Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of gemcitabine with or without bavituximab in patients with nonresectable stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4054-4054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuchi Sumant Pandya ◽  
Lucas Wong ◽  
Andrea J. Bullock ◽  
Stephen A. Grabelsky ◽  
Merrill Kingman Shum ◽  
...  

4054 Background: Despite advances in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC), there is critical need to develop novel therapies.Median survival with combination chemotherapy is limited to less than one year and only the optimally conditioned patients can tolerate these therapies. Bavituximab (B) is a monoclonal antibody (mAB) directed againstphosphatidylserine (PS) that causes vascular shutdown and reactivation of the innate and adaptive immunity in animal models. Preclinical data in mouse PC models indicate that gemcitabine (G) increases PS exposure and the addition of a mAb targeting PS reduces tumor burden, visible liver metastases, microvessel density, and increases tumor macrophage infiltration compared to G alone (Beck et al. 2006). The purpose of this trial is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of G+B vs. G alone as first line therapy in pts. with nonresectable Stage IV PC. Methods: Seventy patients were randomized (1:1) to receive G 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28Edays with or without weekly B 3mg/kg IV until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Key eligibility criteria were Stage IV PC, ECOG ≤2, measurable disease, age≥18 years, total bilirubin ≤1.5xULN, and adequate renal, hematologic, and hepatic function. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Of the 70 (G/G+B 34/36) patients randomized, 67 (G/G+B 33/34) received study treatment and 63 (G/G+B 31/32) were evaluable. No significant difference was seen in age, gender, race or ECOG. At analysis 87% deaths had been reported in G and 72% in G+B group. Median OS estimate is 5.2 months for G and 5.6 months for G+B. No difference between groups was observed in PFS (median 3.9 months for G and 3.7 months for G+B). ORR was 13% for G and 28% for G+B. Most AEs were grade 1-2 and typical of exposure to G. Conclusions: In this patient population with extensive disease burdens and limited treatment options, G+B was well tolerated and demonstrated moderate activity in tumor response and survival. Clinical trial information: NCT01272791.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A384-A384
Author(s):  
Xiaoting Xu ◽  
Jian Huan ◽  
Hui Miao ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Yue Wang ◽  
...  

BackgroundRecurrent or metastatic cervical cancer patients who progressed after standard therapy have limited treatment options and poor prognosis with a 1-year survival rate ranging between 15% and 20%. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus chemoradiotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (Clinical trial ID: ChiCTR2000029068)MethodsIn this open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study conducted at four radiotherapy centers in East China, eligible patients were confirmed by pathology and/or imaging for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. According to the first-line therapies for cervical cancer recommended by NCCN guidelines, all patients were received paclitaxel plus cisplatin regimen, with or without bevacizumab, combined with radiotherapy. After seven fractions radiotherapy at the recurrent or metastatic regions, 240 mg toripalimab every three weeks for six cycles or more were given in combination.ResultsBetween Jan 14th, 2020, and May 1st, 2021, 24 patients were enrolled. All patients were staged at the first visit, as seven patients were with FIGO (2018) stage I, 10 with stage II, 2 with stage III, 1 with stage IV, and 2 with unclear stage. Of 24 included patients, 22 (91.67%) had squamous cervical cancer. The median age was 55 (range, 33–72) years. As of May 31, 2021, median follow-up time was 8.5 months [95% CI: 2.3–10.1]. 14 (58.3%) of 24 patients who achieved an objective response, including 10 (41.7%) complete response (CR) and 4 (16.7%) partial response (PR). The median duration of response was not reached and 7 (29.1%) patients continued toripalimab treatment after the previous 6-cycle immunotherapy. The disease control rate was 75% (18/24). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.61 months (95% CI: 4.14–not reached). For subgroup analysis, the median PFS was significantly prolonged in the CR/PR group compared with that in the SD/PD group [not reached (95% CI: 6.21–not reached) versus 5.5 months (95% CI: 2.69–6.870), P = 0.023]. There was no significant difference in the median PFS between patients who previously received radiotherapy (8.61 months) and those who didn’t (6.87 months) (P = 0.641). 8 (33.3%) patients had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were myelosuppression (29.2%), hypertriglyceridemia (8.3%), hypoalbuminemia (4.2%), pneumonia (4.2%), and hypercholesterolemia (4.2%).ConclusionsToripalimab plus chemoradiotherapy showed promising antitumor activity and tolerable toxicities in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 108-108
Author(s):  
Tie Zhou ◽  
Dingwei Ye ◽  
Zhongquan Sun ◽  
Qinggui Meng ◽  
Dalin He ◽  
...  

