Acceptability of the NCI patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19633-e19633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Nichols ◽  
Sandra A. Mitchell ◽  
Kathy Lang ◽  
Victoria Federico ◽  
Kathleen M. Castro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Support Groups ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Cancer Site ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Cancer Support ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Item Level ◽  
Related Quality

e19633 Background: NCI PRO-CTCAE is a new patient-reported outcome measure designed to enhance adverse event (AE) reporting in clinical trials by integrating the patient experience. The PRO-CTCAE item bank includes items representing the frequency (F), severity (S) and interference (I) with usual activities of 78 symptomatic AEs. The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability of a subset of PRO-CTCAE items to women receiving treatment for HER2+ MBC. Methods: 207 women on active treatment for HER2+ MBC (median 47 months since MBC diagnosis) were recruited from 6 U.S. breast cancer support groups and completed a web survey that included 18 PRO-CTCAE symptoms. Respondents were aged 45-64 years (71%), white (94%), college-educated (72%), with health-related quality of life rated good to excellent (61%) and median EQ5D utility score of 0.8. To explore PRO-CTCAE acceptability and data quality, we examined item level missingness, endorsement frequencies and binary and free-text responses about the comprehensibility of PRO-CTCAE items. Results: Item level missingness across all symptoms for each PRO-CTCAE dimension (F, S and I) ranged from 1.0% to 5.3%, with a median of 2.9%; interference associated with decreased appetite had the greatest missingness (5.3%). Excluding this outlier, maximum missingness was 3.9%. Endorsement frequencies of response choices for S of insomnia, constipation, fatigue, pain, anxiety/worry and sad/unhappy feelings support acceptable instrument sensitivity (all adjacent response points endorsed by >7% of respondents). Most respondents (92%) thought the items were easy to understand; a few were uncertain about how to rate symptoms such as anxiety, depression, insomnia and nausea if they were present but partially controlled with medication. Conclusions: These findings confirm and extend those of other studies demonstrating the acceptability of PRO-CTCAE. Evaluation in a more heterogeneous sample, particularly with respect to education and cancer site, is underway.

Young, Empowered and Strong: A Web-Based Education and Supportive Care Intervention for Young Women With Breast Cancer Across the Care Continuum

2021 ◽  
pp. 933-943
Author(s):  
Tal Sella ◽  
Craig Snow ◽  
Hannah Freeman ◽  
Philip D. Poorvu ◽  
Shoshana M. Rosenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Semistructured Interview ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Care Continuum ◽  
Patient Reported

PURPOSE Patient-centered digital interventions may help empower young women to self-manage symptoms and psychosocial concerns and support informational needs often unaddressed in clinic. METHODS Young, Empowered and Strong (YES) is an interactive web-based intervention designed to engage young women with personalized education and symptom self-management resources on the basis of responses to patient-reported outcome–based questionnaires. We piloted YES among young women (< 45 years) with newly diagnosed early breast cancer (EBC) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Assessments were deployed weekly (EBC and MBC) or every 4 weeks (BCSs) over 12 weeks. At study completion, use, feasibility, and acceptability of YES were evaluated via a survey and semistructured interview. RESULTS Thirty women were enrolled between April and June 2019: 10 EBC, 10 BCSs, and 10 MBC. The mean age at diagnosis and enrollment was 36 (range 25-44) and 39 (range 31-44) years, respectively. Most participants were actively treated (96%, 27 of 28) with endocrine therapy (54%, 15 of 28) or chemotherapy (43%, 12 of 28). Overall, 61% (180 of 296) of assessments were completed (EBC: 70%, BCSs: 63%, and MBC: 52%). Of 37 patient-reported outcome and need domains, the most frequently triggered were sexual health (EBC: 90%, BCSs: 90%, and MBC: 90%), anxiety (EBC: 80%, BCSs: 90%, and MBC: 90%), stress and mindfulness (EBC: 80%, BCSs: 90%, and MBC: 90%), and fatigue (EBC: 90%, BCSs: 80%, and MBC: 90%). On postpilot survey, participants reported that YES helped them to learn (50%, 7 of 14), monitor (43%, 6 of 14), and manage (57%, 8 of 14) their symptoms. CONCLUSION YES is a feasible and acceptable digital intervention to support young women across the breast cancer care continuum. The nearly universal triggering of sexual and mental health needs suggests suboptimal management in the clinical setting and the potential for self-management through a digital platform.

