Selecting optimal patient candidates to assess the clinical utility of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in advanced solid tumors.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22186-e22186
Author(s):  
Cathie T. Chung ◽  
Lawrence D. Piro ◽  
Daniel Lieber ◽  
Melani P. Shaum ◽  
Peter D. Boasberg ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 4297-4312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline du Rusquec ◽  
Ombline de Calbiac ◽  
Marie Robert ◽  
Mario Campone ◽  
Jean Sebastien Frenel

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikatsu Koga ◽  
Atsushi Ochiai

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are used as powerful tools for understanding cancer biology in PDX clinical trials and co-clinical trials. In this systematic review, we focus on PDX clinical trials or co-clinical trials for drug development in solid tumors and summarize the utility of PDX models in the development of anti-cancer drugs, as well as the challenges involved in this approach, following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Recently, the assessment of drug efficacy by PDX clinical and co-clinical trials has become an important method. PDX clinical trials can be used for the development of anti-cancer drugs before clinical trials, with their efficacy assessed by the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). A few dozen cases of PDX models have completed enrollment, and the efficacy of the drugs is assessed by 1 × 1 × 1 or 3 × 1 × 1 approaches in the PDX clinical trials. Furthermore, co-clinical trials can be used for personalized care or precision medicine with the evaluation of a new drug or a novel combination. Several PDX models from patients in clinical trials have been used to assess the efficacy of individual drugs or drug combinations in co-clinical trials.


Nanoscale ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (45) ◽  
pp. 23259-23265
Author(s):  
Meng Suo ◽  
Zeming Liu ◽  
Wenxue Tang ◽  
Jiancheng Guo ◽  
Wei Jiang ◽  
...  

Radiotherapy (RT) is a potent approach to cancer treatment, but the tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors is often highly hypoxic and contains high levels of antioxidant enzymes, thereby reducing the RT efficacy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15038-e15038
Author(s):  
April A. N. Rose ◽  
Olubukola Ayodele ◽  
Sofia Genta ◽  
Thiago Pimentel Muniz ◽  
Deirdre Kelly ◽  
...  

e15038 Background: Recurring oncogenic non-V600E BRAF mts have been identified in many cancer types. Preclinical data indicate that some BRAF non-V600E mts can be targeted with BRAF + MEK inhibitors. BEAVER is an investigator-initiated study designed to test the safety and efficacy of binimetinib and encorafenib (B+E) in patients (pts) with non-V600E BRAF mts. Methods: Key eligibility criteria are: pts with advanced solid tumors with BRAF non-V600E activating (class 1 and 2) or inhibitory (class 3) mts, and no prior BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Pts receive binimetinib (45mg PO BID) and encorafenib (450mg PO daily) on a 28-day cycle until intolerable toxicity or progression. The primary objective is OR rate (ORR) as per RECIST 1.1. In this Simon 2-stage trial, ≥1 of 7 pts need to have an objective response (OR) before commencing second stage of study (26 pts total). Secondary objectives include: safety, DCR, PFS, and OS. Exploratory objectives include: genomic profiling of tumors, evaluating circulating tumor DNA dynamics and development of patient derived xenograft (PDX) models. Results: From June 2019 to Feb 2021, 12 pts were screened and 9 pts enrolled; 9 are evaluable for safety and 8 for efficacy. Tumor types were melanoma and colon (n=2 each), as well as gallbladder, lung, breast and uterine cancers (n=1 each). Median age was 62 yrs (range 40-72). Median number of prior treatments was 2 (range 0-6). 1 pt had a class 1, 3 pts had class 2, and 5 pts had class 3, non-V600E BRAF mts. The median number of cycles was 2 (range: 1-7). Common treatment-related adverse events were mostly grade ≤ 2, and included: Blurred vision (78%), fatigue (67%), nausea (44%), vomiting (33%), and rash (33%). Dose reductions were required in 4/9 pts (44%) due to: blurred vision (22%), central serous retinopathy (11%), malaise (11%) and increased lipase (11%). Drug-related grade 3 AEs occurred in 2/9 pts and included: malaise (11%), confusion (11%), fatigue (11%) and increased lipase (11%). All eye toxicities were reversible with dose interruption. ORR was 12.5% (1/8) with one unconfirmed PR in a melanoma pt (BRAF G469S), treated for 6.5 months. One gallbladder cancer pt (BRAF D594N) had SD, and 6 pts had PD as best response. Genomic profiling was performed on archival tumors for 8 pts. Two PDX models were established. Responses to B+E in PDX models mirrored responses in 2 corresponding pts who had PD. Genomic and molecular profiling of pt tumors and corresponding PDXs identified multiple potential mechanisms of B+E resistance including: activation of EGFR and Akt pathways and inactivation of NF1 and Rb1. Conclusions: Preliminary data confirmed the safety of B+E and showed preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity in advanced cancer pts with non-V600E BRAF mts. This study met the criterion for advancing to stage 2. Enrolment in the BEAVER trial and correlative biomarker analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03839342.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document