Outcomes of retesting BRCA-negative patients using multigene panels.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 23-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddhartha Yadav ◽  
Jennifer Fulbright ◽  
Heidi Dreyfuss ◽  
Ashley Reeves ◽  
Sarah Campian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Cancer Genetics ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Cancer Genes ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
New Genes ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations ◽  
Potential Clinical Benefit

23 Background: New technologies for identifying hereditary predisposition to breast cancer have led to the discovery of novel genes associated with cancer risk. This has prompted re-evaluation of patients who previously tested negative for BRCA1/2 gene mutations, with a possibility of discovering new genes which may impact management. This study reports on the results of retesting patients who previously were negative for BRCA1/2. Methods: Patients who tested negative for BRCA1/2 mutations who had significant personal and family history were referred back to the Cancer Genetics Center between February 1, 2012 and May 30, 2105 for discussion of additional testing. A detailed personal and family history was reviewed, and patients were counseled about the genetics and clinical implications of panel testing for multiple breast cancer genes. Panel testing using next generation sequencing technologies was ordered. Patients were seen in follow up for discussion of results and management. Results: A total of 12 pathogenic mutations were identified during the study period. The genes and frequencies of these mutations were: CHEK2(3), PALB2(3), ATM(2), APC(1), BARD(1), CDH(1), MUTYH(1). There were 33 variants of undetermined significance(VUS) in 27 patients. 5 of these were seen in patients with a known pathogenic mutation; 3 others were later classified as benign. The frequencies of these VUSs were: ATM (9), PALB2(3), BARD1 (3), PTEN(3), PMS2(3), MSH6(2), CHEK2 (1), MYH(1), RAD51(1), BRIP1(2), NF1(1), BMPR1A(1). Of the 46 patients who had their initial BRCA testing and repeat panel testing between February 1, 2012 and May 30, 2015, 6 (13%) tested positive for a pathogenic mutation. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility and potential clinical benefit of retesting individuals who previously tested negative for BRCA1/2 mutation. This approach had a significant management impact on patients and their families, with a 13% detection rate of pathogenic mutations. The success of retesting is predicated upon an infrastructure of provider and patient education, pre and post genetic counseling and serves as a model for other centers.

Pathogenic germline mutations in emerging cancer genes: What happens after panel testing?

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1528-1528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Thomas Hall ◽  
Divya Ahuja Parikh ◽  
Tanya Gupta ◽  
Jennifer Lee Caswell ◽  
Meredith Mills ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Genetics ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Precision Oncology ◽  
Cancer Genes ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Technology ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Gene Panel Testing

1528 Background: Next-generation sequencing technology enables more comprehensive germline genetic testing, including genes whose cancer risks are less well-characterized (particularly among patients with less striking family histories). Little is known about patient outcomes, particularly adherence to risk-reducing recommendations and family testing. Methods: We attempted a phone interview ≥3 times with each adult patient who had a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation found in an emerging cancer gene (defined as any gene other than BRCA1/2 or the Lynch Syndrome genes MLH1, MSH2/6, PMS2) at a single academic cancer genetics clinic from January 2013-July 2016. Results: Of 143 eligible patients, 53 (37%) were successfully contacted and all consented to participate. Median follow-up was 677 days (range 247–1401) and age was 52 years (21-82). Two-thirds (68%) had personal cancer history and 93% had a first-degree relative with cancer. Mutations in genes associated with named syndromes ( APC=5 , CDH1=3 , TP53=3, PTEN=2) were found in 23% (many of whom lacked family history typical of these syndromes) whereas 77% had mutations in less well-characterized genes ( MYH=10, CHEK2=10, ATM=6, PALB2=6 , NBN=3, RAD51C=2, RAD51D=2, SDHB=1, CDKN2A=1, MRE11A=1, RAD50=1, FLCN=1). Conclusions: Two years after panel testing, patients with germline mutations in less well-characterized genes reported high rates of adherence to recommendations, family communication and testing. Limitations include a relatively low response rate and a single academic center; this may bias toward a “best-case” scenario. Larger, population-based studies will be crucial to understand the real-world outcomes of germline multiple-gene panel testing and its contribution to precision oncology. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Prevalence of deleterious mutations among patients with breast cancer referred for multigene panel testing in a Romanian population

2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iulian Gabriel Goidescu ◽  
Gabriela Caracostea ◽  
Dan Tudor Eniu ◽  
Florin Vasile Stamatian
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Cancer Genes ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Risk Genes ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations ◽  
Multigene Panel

