Timing of PSA response to guide cessation of docetaxel in prostate cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16069-e16069
Author(s):  
Peter D. Dickinson ◽  
Jahangeer Malik ◽  
Finbar Slevin ◽  
Ananth Sivanandan ◽  
Noel W. Clarke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Prognostic Group ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Docetaxel Chemotherapy

e16069 Background: Docetaxel plus prednisolone is an established treatment for men with advanced prostate cancer. Clinicians need to be able to identify men who are not benefiting from chemotherapy, and a key unanswered question is how many cycles of docetaxel should men receive before this assessment is made. We investigated the prognostic significance of a PSA response to docetaxel chemotherapy and the number of cycles after which an absence of PSA response could reliably predict future non-response. Methods: Data was collected for men who received one to ten cycles of docetaxel for castrate refractory prostate cancer between 2005 and 2011. PSA was monitored during treatment. All men were treated at a single centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Survival is defined as the interval between the first dose of docetaxel and the date of death. Results: Data was available for 320 patients. At the commencement of chemotherapy, median age was 67 years (range 49-81yrs) and median PSA was 207ng/ml. All patients had a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70%. There were 239 deaths and the median survival of the whole group was 403 days. 140 (44%) patients received 6 cycles of docetaxel and 23 patients (7%) received 10 cycles. Median survival was significantly longer in men who had any fall in PSA during chemotherapy compared to those whose PSA did not fall (462 days vs 268 days, p<0.001). Any PSA fall occurred during the first 4 cycles of docetaxel for 95.1% of men. Median survival was significantly longer in men who had a 50% fall in PSA during chemotherapy compared to those who did not (491 vs 357 days, p<0.001). The 50% fall in PSA occurred during the first 5/6 cycles of chemotherapy in 91.5% and 97.7% of men respectively. Conclusions: A patient’s clinical condition is of paramount importance when assessing them during docetaxel chemotherapy. Our data suggest that a fall in PSA following docetaxel is an indicator of improved overall survival. PSA response could help clinicians decide when to stop docetaxel; patients are unlikely to have a fall in PSA if it has not occurred during the first 4 cycles of chemotherapy and they fall into a poor prognostic group. These patients should be considered for alternative treatment in order to improve outcomes and spare them unnecessary toxicity.

A multivariate prognostic nomogram incorporating PSA kinetics in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer (HRPC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5058-5058
Author(s):  
M. Eisenberger ◽  
E. S. Garrett-Mayer ◽  
Y. Ou Yang ◽  
R. de Wit ◽  
I. Tannock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Multivariate Model ◽  
Psa Kinetics ◽  
Hormone Refractory

5058 Background: To develop a prognostic model and nomogram using baseline clinical variables to predict death among men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Methods: TAX 327 was a clinical trial that randomized 1,006 men with metastatic HRPC to receive 3-weekly or weekly docetaxel or mitoxantrone, each with prednisone. Of these, 635 men had baseline data that included PSA kinetics, with 518 mortality events recorded as of November 2006. We developed a multivariate Cox model and nomogram to predict survival at two, three, and five years. Results: Ten independent prognostic factors were identified in multivariate analysis and include: 1) presence of liver metastases (HR 1.64, p=0.02), 2) number of metastatic sites (HR 1.58 if =2 sites, p=0.001), 3) clinically significant pain at baseline (HR 1.46, p<0.0001), 4) Karnofsky Performance Status (HR 1.42 if =70, p=0.01), 5) type of progression at baseline (HR 1.40 for measurable disease progression and 1.28 for bone scan progression, p=0.002 and 0.014 respectively), 6) pretreatment PSA doubling time (PSADT, HR 1.20 if <55 days, p=0.048), 7) baseline PSA (HR 1.17 per log rise, p<0.0001), 8) tumor grade (HR 1.18 for high grade, p=0.076), 9) alkaline phosphatase (HR 1.26 per log rise, p<0.0001), and 10) hemoglobin (HR 1.10 per unit decline, p=0.006). A PSADT <55 days (median value for this dataset) was associated with other adverse prognostic factors, but was independently associated with shortened overall survival. Men with a PSA less than the median of 114 ng/ml and longer PSADT (=55 days) had a median survival of 24.7 months, while those with higher PSA and shorter PSADT had a median survival of 13.8 months. A nomogram was developed based on this Cox multivariate model and validated internally using bootstrap methods, with a concordance index of 0.69. Conclusions: This multivariate model identified several prognostic factors in men with metastatic HRPC including PSADT, and led to the successful development of a clinically applicable nomogram. External prospective validation may support the wider use of this prognostic baseline model for men with HRPC treated with chemotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals The Median Informs the Message: Accuracy of Individualized Scenarios for Survival Time Based on Oncologists' Estimates