108 Background: GT0918 is a 2nd generation of AR antagonist and capability to down-regulate AR level. This study is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, Ph II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy in patients with mCRPC, and to determine the optimal dose for Ph III study. Methods: Patients with historically confirmed mCRPC who progressed after/intolerant to/reluctant to receive Docetaxel and previously treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide were excluded. All the patients received up to 6 cycles or, unacceptable toxicity, or loss of clinical benefit as recommended by PCWG3. Primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction from baseline. Secondary endpoints included time to PSA progression (TTPP), objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profiles. Results: As of June 30, 2019, 108 treated with GT0918 at three dose levels: 100 mg (n =37), 200 mg (n = 35) and 300 mg (n = 36), the median age of patients was 70.0 years (range 63-77), 88% of patients had stage IV disease at the initial diagnosis and 69.4% had Gleason score ≥ 8. The median duration of disease was 2.88 years. All received prior endocrine therapy, 35.2% received prior chemotherapy, 29.6% received Docetaxel. The median PSA at baseline was 35.285ng/ml, PSA response rate (≥50 % reduction from baseline) was 41.9%. The median time to PSA progression was not reached. There was no significant difference among three arms. Of 19 evaluable patients with target lesions at baseline, the ORR was 15.8% (all were PR) assessed by IRC with RECIST v 1.1, with 20.0% (1/5), 22.2% (2/9), 0 (0/5) at 100, 200, 300 dose level, respectively. The DCR assessed by IRC was 78.9% (CR 0+PR15.8%+SD 63.2%). Of 26 evaluable patients with target lesions at baseline, the ORR was 19.2% assessed by investigators (CR 3.8%+PR 15.4%), with 11.1% (1/9), 20.0% (2/10), 28.6% (2/7) at 100, 200, 300 dose level, respectively. Overall, AEs were experienced by most of patients (94.4 %, n=102). AEs leading to drug interruption were reported in 13 patients (12.0%), 9 (8.3%)of them were suspected to be drug related. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 6 patients (5.6%), 3(2.8%) were possibly related to GT0918. 14 patients (13.0%) experienced Grade 3 and 4 AEs. 17 patients (15.7%)experienced SAE, 5(4.6%) of them were suspected to be related to study drug. Most of AEs were mild or moderate. The common suspected AE (≥10%) were asthenia (17.6%, n=19), anemia (14.8%, n=16), AST increased (14.8%, n=16), ALT increased (13.0%, n=14), decreased appetite (13.0%, N=14), white blood cell count decreased (12.0%, n=13), proteinuria (12.0%, n=13). Conclusions: GT0918 showed a manageable safety profile. This study provided preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with mCRPC. 200mg/day is recommended dose for Ph III trial. Clinical trial information: CTR20170177.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5504-5504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
Tim Meyer ◽  
Kathleen N. Moore ◽  
Jean-Pascal H. Machiels ◽  
Jacques De Greve ◽  
...  