Aim. Multigene panel testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) using next generation sequencing is becoming more common in medical care.We report our experience regarding deleterious mutations of high and moderate-risk breast cancer genes (BRCA1/2, TP53, STK11, CDH1, PTEN, PALB2, CHEK2, ATM), as well as more recently identified cancer genes, many of which have increased risk but less well-defined penetrance.Methods. Genetic testing was performed in 130 consecutive cases with breast cancer referred to our clinic for surgical evaluation and who met the 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic testing.Results. 82 patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations and VUS mutations, and 48 were negative; 36 of the pathogenic mutations were in the high-risk genes and 16 were in the moderate risk genes and only 5 cases in the intermediary risk group.From the VUS mutation group 21 cases were in the intermediary risk group, 9 cases were in the moderate risk group and only 7 cases in high risk group.The most frequent BRCA1 variant was c.3607C>T (7 cases) followed by c.5266dupC and c.4035delA (each in 4 cases). Regarding BRCA-2 mutations we identified c.9371A>T and c.8755-1G>A in 6 cases and we diagnosed VUS mutations in 3 cases.Conclusion. Our study identified 2 mutations in the BRCA1 gene that are less common in the Romanian population, c.3607C>T and c.4035delA. Both variants had particular molecular phenotypes, c.3607C>T variant respecting the triple negative pattern of BRCA1 breast cancer while c.4035delA were Luminal B HER positive.

scholarly journals A Case Report of Germline Compound Heterozygous Mutations in the BRCA1 Gene of an Ovarian and Breast Cancer Patient

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 889
Author(s):  
Ava Kwong ◽  
Cecilia Y. S. Ho ◽  
Vivian Y. Shin ◽  
Chun Hang Au ◽  
Tsun Leung Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 Gene ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Compound Heterozygous ◽  
Strong Family History ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

The germline carrier of the BRCA1 pathogenic mutation has been well proven to confer an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Despite BRCA1 biallelic pathogenic mutations being extremely rare, they have been reported to be embryonically lethal or to cause Fanconi anemia (FA). Here we describe a patient who was a 48-year-old female identified with biallelic pathogenic mutations of the BRCA1 gene, with no or very subtle FA-features. She was diagnosed with ovarian cancer and breast cancer at the ages of 43 and 44 and had a strong family history of breast and gynecological cancers.

scholarly journals Does multilocus inherited neoplasia alleles syndrome have severe clinical expression?

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 521-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agostina Stradella ◽  
Jesús del Valle ◽  
Paula Rofes ◽  
Lídia Feliubadaló ◽  
Èlia Grau Garces ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Age Of Onset ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Cancer Genes ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations ◽  
Predisposing Genes ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Gene Panels

ImportanceGenetic testing of hereditary cancer using comprehensive gene panels can identify patients with more than one pathogenic mutation in high and/or moderate-risk-associated cancer genes. This phenomenon is known as multilocus inherited neoplasia alleles syndrome (MINAS), which has been potentially linked to more severe clinical manifestations.ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence and clinical features of MINAS in a large cohort of adult patients with hereditary cancer homogeneously tested with the same gene panel.Patients and methodsA cohort of 1023 unrelated patients with suspicion of hereditary cancer was screened using a validated panel including up to 135 genes associated with hereditary cancer and phakomatoses.ResultsThirteen (1.37%) patients harbouring two pathogenic mutations in dominant cancer-predisposing genes were identified, representing 5.7% (13/226) of patients with pathogenic mutations. Most (10/13) of these cases presented clinical manifestations associated with only one of the mutations identified. One case showed mutations in MEN1 and MLH1 and developed tumours associated with both cancer syndromes. Interestingly, three of the double mutants had a young age of onset or severe breast cancer phenotype and carried mutations in moderate to low-risk DNA damage repair-associated genes; two of them presented biallelic inactivation of CHEK2. We included these two patients for the sake of their clinical interest although we are aware that they do not exactly fulfil the definition of MINAS since both mutations are in the same gene.Conclusions and relevanceGenetic analysis of a broad cancer gene panel identified the largest series of patients with MINAS described in a single study. Overall, our data do not support the existence of more severe manifestations in double mutants at the time of diagnosis although they do confirm previous evidence of severe phenotype in biallelic CHEK2 and other DNA repair cancer-predisposing genes.

