Impact of postoperative intra-abdominal infection on tumor recurrence and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma after curative liver resection.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 374-374
Author(s):  
Dan-yun Ruan ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Ze-Xiao Lin ◽  
Dong-Hao Wu ◽  
Tian-tian Wang ◽  
...  

374 Background: Postoperative intra-abdominal infection has been reported contributed to higher tumor recurrence rate and poor survival in cancer patients. The study aims to evaluate the impact of postoperative intra-abdominal infection on recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: ALL patients underwent liver resection from 2003 to 2010 were identified. The Clavien–Dindo (CD) classification was adopted to classify the complications and patients who died of postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery (grade V) were excluded form the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess variables. Results: 215 patients were included, the overall 30-day postoperative complication rate was 36.74% (n=79), 13.95% (n=30) were intra-abdominal infectious complication. Patients with intra-abdominal infection had worse RFS (27.6% vs 50%, p<0.001) and OS (46.7% vs 82.2%, p<0.001) than those without it. In multivariate analyses, postoperative intra-abdominal infection was an independent prognostic factor of tumor recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.183; 95% confidence interval, 1.334-3.573) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 4.990; 95% confidence interval, 2.643-9.420). Hepatitis B surface antigen positive, tumor diameter (>5cm) and Child-Pugh class (B) were other three independent factors associated with poor prognosis. Conclusions: According to the study, postoperative intra-abdominal infection predicts tumor recurrence and poor survival after radical liver resection in HCC patients. These findings may have implications of the potential association between inflammatory response and cancer progression.

Tumor Biology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 101042831769594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-Jie Yang ◽  
Jing-Hang Jiang ◽  
Yu-Ting Yang ◽  
Zhe Guo ◽  
Ji-jia Li ◽  
...  

The aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index has been reported to predict prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. This study examined the prognostic potential of stratified aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index for hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing curative liver resection. A total of 661 hepatocellular carcinoma patients were retrieved and the associations between aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and clinicopathological variables and survivals (overall survival and disease-free survival) were analyzed. Higher aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index quartiles were significantly associated with poorer overall survival (p = 0.002) and disease-free survival (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index to be an independent risk factor for overall survival (p = 0.018) and disease-free survival (p = 0.01). Patients in the highest aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index quartile were at 44% greater risk of death than patients in the first quartile (hazard ratio = 1.445, 95% confidence interval = 1.081 – 1.931, p = 0.013), as well as 49% greater risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval = 1.112–1.998, p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis also showed aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index to be an independent predictor of poor overall survival and disease-free survival in patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen or with cirrhosis (both p < 0.05). Similar results were obtained when aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index was analyzed as a dichotomous variable with cutoff values of 0.25 and 0.62. Elevated preoperative aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index may be independently associated with poor overall survival and disease-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients following curative resection.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153303381988798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hansong Bai ◽  
Xing Luo ◽  
Dongxu Liao ◽  
Wei Xiong ◽  
Ming Zeng ◽  
...  

Objective: PTTG3P, which maps to chromosome 8q13.1, is a novel long noncoding RNA with oncogenic properties in cancers. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of PTTG3P in terms of overall survival and recurrence-free survival and its potential regulatory network and transcription pattern in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients and Methods: An in silico analysis was performed using data from the Cancer Genome Atlas-Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Results: Results showed that the high PTTG3P expression group was consistently associated with shorter overall survival and recurrence-free survival, regardless of pathological stages or tumor grade. High PTTG3P expression was an independent indicator of shorter overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.177, 95% confidence interval: 1.519-3.121, P < .001) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.222, 95% confidence interval: 1.503-3.283, P < .001). The genes strongly coexpressed with PTTG3P are enriched in several KEGG pathways that are closely associated with carcinogenesis and malignant transformation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion: Based on the findings, we infer that PTTG3P expression might serve as an independent prognostic biomarker in primary hepatocellular carcinoma.


BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m4087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P Hanna ◽  
Will D King ◽  
Stephane Thibodeau ◽  
Matthew Jalink ◽  
Gregory A Paulin ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To quantify the association of cancer treatment delay and mortality for each four week increase in delay to inform cancer treatment pathways. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Published studies in Medline from 1 January 2000 to 10 April 2020. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Curative, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant indications for surgery, systemic treatment, or radiotherapy for cancers of the bladder, breast, colon, rectum, lung, cervix, and head and neck were included. The main outcome measure was the hazard ratio for overall survival for each four week delay for each indication. Delay was measured from diagnosis to first treatment, or from the completion of one treatment to the start of the next. The primary analysis only included high validity studies controlling for major prognostic factors. Hazard ratios were assumed to be log linear in relation to overall survival and were converted to an effect for each four week delay. Pooled effects were estimated using DerSimonian and Laird random effect models. Results The review included 34 studies for 17 indications (n=1 272 681 patients). No high validity data were found for five of the radiotherapy indications or for cervical cancer surgery. The association between delay and increased mortality was significant (P<0.05) for 13 of 17 indications. Surgery findings were consistent, with a mortality risk for each four week delay of 1.06-1.08 (eg, colectomy 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.12; breast surgery 1.08, 1.03 to 1.13). Estimates for systemic treatment varied (hazard ratio range 1.01-1.28). Radiotherapy estimates were for radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.14), adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery (0.98, 0.88 to 1.09), and cervix cancer adjuvant radiotherapy (1.23, 1.00 to 1.50). A sensitivity analysis of studies that had been excluded because of lack of information on comorbidities or functional status did not change the findings. Conclusions Cancer treatment delay is a problem in health systems worldwide. The impact of delay on mortality can now be quantified for prioritisation and modelling. Even a four week delay of cancer treatment is associated with increased mortality across surgical, systemic treatment, and radiotherapy indications for seven cancers. Policies focused on minimising system level delays to cancer treatment initiation could improve population level survival outcomes.


Surgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 147 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Bohle ◽  
Miguel Pera ◽  
Marta Pascual ◽  
Sandra Alonso ◽  
Xavier Mayol ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Susumu Mochizuki ◽  
Hisashi Nakayama ◽  
Yutaka Midorikawa ◽  
Tokio Higaki ◽  
Masamichi Moriguchi ◽  
...  

Objective The effect of postoperative complications including red blood transfusion (BT) on long-term survival for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to define the relationship between postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with HCC. Methods Postoperative complications of 1251 patients who underwent curative liver resection for HCC were classified, and their recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cumulative overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results Any complications occurred in 503 patients (40%). Five-year RFS and 5-year OS in the complication group were 21% and 56%, respectively, significantly lower than the respective values of 32% ( p &lt; 0.001) and 68% ( p &lt; 0.001) in the no-complication group (n=748). Complications related to RFS were postoperative BT [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.726, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.338–2.228, p &lt; 0.001], pleural effusion [HR: 1.434, 95% CI: 1.200–1.713, p &lt; 0.001] using Cox-proportional hazard model. Complications related to OS were postoperative BT [HR: 1.843, 95%CI: 1.380-2.462, p &lt; 0.001], ascites [HR: 1.562, 95% CI: 1.066–2.290 p = 0.022], and pleural effusion [HR: 1.421, 95% CI: 1.150–1.755, p = 0.001). Conclusions Postoperative complications were factors associated with poor long-term survival. Postoperative BT and pleural effusion, were noticeable complications that were prognostic factors for both recurrence-free survival and overall survival.


Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinli Zheng ◽  
Wei Xie ◽  
Yunfeng Zhu ◽  
Li Jiang

Hepatectomy is still as the first-line treatment for the early stage HCC, but the complication rate is higher than p-RFA and the overall survival rate is comparable in these two treatments. Therefore, the patients with small single nodular HCCs could get more benefit from p-RFA, and we need to do further research about p-RFA.


Author(s):  
Soshi Hori ◽  
Michitaka Honda ◽  
Hiroshi Kobayashi ◽  
Hidetaka Kawamura ◽  
Koichi Takiguchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The prognosis of patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer is determined using tumor size and number of metastases; this is similar to the factors used for the prediction of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. The relationship between the degree of liver metastasis from gastric cancer and prognosis with reference to the classification of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer was investigated. Methods This was a multi-institutional historical cohort study. Among patients with stage IV gastric cancer, who visited the cancer hospitals in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, between 2008 and 2015, those with simultaneous liver metastasis were included. Abdominal pretreatment computed tomography images were reviewed and classified into H1 (four or less liver metastases with a maximum diameter of ≤5 cm); H2 (other than H1 and H3) or H3 (five or more liver metastases with a maximum diameter of ≥5 cm). The hazard ratio for overall survival according to the H grade (H1, H2 and H3) was calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results A total of 412 patients were analyzed. Patients with H1, H2 and H3 grades were 118, 162 and 141, respectively, and their median survival time was 10.2, 5.7 and 3.1 months, respectively (log-rank P &lt; 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio for overall survival was H1: H2: H3 = reference: 1.39 (95% confidence interval: 1.04–1.85): 1.69 (95% confidence interval: 1.27–2.27). Conclusions The grading system proposed in this study was a simple and easy-to-use prognosis prediction index for patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-193
Author(s):  
Engin Celik ◽  
Hale Goksever Celik ◽  
Hamdullah Sozen ◽  
Semen Onder ◽  
Merve Baktiroglu ◽  
...  

