Phase II trial of BNC105P as second-line chemotherapy for advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre Collaboration.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7079-7079
Author(s):  
Anna K. Nowak ◽  
Chris Brown ◽  
Michael Millward ◽  
Brett Gordon Maxwell Hughes ◽  
David C. Bibby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Tumour Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Vascular Disrupting Agent

7079^ Background: BNC105P is a tubulin polymerization inhibitor that acts as a Vascular Disrupting Agent (VDA), has direct cytotoxic effects, and had preclinical and phase I activity in MPM. This aim of this study was to determine activity and safety of BNC105P as second-line therapy after pemetrexed and a platin in MPM. Methods: Eligible patients had progressive MPM, prior pemetrexed and platinum, measurable disease by modified RECIST, ECOG 0-1, and adequate organ and cardiovascular function. Important exclusions included recent thromboembolic, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, or therapeutic anticoagulation. Pts received BNC105P (16 mg/m2 IV) Day 1 + 8 q21d until progression or toxicity. The primary endpoint was centrally reviewed objective tumour response rate (RR); the Simon 2-stage design assumed a RR of interest of 20% and a RR of no interest of 5%, with α = β = 0.05. Continuation past first stage accrual required >1 objective response in 24 patients. Results: 30 subjects were accrued over 10 months (90% male; median age 65 (range 41-83); 77% ECOG PS 1; histology epithelioid (67%), biphasic (10%), sarcomatoid (7%), other/unspecified (17%)). All pts received at least one dose of study drug; pts received a median of 2 cycles and median dose intensity was 100%. No significant haematologic, biochemical, peripheral neurotoxic or cardiac adverse events (AEs) including hypertension were observed. Grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 10 pts (33%). There were 2 deaths on study: 1 due to stroke, the other due to pneumonia and respiratory failure. We observed 1 partial response (3%) and 13 pts with SD as their best response (43%). Median progression free survival was 1.5 mo (95% CI 1.4-2.4); median overall survival was 8.7 mo (95% CI 3.8-NR). Lung function and QOL data was collected. Biomarker analyses correlating to pharmacological changes induced by BNC105P are ongoing and will be presented. Conclusions: BNC105P was safe and tolerable but its single agent response rate failed to meet the pre-specified primary endpoint of interest.

Sunitinib (SU) in combination with docetaxel (D) versus D alone for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC).

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA1010-LBA1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bergh ◽  
R. Greil ◽  
N. Voytko ◽  
A. Makhson ◽  
J. Cortes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recommended Treatment

LBA1010 Background: Taxane-based chemotherapy (CT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed HER2-negative metastatic BC (MBC). SU, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (MTKI), demonstrated antitumor activity in combination with D in a phase I/II study in pts with MBC. A randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial in pts with newly diagnosed ABC tested the hypothesis that addition of a MTKI to D improves PFS vs. D alone. Methods: Eligible pts (female; ≥18 yrs) had an ECOG PS ≤1, and newly diagnosed HER2-negative MBC or ABC. If (neo)adjuvant therapy included a taxane, relapse must have occurred ≥12 mos after CT. Pts were randomized (1:1) to treatment (tx) with D 75 mg/m2 iv on day 1 and SU 37.5 mg/day po from day 2–15 q3w (Schedule 2/1; Arm A), or to D 100 mg/m2 iv 1-hr infusion q3w (Arm B) that could be given until progression. If D was discontinued in Arm A for reasons other than progressive disease (PD), single-agent SU 37.5 mg daily was permitted until PD. Median, independently assessed, PFS (primary endpoint) was compared between tx arms using stratified and unstratified log-rank tests. Overall objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), pt-reported outcomes, and safety were secondary endpoints. Results: As of the data cutoff (February 1, 2010), the ITT population comprised 593 pts (SU+D, n=296; D, n=297). The trial did not meet its primary endpoint of prolonging PFS based on the independent radiologic assessment or in prolonging OS. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Median relative dose intensity (RDI) was 94.2% and 92.4% for SU+D, and 92.6% for D arms, respectively. Median PFS was 8.6 mos (95% CI 8.2–10.3) in the SU+D arm vs 8.3 mos (95% CI 7.7–9.6) for the D arm (HR 0.922). Median OS was 24.8 mos (95% CI 21.5–33.1) in SU+D arm vs 25.5 mos (95% CI 22.8–27.8) for D arm (HR 1.207). ORR was significantly better for SU+D (51%) vs. D (39%) (p=0.0018). Frequent all causality grade 3/4 adverse events (≥10%) were neutropenia (46%), hand–foot syndrome (17%), and fatigue (12%) in the SU+D arm and neutropenia (44%) in the D arm. Conclusions: Based on these data, SU+D is not a recommended treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed ABC. Strategies using antiangiogenic TKIs that increase RR but not OS may need to be revisited. [Table: see text]

A phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of proxalutamide (GT0918) in subjects with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 108-108
Author(s):  
Tie Zhou ◽  
Dingwei Ye ◽  
Zhongquan Sun ◽  
Qinggui Meng ◽  
Dalin He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Psa Progression

108 Background: GT0918 is a 2nd generation of AR antagonist and capability to down-regulate AR level. This study is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, Ph II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy in patients with mCRPC, and to determine the optimal dose for Ph III study. Methods: Patients with historically confirmed mCRPC who progressed after/intolerant to/reluctant to receive Docetaxel and previously treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide were excluded. All the patients received up to 6 cycles or, unacceptable toxicity, or loss of clinical benefit as recommended by PCWG3. Primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction from baseline. Secondary endpoints included time to PSA progression (TTPP), objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profiles. Results: As of June 30, 2019, 108 treated with GT0918 at three dose levels: 100 mg (n =37), 200 mg (n = 35) and 300 mg (n = 36), the median age of patients was 70.0 years (range 63-77), 88% of patients had stage IV disease at the initial diagnosis and 69.4% had Gleason score ≥ 8. The median duration of disease was 2.88 years. All received prior endocrine therapy, 35.2% received prior chemotherapy, 29.6% received Docetaxel. The median PSA at baseline was 35.285ng/ml, PSA response rate (≥50 % reduction from baseline) was 41.9%. The median time to PSA progression was not reached. There was no significant difference among three arms. Of 19 evaluable patients with target lesions at baseline, the ORR was 15.8% (all were PR) assessed by IRC with RECIST v 1.1, with 20.0% (1/5), 22.2% (2/9), 0 (0/5) at 100, 200, 300 dose level, respectively. The DCR assessed by IRC was 78.9% (CR 0+PR15.8%+SD 63.2%). Of 26 evaluable patients with target lesions at baseline, the ORR was 19.2% assessed by investigators (CR 3.8%+PR 15.4%), with 11.1% (1/9), 20.0% (2/10), 28.6% (2/7) at 100, 200, 300 dose level, respectively. Overall, AEs were experienced by most of patients (94.4 %, n=102). AEs leading to drug interruption were reported in 13 patients (12.0%), 9 (8.3%)of them were suspected to be drug related. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 6 patients (5.6%), 3(2.8%) were possibly related to GT0918. 14 patients (13.0%) experienced Grade 3 and 4 AEs. 17 patients (15.7%)experienced SAE, 5(4.6%) of them were suspected to be related to study drug. Most of AEs were mild or moderate. The common suspected AE (≥10%) were asthenia (17.6%, n=19), anemia (14.8%, n=16), AST increased (14.8%, n=16), ALT increased (13.0%, n=14), decreased appetite (13.0%, N=14), white blood cell count decreased (12.0%, n=13), proteinuria (12.0%, n=13). Conclusions: GT0918 showed a manageable safety profile. This study provided preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with mCRPC. 200mg/day is recommended dose for Ph III trial. Clinical trial information: CTR20170177.

