Using mobile app technology for patient data capture and implementation.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 317-317
Author(s):  
Steven J. Nurkin ◽  
Stephen B. Edge ◽  
Venkata R. Kakarla ◽  
Nikhil I. Khushalani
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Treatment Summary

317 Background: Mobile application technology has quickly become an integral part of clinical cancer care. While this technology is most commonly used as a point of care reference or educational tool, it may also be an effective method to capture patient data. The purpose of this project was to create a mobile solution for fast, point-of-care data capture and implementation, patient reported outcomes, to generate a patient treatment summary and provide data for cancer registry and clinical trials. Methods: Using the “MedDB app” (Bitwise Analytics) on an iPad2 (Apple) device, an application was developed to collect patient data following breast surgery for cancer. Collected data included elements required for pathologic staging using the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system (7th Edition) with the application deriving pathologic TNM and Stage Group. In addition, the type of breast surgery, lymph node surgery, and the expected next steps in treatment are coded for collection. Data are entered into the App in the clinic and transferred using a blinded code number to a web-based database. This database is then used to generate a patient surgical treatment summary and care plan, and is available for uploading into a research database. We then developed an individual patient App for their own personal mobile device. The purpose was to collect patient reported outcomes through their adjuvant care and surviorship. Results: The initial pilot included data entry on 20 breast cancer patients who had surgery prior to adjuvant therapy. The time to complete data entry was less than 60 seconds per case. Conclusions: Mobile communication devices are increasingly becoming key tools for clinicians. They are primarily used to search for medical resource information and the review of medical records. This pilot demonstrates the potential for use of mobile computer devices for collecting key data for clinical trials, the cancer registry, generating a patient treatment summary and care plan at the point of service as well as patient reported outcomes through personalized patient apps. Future development will include studies of integration with the electronic health record, the cancer registry systems, and expansion to a complete survivorship care plan system.

Cancer patients' answers to surveys: Incorporation into the electronic health record (EHR) can decrease manual data entry and increase patient-centered information.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 130-130
Author(s):  
Katy E. French ◽  
Thomas W. Feeley ◽  
Tayab A. Andrabi ◽  
Alexis B. Guzman ◽  
John D. Calhoun
Keyword(s):  
Medical History ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Patient Survey ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Patient Reported

130 Background: Delivery of value-based cancer care has centered on the use of EHR’s and how these applications can document health information, including patient reported outcomes (PRO’s), (1-4). Survey information must be incorporated into the medical record with minimal staff intervention. Our institution, and many cancer centers are currently using “EPIC” as their EHR platform. Although this is a data driven platform, and data can be extracted and reported as desired, certain things need to be done prior to going live in order to ensure this occurs. Surveys must be built using standardized “smart data elements” (SDE’s). If patient data is gathered, but not integrated correctly into the EHR, one will find themselves manually entering data. The goal is to allow patients to answer questions about their health history 1 time, validate answers, incorporate into the EHR, and report data. Methods: We engaged our technology team prior to “go-live” to build patient survey questionnaires. 40 survey questions, were mapped to 72 specific EHR/“EPIC” SDE’s. The SDE’s included cancer diagnoses and past medical history. Patients received and completed the electronic survey via the patient portal. Clinic providers validated patient answers from the surveys and the information was incorporated into the EHR. Results: Patient entered survey data collected, documented, and reported within the EHR. Decreased data entry by providers, efficiently incorporating the patient cancer diagnosis and medical history into the EHR. Data collected for review/reporting/research as needed. Conclusions: EHR’s can gather specific/discrete patient data to benefit both patients and providers. Cancer patients can participate in providing health information easily incorporated and documented by the provider. Data can be updated as needed, and used for patient reported outcomes (PRO’s) and other research endeavors. EHR’s should enhance care by allowing providers to spend more face to face time with patients and providing data that is most important to patients from which they may make informed decisions about their health care.

scholarly journals Implementation and Feasibility of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) Data Entry in the PRAEGNANT Real-Time Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer Registry

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (08) ◽  
pp. 870-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Wallwiener ◽  
Felix Heindl ◽  
Sara Brucker ◽  
Florin-Andrei Taran ◽  
Andreas Hartkopf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Trial Staff ◽  
Breast Cancer Registry

