A prognostic examination of the chemotherapeutic selection for pancreatic cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination: A retrospective study from a single center.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 331-331
Author(s):  
Ryoji Takada ◽  
Tatsuya Ioka ◽  
Hironari Sueyoshi ◽  
Nobuko Ishida ◽  
Takuo Yamai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Peritoneal Dissemination ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

331 Background: Pancreatic cancer(PC) patients(pts) with peritoneal dissemination are poor prognosis. This retrospective study evaluated the prognosis of Gemcitabine(GEM)-based current chemotherapy(G), GEM plus S-1 combination therapy(GS) and single agent of S-1 as 1st line chemotherapy regimen in PC pts with peritoneal dissemination. Methods: This is a retrospective study of PC pts with ascites or peritoneal nodules in the CT or US image who underwent chemotherapy between 2002 and 2011. We collected data on age, sex, Performance Status(PS), tumor location, other metastasis location, status of peritoneal dissemination, CA19-9, CEA, albumin, CRP. We classified 1st line chemotherapy regimen in G, GS and S-1, and we evaluated 1-year survival rate, progression free survival(PFS), overall survival(OS) for the 3 regimens. Results: A total of 81 pts were included. Median age were 64 (38-78), males 50%, PS 0-1 89%. The number of pts treated with G, GS, S-1 was 54, 14, 13. The 1-year survival rate of G, GS and S-1 were 20.3%, 28.5% and 53.8%. The median PFS were 106 days, 84 days and 88 days, respectively. The median OS were 196 days, 154 days, 359 days, respectively. The 1-year survival rate of S-1 was significantly better than that of G (p=0.01). Median PFS and median OS of S-1 didn’t demonstrate the superiority compared with that of G (p=0.40, p=0.08). Conclusions: We suggest the selection of S-1 as 1st line chemotherapy regimen in PC pts with peritoneal dissemination might be effective and we need further investigation.

Efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 466-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Ohba ◽  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Yuji Inagaki ◽  
Yasunari Sakamoto ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
First Line ◽  
Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

466 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are standard first-line chemotherapy regimens for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) patients. GEM and S-1 are also used for these patients in Japan. However, the phase 3 trials included a small proportion of recurrent pancreatic cancer (RPC) patients, and patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. In clinical practice, RPC is treated in the same way as MPC. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy between RPC and MPC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the patients with RPC or MPC who received GnP, FFX, GEM, or S-1 as first-line chemotherapy between January 2014 and March 2016 in our institution. RPC was defined as pancreatic cancer with recurrence after R0 or R1 resection. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated. Multivariate analyses of OS were performed with the use of a Cox proportional-hazard model. Results: A total of 181 patients, 40 RPC and 141 MPC, were selected in this study. RPC and MPC groups were similar with respect to age, sex, and performance status (PS). However, the RPC group had lower percentage of liver metastases (P < 0.001). The regimens were GnP/FFX/GEM/S-1: 10/3/20/7 in the RPC group and 37/34/67/3 in the MPC group, respectively. In the RPC group, 31 of 40 patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy; S-1/GEM: 24/7. The median OS was 16.6 months in the RPC group as compared with 9.7 months in the MPC group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–1.10, P = 0.11). The median PFS was 4.8 months in the RPC group and 4.4 months in the MPC group (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57–1.30, P = 0.47). The RR was 10% versus 14% (P = 0.79), the DCR was 50% versus 52% (P = 0.86), in the two groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed PS (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.38–3.49) and liver metastases (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.47–2.34) were independent predictors of OS. On the other hand, RPC or MPC was not found to be an independent prognostic factor (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.67–2.13). Conclusions: It is suggested that chemotherapy in RPC may have similar efficacy compared to MPC. The relatively longer OS in the RPC group seems to associate with the lower percentage of liver metastases.

Safety and efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX in pancreatic cancer: A retrospective experience.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14614-e14614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hemchandra Mahaseth ◽  
John S. Kauh ◽  
Edith Brutcher ◽  
Natalyn Nicole Hawk ◽  
Sungjin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Emory University ◽  
Grade 3