A dose attenuated schedule of irinotecan and capecitabine in combination with celecoxib in advanced colorectal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3584-3584
Author(s):  
B. F. El-Rayes ◽  
A. F. Shields ◽  
U. Vaishampayan ◽  
L. K. Heilbrun ◽  
M. M. Zalupski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Cox 2

3584 Background: The cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme is overexpressed in the majority of colorectal cancers. Inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme can sensitize colorectal cancer cells to the apoptotic effects of chemotherapeutic agents and block angiogenesis. This phase II study was undertaken to determine the effects of adding celecoxib to a dose attenuated irinotecan and capecitabine regimen. Methods: The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan, capecitabine, and celecoxib. Previously untreated patients, except for adjuvant therapy, with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were eligible for this study. Patients received irinotecan 70 mg/m2 (over 30 minutes) on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day from day 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. Celecoxib was administered at a dose of 400 mg twice-daily starting on day -7 until termination from study. Results: A total of 51 patients (median age 58 years) have been enrolled on the study. The results presented are for the first 48 patients registered to the study. Median performance status was 1. A median number of 5.5 cycles (range 0- 18) were administered. In an intention to treat analysis, objective response rate was 50%. The median progression free survival was 6.9 months (90%CI; 4.7–8.2). Median survival is ≥19.4 months. No treatment related deaths were observed. The only grade 4 toxicity was diarrhea in 2 (4%) patients. Grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (33%), hand-foot syndrome (8%), nausea (13%), vomiting (8%) and neutropenia (12%). Conclusion: Lowering the dose intensity of irinotecan in this study did not appear to compromise the treatment outcome and markedly improved the therapeutic index of this combination. Celecoxib can be safely administered in combination with irinotecan and capecitabine. Based on the observed progression free survival and response rate, the regimen has promising activity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Efficacy of oral vinorelbine (NVBo), capecitabine (X) and trastuzumab (H) triple combination (NVBoXH) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC): First results of an international phase II trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1052-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Chan ◽  
V. Ganju ◽  
D. Becquart ◽  
P. Conte ◽  
L. Petruzelka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Oral Vinorelbine

1052 Background: Chemotherapy (CT) plus H is the standard first-line treatment for HER2-positive MBC. H plus vinorelbine is an active and well-tolerated regimen in this setting. The all-oral combination of NVBo and X also appears active and well-tolerated in MBC. We report efficacy and safety results from the first 34 patients (pts) included in an international trial evaluating NVBoXH in HER2-positive MBC. Methods: In this multicenter trial, main eligibility criteria included: HER2-positive disease (IHC 3+ or FISH+), documented measurable MBC previously untreated by CT, relapse 6 months after completing neoadjuvant or adjuvant CT, Karnofsky PS = 70, age =18 years. Pts received 3-weekly cycles of NVBo 60 mg/m2 (cycle 1) escalating to 80 mg/m2 (from cycle 2) days 1 and 8; × 1,000 mg/m2 bid (750 if = 65 years) days 1–14; H 4 mg/kg day 1 as a loading dose then 2 mg/kg i.v. weekly starting on day 8. Treatment was continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint is overall response rate. Results: Baseline characteristics: median age 54 years (20% = 65); prior (neo)adjuvant CT 21 pts (62%); type of CT: anthracycline 52%, anthracycline + taxane 29%, CMF 14%, taxane 5%; visceral involvement 29 pts (85%), >2 metastatic sites 13 pts (38%). Treatment administered: median 8 cycles, median relative dose intensity: NVBo 77%, X 81%, H 95%; NVBo dose escalation to 80 mg/m2 in 91% of pts. Safety (n=34, G3/4 NCI CTC v2 adverse events): neutropenia 22 pts (65%), diarrhea 4 pts (12%), febrile neutropenia 3 pts (9%), vomiting 3 pts (9%), hand-foot syndrome 3 pts (9%), asthenia 3 pts (9%), infection without neutropenia 2 pts (6%), LVEF decline 2 pts (6%), stomatitis 1 pt (3%), nausea 1 pt (3%), constipation 1 pt (3%). Efficacy (n=31 evaluable pts): objective response rate (RECIST) 71% (95% CI [52–86]), CR 13%, PR 58%, SD 23%, PD 6%, disease control (CR+PR+ SD for =6 months) 84%. Progression-free survival, overall survival and duration of response data are not yet mature. Conclusions: This is the first trial, in pts with HER2-positive MBC, to show high efficacy with first-line NVBoXH therapy. This regimen can be safely administered in this pt population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Bevacizumab (BEV) plus second-line taxane (TAX) or other chemotherapy (CT) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Subgroup analysis of RIBBON-2.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 290-290
Author(s):  
A. Brufsky ◽  
V. Valero ◽  
B. Tiangco ◽  
S. R. Dakhil ◽  
A. Brize ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