Abstract Purpose Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been incorporated into clinical trials for many symptoms and medical conditions. A transition from paper-based capture of PROs to electronic PROs (ePROs) has recently started. This study reports on the feasibility of ePRO assessment in a prospective registry including molecular data for patients with advanced breast cancer. Methods As part of the PRAEGNANT network, patients were invited by clinical trial staff, physicians, and nurses to complete three standardized Internet-based questionnaires (EQ 5D 5 L, CES-D and IPAQ). Feasibility was assessed by the staff members who assigned the user accounts by the patients. The completeness of the questionnaires was also assessed. Results Fifteen of 17 patients who were asked agreed to participate to complete the PRO questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L and CES-D). However, the IPAQ (physical activity) questionnaire was only validly completed by 9 patients. Feasibility was ranked better by the physicians and dedicated clinical trial staff than by the nursing staff. Conclusions Incorporating ePRO questionnaires into an advanced breast cancer registry is feasible, and no major hurdles were reported. Involving stakeholders from the start, the application is tailored to the capacities and abilities of both patients and clinical staff. The patientsʼ compliance was better with some questionnaires, but others may present difficulties.

The Development and Initial Findings of A Study of a Prospective Adult Research Cohort with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SPARC IBD)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E Raffals ◽  
Sumona Saha ◽  
Meenakshi Bewtra ◽  
Cecile Norris ◽  
Angela Dobes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
The United States ◽  
Predictors Of Response ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Reported Data

Abstract Background Clinical and molecular subcategories of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are needed to discover mechanisms of disease and predictors of response and disease relapse. We aimed to develop a study of a prospective adult research cohort with IBD (SPARC IBD) including longitudinal clinical and patient-reported data and biosamples. Methods We established a cohort of adults with IBD from a geographically diverse sample of patients across the United States with standardized data and biosample collection methods and sample processing techniques. At enrollment and at time of lower endoscopy, patient-reported outcomes (PRO), clinical data, and endoscopy scoring indices are captured. Patient-reported outcomes are collected quarterly. The quality of clinical data entry after the first year of the study was assessed. Results Through January 2020, 3029 patients were enrolled in SPARC, of whom 66.1% have Crohn’s disease (CD), 32.2% have ulcerative colitis (UC), and 1.7% have IBD-unclassified. Among patients enrolled, 990 underwent colonoscopy. Remission rates were 63.9% in the CD group and 80.6% in the UC group. In the quality study of the cohort, there was 96% agreement on year of diagnosis and 97% agreement on IBD subtype. There was 91% overall agreement describing UC extent as left-sided vs extensive or pancolitis. The overall agreement for CD behavior was 83%. Conclusion The SPARC IBD is an ongoing large prospective cohort with longitudinal standardized collection of clinical data, biosamples, and PROs representing a unique resource aimed to drive discovery of clinical and molecular markers that will meet the needs of precision medicine in IBD.

scholarly journals The feasibility of web surveys for obtaining patient-reported outcomes from cancer survivors: a randomized experiment comparing survey modes and brochure enclosures

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan M. Millar ◽  
Joanne W. Elena ◽  
Lisa Gallicchio ◽  
Sandra L. Edwards ◽  
Marjorie E. Carter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Web Surveys ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Adjusted Risk Ratio ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Paper Survey ◽  
Survey Modes

Abstract Background Central cancer registries are often used to survey population-based samples of cancer survivors. These surveys are typically administered via paper or telephone. In most populations, web surveys obtain much lower response rates than paper surveys. This study assessed the feasibility of web surveys for collecting patient-reported outcomes via a central cancer registry. Methods Potential participants were sampled from Utah Cancer Registry records. Sample members were randomly assigned to receive a web or paper survey, and then randomized to either receive or not receive an informative brochure describing the cancer registry. We calculated adjusted risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals to compare response likelihood and the demographic profile of respondents across study arms. Results The web survey response rate (43.2%) was lower than the paper survey (50.4%), but this difference was not statistically significant (adjusted risk ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.72, 1.07). The brochure also did not significantly influence the proportion responding (adjusted risk ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval = 0.85, 1.25). There were few differences in the demographic profiles of respondents across the survey modes. Older age increased likelihood of response to a paper questionnaire but not a web questionnaire. Conclusions Web surveys of cancer survivors are feasible without significantly influencing response rates, but providing a paper response option may be advisable particularly when surveying older individuals. Further examination of the varying effects of brochure enclosures across different survey modes is warranted.

