasatinib + Cap was tolerated without unexpected combined-treatment toxicity; few pts required dose reduction in later cycles. The recommended phase II dose, Cap 1000 plus dasatinib 100 QD, is well tolerated and will be studied for efficacy in an expanded patient cohort. [Table: see text]

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 527-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Eng ◽  
J. C. Bendell ◽  
A. Bessudo ◽  
N. Y. Gabrail ◽  
J. Diamond ◽  
...  

527 Background: ARQ 197 selectively inhibits the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), which has been implicated in tumor cell migration, invasion, proliferation, and angiogenesis. CPT-11 plus C is a standard of care for CPT-11-refractory mCRC pts with WT KRAS tumors. Resistance to C has been associated with activation of alternative RTK pathways including c-Met. We hypothesize that adding ARQ 197 to CPT-11 plus C may decrease resistance to C therapy and improve pt outcomes. Methods: The primary objectives of phase I were to evaluate safety and tolerability of ARQ 197 administered in combination with CPT-11 plus C, and to define a recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Pts with surgically unresectable locally advanced or mCRC who received at least 1 prior line of chemotherapy, KRAS WT and ECOG performance status < 2 were eligible. Cohorts of 3 pts each were treated with CPT-11 (180 mg/m2) and C (500 mg/m2) every 2 weeks along with escalating doses of ARQ 197 (120, 240, 360 mg) PO BID. Blood and tissue were collected for PK, biomarker, and other analyses. If no DLTs were observed during the first 28-day cycle in 3 pts treated in cohort 3, 360 mg BID would be defined as the RPTD. Responses were assessed every 8 weeks per RECIST v1.1. Results: Nine pts were treated in 3 cohorts. Median age: 53 yrs (range 30-77); ECOG PS 0/1: 4/5; median prior therapies: 2 (range 1-4). No DLTs were observed. The RPTD for ARQ 197 was 360 mg BID. To date, two pts have discontinued (1 disease progression and 1 withdrew consent after achieving complete response) and 7 pts remain on study. The reported grade 3/4 adverse events were: neutropenia (3/4: 1/1), and one case each of grade 3 fatigue, leucopenia, acneiform rash, vomiting, anemia and syncope. Preliminary efficacy data in 9 evaluable pts include 1 CR (after 4 cycles), 2 PR (after 2 cycles), 5 SD, and 1 PD as best response. Conclusions: The combination of ARQ 197 and CPT-11 plus C was well tolerated with encouraging preliminary antitumor activity. The RPTD for ARQ 197 was 360 mg BID. The randomized phase II portion of the study continues accrual. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14009-14009
Author(s):  
J. Chen ◽  
Y. Chao ◽  
L. Chen ◽  
C. Li ◽  
W. Reece ◽  
...  

14009 Background: Phase I of this Phase I/II study (H3E-AA-S038) was conducted to determine the recommended dose of pemetrexed (PT) when given with cisplatin (Cis) to patients with unresectable, advanced gastric carcinoma. Methods: Patients 18 to 70 years of age, with stage IV disease or post-surgery recurrence, no prior palliative chemotherapy, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 were included. Patients received PT and Cis on Day 1 every 21 days. Cis was dosed at 75 mg/m2. PT dosage was planned at 600, 700, 800, and 900 mg/m2. Vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation, and dexamethasone (or equivalent corticosteroid) prophylaxis were required. The initial number of patients to be enrolled per dose level (DL) was 3. If 0/3 patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), PT dose was escalated. If 1/3 patients had DLT, 3 more patients were enrolled at that DL. If ≥2 patients had DLT, the dose was not escalated further. The recommended dose of PT for Phase II was the highest dose at which <2/6 patients experienced DLT. The following toxicities were defined as DLT: death due to toxicity; neutropenia [<0/5 × 109/L for ≥5 days, or <1.0 × 109/L with fever (≥38.5 ºC)]; thrombocytopenia (<10.0 × 109/L, or <50.0 × 109/L with bleeding); AST or ALT >20 × ULN; and non-hematological toxicities of CTC grade 3 or 4 (except nausea and vomiting). Intra-patient dose escalation was not permitted. Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled. The mean (±SD) age of enrolled patients was 52.8 (±10.0) years, and the majority were male (62.5%). At DL1, 0/3 patients experienced DLT. At DL2, 1/6 patients had DLT. At DL3, 3/7 patients had DLT, and so PT dose was not escalated. All DLTs occurred in cycle 1; 2 involved neutropenia, 1 tumor hemorrhage, and 1 hypokalemia. Grade 3/4 toxicities were experienced by 12/16 (75%) patients, including 9 (56%) hematological and 10 (63%) non-hematological events. Five out of thirteen (38%) patients with measurable disease had a RECIST response (2 had a complete response, 1 each at DL1 and DL2; 3 had a partial response, 2 at DL2 and 1 at DL3). At this interim analysis, 2 patients were still on therapy. Conclusions: The recommended dose of PT is 700 mg/m2. Phase II will examine response and safety of PT plus Cis in advanced gastric carcinoma. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14101-14101
Author(s):  
E. Baba ◽  
H. Fujishima ◽  
H. Kusaba ◽  
T. Esaki ◽  
H. Ariyama ◽  
...  