5504 Background: Treatment options for cervical, vaginal, and vulvar (GYN) cancers are limited after first-line therapy. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is associated with squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix (≥90%) and vulva/vagina (40–70%), and may elicit an immune reaction. Programmed death (PD)-1 and its major ligand PD-L1 are expressed in GYN cancers and inhibit immune responses. Nivolumab disrupts PD-1–mediated signaling, restoring antitumor immunity. Methods: In CheckMate 358 (NCT02488759), an ongoing multicohort study of 5 virus-associated cancers, PD-L1–unselected adults with R/M GYN cancers, ECOG PS 0–1, and ≤2 prior systemic therapies for R/M disease were eligible to receive nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety; secondary endpoints were duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 24 treated patients (pts), 19 had cervical and 5 had vaginal or vulvar cancer; median age was 51 y. At a median follow-up of 31 wks (range: 6–38), ORR was 20.8% (Table), and disease control rate (ORR + SD) was 70.8%. All responses were in pts with cervical cancer (ORR, 26.3%) and were observed regardless of PD-L1 or HPV status or number of prior R/M therapies. Median PFS was 5.5 mo (95% CI: 3.5, NR); median OS was NR. Conclusions: Nivolumab demonstrated encouraging clinical activity in pts with cervical cancer and a manageable safety profile in virus-associated GYN cancers, supporting further evaluation in these pts. Updated clinical and biomarker data to be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02488759. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7025-7025
Author(s):  
Monica Peravali ◽  
Cristiane Gomes-Lima ◽  
Eshetu Tefera ◽  
Mairead Baker ◽  
Mamta Sherchan ◽  
...  

7025 Background: ICPi cause various irAE with thyroid dysfunction as a commonly reported abnormality. There is increasing evidence showing positive association with development of irAE and survival. However, prior trials with ICPi had underrepresentation of minorities with <5% African Americans (AA). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients (pts) with stage IV solid malignancies treated with PD1/PDL1 blockers between 1/2013-12/2018 across MedStar Georgetown Cancer Institute facilities. Pts treated with CTLA-4 inhibitors were excluded. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were primary endpoints and were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods and Wilcoxon rank sum test for comparison. Results: 293 pts met eligibility criteria. 91 pts (31%) had any grade irAE; most common AE were endocrine (40.7%) specifically TSH elevation, dermatological (23.1%) and rheumatologic (18.7%). Proportion of irAE was significantly higher in Caucasians versus AA (60.4% vs 30.8%), in pts with low PDL1, lower LDH, older age, and those who had more treatment cycles with ICPi. Rate of progression was lower in pts with irAE (30.8% vs 46.0%, p-0.0140). Median PFS (5.8 vs 3.0 months (mo), p- 0.0204) and OS (17.1 vs 7.2 mo, p value- <0.0001) were higher with irAE. Statistically significant difference in OS (17.1 vs 8.6 mo, p- 0.0002) but not in PFS (5.8 vs 3.3 mo, p: 0.0545) was noted with endocrine irAE. No differences in survival were observed among other commonly reported irAE. Differences in survival among subgroups of pts with irAE are detailed in table. Conclusions: Development of irAE positively correlated with improved PFS and OS as reported in previous studies. To our knowledge, this is the first study observing differences in OS favoring endocrine AE and Caucasian race. These factors may be potential surrogate markers of prognosis pending replication of these results in large-scale studies. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2070-TPS2070
Author(s):  
Jian Li Campian ◽  
Christopher Abraham ◽  
Jingqin Luo ◽  
Grayson Talcott ◽  
Ruth Katumba ◽  
...  