scholarly journals PRECYCLE: Multicenter, Randomized Phase IV Intergroup Trial to Evaluate the Impact of E Health-Based Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Assessment on Quality of Life in Patients with Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Palbociclib and an Aromatase Inhibitor- or Palbociclib and Fulvestrant

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Degenhardt ◽  
Peter A. Fasching ◽  
Diana Lüftner ◽  
Volkmar Müller ◽  
Christoph Thomssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background: Efficacy and quality of life (QoL) are key when selecting a therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. In hormone receptor positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 minus (HER2-) MBC, addition of targeted oral agents such as everolimus or a cycline-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitor (e.g. palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) to endocrine therapy substantially prolongs progression-free survival and in the case of a CDK 4/6i also overall survival. Prerequiste for obtaining such benefit is adherence to therapy over the whole treatment duration. Adherence, maintaining patients’ satisfaction, early detection and management of side effects have thus become important challenges, in particular with these new oral drugs and new ways of continuous support for oncological patients are needed. An eHealth-based platform can help to support therapy management and physician-patient interaction.Methods: PreCycle is a multicenter, randomized, phase IV trial in HR+ HER2+ MBC. All patients (n=960) receive the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib either in first (62.5%) or later line (37.5%) together with endocrine therapy (AI, fulvestrant) according to national guidelines. PreCycle evaluates the time to deterioration (TTD) of QoL in patients supported by eHealth systems with substantially different functionality: CANKADO active vs. inform. CANKADO active is the fully functional CANKADO-based eHealth treatment support system. CANKADO inform is a CANKADO-based eHealth service with a personal login, documentation of daily drug intake, but no further functions. To evaluate QoL, the FACT-B questionnaire is completed at every visit. As little is known about relationships between behavior (e.g. adherence), genetic background, and drug efficacy, the trial includes both patient reported outcome and biomarker screening for discovery of forecast models for adherence, symptoms, QoL, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).Discussion: The primary objective of PreCycle is to test the hypothesis of superiority for time to deterioration (TTD) in terms of DQoL = “Deterioration of quality of life” (FACT-G scale) in patients supported by an eHealth therapy management system (CANKADO active) versus in patients merely receiving eHealth-based information (CANKADO inform). EudraCT Number: 2016-004191-22

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Review of Industry-Sponsored Clinical Trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. BCBCR.S39385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meaghan Krohe ◽  
Yanni Hao ◽  
Roger E. Lamoureux ◽  
Nina Galipeau ◽  
Denise Globe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Patient Reported

Introduction Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures serve to capture vital patient information not otherwise obtained by primary study endpoints. This paper examines how PROs are utilized as endpoints in industry-sponsored metastatic breast cancer clinical trials. Methods A search was conducted in the clinicaltrials.gov web site for trials involving common treatments for metastatic breast cancer. Thirty-eight clinical trials were identified which included a PRO endpoint in the study, and data were extracted and summarized. Results Overall, 17 unique PRO questionnaires and 14 concepts of measurement were identified as secondary or exploratory endpoints. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Breast was the most frequently utilized questionnaire, commonly implemented to assess quality of life. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was also frequently used to measure quality of life or pain. Conclusion This review shares insights into the role of PROs in trials for metastatic breast cancer from which treatment developers and other stakeholders can enhance successful implementation of the patient voice into future trials.

scholarly journals An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for the FACT-B (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast) Questionnaire for Measuring the Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Reliability Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Maria Matthies ◽  
Florin-Andrei Taran ◽  
Lucia Keilmann ◽  
Andreas Schneeweiss ◽  
Elisabeth Simoes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Parallel Forms ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