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (28) ◽  
pp. 3565-3571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belinda E. Kiely ◽  
Andrew J. Martin ◽  
Martin H.N. Tattersall ◽  
Anna K. Nowak ◽  
David Goldstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Time ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
C Statistic

PurposeTo determine the accuracy and usefulness of oncologists' estimates of survival time in individual patients with advanced cancer.Patients and MethodsTwenty-one oncologists estimated the “median survival of a group of identical patients” for each of 114 patients with advanced cancer. Accuracy was defined by the proportions of patients with an observed survival time bounded by prespecified multiples of their estimated survival time. We expected 50% to live longer (or shorter) than their oncologist's estimate (calibration), 50% to live from half to double their estimate (typical scenario), 5% to 10% to live ≤ one quarter of their estimate (worst-case scenario), and 5% to 10% to live three or more times their estimate (best-case scenario). Estimates within 0.67 to 1.33 times observed survival were deemed precise. Discriminative value was assessed with Harrell's C-statistic and prognostic significance with proportional hazards regression.ResultsMedian survival time was 11 months. Oncologists' estimates were relatively well-calibrated (61% shorter than observed), imprecise (29% from 0.67 to 1.33 times observed), and moderately discriminative (Harrell C-statistic 0.63; P = .001). The proportion of patients with an observed survival half to double their oncologist's estimate was 63%, ≤ one quarter of their oncologist's estimate was 6%, and three or more times their oncologist's estimate was 14%. Independent predictors of observed survival were oncologist's estimate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92; P = .004), dry mouth (HR = 5.1; P < .0001), alkaline phosphatase more than 101U/L (HR = 2.8; P = .0002), Karnofsky performance status ≤ 70 (HR = 2.3; P = .007), prostate primary (HR = 0.23; P = .002), and steroid use (HR = 2.4; P = .02).ConclusionOncologists' estimates of survival time were relatively well-calibrated, moderately discriminative, independently associated with observed survival, and a reasonable basis for estimating worst-case, typical, and best-case scenarios for survival.

Usefulness of medical oncologists’ estimates of survival time in people with advanced cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9087-9087
Author(s):  
Belinda E. Kiely ◽  
Andrew J. Martin ◽  
Martin HN Tattersall ◽  
Anna K. Nowak ◽  
David Goldstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Time ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Medical Oncologists

9087 Background: We sought to determine the calibration, precision, prognostic significance and suitability of estimated survival time (EST) as a basis for estimating and explaining prognosis in advanced cancer. Methods: Medical oncologists recorded their EST as the “median survival of a group of identical patients” in patients with advanced cancer and a life expectancy >3 months recruited to a randomized trial of sertraline (Lancet Oncol 2007; 8: 603). Calibration, precision and suitability were defined by the proportions of patients whose observed survival times (OST) were bounded by simple multiples of their EST (based on our previous studies), i.e. 50% expected to live longer (or shorter) than their EST; 30% expected to live from 0.75 to 1.33 times their EST (arbitrary criterion for precision); 50% expected to live from half to double their EST (range for typical scenario); 10% expected to live >3 times their EST (best case scenario), or <¼ of their EST (worst case scenario). Results: Characteristics of the 114 patients were: median age 63 years, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≤70 in 25%, and a median of 8.5 months since diagnosis of advanced cancer. Primary cancer sites included breast (18%), colorectal (16%), lung (15%), prostate (12%) and ovary (10%). Median survival was 10.6 months after a median follow-up of 14 months and 68 deaths. EST were well-calibrated: 54% of patients lived longer than their EST and 46% lived shorter than their EST. EST were imprecise (21% within 0.75 to 1.33 times OST) but equally likely to be over-optimistic (34% >1.33 x OST) or over-pessimistic (39% <0.75 x OST). 6% of patients lived <¼ of their EST; 62% lived from half to double their EST and 9% lived >3 times their EST. Independently significant predictors of OST in a multivariable Cox model included EST (HR=0.92, p=0.004), dry mouth (HR=5.07, p<0.0001), alkaline phosphatase >101U/L (HR=2.80, p=0.0002), KPS ≤70 (HR=2.30, p=0.007), prostate primary (HR=0.23, p=0.002), and steroid use (HR=2.35, p=0.02). Conclusions: Medicaloncologists’ EST were well-calibrated, imprecise, independently associated with OST, and useful for estimating and explaining best case, worse case, and typical scenarios for survival time in patients with advanced cancer.