e14614 Background: Conroy et al reported a significant improvement in overall survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX compared to single agent gemcitabine. The regimen was associated with significant grade 3/ 4 toxicities, such as myelosuppression(46%), fatigue(24%), vomiting(15%) and diarrhea (13%). In order to improve the toxicity profile, we have modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) regimen by removing the bolus 5-FU and adding the routine use of growth factor prophylaxis. We present our experience with mFOLFIRINOX in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were identified from the Emory University tumor registry. Twenty eight patients who received at least one dose of mFOLFIRINOX (5-FU 2400 mg/m2 CIVI over 46 hours, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2 and pegfilgrastim 6 mg every two weeks ) were selected and their charts were retrospectively reviewed for safety, response, and survival. Results: Of 28 patients, 14 (50%) were male, 18 (64%) white, 8 (29%) black and other 2(7%). Median age was 63 (50-75) and ECOG performance status 0-1. Nineteen (68%) patients had primary tumor located in head of pancreas. Eight patients (29%) experienced grade 3/4 toxicities, i.e., nausea/vomiting (11%), diarrhea (11%), fatigue (11%), neuropathy (4%), neutropenia (4%), thrombocytopenia(4%), and sepsis not-related to neutropenia (4%). No grade 3/4 anemia or febrile neutropenia was noted. mFOLFIRINOX controlled the disease in 20 patients (71%) with 2 CR, 4 PR and 14 SD. With a median follow up of 5.5 months, median overall or progression free survival is not reached. Two patients have died and six patients have progressed. Conclusions: Modified FOLFIRINOX is well tolerated in this US population. The clinical activity appears very promising with majority of patients being free of progression.

Randomized phase 2 study of maintenance pemetrexed (Pem) versus observation (Obs) for patients (pts) with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) without progression after first-line chemotherapy: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 30901 (Alliance).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8517-8517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arkadiusz Z. Dudek ◽  
Xiaofei F. Wang ◽  
Lin Gu ◽  
Tom Stinchcombe ◽  
Robert Arthur Kratzke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Group B ◽  
Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Randomized Phase 2

8517 Background: Standard front-line chemotherapy for advanced MPM is (Pem and a platinum; optimal treatment duration is unknown. We performed a randomized phase 2 trial (NCT01085630) to determine if continuation of single-agent Pem after 4-6 cycles of Pem-platinum would improve progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: Eligible pts had histologically confirmed unresectable MPM, and performance status (PS) 0-1. Pts with at least stable disease following 4-6 cycles of Pem-platinum were stratified by first-line regimen (cis- or carboplatin) and histology (epithelioid versus other) and randomized 1:1 to Obs or continuation of Pem until progression. The primary endpoint was PFS. We assumed that Obs produced a median (m) PFS of 3 months (mo) and Pem would yield a 100% improvement in mPFS to 6 mo; 60 eligible pts (30 per arm) were to be randomized. Results: 72 pts from 30 sites registered 12/10-6/16. The study closed early due to slow accrual once 53 pts were randomized; 49 eligible pts (22 Obs, 27 Pem) are included in the efficacy analysis. Pt characteristics (Obs/Pem): age: median (range) 70 (39-85)/70 (52-87); male 68%/78%; PS 0 27%/33%; epithelioid histology 77%/70%; first-line cisplatin 27%/26%. A median of 4 cycles of Pem (range 1-33) was delivered; 22% of pts required dose modification. mPFS was 3 mo on Obs and 3.4 mo on Pem (hazard ratio (HR) 0.99; 95% CI: 0.51-1.90; p=0.9733). Median overall survival (mOS) was 11.8 mo for Obs, and 16.3 mo for Pem (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.44-1.71; p=0.6737). Toxicities ≥ grade 3 on Pem included anemia 8%, lymphopenia 8%, neutropenia 4%, and fatigue 4%; there were no grade 5 toxicities. A higher baseline level of serum mesothelin related peptide (SMRP) was associated with worse PFS (HR 1.861, p=0.049). Baseline osteopontin did not significantly affect PFS (p=0.3630). Conclusions: Although it was well tolerated, maintenance Pem following initial Pem/platinum doublet chemotherapy does not improve PFS in MPM patients. High baseline SMRP was associated with shorter PFS. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT01085630.

Sex differences in efficacy and toxicity of first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC): An analysis of 18,399 patients in the ARCAD database.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4029-4029
Author(s):  
Anna Dorothea Wagner ◽  
Manel Rakez ◽  
Benoist Chibaudel ◽  
Richard Adams ◽  
John Raymond Zalcberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Tumor Characteristics ◽  
First Line ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
The Impact