290 Background: In three randomized trials in the first-line metastatic breast cancer (MBC) setting, combining BEV with CT significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) and objective response rate (ORR) vs. CT alone. BEV also showed a significant PFS benefit in the second-line MBC setting (RIBBON-2) when combined with TAX or other CT. We analyzed data from the subgroup of patients (pts) with TNBC in RIBBON-2. Methods: Eligible pts had MBC that had progressed on first-line CT without BEV. Second-line CT (TAX, gemcitabine, capecitabine, or vinorelbine) was chosen before 2:1 randomization to CT with either BEV (10 mg/kg q2w or 15 mg/kg q3w) or placebo (PLA). All pts could receive BEV at progression. The primary endpoint was PFS. Results: RIBBON-2 included 684 pts; 159 (23%) had TNBC and of these, 67 (42%) received TAX with BEV/PLA. Baseline characteristics were broadly similar in the two treatment arms. In an exploratory analysis of pts with TNBC, BEV + CT led to significantly improved PFS and ORR vs. CT alone, and a trend toward improved overall survival (OS). The magnitude of the effect was particularly pronounced in pts receiving TAX CT. Conclusions: Pts with TNBC derive significant ORR and PFS benefit from BEV combined with second-line CT. Despite the small sample size, there was a trend (HR 0.624; p = 0.0534) toward OS benefit in pts treated with BEV, especially with TAX CT. [Table: see text]

A phase II, multicenter, open-label study of YM155 plus docetaxel in subjects with stage III (unresectable) or stage IV melanoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8587-8587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Leta Steinberg ◽  
Agop Y. Bedikian ◽  
D. Scott Ernst ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Bruce Redman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Benefit Rate

8587 Background: Survivin is a microtubule-associated protein implicated in both preservation of cell viability and regulation of mitosis in tumor cells. It is over-expressed in melanoma, breast, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. YM155 is a first in class survivin inhibitor. Methods: The study had 2 parts: Part 1 established the dose of docetaxel that was tolerable in combination withYM155 at 5 mg/m2/day continuous infusion over 168 hours q 3 weeks. Part 2 utilized the dose of docetaxel established in Part 1 to further evaluate the tolerability and activity of the combination. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate, 1-year overall survival (OS), time from first response to progression, clinical benefit rate, time to response, and safety. Results: 64 patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with docetaxel followed by continuous infusion YM155. 7 patients were treated with 100mg/m2 of docetaxel and 57 patients were treated with 75mg/m2 of docetaxel. Median age was 59, with 44 men and 20 women treated. 6-month PFS per Independent Review Committee (IRC) was 34.8% (95% CI 21.3 – 48.6%). Overall objective response rate per IRC was 12.5%, with no complete responses (CR) and 8 patients with partial responses (PR). The Stable disease (SD) rate was 51.6%, leading to a clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD) of 64.1%. Estimated 1-year overall survival is 50.5%. 87.5% of patients experienced a Grade 3 (G3) or Grade 4 (G4) event attributable to either YM155 or docetaxel. The clinically pertinent G3 or 4 toxicities occurring in greater than 5% of patients treated included neutropenia (59.4%), febrile neutropenia (12.5%), mucositis (9.4%), fatigue (7.8%), diarrhea (6.3%), and dehydration (6.3%). There were 3 deaths on study, all attributable to disease progression. Conclusions: YM155 is a novel agent that shows modest activity when combined with docetaxel in patients with melanoma. YM155 was generally well tolerated, but the pre-determined primary endpoint for efficacy was not achieved.

