Risk factors for oral mucositis (OM) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving high-dose melphalan (Mel) prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19565-e19565
Author(s):  
Bhavana Bhatnagar ◽  
Olga G. Goloubeva ◽  
Steven Gilmore ◽  
Arnold Hoffman ◽  
Kathleen Ruehle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
High Serum ◽  
P Value ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
High Dose Melphalan ◽  
The Impact

e19565 Background: OM is a common complication of high-dose melphalan in MM patients (pts). Proposed risk factors for OM in SCT include: low albumin and high serum creatinine (Cr) levels, both were evaluated in MM patients undergoing Mel/ASCT. (Grazziutti, ML, Bone Marrow Transplant 2006). Methods: This is a single center retrospective chart review of 214 sequentially treated MM pts who received Mel 200mg/m2 conditioning prior to SCT between January 2005-September 2011. Data collected included: demographics, Hgb, Cr, C-reactive protein and albumin on the day of SCT, length of hospital stay. OM assessment was graded as follows: Grade 1, no OM; Grade 2, mild OM; the pts maintained adequate oral intake; Grade 3, decreased oral intake and/or use of oral narcotics; Grade 4, severe OM needing intravenous narcotics. Results: The table below describes pt characteristics grouped by OM grade. Overall, 56 pts (27%) had grade 3/4 OM. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed no statistically significant correlation between OM grade and Hgb, Cr, albumin, CRP; the overall test’s p value = 0.55. There were no racial or gender differences with regard to grade of mucositis, the p-values range are 0.75 and 0.31, respectively (likelihood ratio chi-square test). Most interestingly, OM did not impact length of hospital stay. Conclusions: We did not establish any predictive risk factors for OM as previously described. Analysis of the impact of OM on MM response and event and overall survival will be presented. Studies of Mel pharmacogenetics may provide insight to patients' predisposition to OM. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Impaired Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Increased Length of Hospital Stay Following Hysterectomy on Benign Indications in Premenopausal Women: a Study From the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (03) ◽  
pp. 288-299
Author(s):  
Ninnie Borendal Wodlin
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Gynecological Surgery ◽  
National Register ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction The aims of the study were to evaluate the impact of intra- and postoperative complications on satisfaction one year after hysterectomy for benign conditions, to determine risk factors for low patient satisfaction and to analyze whether complications were associated with the length of hospital stay. Material and Methods A retrospective study of 27 938 women from the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions between January 2004 and June 2016. Data were obtained from prospectively collected pre-, peri- and postoperative forms. Statistical analyses were performed using multivariable logistic regression models. Crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Results More than 90% were satisfied with the hysterectomy. Dissatisfaction was associated with complications. Pelvic pain as indication, preoperatively having less expectations to get rid of symptoms or being alleviated from surgery, and current smoking were also risk factors for low patient satisfaction. Vaginal and abdominal subtotal hysterectomies were associated with high satisfaction. Occurrence of complications intra- and postoperatively before discharge was associated with increased length of hospital stay, as well as occurrence and severity of complications reported after discharge from hospital. Conclusions Complications were strongly associated with lower patient satisfaction. Preoperative expectations of surgery, indication, mode of surgery and life-style factors had impact on the satisfaction. Patient-centered information to ensure realistic expectations and prevention of complications seem to be essential to gain optimal patient satisfaction with surgery.

International multi-centre study of incidence and risk factors of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and or pulmonary embolism (PE) in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8555-8555 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. P. Secin ◽  
G. Fournier ◽  
I. S. Gill ◽  
C. C. Abbou ◽  
C. Schulmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Lung Ventilation ◽  
The United States ◽  
P Value ◽  
Tobacco Exposure ◽  
Multi Centre Study ◽  
Exact Test

8555 Background: There is no data regarding the incidence and variables associated with symptomatic DVT and or PE in patients undergoing LRP. Our aim was to evaluate the multi-centric incidence and risk factors for perioperative symptomatic DVT and PE after LRP. Methods: Patients with symptomatic DVT and or PE occurring within 2 months of surgery since start of the respective institutional LRP experience were included. Eight academic centers from both the United States and Europe participated. Diagnoses were made by Doppler ultrasound for DVT; and lung ventilation/perfusion scan and or chest computed tomography for PE. Associations between variables and DVT and/or PE were evaluated using Fisher’s exact test for categorical predictors and logistic regression for continuous predictors. Results: Patient reoperation (p value) (<0.001), tobacco exposure (0.02), prior DVT (0.007), larger prostate size (0.02) and length of hospital stay (0.009) were significantly associated with higher risk of symptomatic DVT/PE. The nonuse of perioperative heparin was not a risk factor (1), as well as neoadjuvant therapy (1), perioperative transfusion (0.1), body mass index (0.9), surgical technique (0.3), operating time (0.2) and pathologic stage (0.5). There were no related deaths. Patients receiving preoperative heparin had significantly higher mean operative blood loss, 480cc vs 332cc (<0.001) However, this did not translate into longer hospital stay (0.07); higher transfusion rates (0.09) or reoperation rates (0.3). The estimated cost of heparin prophylaxis in these patients exceeded $2.5 million. Conclusion: The incidence of symptomatic DVT or PE was similar despite different prophylactic regimens. Our data does not support the administration of prophylactic heparin in LRP to low risk patients (no prior DVT, no tobacco exposure, no prostate enlargement and or no anticipation of prolonged hospital stay). [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Impact of surgical delays on pre-operative complications in primary GBM patients- a 5-year study