TPS2070 Background: Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) after chemoradiotherapy has a dismal outcome with very limited treatment options. Addition of reirradiation to bevacizumab appears to improve progression-free survival (PFS) but does not improve overall survival (OS). Immune checkpoint inhibitors of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway appear to have limited single-agent activity for rGBM due to its immunesuppressive microenvironment. Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an inducible and rate-limiting enzyme that catabolizes tryptophan (Trp) into kynurenine (Kyn). IDO1 is over-expressed in 50̃90% of GBM patients, and high IDO1 levels correlate with reduced OS. Epacadostat is a highly potent and selective oral inhibitor of IDO1 and may increase tumor sensitivity to anti-PD-1 blockade. Retifanlimab is a humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody directed against PD-1. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining retifanlimab plus or minus epacadostat with reirradiation and bevacizumab for rGBM patients. Methods: This is an open-label nonrandomized phase II study of two sequential cohorts for bevacizumab-naïve adults with rGBM: retifanlimab + bevacizumab+ radiation (cohort A), and retifanlimab + epacadostat + bevacizumab + radiation (cohort B). Each cohort will enroll 24 evaluable patients. Key eligibility criteria include candidates for reirradiation and bevacizumab, age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60%, and dexamethasone dose ≤ 4 mg/day. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include PFS, neurologic functions, and toxicity. The correlative endpoints include studies assess the anti-glioma immune response, serum Kyn/Trp ratio, and RNA expression of IDO1 and PD-L1 from available tissue. The trial is actively enrolling. At the time of abstract submission, 16 of the planned 24 patients in Cohort A have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03532295. [Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 567-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradford Richard Hirsch ◽  
Xiaolong Jiao ◽  
Thomas Wilson ◽  
Michelle Denise Hackshaw ◽  
Eric Jonasch ◽  
...  

567 Background: The COMPARZ trial demonstrated that pazopanib was non-inferior to sunitinib regarding their efficacy as first line of therapy (LOT) for advanced/metastatic RCC (aRCC). However, no studies have compared the effectiveness of pazopanib to sunitinib outside the clinical trial setting. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the two therapies in a US community oncology setting. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using US Oncology’s (USON) iKnowMed electronic health record (EHR) database, supplemented with chart review. Patient eligibility criteria included: ≥ 18 years of age at first diagnosis of aRCC, treated with pazopanib or sunitinib as the 1st LOT between 11/1/2009 – 8/31/2012 in the USON with ≥ 2 office visits. A propensity score (PS) matching was performed to match patients receiving pazopanib to sunitinib. Clinical outcomes including progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) were compared. Results: A total of 177 patients on pazopanib and 739 patients on sunitinib were identified from the EHR database. After PS matching, 153 pts were included in pazopanib and sunitinib cohort respectively. The mean age, gender distribution, and the Heng disease risk groups were similar between the two cohorts (p>0.05). No significant difference in PFS was observed with pazopanib (median: 9.3 [95%CI, 7.0 to 11.8] months) compared to sunitinib (median: 8.3 [95%CI, 6.4 to 10.9] months, p = 0.43). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in OS for pazopanib (median: 22.3 [95% CI, 16.2 to 31.7] months) compared to sunitinib (median: 26.3 [95% CI, 16.4 to 38.2, p = 0.76] months). AEs (any grade) including diarrhea, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, fatigue were significantly lower in sunitinib (p<0.05) while anorexia was lower in pazopanib (p<0.05). Conclusions: Consistent with the results of COMPARZ, no significant difference was observed in PFS and OS among aRCC patients treated with pazopanib or sunitinib as the 1st LOT in the real world. AEs seemed to be less common with sunitinib, and this may be partially attributed to the limitation of retrospective data.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 698-698
Author(s):  
Marc Thomas Roth ◽  
Dana Backlund Cardin ◽  
Erkut Hasan Borazanci ◽  
Margaux Steinbach ◽  
Vincent J. Picozzi ◽  
...  