UnCHAARTED territory: The role of docetaxel rechallenge following chemohormonal therapy for metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
Mary Mahler ◽  
Esmail Mutahar Al-Ezzi ◽  
Noa Shani Shrem ◽  
Eric Winquist ◽  
Christina M. Canil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Chemohormonal Therapy ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Number Of Cycles

117 Background: Since docetaxel has been advanced to the metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) setting, there is a lack of evidence guiding its re-introduction upon castrate-resistant (CR) progression. We sought to identify clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients subjected to docetaxel rechallenge (DR) following prior docetaxel exposure in the mCSPC realm. Methods: Patients rechallenged with docetaxel following treatment in the mCSPC setting were identified from three academic centres in Ontario, Canada. Retrospective chart reviews were performed to identify clinical, treatment and outcome variables. Results: Of the 45 patients with DR initiated between 06/2015 and 07/2020, the median age was 65, 60% had a Gleason score of ≥8, and 64% had an ECOG of ≤1. 56% had bone only metastasis, 4% lymph node only metastasis, 29% bone and lymph node metastasis, and 11% had visceral metastasis. In the mCSPC setting, 98% of patients received 6 cycles of docetaxel with 13% requiring dose delays. Of 43 informative patients, all had a PSA response to chemohormonal therapy. 91% achieved at least a 50% PSA response (PSA50), of which 40% had a 50-89% PSA reduction and 51% had a ≥90% PSA reduction. 29% of patients obtained a PSA nadir of < 0.2 ng/mL. 16% had CR progression in < 6 months, 56% in 6-12 months, and 28% in > 12 months. DR was initiated after a median of 20.8 months (range 6.0-40.4) following the last dose of docetaxel for mCSPC, and was given as first line treatment for CR disease to 7%, second line to 51%, third line to 40%, and fourth line or beyond to 2% of patients. 69% of patients had received an androgen-receptor axis targeted therapy prior to DR, 18% radium 223, and 7% had received a trial drug. Notably, no patients had received cabazitaxel prior to DR. The median number of cycles of docetaxel received at rechallenge was 5 (range 1-11) with 18% of patients requiring treatment delays. 64% of patients stopped treatment due to progression, 16% due to side effects, 7% at the patient’s request, 7% due to completion of the planned number of cycles, and 6% due to death or other causes. Among 44 informative patients, 23% achieved at least a PSA50, with 18% having a 50-90% PSA reduction, and 5% having a ≥90% PSA reduction. The median time to progression (biochemical, radiographic, or death) was 2.3 months (95%CI 1.7-4.4) and the median overall survival was 11.0 months (95%CI 8.5-14.3). Conclusions: DR following exposure to docetaxel in the mCSPC setting resulted in a PSA50 in only around one quarter of patients. Both the median time to progression and overall survival were found to be short. With future investigations, we hope to identify clinical variables that will help predict which patients might benefit most from DR.