Measuring Quality of Life in Cosmetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes Instruments

2007 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 823-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea L. Pusic ◽  
Constance M. Chen ◽  
Stefan Cano ◽  
Anne Klassen ◽  
Colleen McCarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported

Feasibility of a healthcare system-based tetralogy of Fallot patient registry

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-275
Author(s):  
Audrey L. Khoury ◽  
Eric G. Jernigan ◽  
Muntasir H. Chowdhury ◽  
Laura R. Loehr ◽  
Jennifer S. Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Tetralogy Of Fallot ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Birth Mother ◽  
Information Privacy Concerns ◽  
Recruitment Challenges ◽  
Patient Reported

AbstractBackgroundPatient-reported outcomes and epidemiological studies in adults with tetralogy of Fallot are lacking. Recruitment and longitudinal follow-up investigation across institutions is particularly challenging. Objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility of recruiting adult patients with tetralogy of Fallot for a patient-reported outcomes study, describe challenges for recruitment, and create an interactive, online tetralogy of Fallot registry.MethodsAdult patients living with tetralogy of Fallot, aged 18–58 years, at the University of North Carolina were identified using diagnosis code query. A survey was designed to collect demographics, symptoms, history, and birth mother information. Recruitment was attempted by phone (Part I, n=20) or by email (Part II, n=20). Data analysis included thematic grouping of recruitment challenges and descriptive statistics. Feasibility threshold was 75% for recruitment and for data fields completed per patient.ResultsIn Part I, 60% (12/20) were successfully contacted and eight (40%) were enrolled. Demographics and birth mother information were obtained for all enrolled patients. In Part II, 70% (14/20) were successfully contacted; 30% (6/20) enrolled and completed all data fields linked to REDCap database; the median time for survey completion was 8 minutes. Half of the patients had cardiac operations/procedures performed at more than one hospital. Automatic electronic data entry from the online survey was uncomplicated.ConclusionsAlthough recruitment (54%) fell below our feasibility threshold, enrolled individuals were willing to complete phone or online surveys. Incorrect contact information, privacy concerns, and patient-reported time constraints were challenges for recruitment. Creating an online survey and linked database is technically feasible and efficient for patient-reported outcomes research.

scholarly journals Continuous digital collection of patient-reported outcomes during inpatient treatment for affective disorders - implementation and feasibility

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maike Richter ◽  
Michael Storck ◽  
Rogerio Blitz ◽  
Janik Goltermann ◽  
Juliana Seipp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Affective Disorders ◽  
Inpatient Treatment ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Depression Severity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Longitudinal Data Collection ◽  
Digital Collection

Multivariate predictive models have revealed promising results for the individual prediction of treatment response, relapse risk as well as for the differential diagnosis in affective disorders. Yet, in order to translate personalized predictive modelling from the research context to psychiatric clinical routine, standardized collection of information of sufficient detail and temporal resolution in day-to-day clinical care is needed, based on which machine learning algorithms can be trained. Digital collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is a time- and cost-efficient approach to gain such data throughout the treatment course. However, it remains unclear whether patients with severe affective disorders are willing and able to participate in such efforts, whether the feasibility of such systems might vary depending on individual patient characteristics and if digitally acquired patient-reported outcomes are of sufficient diagnostic validity. To address these questions, we implemented a system for continuous digital collection of patient-reported outcomes via tablet computers throughout inpatient treatment for affective disorders at the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Muenster. 364 affective disorder patients were approached, 66.5% of which could be recruited to participate in the study. An average of four assessments were completed during the treatment course, none of the participants dropped out of the study prematurely. 89.3% of participants did not require additional support during data entry. Need of support with tablet handling and slower data entry pace was predicted by older age, whereas depression severity at baseline did not influence these measures. Patient-reported outcomes of depression severity showed high agreement with standardized external assessments by a clinical interviewer. Our results indicate that continuous digital collection of patient-reported outcomes is a feasible, accessible and valid method for longitudinal data collection in psychiatric routine, which will eventually facilitate the identification of individual risk and resilience factors for affective disorders and pave the way towards personalized psychiatric care.

