Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients undergoing maintenance therapy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9646-9646
Author(s):  
Qiuling Shi ◽  
Xin Shelley Wang ◽  
James M. Reuben ◽  
Evan N. Cohen ◽  
Loretta A. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Muscle Weakness ◽  
Symptom Severity ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Tnf Alpha ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Mixed Effect

9646 Background: After 3-months autologous stem cell transplant (AuSCT), a percentage of multiple myeloma (MM) patients during maintenance therapy continue to experience a complex of symptoms related to peripheral neuropathy. This longitudinal study examined these self-reported neuropathy symptoms and identified circulating inflammatory markers associated with high neuropathy-related symptoms. Methods: MM patients (N=51) rated symptom severity on 0-10 scale via the M. D. Anderson symptom Inventory (MDASI) weekly from 3 to 9 months post AuSCT during maintenance therapy. Patient also rated pain on hand or foot in routine clinic visit. A panel of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, receptors, chemokines was evaluated on serum samples by Luminex. Mixed effect analysis was used to describe the changes on cytokines and symptom outcomes across time. Trajectory analysis identified patients that persistently reported higher or lower symptom severity overtime. Results: During the study period, there was no significant reduction on pain in general or on hand/foot, or change in neuropathic symptoms such as numbness/tingling and muscle weakness. Among a third (33%) of patients who was consistently in high pain (mean 5.5), MIP-1a (p=.001) and MCP-1 (p=.032) showed significant decrease. Approximately 40 % had persistently high numbness/tingling (mean 5.2) across the observation period. Compared to low symptom group patients, this high numbness group had significantly higher IL-6 (p=.019) and TNF-alpha (p=.006). High muscle weakness (mean 3.1) was for 69% of the sample. This group had significantly higher CRP (p=.005) and TNF-alpha (p=.001). Conclusions: This is the first longitudinal study that tracked persistent neuropathy-related symptoms for MM patients post AuSCT. Approximately one third reported painful neuropathy, either from induction therapy or ongoing maintenance therapy. High levels of these neuropathy symptoms were associated with higher levels of specific pro-inflammatory markers. This study provided rationale for examining the effectiveness of anti-inflammation as mechanism driven intervention on peripheral neuropathy in this cohort of MM patients.

A Phase II Study of Sequential Velcade/Thalidomide/ Dexamethasone (VTD) as Maintenance Therapy Post Single Autologous Peripheral Stem Cell (PSCT) in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3403-3403
Author(s):  
Firoozeh Sahebi ◽  
Amrita Krishnan ◽  
George Somlo ◽  
Leslie Popplewell ◽  
P. Parker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract Abstract 3403 Poster Board III-291 Autologous PSCT remains standard treatment in younger patients (pts) with multiple myeloma. However, relapse is the major cause of treatment failure. Several studies have reported improved progression-free survival (PFS) and possibly overall survival with thalidomide alone or in combination with steroid and chemotherapy as maintenance/consolidation therapy post autologous PSCT. We performed a phase II study investigating the role of sequential velcade/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD) as maintenance therapy post single PSCT. The objectives were to examine the toxicities of prolonged course of sequential VTD, CR rate, PFS and overall survival following single autologous PSCT. Within 4-8 weeks of autologous PSCT using melphalan 200mg/m2, pts received weekly velcade (vel) at 1.3mg/m2 /wk x 3 weeks with 1 week rest and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/d x 4 d for 6 months, followed by thalidomide (thal) at 50 -200mg/d and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/dx4 d for 6 more months. Single agent thalidomide was then continued until disease progression. Twenty-eight pts have been enrolled. Median age is 54 years (29-66). Median time from diagnosis is 7.9 mo. (4.2 – 