BACKGROUND The most frequent malignant disease in women is breast cancer. In the metastatic setting, quality of life is the primary therapeutic goal, and systematic treatment has only a limited effect on survival rates; therefore, the concept of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are gaining more and more importance in the therapy setting of diseases such as breast cancer. One of the frequently used questionnaires for measuring the HRQoL in patients with breast cancer is the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B). Currently, paper-based surveys still predominate, as only a few reliable and validated electronic-based questionnaires are available. ePRO tools for the FACT-B questionnaire with proven reliability are missing so far. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to analyze the reliability of tablet-based measurement of FACT-B in the German language in adjuvant (curative) and metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS Paper- and tablet-based questionnaires were completed by a total of 106 female adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer patients. All patients were required to complete the electronically based (ePRO) and paper-based version of the FACT-B. A frequency analysis was performed to determine descriptive sociodemographic characteristics. Both dimensions of reliability (parallel forms reliability using Wilcoxon test and test of internal consistency using Spearman ρ) and agreement rates for single items, Kendall tau for each subscale, and total score were analyzed. RESULTS High correlations were shown for both dimensions of reliability (parallel forms reliability and internal consistency) in the patients’ response behavior between paper-based and electronically based questionnaires. Regarding the reliability test of parallel forms, no significant differences were found in 35 of 37 single items, while significant correlations in the test for consistency were found in all 37 single items, in all 5 sum individual item subscale scores, as well as in total FACT-B score. CONCLUSIONS The ePRO version of the FACT-B questionnaire is reliable for patients with breast cancer in both adjuvant and metastatic settings, showing highly significant correlations with the paper-based version in almost all questions all subscales and the total score.

Validation of the NCI patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) in women receiving treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9144-9144
Author(s):  
Sandra A. Mitchell ◽  
Kathy Lang ◽  
Christine Nichols ◽  
Steven B. Clauser ◽  
Victoria Federico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Symptom Dimensions ◽  
Cancer Support ◽  
Patient Reported

9144 Background: NCI PRO-CTCAE is designed to enhance adverse event reporting by integrating patients’ self-report of the frequency (F), severity (S) and interference (I) with usual activities of 78 symptomatic treatment toxicities. This study examined the construct validity of a subset of PRO-CTCAE items in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: 207 women (70% aged 45-59 years; 94% White;71% college-educated) with HER2+ MBC who had received treatment in the past month were recruited from 6 U.S. breast cancer support groups and completed a web survey that collected 18 PRO-CTCAE symptoms, and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSC). Pairwise concordance among PRO-CTCAE symptom dimensions was examined using weighted Kappa and Bowker’s test for symmetry. Results: Respondents were a median of 47 months since MBC diagnosis and 61% rated their health-related quality of life (HRQL) as good to excellent. Symptom prevalence was similar for PRO-CTCAE and RSC, with respondents more likely to endorse mood disturbance on PRO-CTCAE (Anxiety/Worry 90%; Sad/Unhappy Feelings 86%) vs. RSC (Anxiety 63%; Depressed Mood 61%). There was parallel rank-ordering of fatigue, anxiety, insomnia, depression, difficulty concentrating and neuropathy as the symptoms that were most severe, interfered most and caused the greatest bother. Within PRO-CTCAE, pairwise agreement among F, S and I was moderate for most symptoms (κw=.42 to .54). Agreement between F and S was highest for pain, nausea and arm/leg swelling (κw=.61 to .80), and lowest for anxiety/worry and sad/unhappy feelings (κw= .27-.37). Except for arm/leg swelling, endorsement patterns by the dimensions of F, S and I were distinct (Bowker’s p all <.002). Across PRO-CTCAE symptoms, S was consistently higher than I (mean differences .12 to .72, all p<.01]). Means for S were consistently and significantly higher for those with impaired versus preserved HRQL, providing evidence of construct validity. Conclusions: This study supports the construct validity of PRO-CTCAE, and suggests that F, S and I dimensions offer non-overlapping information relative to 17 /18 PRO-CTCAE symptomatic toxicities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document