14101 Background: The combination of 5-FU and CDDP has been reported to be active against metastatic gastric cancer (MGC), and great synergy has been shown in vivo and in vitro when 5-FU precedes CDDP. We investigated a sequential combination of S-1 (Tegafur, oxonic acid, CDHP) followed by CDDP for MGC. Methods: In order to determine a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RD), we conducted a phase I trial applying increasing doses of oral administration of S-1 (65–80mg/m2) for 21 days and increasing doses of CDDP (60–80mg/m2) on day 22 every 35 days. Pts with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer, no prior chemotherapy, measurable disease, performance status ECOG less than 3, and adequate organ functions were eligible for the study. Three pts were treated at each dose level with escalation based on toxicity. Fifteen pts were included and evaluated for DLT and MTD. Results: DLT was NCICTC grade 3 anorexia and fatigue in patients treated at the dose level 5 of S-1 80mg/m2 and CDDP 80mg/m2. Other toxicity more than grade 3 was neutropenia (grade 3) and nausea/vomiting (grade 3). Non-hematological toxicities were grade 1/2 and included diarrhea, nausea and stomatitis. There was no treatment-related mortality. The recommended dose was a combination of S-1 80mg/m2 and CDDP 70mg/m2. A tentative median survival was 19.5 months. Conclusions: This sequential S-1 and CDDP administered every 35 days is tolerable and beneficial for patients with MGC, and thus the consequent phase II trial is recommended. A multicenter phase II study is currently under way. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 101-101
Author(s):  
A. Hosokawa ◽  
K. Ogawa ◽  
S. Kajiura ◽  
Y. Tsukioka ◽  
T. Kobayashi ◽  
...  

101 Background: S-1 plus cisplatin has been regarded as standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with AGC in Japan, and S- 1 plus docetaxel showed promising results for AGC in clinical trials. To investigate the usefulness of S-1 plus cisplatin alternating with S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment in patients with AGC, we conducted a phase I/II study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose (RD), preliminary efficacy and toxicity. Methods: Eligibility criteria included pathologically confirmed AGC; no prior chemotherapy; Age 20 to 74, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 to 2; adequate organ function; and written informed consent. Cisplatin was administered on day1 and the dose was escalated by 10 mg/m2 from starting dose of 40 mg/m2 in phase I part. S-1 was given orally at 80 mg/m2 on day1-14. Docetaxel was administered at 40 mg/m2 on day 22 in combination with S-1 80 mg/m2 on days 22-35. The treatment was repeated every 6 weeks. The RD was studied in every 3-6 patients cohort and determined according to the pre-defined DLTs. Primary endpoint of phase II was the response rate (RR). Results: Between Aug 2006 and Jul 2010, 33 pts were enrolled. Nine patients entered the phase I part and 24 enrolled in phase II part. In the phase I part, the MTD of cisplatin was presumed to be 50 mg/m2, because 50% of patients (3/6) developed DLTs. Therefore, the RD of cisplatin was estimated as 40 mg/m2, and the 27 patients received the treatment at RD level. Patients characteristics were as follows: median age=65 years (range 48-74), Male: female=21:6, PS 0:1:2=11:16:0, diffuse: intestinal=19:8, initially unresectable: recurrent=24:3. The RR was 59.2% (95% CI, 40.7-77.7). Median follow-up period was 14.6 months, median PFS was 7.9 months, and median survival time was 17.2 months, although survival data remain to be confirmed. Major grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (63%), leucopenia (41%), and anemia (33%). These toxicities were tolerable and manageable. No treatment-related death was observed. The updated analysis will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: This alternating treatment seems to be effective and well tolerated in the first-line treatments in patients with AGC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Roberto Pazo-Cid ◽  
Carmen Guillén-Ponce ◽  
Rafael López ◽  
Ruth Vera ◽  
...  