698 Background: Survival statistics for mPDA are dismal and with limited treatment options novel agents are needed to improve disease outcomes. PBI-05204 (Phoenix Biotechnology, Inc., San Antonio, TX) is a modified supercritical carbon dioxide extract of Nerium oleander leaves. Oleandrin, the extract’s major cytotoxic component, has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in various tumor cell lines. In a human PDA orthotopic model, this preparation reduced tumor burden as monotherapy. Pharmacodynamic studies suggest that PBI-05204’s mechanism of action is through inhibition of the PI3k/Akt/mTOR pathway. Methods: A phase II single-arm, open-label study to determine the efficacy of PBI-05204 in patients (pts) with mPDA refractory to standard therapy was conducted. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with the hypothesis that 50% of pts would be alive at 4.5 months. Secondary objectives included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate. Pts received oral PBI-05204 daily until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or pt withdrawal. Radiographic response was assessed every two cycles. Results: Forty-one pts were enrolled; two never received treatment and one was found to have a neuroendocrine tumor after pathological re-evaluation, leaving 38 pts for analysis. Median age at time of enrollment was 65.0 years. The median time from initial diagnosis to treatment was 16.9 months. The primary reason for withdrawal was PD (45.2%). Ten pts were alive at 4.5 months (26.3%) with a mPFS of 56 days (corresponding to first restaging). One objective response (2.6%) was observed for 162 days. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 63.2% of pts with the most common attributed to drug (all grades) being fatigue (36.8%), vomiting (23.7%), nausea (18.4%), decreased appetite (18.4%), and diarrhea (15.8%). Conclusions: PBI-05204 did not meet its primary endpoint for OS in this study. Recent preclinical data indicate an efficacious role for PBI-05204 against glioblastoma multiforme when combined with chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, and radiotherapy. A randomized Phase II trial is currently being designed. Clinical trial information: NCT02329717.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7573-TPS7573
Author(s):  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
David Cunningham ◽  
Sharon Yavrom ◽  
Wenying Huang ◽  
...  

TPS7573 Background: Patients (pts) with iNHL treated with front-line immunochemotherapy may benefit from an alternative, chemotherapy-free regimen at relapse. Zandelisib, a potent, selective, and structurally differentiated oral PI3Kδ inhibitor, achieved an 87% response rate, with median duration of response not reached in iNHL when given as a monotherapy or in combination with R. A low rate ( < 10%) of Grade ≥ 3 immune-mediated adverse events of special interest associated with PI3kδ inhibitors is observed in patients administered zandelisib on an intermittent schedule (IS) (JCO 2020 38:15_suppl, 8016). An open-label, phase 2 study (TIDAL, NCT03768505) of zandelisib as monotherapy is ongoing in pts with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Methods: The COASTAL study is a randomized, open-label, controlled multicenter phase 3 trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of zandelisib in combination with R versus standard immunochemotherapy in pts with iNHL. Key eligibility criteria: adults with relapsed or refractory FL or MZL who received ≥1 prior lines of therapy which must have included an anti-CD20 antibody in combination with chemotherapy or lenalidomide (L); at least one bi-dimensionally measured lesion > 1.5 cm; adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function; ECOG performance status score of 0 to 1. Key exclusion criteria: histologically confirmed diagnosis of FL grade 3b or transformed disease; administration of 2 prior immunochemotherapy regimens; prior PI3K inhibitor therapy; known lymphomatous involvement of the central nervous system. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive R-zandelisib or immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP or R-B) and stratified by type and number of prior treatment regimens, histology, and duration of treatment-free interval after last therapy. Zandelisib will be given in a 28-day cycle comprising of daily dosing for 2 cycles followed by IS dosing on days 1-7 of each 28-day subsequent cycle for a duration of 2 years. Rituximab or immunochemotherapy will be given for a total of 6 cycles. Disease response will be assessed by an Independent Response Review Committee according to the modified Lugano Classification. Radiographic tumor assessment will be performed approximately every 12 weeks for the first 9 months, every 16 weeks for the next 12 months, and every 24 weeks thereafter. The primary efficacy endpoint is progression-free survival. The major secondary endpoints include ORR, complete response rate, overall survival, and safety. The trial will enroll approximately 534 pts in ̃200 sites globally and will begin enrollment in mid-2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04745832.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4452-4452
