Encouraging activity of bicalutamide and everolimus in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): Early results from a phase II clinical trial.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 157-157
Author(s):  
C. Pan ◽  
P. Ghosh ◽  
P. Lara ◽  
D. Robles ◽  
L. Beckett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Formation ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Psa Response

157 Background: Multiple signaling pathways are involved in the development of CRPC. We previously showed that the mTOR pathway is activated in CRPC cell lines while inhibition of this pathway results in upregulation of androgen receptor (AR) signaling (Wang et al, Oncogene. 2008). Simultaneous blockade of the mTOR and AR pathways synergize in inducing PCa cell death and delaying tumor formation in mouse models. We hypothesize that simultaneous blockade of the AR and mTOR pathways in CRPC patients with bicalutamide and everolimus will result in improved efficacy compared to bicalutamide alone. Methods: A phase II clinical trial with a lead-in safety phase was designed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of the bicalutamide and everolimus combination in CRPC patients compared with bicalutamide alone. Patients must have histologically confirmed disease and demonstrated disease progression (either by PSA or radiographically) while on androgen deprivation therapy. At the lead-in phase, all patients receive both agents. At the phase II stage, patients are randomized to bicalutamide +/− everolimus. The primary endpoint is PSA response. The second endpoints include progression-free survival, time-to-treatment failure, overall survival and toxicity. Here, we report the results of the lead-in phase. Results: Eight patients were recruited at the lead-in phase. The bicalutamide/everolimus combination was well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. Six of 8 patients have had PSA response after at least 8 weeks of therapy and the remaining two patients had stable PSA response. The median time to disease progression was 6.8 months. Nine patients have been recruited at the phase II stage so far. This clinical trial is being subcontracting to the other sites of the California Cancer Consortium. Tumor and blood specimens are being collected for molecular correlative studies of mTOR pathway markers. Conclusions: The rational combination of bicalutamide and everolimus appears to have promising anti-tumor activity and an acceptable toxicity profile. The randomized phase of the clinical trial is currently ongoing and will be reported. Supported by Novartis. [Table: see text]

A randomized phase II trial of docetaxel plus carboplatin versus docetaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who have progressed after response to prior docetaxel chemotherapy: The RECARDO trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 166-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther W. Bouman-Wammes ◽  
Linda de Munck ◽  
H Pieter van den Berg ◽  
Aart Beeker ◽  
Carolien H. Smorenburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response

166 Background: Docetaxel is the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with castration resistant prostate carcinoma (CRPC). Docetaxel re-challenge has never been tested in a prospective randomized clinical trial. As some studies supported the addition of carboplatin to docetaxel in this setting, we performed a phase II trial investigating the combination of docetaxel plus carboplatin versus docetaxel monotherapy in docetaxel pre-treated CRPC patients. Methods: Patients with CRPC with a progression-free interval (PFI) of at least 3 months after initial treatment with docetaxel were randomized between docetaxel 75mg/m2 or docetaxel 60mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 4, both plus prednisone in a 3-weekly schedule. Treatment was continued until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or completion of 10 cycles. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) (PSA and/or RECIST). Secondary objectives are overall survival, toxicity, PSA response and quality of life. Results: As a result of insufficient recruitment, the study was discontinued early after inclusion of 75 patients, instead of the targeted 150 patients. The median PFS was comparable between both groups (docetaxel 12.7 months versus combination therapy 11.7 months p = 0.99), and no difference in OS was found (median OS 18.5 months versus 18.9 months, p = 0.88). Rates of PSA response were comparable (response/stable PSA in 42.1%/39.4% of the patients in the monotherapy arm versus 35.1%/48.6% in the combination arm, NS). The incidence of grade 3-4 infections and gastro-intestinal (GI) side effects was higher in the docetaxel plus carboplatin arm (GI side effects 0% versus 13.9% p = 0.03; infection 2.7% versus 16.7% p = 0.056). The difference in febrile neutropenia (0% versus 11.1%) is not significant. Conclusions: For patients with CRPC and an initial good response to docetaxel, re-treatment with docetaxel monotherapy is a feasible, save and effective treatment. Addition of carboplatin resulted in more toxicity. Docetaxel re-challenge is a viable therapeutic option for selected patients. Clinical trial information: NTR3070.