Purpose: Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer is defined as the concurrent presence of ovarian cancer with endometrial cancer. We aimed to evaluate whether there is an effect of endometriosis on progression-free survival and overall survival of women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer. We also compared these findings with the patients having endometrial-only tumors and ovarian-only tumors. Methods: The patients who underwent surgery for endometrioid or clear-cell endometrial-only tumors and/or ovarian-only tumors and synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer between 2005 and 2016 were included in this cohort study. The effect of the presence of endometriosis on progression-free survival and overall survival in these women who met the criteria was determined using statistical methods. Women were also compared regarding their demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics. Results: A total of 176 patients were included in this study. All histology types of tumors located in endometrium or ovary were endometrioid or clear-cell cancer. Endometriosis was present in 62 patients (35.2%), whereas adenomyosis was present in 44 patients (25%). Endometriosis was diagnosed more frequently in women with ovarian-only tumors and synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer than those with endometrial-only tumors (59.2% vs 5.7%, p < 0.001 and 45.7% vs 5.7%, p < 0.001, respectively). The patients with endometriosis showed no significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.70; 95% confidence interval = 0.48–6.03; p = 0.408 and hazard ratio = 1.67; 95% confidence interval = 0.30–9.44; p = 0.562, respectively). The presence of endometriosis was a stronger predictor for progression-free survival and overall survival comparing with the presence of adenomyosis. Conclusion: The women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer should be informed that endometriosis has no detrimental effect on progression-free survival and overall survival.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3088-3088
Author(s):  
Ryan A. Wilcox ◽  
Kay Ristow ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
David James Inwards ◽  
Ivana Micallef ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3088 Background: Despite the use of modern immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP) regimens, almost 50% of patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) will relapse. Current prognostic models, most notably the International Prognostic Index, are comprised of patient and tumor characteristics and are unable to identify patients with less than a 50% chance of long-term survival. However, recent observations demonstrate that factors related to host adaptive immunity and the tumor microenvironment are powerful prognostic variables in non-Hodgkin lymphoma Methods: We retrospectively examined the absolute neutrophil count (ANC), monocyte count (AMC) and lymphocyte count (ALC), obtained from an automated complete blood count with differential, as prognostic variables in a cohort of 255 consecutive DLBCL patients that were uniformly treated with R-CHOP between 2000 and 2007 at a single institution. The primary study objective was to assess if ANC, AMC, and ALC at diagnosis were predictors of overall survival (OS) in DLBCL. Results: At diagnosis, the median ANC was 4720/uL (range 1190–17690), the median AMC was 610/uL (range 30–4040), and the median ALC was 1220/uL (range 140–5410). The median follow-up for these patients was 48 months. In the univariate analysis, each of these variables predicted OS as continuous variables. As dichotomized variables, an elevated ANC (≥5500/μL; hazard ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.14–2.60, p=0.01) and AMC (≥610/μL; hazard ratio 3.36, 95% confidence interval 2.10–5.59, p<0.0001) were each associated with inferior OS. In contrast, the presence of lymphopenia, defined as an ALC ≤1000/uL, was associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio 2.21, 95% confidence interval 1.43–3.39, p=0.0004). When components of the IPI were included on multivariate analysis only the AMC and ALC were independently significant prognostic factors for OS, with hazard ratios of 3.37 (95% confidence interval 2.05–5.74, p<0.0001) and 2.19 (95% confidence interval 1.38–3.44, p=0.0009), respectively. The dichotomized AMC and ALC generated the AMC/ALC prognostic index (PI) and stratified patients into 3 risk groups: very good (AMC <610/uL and ALC >1000/uL), good (AMC ≥610/uL or ALC ≤1000/uL), and poor-risk (AMC ≥610/uL and ALC ≤1000/uL) populations. For both the very good (n=79) and good-risk (n=134) groups median OS has not been reached with estimated 5-year overall survival of 88% and 69%, respectively. Median OS for poor-risk (n=42) patients was 1.7 years (95% confidence interval 1.1–2.7 years) with an estimated 5-year overall survival of 28% (p<0.0001). By comparison, the R-IPI was unable to identify a group of patients with a median survival less than 8 years. The estimated 5-year OS was 93%, 71% and 53% for very good, good and poor-risk patients, respectively. We sought to determine whether the AMC/ALC PI may provide additional prognostic information when combined with the R-IPI. To test this possibility, the 171 very good/good risk and 84 poor risk patients identified by the R-IPI were subsequently risk stratified using the AMC/ALC PI. Among R-IPI very good/good risk patients a subset of poor risk patients (n=21) with a median OS of 2.2 years (95% confidence interval 1.1–6.6 years) and 35% 5-year OS could be identified with the AMC/ALC PI. In contrast, 5-year OS ranged from 75%-88% among very good and good risk patients. Similarly, stratification of R-IPI poor risk patients by the AMC/ALC PI identified subsets of very good (n=19) and good risk (n=44) patients with median OS that had not been reached and 86% and 55% 5-year OS, respectively. High risk (n=21) patients had a median OS of 1.4 years (95% confidence interval 0.9–2.2 years) and an estimated 5-year OS of less than 25%. Conclusions: Measurement of AMC and ALC at diagnosis is widely applicable, cost effective, predicts OS, and identifies high-risk patients with DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document