Purpose Gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (NAB) paclitaxel (GA) significantly improved survival compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and a Karnofsky performance status (PS) of 70% or greater. Because of the low number of patients with reduced PS, the efficacy of this regimen in fragile patients remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of different GA dosing regimens in patients with a poor PS. Patients and Methods In the phase I part of this study, patients were randomly assigned to one of the following four parallel GA treatment arms (six patients per arm): a biweekly schedule of NAB-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2 [arm A] or 125 mg/m2 [arm C]) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 or a standard schedule of 3 weeks on and 1 week off of NAB-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 [arm B] or 125 mg/m2 [arm D]) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2. The two regimens with the better tolerability profile on the basis of predefined criteria were evaluated in the phase II part of the study, the primary end point of which was 6-month actuarial survival. Results Arms B and D were selected for the phase II part of the study. A total of 221 patients (111 patients in arm B and 110 patients in arm D) were enrolled. Baseline characteristics including median age (71 and 68 years in arms B and D, respectively), sex (51% and 55% men in arms B and D, respectively), and metastatic disease (88% and 84% in arms B and D, respectively) were comparable between arms. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities in arms B and D were anemia (12% and 7%, respectively), neutropenia (32% and 30%, respectively), thrombocytopenia (7% and 11%, respectively), asthenia (14% and 16%, respectively), and neurotoxicity (11% and 16%, respectively). In arms B and D, there were no significant differences in response rate (24% and 28%, respectively), median progression-free survival (5.7 and 6.7 months, respectively), and 6-month overall survival (63% and 69%, respectively). Conclusion NAB-paclitaxel administered at either 100 and 125 mg/m2 in combination with gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days is well tolerated and results in acceptable safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and a poor PS.


1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1751-1751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Wasserman ◽  
Caroline Cuvier ◽  
François Lokiec ◽  
François Goldwasser ◽  
Salima Kalla ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Two phase I studies of the oxaliplatin and irinotecan combination were performed in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a performance status (PS) of ≤2 and normal hematologic, hepatic, and renal functions received oxaliplatin (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed 1 hour later by irinotecan administered over a 30-minute period, every 3 weeks. Dose levels that were explored ranged from 85 to 110 mg/m2 for oxaliplatin and 150 to 250 mg/m2 for irinotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, irinotecan, SN-38, and its glucuronide, SN-38G, were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas (24 with colorectal cancer [CRC], four with pancreas cancer, four with gastric cancer, three with hepatocarcinoma, and four with other) received 216 treatment cycles. Median age was 54 years (range, 21 to 72 years); 95% had PS of 0 to 1; all but six had failed fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The maximum-tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 200 mg/m2 in one study and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 250 mg/m2 in the other study. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia were dose-limiting toxicities; other toxicities included emesis and dose-cumulative neuropathy. Recommended dose for phase II studies is oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m2. At this dose (12 patients, 65 cycles), grade 3 and 4 toxicities per patient included the following: emesis in 42% of patients, neutropenia in 33% (febrile episodes in 17%), peripheral neuropathy in 25%, delayed diarrhea in 17%, and thrombocytopenia in 8%. Two patients with Gilbert's syndrome experienced severe irinotecan toxicity. No plasmatic pharmacokinetic interactions were detected. Seven partial responses were observed in 24 CRC patients. CONCLUSION: This combination is feasible, with activity in 5-FU–resistant CRC patients. Phase I studies that explore the every-2-weeks schedule, in addition to phase II studies of this schedule (as well as in combination with 5-FU) as second-line therapy of metastatic CRC, are ongoing.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 175883591878685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Umehara ◽  
Yoshimi Maekawa ◽  
Fumito Koizumi ◽  
Makiko Shimizu ◽  
Toshio Ota ◽  
...  