REVEL: A randomized, double-blind, phase III study of docetaxel (DOC) and ramucirumab (RAM; IMC-1121B) versus DOC and placebo (PL) in the second-line treatment of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following disease progression after one prior platinum-based therapy.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA8006-LBA8006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice Perol ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Oscar Arrieta ◽  
Kumar Prabhash ◽  
Konstantinos N. Syrigos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Pulmonary Hemorrhage ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Double Blind

LBA8006^ Background: RAM is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets the extracellular domain of VEGFR-2. The REVEL study evaluated the efficacy and safety of RAM+DOC vs. PL+DOC (DOC) in patients (pts) with stage IV nonsquamous (NSQ) and squamous (SQ) NSCLC after platinum-based therapy. Methods: Pts with NSQ and SQ stage IV NSCLC were randomized 1:1 (stratified by sex, region, ECOG PS, and prior maintenance therapy) to receive DOC 75 mg/m2 in combination with either RAM 10 mg/kg or PL on day 1 of a 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Results: Between Dec 2010 and Feb 2013, 1,253 pts (26.2% SQ) were randomized (RAM+DOC: 628; DOC: 625). Pt characteristics were balanced between arms. ORR was 22.9% for RAM+DOC and 13.6% for DOC (P<0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.762 (P<0.0001); median PFS was 4.5 months (m) for RAM+DOC vs. 3.0m for DOC. REVEL met its primary endpoint; the OS HR was 0.857 (95% CI 0.751, 0.98; P=0.0235); median OS was 10.5m for RAM+DOC vs. 9.1m for DOC. OS was longer for RAM+DOC in most pt subgroups, including SQ and NSQ histology. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurring in >5% of pts on RAM+DOC were neutropenia (34.9% vs. 28.0%), febrile neutropenia (15.9% vs. 10.0%), fatigue (11.3% vs. 8.1%), leukopenia (8.5% vs. 7.6%), hypertension (5.4% vs. 1.9%), and pneumonia (5.1% vs. 5.8%). Grade 5 AEs were comparable between arms (5.4% vs. 5.8%), as was pulmonary hemorrhage (any grade; all pts: 2.1% vs. 1.6%; SQ pts: 3.8% vs. 2.4%). Conclusions: REVEL demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in ORR, PFS, and OS for RAM+DOC vs DOC in NSCLC pts with stage IV NSCLC as second-line treatment after platinum-based therapy. Benefits were similar in NSQ and SQ pts, and no unexpected AEs were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT01168973.

Multicenter phase II study of cetuximab plus docetaxel in 84 patients with recurrent or metastatic, platinum-pretreated SCCHN

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6048-6048 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. K. Knoedler ◽  
T. Gauler ◽  
A. Matzdorff ◽  
O. Jordan ◽  
M. Schroeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitivity ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
To Receive

6048 Background: Cetuximab and docetaxel are both active in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We investigated the efficacy of cetuximab plus docetaxel as second-line treatment in platinum-pre-treated patients with recurrent and or metastatic SCCHN. Methods: 84 patients were enrolled and received cetuximab (initial dose of 400 mg/m2, followed by subsequent weekly doses of 250 mg/m2) and docetaxel (35 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 of a 4-week cycle) for a maximum of 6 cycles. Patients with stable disease continued to receive cetuximab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate according to RECIST criteria. Secondary endpoints were response rate in relation to platinum sensitivity, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. Results: According to RECIST there were 10 PR (12%) and 23 SD (27%), resulting in a disease control rate of 39%. Response to protocol treatment was unrelated to previous platinum sensitivity. Median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 5.1) and median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.5). The duration on protocol treatment exceeded 12 months in 6 (8%) patients. Grade III/IV toxicities included gastric perforation (n = 1), pneumonia (n = 7), mucositis and skin toxicities. Conclusions: Cetuximab plus docetaxel was an active second-line treatment regimen with acceptable toxicity in patients with platinum-pretreated SCCHN. The responsiveness was independent of previous platinum sensitivity. [Table: see text]