Cetuximab in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R&M SCCHN) (EXTREME)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5537-5537 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Vermorken ◽  
R. Mesia ◽  
M. E. Vega-Villegas ◽  
E. Remenar ◽  
R. Hitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Phase Iii

5537 Background: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is expressed in nearly all SCCHN and carries a strong prognostic significance, providing the rationale for using EGFR-targeted agents, such as cetuximab, in this indication. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy commonly used in the treatment of R&M SCCHN. Methods: Patients (pts) were enrolled into this phase III trial from December 2004 to December 2005 and randomized either to Group A: cetuximab (first dose 400 mg/m2 then 250 mg/m2 weekly) plus a maximum of 6 three-weekly cycles of cisplatin (100 mg/m2 IV on day 1) or carboplatin (AUC 5, day 1) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for the first 4 days of each cycle) or to Group B: cisplatin or carboplatin with 5-FU as before. Cetuximab was administered until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint is overall survival time; secondary endpoints are progression-free-survival, response rate, disease control rate, safety, and Quality of Life. It was planned to randomize a total number of 420 pts in order to detect a difference in improvement in overall survival of 2.5 months. Results: At the end of the recruitment,440 pts have been randomized, to date 320 pts are under treatment, 21 have withdrawn from the study and 99 have completed the study. The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has performed an independent preplanned safety analysis from the first 140 pts, 138 pts of whom were treated. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 weeks: M/F122/16, median age57 years [range, 38–79],median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) 80 [range, 70–100]. In this safety analysis, there were 14 deaths, none of which were treatment related. The most frequent drug related grade 3–4 toxicity was mainly represented by neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia. Conclusions: The DSMB evaluated baseline and safety data, found no reason to stop the trial and recommended continuation of the study. [Table: see text]

Randomized phase II trial of docetaxel, with or without doxercalciferol, in advanced, androgen-independent prostate cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5119-5119
Author(s):  
S. Attia ◽  
J. Eickhoff ◽  
G. Wilding ◽  
J. Blank ◽  
H. Rezazadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Vitamin D Analogs ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Androgen Independent

5119 Background: Docetaxel is the standard of care for advanced androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Doxercalciferol, a vitamin D analog (1a-hydroxyvitamin D2), has single-agent activity in AIPC (Clin Cancer Res 9(11), 2003). Preclinical evidence supports combining vitamin D with chemotherapy to treat AIPC. Here we report results of a multi-institutional trial combining docetaxel and doxercalciferol. Methods: Patients with chemo-naive AIPC were randomized 1:1 to receive, on a four week cycle, docetaxel (35 mg/m2 IV; days 1, 8 and 15) with either doxercalciferol (10 mcg PO daily, days 1–28) or placebo in a double-blind fashion. The primary endpoint was to compare progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were to assess overall survival (OS), objective response (RECIST), PSA response (consensus criteria), and toxicity. PFS and OS were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. Eligibility criteria included no prior cytotoxic therapy; radiographic evidence of metastasis; performance status ≤ 2 and no recent history of nephrolithiasis. Results: Seventy patients were randomized. Median follow-up time was 16.2 months (range, 0–40.5 months). Median PFS in the doxercalciferol arm was 14.9 months (95% CI: 8.7–16.6 months) versus 11.9 months (95% CI: 8.9–16.4 months) in the placebo arm (p=0.73). Median OS in the doxercalciferol arm was 18.1 months (95% CI: 14.9–26.2 months) and 17.9 months (95% CI: 12.1–24.6 months) in the placebo arm (p=0.63). Twenty-nine patients in the doxercalciferol arm and 33 in the placebo arm were evaluable for objective response. No complete responses were seen. Partial response rate was 14% (doxercalciferol) vs. 15% (placebo) (p=0.88). PSA response rate was 44% (95% CI: 29%-60%) in the doxercalciferol arm and 42% (95% CI: 27%-59%) in the placebo arm (p=0.87). Grade 3/4 toxicity rates were 38% in the doxercalciferol arm and 39% in the placebo arm (p=0.99). Conclusions: Despite encouraging data with other vitamin D analogs combined with docetaxel in AIPC, the addition of daily doxercalciferol to weekly docetaxel did not enhance median PFS, OS or tumor response. Toxicity was similar between treatment groups. Further evaluation of vitamin D analogs in combination with chemotherapy in AIPC remains of interest. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Use of epirubicin, carboplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (ECarboF) as a second-line treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 173-173
Author(s):  
U. B. McGovern ◽  
S. J. Harland
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Docetaxel Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