Background: KW-2450 is an oral dual insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor/insulin receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We investigated the in vitro and in vivo preclinical activity of KW-2450 plus lapatinib and letrozole and conducted a phase I trial of the triple-drug combination in one male and 10 postmenopausal female patients with advanced/metastatic hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Methods: A series of in vitro and in vivo animal studies was undertaken of KW-2450 in combination with lapatinib and hormonal agents. The phase I trial was conducted to establish the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of KW-2450 administered in combination with lapatinib and letrozole. Results: Preclinical studies showed KW-2450 and lapatinib act synergistically to induce in vitro apoptosis and inhibit growth of HER2-positive MDA-MB-361 and BT-474 breast cancer cell lines. This combined effect was confirmed in vivo using the MDA-MB-361 xenograft model. KW-2450 showed synergistic in vitro growth inhibition with letrozole and 4-hydroxytamoxifen in ER-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells and MCF-7-Ac1 aromatase-transfected MCF-7 cells. In the phase I study, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; grade 3 rash and grade 3 hyperglycemia, respectively) occurred in two of three patients at the dose of KW-2450 25 mg/day plus lapatinib 1500 mg/day and letrozole 2.5 mg/day. The RP2D of the triple-drug combination was established as KW-2450 25 mg/day, lapatinib 1250 mg/day, and letrozole 2.5 mg/day with no DLT at this dose level. Conclusions: The proposed phase II study of the RP2D for the triple-drug combination did not progress because of anticipated difficulty in patient enrollment and further clinical development of KW-2450 was terminated.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3162-3162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip C. Amrein ◽  
Eyal Attar ◽  
Tak Takvorian ◽  
Ephraim Hochberg ◽  
Karen K. Ballen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Preclinical studies have shown that CLL cells overexpress lyn kinase protein, and in vitro inhibition of lyn kinase leads to apoptosis of the CLL cells (Contri, J Clin Invest 2005). Because dasatinib has been shown to inhibit lyn kinase in CML cells at concentrations easily achievable in patients, we undertook this phase II study in patients with previously treated CLL/SLL. Methods: Patients were required to be over 18 years of age, have a diagnosis of CLL/SLL by flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry, and have failed either 1 course of treatment with a fludarabine-containing regimen or 2 non-fludarabine containing regimens. The starting dose of dasatinib was 140 mg daily by mouth. This dose could be reduced to 100 mg or 80 mg daily for toxicity. At baseline all patients had bone marrow biopsies and CT scans, and these were repeated at 2 months. Sequential blood and bone marrow samples were tested for lyn kinase activity. Results: Among the 15 patients enrolled there were 10 male and 5 female subjects with a median age of 59 years (40–78 years). ECOG performance status was 0 in 9 subjects, 1 in 3, and 2 in 3 subjects. All patients had previously received fludarabine, and 5 patients required treatment within 6 months of their last regimen. The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range: 1 to 7). By cytogenetic/FISH analysis there were 5 patients with del(17p) and 6 patients with del(11q). All patients required treatment by NCI–WG criteria. The major toxicity encountered was myelosuppression: grade 3 + 4 neutropenia in 10 subjects, grade 3 + 4 thrombocytopenia in 4 subjects. Gastrointestinal toxicity was minor with only 1 subject experiencing grade 3 diarrhea. Other toxicities: 1 patient had a grade 2 pleural effusion, 1 patient had a transient serum K=9.9 (likely an artifact of high white count and without clinical sequelae), and 1 patient had a transiently prolonged QTc of 516 ms. There were no fatal events, and all toxicities were reversible. The median duration on study was 10 weeks, but 5 responding or stable patients have remained on treatment for over 9 months. Partial responses (PR) by NCI-WG criteria were achieved in 2 of the 15 patients (13% with 90% CI 2%–36%). An additional 2 patients would have qualified for PR (lasting &gt;2 months) except for myelosuppression. Among the remaining 11 patients, 6 had nodal responses (2 CR and 4 PR) by physical exam (PE) without a 50% reduction in lymphocytosis. CT scans confirmed nodal responses in 3 of the 10 patients with nodal responses by PE. The relationship between clinical response and lyn kinase, bcl-2, and mcl-1 expression will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Dasatinib has modest activity in CLL, and combinations with standard agents, perhaps in an intermittent schedule, should be considered in subsequent trials.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13029-13029
Author(s):  
E. Gallerani ◽  
S. Cresta ◽  
D. Tosi ◽  
C. Sessa ◽  
G. Capri ◽  
...  