DNA repair germline pathogenic mutation associations with treatment duration and family history in prostate cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 245-245
Author(s):  
James Vu ◽  
Marcus Marie Moses ◽  
Lahiru Ranasinghe ◽  
Patrick Cotogno ◽  
Charlotte Manogue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Family History ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
History Of

245 Background: Germline mutation testing for metastatic prostate cancer patients creates a potential opportunity to personalize targeted therapies to improve treatment outcomes. The goal of this study was to characterize cancer family history, and evaluate treatment outcomes, in mCRPC patients with DNA repair pathogenic germline alterations. Methods: A retrospective study of metastatic PCa patients at Tulane Cancer Center identified 246 patients undergoing germline testing using panels (30-80 genes) (Color.com or Inviate.com). Clinical annotations included family history, life-extending treatments, and treatment duration. Statistical analyses including chi-square and Wilcoxon Rank Sum. Results: In the 246 patients tested for germline mutations, 27 patients (11.0%) had ≥1 DNA repair germline pathogenic mutation (BRCA2 = 11, BRCA1 = 3, CHEK2 = 5, ATM = 3, NBN = 1, PMS2 = 2, MSH2 = 1, PALB2 = 1) while 219 patients (89.0%) possessed no pathogenic mutation in these genes. Patients with a DNA repair pathogenic mutation were more likely to have > 2 family members affected by cancer, regardless of cancer type or degree of relationship (p = 0.04). In the DNA repair population, 5 pathogenic patients had no family history of cancer (18.5%, n = 5). Patients were more likely to have a germline alteration if they had 1 or more first degree relatives affected with breast cancer (p = 0.00001). Median lines of life-extending treatments to date between the pathogenic and non-pathogenic population were equal at 2. There were no significant differences in treatment duration for abiraterone (p = 0.49), enzalutamide (p = 0.99), docetaxel (p = 0.28), cabazitaxel (p = 0.53), carboplatin+docetaxel (p = 0.41), or radium-223 (p = 0.59) between the two groups. Conclusions: In this study, DNA repair pathogenic germline mutations did not affect treatment durations or lines of therapy but these studies are underpowered. The relationship between a family history of breast cancer and a DNA repair pathogenic mutation has not previously been reported.

scholarly journals Prevalence of germline TP53 mutation among early onset middle eastern breast cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Khalid Siraj ◽  
Tariq Masoodi ◽  
Rong Bu ◽  
Sandeep Kumar Parvathareddy ◽  
Kaleem Iqbal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Middle Eastern ◽  
Mutation Screening ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Positive Family History ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background The data on prevalence and clinical relevance of TP53 germline mutations in early onset Middle-Eastern breast cancer (BC) is limited. Methods We determined TP53 germline mutations in a cohort of 464 early onset BC patients from Saudi Arabia using capture sequencing based next generation sequencing. Results Germline TP53 pathogenic mutations were found in 1.5% (7/464) of early onset Saudi BC patients. A total of six pathogenic missense mutations, one stop gain mutation and two variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were detected in our cohort. No TP53 pathogenic mutations were detected among 463 healthy controls. TP53 mutations carriers were significantly more likely to have bilateral breast cancer (p = 0.0008). At median follow-up of 41 months, TP53 mutations were an unfavorable factor for overall survival in univariate analysis. All the patients carrying TP53 mutations were negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Majority of patients (85.7%; 6/7) carrying TP53 mutation had no family history suggestive of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) or personal history of multiple LFS related tumors. Only one patient had a positive family history suggestive of LFS. Conclusions TP53 germline mutation screening detects a clinically meaningful risk of early onset BC from this ethnicity and should be considered in all early onset BC regardless of the family history of cancer, especially in young patients that are negative for BRCA mutations.

scholarly journals Prevalence and Spectrum of Breast Cancer Inherited Mutations in Uganda and Cameroon Women

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 43s-43s
Author(s):  
B. Adedokun ◽  
Y. Zheng ◽  
P. Ndom ◽  
A. Gakwaya ◽  
T. Makumbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Positive Family History ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Sub Saharan