CTNI-28. VOLUMETRIC AND DOSIMETRIC PATTERNS OF FAILURE ANALYSIS OF A PHASE II CLINICAL TRIAL OF 18F-DOPA-PET DIRECTED DOSE ESCALATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR GLIOBLASTOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi65-vi65
Author(s):  
William Breen ◽  
S Keith Anderson ◽  
Deanna Pafundi ◽  
Timothy Kaufmann ◽  
Christopher Hunt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Patterns Of Failure ◽  
Dose Volumes

Abstract While dose escalation of radiotherapy (DERT) has failed to improve overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) for glioblastoma in previous studies, a recent phase II clinical trial utilizing 18F-DOPA-PET-directed DERT demonstrated improved PFS in MGMT-unmethylated patients and OS in MGMT-methylated patients compared to historical controls. This planned secondary analysis sought to determine 1) how 18F-DOPA-PET changes RT volumes beyond standard MRI-planning, 2) which patients benefit most and least from this protocol, 3) which are mostly likely to experience clinically significant radionecrosis after DERT, and 4) patterns of failure after DERT. For 69 evaluable patients, median MRI-defined, PET-defined, and combined low-dose gross tumor volumes (GTV51) were 54 cc (range 9-248), 23 cc (0.4-179), and 62 cc (10-260), respectively. Median MRI-defined, PET-defined, and combined high-dose GTVs (GTV76) were 32 cc (range 4-136), 6 cc (0.1-138), and 34 cc (4-162), respectively. 18F-DOPA-PET resulted in a median volumetric expansion of 13% (0-243%) and 5% (0-217%) from MRI-defined low-dose and high-dose GTV’s, respectively. Central failures ( >95% of recurrence tumor volume) occurred within the 76 Gy, 60 Gy, and 51 Gy isodose lines in 32 (46%), 60 (87%), and 64 (93%) patients, respectively. Recursive partitioning analysis stratified patients by OS and PFS. Patients with 18F-DOPA-PET-defined GTV76 > 7.8cc, MRI-defined GTV76 > 42.7cc, and MGMT promotor-unmethylated tumors had the shortest OS, while patients with smaller PET and MRI-defined tumors had the longest OS (median 10.4 vs. 64.6 months, p< 0.001). Similarly, PFS was worst in patients with 18F-DOPA-PET-defined GTV76 > 2.17 cc who had biopsy only (median PFS 3.2 months, p< 0.001). Patients with 18F-DOPA-PET-defined GTV51 > 50 cc had the highest risk of grade 3+ radionecrosis (p< 0.001). In conclusion, larger 18F-DOPA-PET and MRI-defined tumor volumes were associated with worse outcomes, and 18F-DOPA-PET-directed DERT appears to reduce risk of central recurrence in high-dose volumes.

scholarly journals Phase II Clinical Trial of Everolimus in a Pan-Cancer Cohort of Patients with mTOR Pathway Alterations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elio Adib ◽  
Katarzyna Klonowska ◽  
Krinio Giannikou ◽  
Khanh T. Do ◽  
Solida Pruitt-Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Pan Cancer

ProCAID: A phase I clinical trial to combine the AKT inhibitor AZD5363 with docetaxel and prednisolone (DP) chemotherapy for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 228-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon J. Crabb ◽  
Alison J. Birtle ◽  
Karen Martin ◽  
Nichola Downs ◽  
Megan Bowers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Akt Inhibitor ◽  
Clinical Resistance