4029 Background: The clearance of 5-FU differs significantly between men (M) and women (W). Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) for CRC has a higher toxicity in W. The impact of sex on efficacy and toxicity in first-line trials of metastatic CRC (mCRC) is unknown. Methods: We analyzed patient (pt) and tumor characteristics, toxicities (nausea (AE1), vomiting (AE2), diarrhea, neutropenia (AE3)) and efficacy (overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS)) according to sex in the following treatment groups: A: CT alone, B: CT + bevacizumab, C: CT + EGFR-antibodies, with subgroup analyses in the CT alone group for single-agent, doublets and triplets, as well as irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-based regimens. Pts from trials with treatments still used today and all relevant data available were eligible. OS and PFS were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models adjusted for primary tumor location and performance status (PS). Results: We included 28 trials with 18.399 pts (11.352 M and 7.047 W). W were younger (61 vs. 63 years), had more often a PS of 1 (49 vs 45%), BRAF mutations (10 vs. 7%), right-sided tumors (42 vs. 35%) and less often rectal tumors (26 vs. 32%). Significant differences in toxicity are reported in table. Rates of diarrhea were similar. There was no sex disparity in OS in the predefined subgroups except for pts receiving triplets where OS was better in M (HRadj=1.39 (1.05 - 1.85)). Median (interquartile range) OS in months for M and W was 16.7 (9.2-27.4) and 16.2 (8.9-27.2) in group 1, 21.9 (12.7-37.5) and 22.3 (12.9 – 39.0) in group 2, and 26.8 (14.6-45.3) and 24.8 (12.3-49.2) in group 3. HRsadj (W vs M) (95% CI), p values for OS were 1.02 (0.96-1.09), .557, 0.92 (0.83-1.03), .142, 0.99 (0.85-1.14), .866. Conclusions: M and W with mCRC differ significantly regarding patient and tumor characteristics. The significant higher toxicity in W does not translate in a higher treatment efficacy. Apart from known sex differences in pharmacokinetics of 5-FU, differences in pharmacodynamics must be postulated. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A 6 year retrospective study

2014 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 033-037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sushruta Shrivastava ◽  
Amal Chandra Kataki ◽  
Debabrata Barmon ◽  
Pankaj Deka ◽  
Chidananda Bhuyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Chemotherapy Patients ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Abstract Aims and Objectives: To study the clinical presentations of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and its response to chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of 28 women of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia evaluated over a period of 6 years from January 2004 to December 2009. Patients were evaluated on the basis of their age, number of deliveries, history of abortion or molar pregnancy, and the treatment received. All patients were scored on the basis of WHO scoring system. Patients with low risk (score </=6) received single agent chemotherapy with methotrexate or actinomycin D. Patients with high risk (score >/=7) received multiple agent chemotherapy with EMACO regimen. After completion of chemotherapy patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. The response to treatment was evaluated during follow-up by clinical examination, beta hCG levels and imaging as and when required. Results: Out of 28 women only 27 could be evaluated, because 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Out of 27 patients, 18 patients (66.67%) achieved complete remission with the first-line chemotherapy and additional 25.92% (7/27) achieved complete remission with second line chemotherapy resulting in complete remission of 92.5% (25/27). Conclusion: Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia is curable if patient is properly evaluated and scored. It shows good response to chemotherapy.

Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (16) ◽  
pp. 2212-2217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Herrmann ◽  
György Bodoky ◽  
Thomas Ruhstaller ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
Emilio Bajetta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Good Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeThis phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (Gem) plus capecitabine (GemCap) versus single-agent Gem in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to receive GemCap (oral capecitabine 650 mg/m2twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus Gem 1,000 mg/m2by 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or Gem (1,000 mg/m2by 30-minute infusion weekly for 7 weeks, followed by a 1-week break, and then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks). Patients were stratified according to center, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), presence of pain, and disease extent.ResultsA total of 319 patients were enrolled between June 2001 and June 2004. Median overall survival (OS) time, the primary end point, was 8.4 and 7.2 months in the GemCap and Gem arms, respectively (P = .234). Post hoc analysis in patients with good KPS (score of 90 to 100) showed a significant prolongation of median OS time in the GemCap arm compared with the Gem arm (10.1 v 7.4 months, respectively; P = .014). The overall frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar in each arm. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event in both arms.ConclusionGemCap failed to improve OS at a statistically significant level compared with standard Gem treatment. The safety of GemCap and Gem was similar. In the subgroup of patients with good performance status, median OS was improved significantly. GemCap is a practical regimen that may be considered as an alternative to single-agent Gem for the treatment of advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with a good performance status.