173 Background: ECarboF chemotherapy is an active first line chemotherapy treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. We have now investigated its efficacy and toxicity in patients who have progressed during or after docetaxel chemotherapy. Methods: 37 patients with metastatic prostate cancer who had received ECarboF chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed from a five year period (2005-2010). All patients had previously received first-line docetaxel chemotherapy and had either progressed following treatment (n=17) or were docetaxel refractory (n=20). Patients received epirubicin 50mg/m2 iv d1, carboplatin (AUC 5) d1, fluorouracil 440mg/m2 d1, d15 and folinic acid 20mg/m2 d1, d15 on a q4w cycle. 20% dose reductions were made for the first cycle in patients with poorer performance status. PSA was measured before each cycle of treatment and all patients were assessed for toxicity. Results: Patients had a median age of 70 years (range 48-77), median baseline PSA of 226.5 ng/mL (range 9.6-1,580) and the median number of ECarboF chemotherapy cycles received was 6 (range 1-10). 65% (n=24) of patients were ECOG 0-1, the remaining 35% (n=13) were ECOG 2-3. 16% (n=6) patients had a ≥ 30% decline in PSA and 16% (n=6) patients had a ≥ 50% decline in PSA. 35% (n=13) of patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicity, most commonly anaemia (13.5%), neutropenia (13.5%) and thrombocytopenia (8.1%) with one treatment related death (neutropenic sepsis) during the five year period analysed. Median time to PSA progression was 5.1 months. Conclusions: ECarboF has activity with acceptable toxicity post docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Although PSA response rates are modest, the time to progression is comparable to that of more toxic regimens. ECarboF should be considered as an active second-line chemotherapy regimen. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

βIII-tubulin expression as a predictor of docetaxel resistance in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15174-e15174
Author(s):  
Bertha E. Sanchez ◽  
Nilesh Gupta ◽  
Meredith Mahan ◽  
Evelyn R Barrack ◽  
Prem-veer Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Docetaxel Resistance ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Castrate Resistant

e15174 Background: Docetaxel is a tubulin-targeting cytotoxic that remains first-line therapy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) even though half of pts are reported to be non-responders. A predictive marker to identify those who will benefit from docetaxel-therapy will assist clinical decision making. High βIII-tubulin (TUBB3) expression has previously been reported to correlate with lack of response to taxanes in other cancers. We evaluated TUBB3 expression as a predictor of docetaxel-resistance in mCRPC. Methods: mCRPC pts treated with at least 3 cycles of docetaxel between 1990 and 2011 were identified retrospectively. TUBB3 immunostaining was performed on archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Stain intensity was scored from 0 to 3; 2 and 3 were interpreted as positive. Rates of PSA response were compared between pts with positive (+) and negative (-) TUBB3 expression. Two definitions of PSA response were evaluated (any PSA decline and at least 50% decline). Overall survival (OS) distribution between TUBB3+ and TUBB3- pts was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 73 pts, 26 (35%) expressed TUBB3. At diagnosis, the mean age was 65.7 years and the median Gleason score was 8. At the time of docetaxel therapy, the mean age was 71.2 years, the median PSA level was 70.9 (range, 0.2-5253) and 76% had ECOG performance status ≤1. The median number of docetaxel cycles was 7 (range, 3-18). The total dose of docetaxel was not different between groups (p=0.705). The median OS was 19.2 mo. TUBB3 expression was not correlated with any clinical or pathological characteristic (age, Gleason score, stage, ECOG, PSA, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, visceral disease or chemotherapy before docetaxel). 65% of TUBB3+ pts had any PSA decline compared to 89% of pts with TUBB3- (p=0.0267). 52% of TUBB3+ pts had a PSA decline of ≥ 50% compared to 70% of TUBB3- pts (p=0.0144). Median OS for TUBB3+ pts was 16.8 mo compared to 20.4 mo in TUBB3- pts (p=0.039). Conclusions: High TUBB3 expression was associated with shorter OS and lower PSA response rates in mCRPC pts treated with docetaxel. These findings need to be validated prospectively.