Background: Breast cancer among indigenous Africans is characterized by higher prevalence of triple-negative disease and poor prognosis. A previous study in Nigeria reported a strikingly high prevalence of deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Nigerian women with breast cancer. It is unknown if this is true in other sub-Saharan African countries. Aim: The objective of this study is to determine the frequency of germline mutations among an unselected sample of women in Africa. Methods: We conducted a case-control study of breast cancer in Uganda and Cameroon to investigate genetic and nongenetic risk factors for breast cancer. Breast cancer cases were enrolled in two tertiary hospitals in the two countries, unselected for age at diagnosis and family history. Controls who were free of breast cancer were enrolled in the same hospitals and matched to cases on age. A 24-gene sequencing panel was used to test germline mutations in cases and controls. Results: There were 176 cases and 177 controls with a mean age at diagnosis of 46.2 years for cases and mean age at interview of 46.7 years for controls. Among cases, 18.2% carried a pathogenic mutation in a breast cancer gene: 6.3% in BRCA1, 6.3% in BRCA2, 1.7% in ATM, 1.1% in PALB2, 0.6% in BARD1, 0.6% in CDH1, 0.6% in TP53, and 1.2% in any of 17 other genes. Among controls, 2.3% carried a pathogenic mutation in one of the 24 susceptibility genes. Cases were 9.6-fold more likely to carry a mutation compared with controls (odds ratio=9.61, 95% confidence interval: 3.28-38.1; P < 0.001). The mean age of breast cancer cases with pathogenic BRCA1 mutations was 38.3 years compared with 46.7 years among other cases without such mutations ( P = 0.03). There was a trend that cases with a positive family history had higher chance of carrying a mutation (33.3%) than cases without (17.1%), but few cases reported a positive family history. Conclusion: Our findings confirm the earlier report of a high proportion of deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 among breast cancer patients in sub-Saharan Africa. As most of these women present with advanced breast cancer, there is an urgent need to improve access to genomic testing and life saving cancer medicines including chemotherapy and clinical trials of novel agents like PARP inhibitors. Given the high burden of inherited breast cancer, genetic risk assessment should be integrated into cancer control plans in sub-Saharan Africa.

Family cancer patterns and variation by race and ethnicity among individuals with pathogenic variants in multi-gene cancer predisposition panels at a large urban comprehensive cancer center.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13540-e13540
Author(s):  
Sushma Tatineni ◽  
Kristen Purrington ◽  
Hadeel Assad ◽  
Nadine Abdallah ◽  
Meri Tarockoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Race And Ethnicity ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
History Of

e13540 Background: The identification of pathogenic variants and variants of unknown significance (VUS) in multi-gene cancer predisposition testing raises new questions regarding cancer risk and management. We evaluated the personal and family cancer patterns and variation by race and ethnicity, among individuals positive for pathogenic variants in non-BRCA1/ 2 cancer predisposing genes. Methods: The Karmanos Cancer Institute (KCI) Cancer Genetics database was queried from May 13, 2013 through December 31, 2018. There were 3,544 unrelated individuals evaluated for hereditary cancer predisposition of whom 1,868 had 18-gene panel testing at 6 sites across Michigan. Data was collected on personal and family cancer history including ages at diagnosis utilizing a 3-generation pedigree, self-identified race and ethnicity and results of genetic testing. We describe the prevalence of pathogenic variants by proband cancer diagnosis, family history, race, and ethnicity. Results: The race/ethnic distribution of the tested cohort included 67.5% non-Hispanic White (NHW), 24.4% African American (AA), 2.1% Arab, 1.8% Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ), 1.0% Hispanic, and 3.4% other. The distribution of cancer diagnoses included 40.6% breast, 5.5% ovarian, 4.1% colon, 3.5% endometrial, 2.0% pancreas and 39.7% unaffected. Pathogenic variants were seen in 151 (8.1%) individuals and VUS in 309 (16.5%). The five most common pathogenic variants were CHEK2 (40), MUTYH (22), ATM (20), and PALB2 (18). The most common pathogenic variants by race and ethnicity were CHEK2 (NHW), RAD51C (AA), PALB2 (Arab), CHEK2, MSH6 (AJ), and none in Hispanics. Variants associated with the four most common cancer types were breast ( CHEK2 ), ovarian ( CHEK2, MUTYH, BRIP1), colon ( ATM), and endometrial ( MSH6, PALB2). Of 40 individuals with CHEK2 variants, 92.5% were NHW, and 34 (85%), 31 (78%), 10 (25%), 1 (2.5%) had family history of breast cancer, breast cancer before age 50, ovarian, and colon cancer, respectively. Of 20 with ATM variants, 95% were NHW, 13 had family history data and 10 (76.9%), 8 (61.5%), 2 (15.4%), 1 (7.7%) had family history of breast, breast cancer before age 50, ovarian, and colon cancer, respectively. Conclusions: Pathogenic variants seen using multigene panel testing differ by race, ethnicity and personal/family history of cancer. This data will inform genetic counseling strategies in regards to cancer risk and management. Data on additional genes updated through 2019 will be presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document