Transition of molecular target agent therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 317-317
Author(s):  
Kazufumi Kobayashi ◽  
Sadahisa Ogasawara ◽  
Aya Takahashi ◽  
Yuya Seko ◽  
Satoshi Tsuchiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Molecular Target ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Significant Difference

317 Background: There have been considerable advances in systemic chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent times. Currently, four molecular target agents (MTA) are available for HCC treatment in Japan. Sequential therapy using multiple MTAs is being considered as the gold standard of treatment. However, the effectiveness of the treatment strategy transition for HCC remains unclear. The present study aimed to clarify the current practical use of MTAs and its effectiveness in HCC treatment. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective study, we collected and analyzed the clinical data of 877 patients who underwent MTA therapy for HCC from June 2009 to March 2019 at several institutes in Japan. The patients were classified into 3 groups as per the period of initial MTA treatment beginning (period 1: 2009–2012, n = 267; period 2: 2013–2016, n = 352; period 3: 2017–2019, n = 258). These 3 periods were defined to have approximately same term. Period 3 means the era of multiple MTAs because of the approval of regorafenib in Japan in 2017. We assessed the patient characteristics, MTA use, and prognosis of the 3 groups. Results: The proportion of patients with advanced-stage HCC, defined according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, in each period was 70.1%, 66.5%, and 62.0% in period 1, 2, and 3, respectively. MTA use for intermediate stages increased with the passage of time ( p = 0.052). The proportion of multiple MTAs use was remarkably increased in the 3 groups (1.1%, 10.2%, and 42.6%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Child-Pugh score, proportion of macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic metastasis, and α-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL showed no significant difference among the 3 groups. The median overall survival was 11.9 months for the entire cohort and 10.4, 11.3, and 15.2 months, for period 1, 2, and 3, respectively. It is noteworthy that the prognosis of patients with HCC improved over time ( p = 0.016). With respect to progression-free survival, the median value was 3.0 months for the entire cohort and 2.7, 2.8, and 4.7 months for period 1, 2, and 3, respectively ( p < 0.0001). The treatment duration was also prolonged with time (2.7, 3.2, and 6.6 months for period 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard model showed that HCV infection, Child-Pugh score, performance status, α-fetoprotein ≥400 ng/mL, presence of macrovascular invasion, and period 3 for initial MTA introduction were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: Sequential therapy with multiple MTAs has gained popularity with time and is considered to improve patient prognosis. The development of MTA therapy for HCC is expected to continue. Therefore, further studies are needed to help determine the appropriate drugs, the sequence of MTA use, and the precise transition time.

EFFICACY OF PERFUSION THERMOCHEMOTHERAPY IN GASTRIC CANCE MANAGEMENT BASED ON RESULTS OF PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY

2021 ◽  
pp. 87-91
Author(s):  
М.Yu. Reiitovich ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Peritoneal Dissemination ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prospective Randomized Study ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Borrmann Type

The article analyses the results of a prospective randomized study of a cohort of 154 radically operated patients with stage IIB-IIIC gastric cancer (Borrmann type 111 IV). 76 patients were administered intraoperative perfusion thermochemotherapy (HIPEC). It was noted that enhancing radical surgery procedure by complementing it with HIPEC in managing this prognostically unfavorable group of patients resulted in a decrease in the frequency of progression cases (p = 0.009), metachronous peritoneal dissemination — (p < 0.001), and 5-year cumulative carcinomatosis incidence — 70.7 ± 6.8 % to 23.6 ± 5.2 % (p < 0.001) thereby building a groundwork for improving 5-year adjusted survival rate from 27.0 ± 6.7 % to 45.1 ±6.4 % (p = 0.05), progression-free survival — from 16.3 ± 5.5 % to 42.1 ± 6.3 % (p < 0.001), and dissemination-free survival — from 19.4 ± 5.9 % to 45.2 ± 6.3 % (p = 0.001).

scholarly journals Role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Elderly and Poor Performance Status Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren M. Rosati ◽  
Joseph M. Herman
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Patient Reported

Literature on the management of nonmetastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in patients who are elderly or have poor performance status is sparse. The median survival of this unique cohort of patients is < 6 months, and most patients are only offered single-agent gemcitabine or supportive care. Recently, adding nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel to gemcitabine was shown to improve survival of patients with metastatic disease with Eastern Cooperative Group performance status of 2. Although standard chemoradiotherapy provides long-term locoregional control in locally advanced pancreatic cancer, it is difficult for this group of patients to tolerate 6 weeks of therapy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can be delivered in only 3 to 5 days, does not require concurrent chemotherapy, and has limited toxicity, and tumor control rates appear to be equivalent to or better than those achieved with standard chemoradiotherapy. Additionally, SBRT has been shown to improve cancer-related pain and patient-reported quality of life. Given the favorable toxicity profile, SBRT seems like an obvious choice for patients who are elderly, have multiple comorbidities, or have poor performance status. Herein, we review the literature on SBRT in this unique patient population and discuss future directions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document