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv15-iv15
Author(s):  
Thaaqib Nazar ◽  
Stephen Price
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Operative Complication ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is one of the most aggressive primary brain tumors with poor prognosis (median survival 18 months) and no cure. Management strategies often involve maximum safe resection followed by chemoradiotherapy. There has been a move from managing such patients electively rather than the traditional model of treating them as an emergency. While this may have advantages, this can delay the time from presentation to operation. This delay has recently been further compounded by the current COVID-19 pandemic. There is no data available as to whether the surgical delays that are currently occurring have an impact on patient care, and may outweigh the benefits of elective management on health services. We aimed to conduct a single centre observational study to assess how long patients should be waiting prior to surgery. We hypothesised that the longer the wait, the higher the pre-operative complication rate and worse the outcomes. Method 698 patients in a GBM database over a 5-year period (29/10/14- 8/11/19) were studied. All patient data was accessed via electronic patient records Surgical delay was defined as the interval between date of being put on the waiting list (the date seen in the neuro-oncology clinic) to date of surgery. Primary outcome measure was preoperative complications, which was categorised into transient neurological decline, stroke, seizures, diabetes/erratic blood sugars, emergency admission, others (e.g., cardiovascular compromise, steroid complications, blood disorders) Inclusion criteria included: First presentation supratentorial WHO Grade 4 GBM confirmed on histology (this included histological variants such as Gliosarcoma and Epithelioid Glioblastoma), and all patients who had been seen in the neuro-oncology clinic prior to surgery. Exclusion criteria included all patients who were not thought to have a GBM or high-grade glioma on initial imaging, those admitted as an emergency without being seen in a neuro-oncology clinic, recurrent or secondary GBMs. Results 460 patients met the inclusion criteria in this study. There was a pre-operative complication rate of 14.6% (67/460). 55% of complications were due to a transient neurological decline (37/67) with 16.4 % (11/67) of patients presenting with seizures. For those with surgical delays ≤7 days pre-operative complication rates were 2.2 % vs 15.9% in those with delays &gt;7 days, p value 0.012, Odds ratio 8.53 (95% CI 1.48- 88.09). Results were statistically significant in those with delays greater than 10 and 14 days (p values 0.0026 and 0.0004 respectively) ROC Curve analysis revealed an AUC of 0.66 with sensitivities of 99%, 90% and 76% at surgical delays of 7,10 and 14 days respectively. The median length of hospital admission in both groups of patients was 5 days (p= 0.2065) All statistical analysis was carried out using Prism 9 and SPSS Conclusion In spite of unchanged length of hospital stay, we note a significant increase in pre-operative complication rates as a result of surgical delays greater than 7,10 and 14 days, which introduces an interesting debate in the merit of delaying operations for further assessment in clinic. Our objectives would be to minimize complication rate, therefore a high sensitivity i.e. true positive rate would be most desirable. The 99% levels achieved at 7 days In the ROC analysis lends weight to introducing policy to fast-track admissions for primary GBM patients. Further directions could include assessing the impact reduced surgical services and redeployment might have had on complications rates and length of hospital stay on patients admitted over the COVID 19 pandemic.

scholarly journals P23: ENHANCED RECOVERY PROGRAMME – DOES PREOPERATIVE EDUCATION REDUCE LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAY (LOS) IN PRIMARY HIP & KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ahmad ◽  
H Rahman ◽  
N Awan
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Preoperative Education ◽  
Educational Group ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Total knee and hip arthroplasty significantly improve quality of life in people suffering from end-stage hip & knee arthritides. Enhanced recovery programs have shown improved outcomes following elective arthroplasty by decreasing patients anxiety, postoperative pain and reducing the length of hospital stay (LOS). The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of preoperative education programs on length of hospital stay in patients undergoing hip & knee arthroplasty. Method Retrospective data was collected from a consecutive series of 520 patients' charts and Irish National Orthopedic Register (INOR) who underwent Hip or Knee arthroplasty from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018, in Our Lady Hospital, Navan. The length of stay study compared two hundred and twenty-six patients in the Educational Group (EG) who attended the Hip & Knee School (Preoperative Education Class) with 294 patients in the Conventional Group (CG) who did not attend the hip and knee educational programme. Result We identified that Length of Hospital Stay decreased to 5.2 days in Educational Group from 5.5 days in Conventional Group (P-value equals to 0.26, statistically insignificant, t = 1.1093 df = 518), with a mean difference of only 0.3 days (95% confidence interval). Conclusion Preoperative education does not reduce the length of hospital stay in primary hip & knee arthroplasty. Take-home message Preoperative education has no role in reducing hospital stay in Arthroplasty patients.