Author(s):  
Lawrence E. Garbo ◽  
Patrick J. Flynn ◽  
Margaret A. MacRae ◽  
Mary A. Rauch ◽  
Yunfei Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive type of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma that usually presents as disseminated disease. Prognosis is poor, and responses to chemotherapy are less durable than those achieved in other types of lymphoma. New treatment options are desperately needed. Gemcitabine has shown activity in MCL as a single agent. In addition, the combination of mitoxantrone and rituximab has also been shown to be active in MCL. However, the use of these drugs in combination has not been evaluated in the treatment of MCL. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine+mitoxantrone+rituximab in relapsed or refractory MCL; secondary objectives were duration of response, survival at 1-year, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity, especially myelotoxicity. Sixteen patients were enrolled between April 2005 and December 2006, and only 15 were evaluable due to one patient’s withdrawal of consent. Patients received gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 IV (30–60 min infusion), mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 IV (5–10 min infusion), and rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 (max 400 mg/hr). Patients also received gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on Day 8 of the 21-day cycle. Medication was administered in the following order: gemcitabine→mitoxantrone→rituximab. Patients were to be treated for a maximum of 8 cycles or until the patient had evidence of a response, progressive disease, or intolerable toxicity. The median patient age was 74 years, 100% were white, and 69% were male. Of all patients, 86% had Stage IV MCL at baseline. Patients received a median of 6 cycles (range, 3 – 8). Efficacy results for the evaluable population are CR 13%, PR 27%, PD 13%, and SD 47%. Median PFS was 8.72 months (range, 1.84 – 23.49); median overall survival was 10.03 months (range, 2.50 – 23.49). Grade 3–4 treatment related toxicities reported in >1 patient were neutropenia (93%), leukopenia or thrombocytopenia (53% each), anemia (20%), and asthenia (13%). 60% of patients are currently alive as of July 2007; 9 patients discontinued study treatment due to disease progression (13%), toxicity (27%), MD request (7%), or withdrawal of consent (13%). 7 patients had normal study completion (44%). The study was closed early due to slow accrual owing to alternative treatment which became available at the time. The combination of gemcitabine, mitoxantrone, and rituximab in MCL was well-tolerated with manageable adverse events in spite of 93% neutropenia. Supplemented growth factor use was able to minimize neutropenia. No Grade 3–4 infection was reported. This regimen holds promise in patients with MCL and further studies are warranted. Updated data will be presented.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110229
Author(s):  
Francesco Grossi ◽  
Piotr Jaśkiewicz ◽  
Marion Ferreira ◽  
Grzegorz Czyżewicz ◽  
Dariusz Kowalski ◽  
...  

Objective: The study investigated the efficacy and safety of oral vinorelbine-cisplatin (OV-CDDP) and gemcitabine-cisplatin (GEM-CDDP) in patients with squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC). Patients and methods: This was an open-label, prospective, multicenter, international phase II study that enrolled untreated patients with advanced sq-NSCLC. Patients were randomized to receive 3-week cycles of either 60–80 mg/m2 OV days 1 and 8 in combination with 80 mg/m2 CDDP day 1 (arm A) or 1250 mg/m2 GEM days 1 and 8 in combination with 75 mg/m2 CDDP day 1 (arm B). After four cycles, patients without disease progression continued maintenance dose of OV or GEM until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life (QoL). Results: A total of 114 patients with sq-NSCLC were randomized, and 113 were treated (57 in arm A and 56 in arm B). DCR was high in both arms: 73.7% (95%CI: 62.4–100.0) in arm A and 75.0% (95%CI: 63.7–100.0) in arm B. Median PFS and TTF were similar in arm A and B 4.2 and 2.8 months, and 4.3 and 3.1 months, respectively. Even though the difference was not significant, the OS was 10.2 for arm A and 8.4 months for arm B. The safety profiles were consistent with the current knowledge of adverse events. QoL results revealed an improvement in patients under OV treatment. Conclusion: The OV-CDDP combination showed comparable efficacy to GEM-CDDP with acceptable safety profile and enhanced patients’ QoL. Trial registration: The study was registered under EudraCT number 2012-003531-40.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document