145). Disease stage at diagnosis; by Salmon-Durie (II/III 6/22) and by ISS (I/II/III 11/9/7/missing data in 1 pt). Pts received induction treatment with thal/dex (14), velcade based (15) and revlimid based regimens (7). Median B2M at enrollment is 1.75 mg/L (1.14 -5.3). Disease status at enrollment; CR (7) VGPR (9), PR (11), SD (1). Three pts have chromosome 13 abnormalities (1 pt by karyotype and 2 pts by FISH). Results: All pts have undergone transplant. Four pts were unable to start planned maintenance therapy due to development of grade II or more neuro toxicities (3), and persistent thrombocytopenia (1) after PSCT. Twenty-four pts started maintenance vel/dex within 4-8 weeks of PSCT. Nine pts have completed 6 months of vel/dex. Two pts stopped vel/dex because of low WBC (1) or PN (1). With a median F/U of 5.2 mo. (1.2 -17.3) nine of 28 pts (33%) have achieved CR post PSCT and six out of 11 evaluable pts (55%) have achieved CR after vel/dex. Six out of 9 pts (66%) who have completed 6 mo. of vel/dex achieved CR. Two out of 9 pts (22%) have upgraded their response with vel/dex. Four pts have completed 6 month of thal/dex and are beyond 1 year post PSCT. Two out of 4 pts remain in CR at one year post PSCT. One pt is in PR and 1 pt has progressed. Two pts could not complete thal/dex phase of therapy because of relapse (1) and grade III GI toxicity (1). Three pts have relapsed of whom 1 pt died of relapsed myeloma (leptomeningeal disease). No grade IV toxicity has been noted. Grade III toxicities have occurred in 4 pts; low platelet (1), fatigue (1), mood alteration (1), GI (severe constipation) (1). Thirteen pts have peripheral neuropathy (PN). Ten pts had PN grade I at enrollment. Only 3 pts have developed PN on the study and all are grade I - II. Median velcade dose is 1.3 mg /m2/wk and thalidomide dose is 100mg /d. Conclusion: Prolonged sequential velcade/thalidomide/dexamethasone maintenance therapy post single autologous PSCT is well tolerated with no severe peripheral neuropathy. Fifty-five percent of pts have achieved CR and 22% have upgraded their response after six months of velcade/dexamethasone therapy suggesting this is an active and well tolerated maintenance strategy post PSCT. Disclosures: Sahebi: Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of bortezomib(Velcade)in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone is investigated as maintenance therapy post autologuous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma.

High Rate of Complete Remission (CR) and Upgraded Response with Weekly Maintenance Bortezomib Post Single Autologous Peripheral Stem Cell Transplant (PSCT) In Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Results of a Phase II Prospective Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2399-2399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Firoozeh Sahebi ◽  
Amrita Krishnan ◽  
Leonardo Farol ◽  
Ji-Lian Cai ◽  
George Somlo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract Abstract 2399 The quality and depth of response particularly achievement of complete remission (CR) have been associated with significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant. Achievement of CR is considered a valid surrogate endpoint for survival in clinical trials for patients with multiple myeloma. We performed a phase II study investigating the role of sequential bortezomib/dexamethasone followed by thalidomide/dexamethasone as maintenance therapy post single autologous PSCT. The objectives were to examine the feasibility, toxicities, CR, PFS and overall survival rates. Within 4–8 weeks of autologous PSCT using melphalan 200mg/m2, pts received weekly bortezomib (bor) at 1.3mg/m2 /wk × 3 weeks with 1 week rest and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/d × 4 d for 6 months, followed by thalidomide (thal) at 50 –200mg/d and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/dx4 d for 6 more months. Single agent thalidomide was then continued until disease progression. Between March 2008 and June 2010, forty-five pts were enrolled. Median age was 54 years (29-71). Median time from diagnosis was 6.1 mo. (3.5 – 145.9). Disease stage at diagnosis; by Salmon-Durie (I/II/III 2/8/34/1 not available) and by ISS (I/II/III 18/14/8/ 5 not available). Pts received prior