13029 Background: Proteasome inhibition blocks the chemotherapy-induced activation of NF-кB increasing chemosensitivity to anticancer agents due to increased apoptosis. NF-кB is frequently aberrantly activated in primary human carcinomas and over-expressed in aggressive breast cancer lines1 supporting the rationale for combining B with P. We designed a phase I-II and PD trial to determine the recommended dose (RD) of the B&P combination, to screen for antitumor activity in patients with potentially taxane-sensitive tumors, to search for drug-induced changes and to identify potential surrogate markers of drug activity and toxicity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Methods: Eligibility included ECOG performance status < 2, neurotoxicity < 2 and adequate organ functions. Treatment was given Q21 days: B on days 1,4, 8 and 11 and P on days 1 and 8. PBMC for gene expression profiling have been collected on day 1 and 4 before and after therapy. RECIST for response was applied. Results: Twenty-nine patients (20 female, median age 60 yrs) were accrued and 25 are evaluable (breast cancer: 13, ovarian cancer: 7, prostate cancer 1, other 4) ; 16 pts were treated in 4 escalation levels and the RD defined respectively at 1.3 mg/m2/dose & 100 mg/m2/dose for B&P. Neurotoxicity was the main toxicity (G1 36%, G2 20% and 1 case G3) requiring treatment discontinuation in 2 pts at cy 6 & 7. Other toxicities (all grades) were nausea and vomiting (68%), diarrhea (56%, G3 12%), alopecia (52%), asthenia (36%, G2 4%), and myalgia (32%, G2 8%). Antitumor activity consisted of 3 PR in pts with ovarian cancer lasting respectively 14, 8+ and 16 wks; 2 PRs in pts with breast cancer (12+ wks,14+ wks) and 1 PR in a pt with prostate cancer. Conclusions: Thus far the regimen has acceptable toxicity with evidence of antitumor activity. The trial will continue until accrual of four additional patients as planned. Footnotes 1 Adams J Current Opin Oncol 2002, 14:628–634. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 653-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. BlumL. Forero ◽  
M. K. Heiskala ◽  
N. Meneses ◽  
K. Chandrawansa ◽  
F. Fang ◽  
...  

653 Background: E7389 is a synthetic analog of halichondrin B, with a broad anti- proliferative activity against tumor cells. Methods: E7389 was evaluated in an open-label, single-arm Phase II trial as monotherapy for patients with refractory breast cancer (≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens, which must have included an anthracycline and a taxane). E7389 was administered as an IV bolus of 1.4 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (group 1), or on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (group 2). The primary efficacy endpoint was ORR. Results: As of 9 December 2005, 88 patients had received treatment, 68 in group 1 and 20 in group 2. Median age was 55 yrs (range 36–84) and ECOG performance status 0–1. Sixty-six percent of the tumors were ductal carcinomas, 6% lobular, and 27% were unclassified. Sixty percent of the tumors were ER+, 47% PR+, and 17% Her2/neu 3+. The patients had received at least two previous regimens, with a median number of 5 (range 2–14). Forty-eight percent of the patients had also used hormonal therapy. Forty-nine patients in group 1 and 12 patients in group 2 had completed their 2nd cycle of treatment, and twenty-one in group1 and 1 in group 2 their 4th cycle. Safety: The major toxicity related to study drug was neutropenia. Among 73 patients with preliminary safety data available, two patients had Grade 3 febrile neutropenia, and 31 had Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or leukopenia. The other Grade 3 toxicities encountered in more than two patients were dehydration (4 patients) and dyspnea (4 patients). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was reported in 2 patients. Efficacy: At the end of cycle four there were 10 (15.2%) confirmed partial responses (PRs) out of 66 evaluable patients in group 1, and 1 confirmed PR (5.6%) out of 18 evaluable patients in group 2. The median duration of confirmed responses was 113 days. Conclusions: Based on the safety and efficacy in this refractory breast cancer population, E7389 appears to be a therapy worthy of continued investigation in patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer. In order to comply with the current demand for individualized cancer care, bio-markers which would predict the sensitivity to E7389 are being searched in the tumor samples of the patients in the current and forthcoming studies. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document