Indications and practice of enteral nutrition

2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (51) ◽  
pp. 2028-2033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judit Hallay ◽  
Dániel Nagy ◽  
Béla Fülesdi
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Nutrition Therapy ◽  
Present Review ◽  
Hospitalised Patients ◽  
Impact On Treatment ◽  
Efficacy Of Treatment

Malnutrition in hospitalised patients has a significant and disadvantageous impact on treatment outcome. If possible, enteral nutrition with an energy/protein-balanced nutrient should be preferred depending on the patient’s condition, type of illness and risk factors. The aim of the nutrition therapy is to increase the efficacy of treatment and shorten the length of hospital stay in order to ensure rapid rehabilitation. In the present review the authors summarize the most important clinical and practical aspects of enteral nutrition therapy. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(51), 2028–2033.

565 POST-OPERATIVE WEIGHT LOSS AND OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ESOPHAGECTOMY

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Khaw ◽  
S Munro ◽  
J Sturrock ◽  
H Jaretzke ◽  
S Kamarajah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Failure To Thrive ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Postoperative Weight Loss ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract   Oesophageal cancer is the 11th most common cancer worldwide, with oesophagectomy remaining the mainstay curative treatment, despite significant associated morbidity and mortality. Postoperative weight loss remains a significant problem and is directly correlated to poor prognosis. Measures such as the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme and intraoperative jejunostomy feed have looked to tackle this. This study investigates the impact of these on mortality, length of hospital stay and postoperative weight loss. Methods Patients undergoing oesophagectomy between January 1st 2012—December 2014 and 28th October 2015–December 31st 2019 in a national tertiary oesophagogastric unit were included retrospectively. Variables measured included comorbidities, operation, histopathology, weights (pre- and post-operatively), length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and mortality. Pre-operative body weight was measured at elective admission, and further weights were identified from a prospectively maintained database, during further clinic appointments. Other data was collected through patient notes. Results 594 patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 65.9 years (13–65). Majority of cases were adenocarcinoma (63.3%), with varying stages of disease (TX-4, NX-3). Benign pathology accounted for 8.75% of cases. Mean weight loss post-oesophagectomy exceeded 10% at 6 months (SD 14.49). Majority (60.1%) of patients were discharged with feeding jejunostomy, and 5.22% of these required this feed to be restarted post-discharge. Length of stay was mean 16.5 days (SD 22.3). Complications occurred in 68.9% of patients, of which 13.8% were infection driven. Mortality occurred in 26.6% of patients, with 1.83% during hospital admission. 30-day mortality rate was 1.39%. Conclusion Failure to thrive and prolonged weight-loss following oesophagectomy can contribute to poor recovery, with associated complications and poor outcomes, including increased length of stay and mortality. Further analysis of data to investigate association between weight loss and poor outcomes for oesophagectomy patients will allow for personalised treatment of high-risk patients, in conjunction with members of the multidisciplinary team, including dieticians.

scholarly journals Risk factors for high length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality in hip fractures in the elderly

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 322-330
Author(s):  
J. Salvador Marín ◽  
F.J. Ferrández Martínez ◽  
C. Fuster Such ◽  
J.M. Seguí Ripoll ◽  
D. Orozco Beltrán ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
High Length

scholarly journals Influence of Weekday of Admission and Level of Distress on Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Brunner ◽  
André Meichtry ◽  
Davy Vancampfort ◽  
Reinhard Imoberdorf ◽  
David Gisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Linear Model ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Complex Problem ◽  
Interdisciplinary Management ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is often a complex problem requiring interdisciplinary management to address patients’ multidimensional needs. The inpatient care for patients with LBP in primary care hospitals is a challenge. In this setting, interdisciplinary LBP management is often unavailable during the weekend. Delays in therapeutic procedures may result in prolonged length of hospital stay (LoS). The impact of delays on LoS might be strongest in patients reporting high levels of psychological distress. Therefore, this study investigates which influence the weekday of admission and distress have on LoS of inpatients with LBP.MethodsRetrospective cohort study conducted between 1 February 2019 and 31 January 2020. ANOVA was used to test the hypothesized difference in mean effects of the weekday of admission on LoS. Further, a linear model was fitted for LoS with distress, categorical weekday of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday), and their interactions.ResultsWe identified 173 patients with LBP. Mean LoS was 7.8 days (SD=5.59). Patients admitted on Friday (mean LoS=10.3) and Saturday (LoS=10.6) had longer stays but not those admitted on Sunday (LoS=7.1). Analysis of the weekday effect (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday) showed that admission on Friday or Saturday was associated with significant increase in LoS compared to admission on other weekdays (t=3.43, p=<0.001). 101 patients (58%) returned questionnaires, and complete data on distress was available from 86 patients (49%). According to a linear model for LoS, the effect of distress on LoS was significantly modified (t=2.51, p=0.014) by dichotomic weekdays of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday).ConclusionsPatients with LBP are hospitalized significantly longer if they have to wait more than two days for interdisciplinary LBP management. This particularly affects patients reporting high distress. Our study provides a platform to further explore whether interdisciplinary LBP management addressing patients’ multidimensional needs reduces LoS in primary care hospitals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document