induction treatment with thal/dex (15), bortezomib based (27) and lenalidomide based regimens (10). Median B2M at enrollment was 1.8 mg/L (1.05 -5.3). Disease status at enrollment included complete remission (CR) (11), very good partial response (VGPR) (11), partial response (PR) (23). Six pts had chromosome 13 abnormalities (1 pt by karyotype and 5 pts by FISH), 2 pts had t 4;14 (one with concurrent ch 17 p del) and 3 pts had complex cytogenetic abnormalities. Results: Forty-five pts have been enrolled and undergone transplant. Five pts were unable to start planned maintenance therapy due to development of grade II or more neuro toxicities (4), and persistent thrombocytopenia (1) after PSCT. Thirty nine pts started maintenance bor/dex within 4–8 weeks of PSCT. One pt is too early for maintenance therapy. Twenty-five pts have completed the planned 6 months of bor/dex. Ten pts stopped bor/dex because of low WBC (2), PN (4), diagnosis of adrenal cancer (1), myocardial infarction (MI) (1), and relapse (2). Six pts are still receiving maintenance bortezomib. With a median F/U of 8.5 mo. (0.2 -24.0) twelve of 44 evaluable pts (27%) have achieved CR post PSCT and 17 of 33 evaluable pts (51%) have achieved CR after bor/dex on an intention to treat (ITT) analysis. Fifteen of 25 pts (60%) who have completed 6 months of bor/dex have achieved CR. Nine of 25 pts (36%) have upgraded their response with bor/dex. Eight pts (24%) could not complete bortezomib due to toxicities. At one year post PSCT fourteen of 28 evaluable pts (50%) remain in CR. Six pts have relapsed of whom 2 died of relapsed myeloma (leptomeningeal disease 1 pt). One pt experienced MI while receiving bortezomib (grade IV). Grade III toxicities have occurred in 17 pts; low platelet (1), asthenia (2), mood alteration (1), GI (severe constipation due to partial bowel obstruction on thalidomide) (1), skin rash (1), hyperglycemia (1), lymphopenia (10), sinus bradycardia (1), elevated triglyceride (1), DVT (1), low phosphate (3), leukopenia (1), edema (1). Sixteen pts had peripheral neuropathy (PN) grade I prior to start of bortezomib. Only 8 pts have developed new PN on the study and all are grade I-II. No patient has experienced grade III-IV PN. Median bortezomib dose is 1.3 mg /m2 per week. Conclusion: Prolonged weekly bortezomib maintenance therapy is well tolerated and can upgrade response post single autologous PSCT with no severe peripheral neuropathy. Fifty one percent of pts have achieved CR and 36% have upgraded their response after six months of bortezomib/dexamethasone therapy suggesting this is an active maintenance strategy post PSCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Symptom Burden of Busulfan and Melphalan Versus Melphalan Alone for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 681-681
Author(s):  
Loretta A. Williams ◽  
Muzaffar H. Qazilbash ◽  
Qiuling Shi ◽  
Qaiser Bashir ◽  
Huei K. Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Muscle Weakness ◽  
Symptom Severity ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Dry Mouth ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Background: High-dose melphalan 200 mg/m2 (Mel) is the standard for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) for multiple myeloma. Retrospective analyses suggested that a combination of busulfan and melphalan (Bu-Mel) may be associated with a longer progression-free survival (PFS). A secondary aim of a randomized, phase III trial that compared the safety and efficacy of Bu-Mel vs Mel was to compare the symptom burden of the two regimens. Symptom burden is the combined impact of disease- and therapy-related symptoms on patient functional ability. Methods: Patients were randomized to Bu-Mel (Bu 130 mg/m2 daily for 4 days, either as a fixed dose or to target an average daily area under the curve of 5000 μmol-min, followed by 2 daily doses of Mel 70 mg/m)2or Mel (Mel 100 mg/m2 daily for 2 days). A subset of patients completed the 20 symptom severity and 6 interference items of MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Multiple Myeloma (MDASI-MM) prior to the start of the treatment regimen and weekly for 4 weeks post autoHSCT. Symptoms and interference are rated on 0-10 scales (0 = none or no interference, 10 = worst imaginable or complete