scholarly journals ARGON APPLICATION FOR CREATION OF PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-174
Author(s):  
O.L. Tkachuk ◽  
◽  
R.L. Parakhoniak ◽  
S.A. Plaksin ◽  
A.S. Glushenkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Gallstone Disease ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Shoulder Girdle ◽  
Subjective Assessment ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Hospitalization Period ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Subjective Pain

Objective. To advance the patients’ rehabilitation after laparoscopic surgeries by using insufflation with argon gas for pneumoperitoneum formation. Methods. The given study is the investigation of sequentially admitted 360patients with gallstone disease (cholelithiasis). The patients have been randomly divided into 4 groups: Group1 - uncomplicated gallstone disease, carboxyperitoneum (n=192); Group1a - acute cholelithiasis (n=37), carboxyperitoneum; Group2 - uncomplicated gallstone disease, argonperitoneum (n=102); Group2a - acute cholelithiasis (n=29), argonoperitoneum. All the patients have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Subjective assessment of the pain syndrome intensity has been studied on the basis of patient-reported outcomes questionnaire according to the visual analogue scale (VAS), need for analgesic injections, presence and intensity of the shoulder pain syndrome as well as the duration of in-patient treatment. Results. In accordance with patient-reported outcomes (with argonperitoneum application) subjective pain sensation has proved to decrease by 1.5-2 fold. On the first day of the postoperative period both in uncomplicated gallstone disease and in acute cholelithiasis, argonperitoneum has statistically significantly reduced the need for analgesics. Pain in the shoulder girdle (omalgia) was observed in 48.9% of the patients having been applied carboxyperitoneum whereas it was noticed in only 5.3% of the patients having been applied argonperitoneum during the operation. Argonperitoneum application statistically significantly reduces in-patient treatment period by 30% (from 2.3 - to 1.6 days) in uncomplicated gallstone disease and by 23% (from 4.3 - to 3.3 days) in gallstone disease complicated by acute cholelithiasis. Conclusion. Application of argon for pneumoperitoneum formation in laparoscopic cholecystectomies reliably reduces pain syndrome intensity in the postoperative period. The number of postoperative omalgia cases is reduced by 42% in patients having undergone cholecystectomies with argonperitoneum application. Application of argonperitoneum in management of patients with cholelithiasis may reduce the hospitalization period by 25-30%. What this paper adds The effect of argon application as an insufflation gas in laparoscopic operations upon the intensity of the postoperative pain syndrome has been studied for the first time. Argonperitoneum application has been found to improve the postoperative course by reducing pain irritation. Argon application leads to reduce analgesics consumption.

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: The Time Is Ripe for Integration Into Patient Care and Clinical Research

2016 ◽  
pp. e89-e96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Schwartzberg
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Electronic Systems ◽  
Psychological States ◽  
Longitudinal Tracking ◽  
Patient Reported

In the emerging team-based approach to delivering cancer care, collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provides longitudinal monitoring of treatment adverse effects, disease complications, functional statuses, and psychological states throughout the cancer continuum for all providers to use. Electronic systems offer added capabilities, including easy quantitation of individual symptom items and aggregated scales, standardization, and longitudinal tracking of patient surveys for trend analysis over time. An ideal electronic PRO (ePRO) platform is clinically relevant, validated, and reliable and would offer patient usability. Additionally, it should allow for automated responses to and from patients, have scheduling functionality, and send real-time alerts to site personnel and patients. Clinical interfaces should be easy to read and integrated into the electronic medical record. Multiple ePRO systems, often using electronic tablets, have been created and are beginning to be widely deployed. The Patient Care Monitor is one example of a system that has evolved into a comprehensive patient engagement platform, with a complete review of systems survey and capabilities for mobile health usage. Recent clinical trials have established ePRO systems as an effective method of providing information, which aids improved patient outcomes, including reduced health resource utilization and longer time on therapy. ePROs are also increasingly incorporated into clinical trials, where they can provide more thorough reporting of adverse events than can be captured by alternative methods. Mobile devices have the potential to become the method by which all members of the provider team communicate with patients both at the point-of-care and between clinic visits to optimize care delivery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document