A phase II trial of panitumumab with irinotecan and S-1 (IRIS) as second-line treatment in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 732-732
Author(s):  
Rai Shimoyama ◽  
Tetsuo Kimura ◽  
Toshi Takaoka ◽  
Kazuki Sakamoto ◽  
Shunji Kawamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

732 Background: Panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in second-line chemotherapy increased objective response rate and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus FOLFIRI alone in patients with wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (Peeters et al, J Clin Oncol 2010). This trial (UMIN000004659) evaluated tolerability and efficacy of combination therapy with irinotecan and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine (IRIS) plus panitumumab as second-line chemotherapy in patients with WT KRASmCRC. Methods: Main inclusion criteria were: patients with WT KRAS mCRC refractory to one prior chemotherapy regimen for mCRC, ECOG PS 0-2, and age ≥20 years. Patients received panitumumab (6 mg/m2) and irinotecan (100 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 and S-1 (40-60 mg according to body surface area) twice daily for 2 weeks, repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was completion rate of protocol therapy (CRT). The secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in 9 centers. The overall CRT was 62.2% (23/37). Most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were: skin rash (24%), diarrhea (16%), and appetite loss (11%). The overall RR was 32.4% (12/37). Of these, four patients underwent conversion surgery. Median PFS and OS were 9.5 months (95% CI: 3.5-15.4 months) and 20.1 months (95% CI: 16.7-23.2 months), respectively. Conclusions: IRIS plus panitumumab has acceptable toxicity profile and promising efficacy in patients with previously treated WT KRAS mCRC. This regimen can be an additional treatment option for second-line chemotherapy in WT KRAS mCRC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000004659.

Efficacy and safety of CetuGEX in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RM-HNSCC): Results from the randomized phase II RESGEX study.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 59-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Keilholz ◽  
Andrzej Kawecki ◽  
Andreas Dietz ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Epidermal Growth

59 Background: Standard treatment for RM-HNSCC is a combination of cisplatin (P), 5-FU (F), and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blocking monoclonal antibody cetuximab. CetuGEX is a new monoclonal antibody sharing the identical EGFR-binding domain with cetuximab, but a modified Fc part by a proprietary glycosylation method to optimize antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Methods: Patients with RM-HNSCC without relevant comorbidities were randomized to receive up to 6 cycles of P 100 mg/m2, F 4 x 1000 mg/m2/24hrs and CetuGEX vs. cetuximab. Initial dose of cetuximab was 400mg/m2, followed by weekly 250 mg/m2. CetuGEX was given as 990 mg, followed by weekly 720 mg. After end of combination treatment, patients received single agent antibody maintenance until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Stratification factors included FcγRIIIa status, primary tumor site, EGFR pretreatment vs. naïve, and recurrent vs. metastatic disease. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by immune related response criteria (irRC). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and overall survival (OS) as well as safety and QoL. Results: During Jan 2014 and Feb 2016, 240 patients were accrued in 34 European centers, of which 123 received cetuximab and 117 CetuGEX. The median follow-up was 15 month until May 2017. No difference was observed for the primary endpoint of PFS by irRC [median 27.7 (CetuGEX) and 26.4 (cetuximab) weeks; HR 1.003; 95%-CI 0.738 – 1.363; p = 0.98]. No advantage of CetuGEX over cetuximab was observed for all other secondary efficacy endpoints and subgroup analyses by stratification factors. Infusion related reactions (IRR) were higher for CetuGEX (38.8%) than for cetuximab (5.7%) (Pearson chi2= 37.08; p < 0.0001), but without sequelae. Conclusions: The RESGEX study is the first head-to-head comparison of an ADCC-optimized to a conventional EGFR-directed antibody. The study failed to show superior efficacy of CetuGEX over cetuximab. Both compounds appear to have the same efficacy and a similar safety profile. Glycosylation changes in the Fc part induced more IRRs. Clinical trial information: NCT02052960.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document