interference). Differences in individual symptom severity and interference between the two arms were assessed by t-tests and mixed modeling. Results: As previously reported, 204 (Bu-Mel: 104, Mel: 100) were enrolled between October 2011 and March 2017. At last evaluation, 52 (51%) and 49 (49%) patients achieved a CR (p=0.88), and 69 (68%) and 67 (67%) patients achieved a CR+nCR (p=0.88) in Bu-Mel and Mel arms, respectively. Median PFS was 64.7 months and 34.4 months (p=0.013) in Bu-Mel and Mel arms, respectively. There was no difference in OS between the two arms. One hundred sixty-five of the patients (Bu-Mel: 81, Mel: 84) completed at least one MDASI-MM assessment. Median ages at autoHSCT were 57.2 and 57.0 years in Bu-Mel and Mel groups, respectively (p=0.86). At baseline, t-tests showed significantly higher mean severity of constipation (1.80, standard deviation [SD] = 2.87 vs 0.98, SD = 1.94; p=0.036), muscle weakness (2.38, SD=2.49 vs 1.44, SD=1.87; p=0.034), diarrhea (1.45, SD=2.43 vs 0.60, SD=1.10; p=0.005), and global symptom interference (2.96, SD=2.81 vs 1.77, SD=2.00; p=0.003) in the Bu-Mel arm than the Mel arm. The Bu-Mel patients had a significantly higher mean severity of pain (5.67, SD=2.65 vs 3.17, SD=3.07; p=0.0043) and mouth sores (7.35, SD=2.41 vs 1.25, SD=2.22; p <0.0001) than the Mel patients 7 days post autoHSCT. Longitudinal analysis using mixed modeling showed that the Bu-Mel arm had a significantly higher mean severity of pain (ED = 1.102, p=0.003), drowsiness (ED = 0.674, p=0.040), dry mouth (ED = 0.904, p=0.009), constipation (ED = 0.695, p=0.006), muscle weakness (ED = 0.815, p=0.006), mouth sores (ED = 1.683, p <0.0001), rash (ED = 0.362, p=0.019), and interference with physical functions (general activity: ED = 1.015, p=0.010; working: ED=1.229, p=0.006; walking: ED=0.920, p=0.009) than the Mel arm during the 4 weeks following autoHSCT. Conclusions: Patients receiving Bu-Mel vs Mel prior to autoHSCT report some differences in symptom severity, with Bu-Mel patients experiencing more severe sore mouth, pain, and symptom interference with daily functioning. The greater intensity of the double-alkylating agent conditioning regimen of Bu-Mel likely led to these differences. The increased severity of drowsiness, dry mouth, constipation, and muscle weakness may be due to an increased need for opioids to control severe pain and mouth sores. The effect of significant differences in symptom severity and interference at baseline between these two groups, despite randomization, is not clear. However, the longer time to progression of myeloma with the Bu-Mel regimen may offset the greater symptom burden early post autoHSCT. Systematic measurement of symptom burden during clinical trials can provide useful information for clinicians and patients in evaluating the full impact of different treatment regimens and enhance treatment decision making and discussion between clinicians and patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Longitudinal relationship between inflammatory markers and patient-reported symptom severity during induction therapy for multiple myeloma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9083-9083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary H Sailors ◽  
Xin Shelley Wang ◽  
Ping Liu ◽  
Valen E. Johnson ◽  
James M. Reuben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Symptom Severity ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Diabetes Diagnosis ◽  
Poor Appetite ◽  
Negatively Associated ◽  
Disturbed Sleep ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Sore Mouth

9083 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing induction therapy experience both disease- and therapy-related symptoms. We investigated the association between the trajectory of symptom severity and changes in levels of inflammatory markers. Methods: MM patients (N=62) rated symptoms via the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) twice a week during induction therapy. Patients contributed serum samples before the start of every chemotherapy cycle. A panel of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and markers was evaluated by Luminex. Ordinal regression analyses were used to describe the relationship between cytokines and symptom outcomes across time. These