Clinical predictors of second-line chemotherapy (ChT) benefit in pancreatic cancer (PC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15733-e15733
Author(s):  
Ilya Pokataev ◽  
Igor Bazin ◽  
Mikhail Fedyanin ◽  
Alexey Tryakin ◽  
Anna Popova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Prognosis Score

e15733 Background: Second line ChT is shown to improve outcome in selected patients with PC; however there are no approved models predicting its benefit. This retrospective study was aimed to evaluate prognostic factors in patients with PC who had disease progression following 1st line ChT and their value in prediction of 2nd line ChT benefit. Methods: Records of PC patients treated in N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center since 2000 to 2015 were analyzed. Inclusion criteria for this retrospective analysis were: morphologically confirmed PC, disease progression after 1st line ChT or adjuvant / induction ChT with ChT-free interval <6 months. The most common clinical factors were evaluated for prognostic significance in the Cox proportional hazards model with overall survival (OS) as the end-point. OS was calculated from the date of progression following previous ChT. Cutoff values for quantitative variables were determined using ROC curve analyses. Results: Records of 172 patients matched the inclusion criteria. Second line ChT was administered in 110 (64%) patients (47% of them received gemcitabine- and/or platinum-based doublets). The Cox multivariate analysis identified two independent prognostic factors: Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≤70% and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >5 at the time of disease progression after 1st line ChT (Table). Administration of 2nd line ChT improved outcome of patients with favorable prognosis (score ≤1): median OS increased from 1.7 to 5.5 months in groups without (n=23) and with (n=90) ChT, respectively (p=0.02). In patients with poor prognosis (score>1) there were no benefit by administration of 2nd line ChT: medians OS were 2.3 and 1.7 months in groups with (n=20) and without (n=39) ChT, respectively (p=0.23). Conclusions: This novel prognostic model can potentially predict 2nd line ChT benefit in patients with PC, however it needs to be validated in further trials. [Table: see text]

A phase Ib/II trial of indomethacin and enzalutamide to treat castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS394-TPS394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong-xian Pan ◽  
Primo Lara ◽  
Christopher P. Evans ◽  
Mamta Parikh ◽  
Ralph de Vere White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Androgen Synthesis ◽  
Psa Response

TPS394 Background: Enzalutamide (Enza) and abiraterone (Abi) are commonly used to treat CRPC. Resistance is the most common cause of treatment failure. We discovered that a critical steroidogenic enzyme AKR1C3 was significantly elevated and contributed to intratumoral androgen synthesis in Enza-resistant prostate cancer cells and tumors. Overexpression of AKR1C3 induced androgen receptor variant 7 (AR-V7) expression, while inhibition of AKR1C3 downregulated AR-V7. We then discovered that indomethacin (Indo) inhibited AKR1C3 activation and sensitized resistant CRPC cells to Enza and Abi. One patient accidentally took Indo and achieved biochemical as well as radiological response of his prostate cancer. These findings prompted us to design a clinical trial to test the combination of Indo with Enza for the treatment of CRPC and to study the underlying mechanisms of action and resistance. Methods: This investigator-initiated single-arm Phase Ib/II trial enrolls patients with progressive CRPC after Abi, adequate vital organ function, ECOG performance status 0-2, and serum testosterone < 50 ng/dl. Major exclusion criteria include prior Enza treatment, brain metastasis and history of seizure. In the Phase Ib cohort, patients receive Enza 160 mg po qd and Indo 50 mg po tid to determine toxicity. The Phase II expansion will enroll 26 patients with 21 evaluable patients. This sample size provides 90% power to detect, at the 0.05 level (1-sided), the difference between a PSA response rate of 50% expected with the study treatment and a historical control of 20% with Enza alone. Co-primary endpoints are safety and PSA response of ≥50% decrease. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate as determined by the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria (PCWG2), progression-free survival and overall survival. Molecular correlative studies are exploratory endpoints. Serum and intratumoral androgen levels, full-length AR, AR-V7 and AKR1C3 will be measured to assess the effect of the combination therapy. To date, 4 patients have been enrolled to the trial (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier No: NCT02935205; this trial is funded by DoD Prostate Cancer Research Program IMPACT award). Clinical trial information: NCT02935205.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document