228 Background: DP extends survival in mCRPC. However emergent clinical resistance is effectively inevitable. Serine/threonine protein kinase AKT (protein kinase B) pathway activation is highly prevalent in mCRPC contributing to disease progression and DP therapeutic resistance. AZD5363 is a potent oral pan-AKT inhibitor. Pre-clinical data suggest activity in mCRPC and synergy with docetaxel. This phase I trial was to develop a DP/AZD5363 combination in mCRPC. Methods: Eligibility included chemotherapy naive histologically/cytologically proven measurable/evaluable mCRPC, PSA or radiographic disease progression, ECOG performance status 0 or 1, serum testosterone <1.7 nmol/L. Treatment comprised DP up to 10 cycles (75 mg/m2, IV, day 1; prednisolone 5 mg BID, PO, day 1–21) and AZD5363 to disease progression. Planned AZD5363 dose levels were 320 mg (DL1), 400 mg (DL2) and 480 mg (DL3), BID, PO, 4 days on/3 days off, from cycle 1, day 2. We utilised a conventional 3+3 dose escalation to determine a recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for AZD5363 combined with DP according to defined dose limiting toxicity (DLT) using CTCAEv4. Results: 10 patients were recruited (4 DL1, 6 DL2), median age 67.5 (Range: 56-72). A median of 6.5 cycles (Range: 3-10) of DP and 4 cycles (Range: 1-13) of AZD5363 were administered. No DLTs were seen in DL1. 2 patients in DL2 experienced DLTs (G3 rash, G3 diarrhoea). 7 pts (70%) had at least one G3/4 IMP-related AE with neutropenia (n=3) and maculo-papular rash (n=3) the most common. G3/4 AEs considered related to AZD5363 occurred in 3 patients (0 DL1, 3 DL2) including maculo-papular rash, diarrhoea and neutropenia. Transient hyperglycaemia occurred in all patients (Random glucose C1D2 pre dose mean 6.0 mmol/L, 2 hour mean 8.7 mmol/L, 4 hour mean 9.5 mmol/L, 8 hour mean 6.5 mmol/L). Conclusions:The RP2D for AZD5363 is 320 mg bd 4 days on/3 days off in combination with full dose DP for mCRPC. A placebo controlled randomised phase II trial for this approach has commenced recruitment. This work was supported by CRUK [C9317/A16029]. CRUK Reference: CRUK/12/042. This research was conducted with support from the Investigator-Sponsored Study Collaboration between AstraZeneca and the National Cancer Research Network. Clinical trial information: NCT02121639.

A phase Ib/II trial of indomethacin and enzalutamide to treat castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS394-TPS394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong-xian Pan ◽  
Primo Lara ◽  
Christopher P. Evans ◽  
Mamta Parikh ◽  
Ralph de Vere White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Androgen Synthesis ◽  
Psa Response

TPS394 Background: Enzalutamide (Enza) and abiraterone (Abi) are commonly used to treat CRPC. Resistance is the most common cause of treatment failure. We discovered that a critical steroidogenic enzyme AKR1C3 was significantly elevated and contributed to intratumoral androgen synthesis in Enza-resistant prostate cancer cells and tumors. Overexpression of AKR1C3 induced androgen receptor variant 7 (AR-V7) expression, while inhibition of AKR1C3 downregulated AR-V7. We then discovered that indomethacin (Indo) inhibited AKR1C3 activation and sensitized resistant CRPC cells to Enza and Abi. One patient accidentally took Indo and achieved biochemical as well as radiological response of his prostate cancer. These findings prompted us to design a clinical trial to test the combination of Indo with Enza for the treatment of CRPC and to study the underlying mechanisms of action and resistance. Methods: This investigator-initiated single-arm Phase Ib/II trial enrolls patients with progressive CRPC after Abi, adequate vital organ function, ECOG performance status 0-2, and serum testosterone < 50 ng/dl. Major exclusion criteria include prior Enza treatment, brain metastasis and history of seizure. In the Phase Ib cohort, patients receive Enza 160 mg po qd and Indo 50 mg po tid to determine toxicity. The Phase II expansion will enroll 26 patients with 21 evaluable patients. This sample size provides 90% power to detect, at the 0.05 level (1-sided), the difference between a PSA response rate of 50% expected with the study treatment and a historical control of 20% with Enza alone. Co-primary endpoints are safety and PSA response of ≥50% decrease. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate as determined by the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria (PCWG2), progression-free survival and overall survival. Molecular correlative studies are exploratory endpoints. Serum and intratumoral androgen levels, full-length AR, AR-V7 and AKR1C3 will be measured to assess the effect of the combination therapy. To date, 4 patients have been enrolled to the trial (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier No: NCT02935205; this trial is funded by DoD Prostate Cancer Research Program IMPACT award). Clinical trial information: NCT02935205.

