Adjuvant sunitinib in high-risk patients with uveal melanoma: A pilot study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8560-8560
Author(s):  
Matias Emanuel Valsecchi ◽  
Nancy Shockley ◽  
Deborah Summers ◽  
Carol L Shields ◽  
Jerry A Shields ◽  
...  

8560 Background: Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular cancer in adults. Despite the successful treatments for primary tumors, up to 50% of the patients later die of distant metastases. Currently no effective adjuvant treatment is available for these patients. Our group previously reported that sunitinib stabilized systemic metastases in 65% of uveal melanoma patients who failed prior treatments. In this pilot study, we tested sunitinib in an adjuvant setting in high-risk patients with primary uveal melanoma. Methods: Patients with estimated metastatic death rate ≥ 50% based on the following criteria were eligible: (1) monosomy 3 and 8q amplification; (2) large tumor (≥ 15 mm in diameter and ≥7 mm in thickness); (3) monosomy 3 and other risk factors (large tumor, epithelioid dominant cell type, local recurrence, or extra-scleral extension). Sunitinib was given at 25 mg PO daily for at least 6 months. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis (SPSS 17.0). Secondary endpoint was safety. Results: A total of 23 Caucasian patients (median, 54 years; range: 25 – 77) were enrolled. All patients received sunitinib for at least 6 months (range: 6 – 12). Eighteen patients had confirmed monosomy 3, from whom 13 (72%) also showed 8q amplification. The median follow-up was 24 months (range 12 – 54 months). Only one patient died of unknown cause (OS: 30.4 months). A total of seven patients (30%) developed systemic metastases, all of which were liver metastases. The DFS and OS rates at 2 years were 70% (95% CI: 47 – 86%) and 100%, respectively. The OS rate at 2 years was better than historical control with monosomy 3 patients (51%, 95% CI: 31 – 71%) (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44:1008). In those patients who relapsed, the median time to progression after finishing sunitinib was 2 months (range: 0 – 8). The most common adverse events were: diarrhea (47%), fatigue (39%), dermatitis (30%), stomatitis (13%), leucopenia (8%), and nausea (4%). Most were grade 1 or 2 (88%) and only one was considered grade 4 (diarrhea). Conclusions: In high-risk uveal melanoma patients with estimated metastatic death rate of ≥ 50%, adjuvant sunitinib showed promising results and deserves further investigation.

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K. Rosner ◽  
Timothy R. Kuklo ◽  
Rabih Tawk ◽  
Ross Moquin ◽  
Stephen L. Ondra

Object The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in high-risk patients who undergo major spine reconstruction. Methods In the pilot study, 22 patients undergoing major spine reconstruction received prophylactic IVC filters. These patients were prospectively followed to evaluate complications related to the filter, the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) formation, and the rate of pulmonary embolism (PE). These data were compared with those obtained in a retrospective review for PE in a matched cohort treated at the same institution. At a second institution the treatment guidelines were implemented in 17 patients undergoing complex spine surgery with the same follow-up criteria. In the pilot study, no patient experienced PE (0%), whereas two had DVT (9%). Bilateral DVT developed postoperatively in one patient (associated morbidity rate 4.5%), who required thrombolytic therapy. One patient died of unrelated surgical complications. The PE rate in the matched cohort at the same institution was 12%. At the second institution, no patient had PE, and no complications were noted. Conclusions In this patient population, prophylactic IVC filter placement appears to decrease the PE rate substantially, from 12 to 0%. The placement of IVC filters appears to be a safe and efficacious intervention for prevention of PE in high-risk patients.


Ophthalmology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matias E. Valsecchi ◽  
Marlana Orloff ◽  
Rino Sato ◽  
Inna Chervoneva ◽  
Carol L. Shields ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22059-e22059
Author(s):  
Takami Sato ◽  
Marlana M. Orloff ◽  
Matias Emanuel Valsecchi ◽  
Ayako Shimada ◽  
Inna Chervoneva ◽  
...  

e22059 Background: Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular cancer in adults. Despite successful treatment of primary tumors, up to 50% of patients later die of distant metastases. Currently, no effective adjuvant treatment is available. Presence of both monosomy 3 and 8q amplification (M3 + 8q amp) or DecisionDx-UM Class 2 in the primary uveal melanoma characterizes a group of patients with high metastatic death rates with reported 2-year survival rates ranging from 50% to 78%. This study aims to decrease or delay the death from metastatic uveal melanoma. Methods: Uveal melanoma patients with high risk for systemic metastasis defined as any of the following were eligible: A) M3 + 8q amp; B) Class 2. Patients must show no evidence of systemic metastasis and they need to be enrolled within 6 months of initial treatment of primary uveal melanoma. Patients were randomized to receive either sunitinib 25 mg daily or valproic acid (VPA) 750 mg daily as adjuvant treatment for 6 consecutive months. Improvement of 2-year overall survival (OS) rate from historical reference (70%) to 85% was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included 1) systemic relapse-free survival (RFS) rate at 18 months, 2) ability to complete adjuvant treatment and, 3) toxicity assessment. The study was not powered to compare the efficacy between each arm. Results: A total of 90 patients were enrolled in this study. Two patients were excluded from the study including one in the sunitinib arm (did not start treatment after randomization) and one in the VPA arm (refused to stop VPA at 6 months). Nine of 45 patients in the sunitinib arm and 4 of 43 patients in the VPA arm could not complete the 6-month treatment due to toxicity (sunitinib n = 6, VPA n = 2) or systemic progression (sunitinib n = 3, VPA n = 2). The rest of patients completed the 6-month course of study treatments and all patients were followed at least for 2 years. With a median follow-up of 40.2 months, the 2-year OS rates of the sunitinib and VPA group were 95.6% (90% CI 86.5-98.6) and 90.7% (90% CI 80.1 - 95.8), respectively. The 18-month RFS rates of the sunitinib and VPA group were 75.6% (90% CI 63.1 - 84.3) and 62.8% (90% CI 49.4 - 73.5), respectively. Conclusions: Although the study is still ongoing, adjuvant sunitinib and VPA were considered to be safe and tolerable treatments for high-risk uveal melanoma. Sunitinib showed a tendency for a better outcome, thus a Cohort 2 was created to investigate the safety and potential improvement of 18-month RFS rate with 12 months of treatment with sunitinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02068586.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 554-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Guarracino ◽  
L. Cabrini ◽  
R. Baldassarri ◽  
C. Cariello ◽  
R. D. Covello ◽  
...  

Thyroid ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 480-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Bartenstein ◽  
Elisa Caballero Calabuig ◽  
Carlo Ludovico Maini ◽  
Renzo Mazzarotto ◽  
M. Angustias Muros de Fuentes ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 175114371989279
Author(s):  
Matthew Baldwin ◽  
Bruce McCormick ◽  
Mark Foale ◽  
Martha Belete ◽  
Connie Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document