analyses were adjusted for patient and clinical factors (age, sex, diabetes diagnosis, anemia, BMI, comorbidity, staging, ECOG PS, prior treatment status, tumor response, opioid use, and chemo regimen). Results: Bortezomib-based induction therapy was received by 89% of the sample. Fatigue was persistently the most severe symptom during induction therapy, followed by disturbed sleep, muscle weakness, pain, drowsiness, and bone aches. Numbness, which is representative of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, significantly worsened from baseline (p=0.01). We observed significant longitudinal associations between sIL-1R1 and distress and sadness (both p=0.02); between sIL-6R and disturbed sleep (p=0.001), poor appetite (p=0.04), and sore mouth (p=0.006). IL-6 was significantly associated with pain, fatigue, nausea, and sore mouth (all p<.05). A negative association between sTNF-RII and pain, sleep, distress, remembering, poor appetite, and nausea (all p<0.05) was also observed. MCP-1 was positively associated with numbness (p=0.04); while MIP-1α was negatively associated with sleep, numbness, constipation, poor attention (all p<0.01), and bone aches (p=0.0006). IL-10 was negatively associated with mood interference (p=0.04). Conclusions: Frequent assessment can document the longitudinal course of multiple symptoms during induction and provides opportunity to evaluate systemic inflammation as a potential source of symptom burden during induction therapy for MM.

Incidence of serious adverse events in bortezomib, lenalidomide and bortezomib plus lenalidomide maintenance for multiple myeloma: Interim analysis of MMRF-CoMMpass study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19516-e19516
Author(s):  
Venkata Vosuri ◽  
Mark A Fiala ◽  
Wenners Ballard ◽  
Tanya Marya Wildes ◽  
Mark A. Schroeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

e19516 Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by maintenance therapy is the standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Maintenance typically consists of lenalidomide (LEN), however, bortezomib (BOR) and bortezomib-lenalidomide combination are other options. The respective toxicity of these regimens has not been well studied. We performed secondary data analysis to compare incidence of serious adverse events associated with each maintenance therapy group during post-ASCT maintenance treatment period. Methods: Data was extracted from the open-access MMRF Researcher Gateway corresponding with interim analysis from the CoMMpass study. We extracted data of first-time autologous stem cell transplant patients who completed maintenance therapy post-ASCT. We categorized patients into three sub groups bortezomib, lenalidomide or combination (bortezomib and lenalidomide) maintenance therapy. Incidence rate for serious adverse events (grade 3 or higher) was calculated by number of events per 100 person-months for each maintenance therapy. Results: 231 patients were eligible for our analysis. 169 patients received lenalidomide, 27 bortezomib and 35 combination. The most common adverse event was neutropenia and second most common is pneumonia. Neutropenia incidence was 1.1,0.7 and 0.9 per 100 person-months in lenalidomide, bortezomib and combination regimens respectively. Incidence of deep vein thrombosis, GI intolerance and peripheral neuropathy 0.1 per 100 person-months respectively was observed in lenalidomide group only. Combination maintenance had the highest total adverse event incidence rate of 5.4 per 100 person-months. Incidence of 1.7 and 3.8 per 100 person-months is observed in bortezomib and lenalidomide cohorts respectively. Conclusions: Lenalidomide and bortezomib maintenance had similar incidence of serious adverse events. A higher incidence of serious adverse events was noted in the combination lenalidomide/bortezomib regimens. Interestingly, we observed lower incidence of adverse events in all groups in CoMMpass study compared to respective clinical trials involving maintenance regimens. This may be due to under reporting of adverse events in CoMMpass study. The incidence of adverse events mentioned above should be interpreted in the context of drugs and other factors involved in the disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document