Early data from a phase II trial investigating the combination of pembrolizumab (PEM) and entinostat (ENT) in relapsed and refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20018-e20018 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Sermer ◽  
Santosha Adipudi Vardhana ◽  
Ashley Ames ◽  
Erin Biggar ◽  
Alison J. Moskowitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hdac Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Immune Recognition ◽  
Cytokine Analysis ◽  
Early Results

e20018 Background: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have single agent activity in various types of lymphoma. They have been shown to restore antigen-specific immune recognition in cancer cells and to downregulate PD-1 expression in circulating T lymphocytes. In preclinical studies, the combination of HDAC inhibitors and anti-PD-1 antibodies acts synergistically against various tumor models in mice. Accordingly, we investigated the safety and efficacy of the novel combination of the HDAC inhibitor ENT and the PD-1-blocking antibody PEM in patients with R/R HL. Methods: Patients with R/R HL received ENT 5-7 mg orally once weekly and PEM 200 mg intravenously once every three weeks. The primary objective is overall response rate (ORR) and 12-month progression-free survival (PFS). Multiplexed serum cytokine analysis of 20 pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines was performed on sera from peripheral blood samples collected at baseline and at 21 days on treatment. Results: At data cutoff on 2/5/20, 14 patients with HL have been enrolled. Out of 13 evaluable patients, 12 responded (92% ORR), including 3 who progressed on prior anti-PD-1 therapy. With a median duration of follow-up of 176 days (21-632), 9 patients are currently receiving treatment on study, 2 discontinued due to toxicity, 1 for progression, and 2 for consolidation with transplant or radiation. After 21 days on treatment, there was a decrease in median serum levels of eotaxin (-39%, p = 0.002), eotaxin-3 (-56%, p = 0.04), MDC (-78%, p = 0.025), MIP1a (-60%, p = 0.025), and TARC (-98%, p < 0.001) and a 3-fold increase in median levels of IFNγ (p = 0.032). There was an association between extent of tumor reduction and greater decrease in the cytokines eotaxin-3 (-62%, p = 0.064), MDC (-90%, p = 0.064), and MIP1a (-85%, p = 0.064), which trended towards statistical significance. Out of 22 total patients enrolled in this study (including 8 patients with follicular lymphoma), 62% had grade ≥3 adverse events (AE), which were predominantly hematologic, including neutropenia (48%), thrombocytopenia (19%), and anemia (10%). Immune-related AEs included 3 cases of hypothyroidism, 2 cases of hepatitis and 1 case of pneumonitis. Four patients who experienced serious AEs due to pericarditis (n = 2), hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and bullous dermatitis were taken off study. Conclusions: Early results from this ongoing phase II clinical trial suggest that the combination of PEM and ENT is safe with encouraging responses in HL. Clinical trial information: NCT03179930 .

scholarly journals Factors Associated with Good Patient Outcomes Following Convalescent Plasma in COVID-19: A Prospective Phase II Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danyal Ibrahim ◽  
Latha Dulipsingh ◽  
Lisa Zapatka ◽  
Reginald Eadie ◽  
Rebecca Crowell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Open Label

We conducted a prospective single-arm open-label phase II clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Convalescent plasma with sufficient IgG titer (1:320) obtained from recovered donors was administered to adult patients with either severe or critical COVID-19 illness. Primary outcomes were adverse events in association with plasma administration, and hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included disease progression, recovery, length of stay, and hospital discharge. Of the 38 patients included in the analysis, 24 (63%) recovered and were discharged, and 14 (37%) died. Patients who received convalescent plasma early in the disease course (severe illness group) as compared to the patients that received convalescent plasma later in disease progression (critical illness group) had significantly lower hospital mortality 13% vs 55% (p<0.02) and shorter mean hospital length of stay 15.4 vs 33 days (p<0.01). One patient experienced a transient transfusion reaction. No other adverse effects of convalescent plasma infusion were observed. Our results suggest that convalescent plasma is safe and has the potential for positive impact on clinical outcomes including recovery and survival if given to patients early in the course of COVID-19 disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document