Use of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in patients with advanced cancer referred to an embedded palliative care clinician.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
Sarah D'Ambruoso ◽  
Anne M. Walling ◽  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
Alexandra Drakaki ◽  
Jonathan Wade Goldman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Initial Visit ◽  
Emotional Symptoms ◽  
Distress Screening ◽  
Palliative Oncology ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale

96 Background: Physical and emotional symptoms are highly prevalent in patients with advanced cancers and contribute to overall distress level and decreased self-reported quality of life. Oncology organizations and accrediting bodies now routinely recommend universal distress screening among patients with advanced cancers. Palliative and supportive care clinicians play an important role in implementing symptom and distress screening in cancer centers. Methods: As part of an embedded palliative care nurse practitioner (PC-NP) intervention within a large ambulatory oncology clinic, patients with advanced breast, GU, GI and lung cancer were screened for physical and emotional symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and treated appropriately including referral to psychology-based supportive care clinic for moderate to severe anxiety and depression or clinician-identified need. We used pre-test post-test methods to see if symptoms improved after enrollment in an embedded palliative oncology program. Results: Sixty-eight patients were screened at initial visit and 41 had follow-up screening during the first 13 months of the program with a part-time PC-NP. Only the 41 patients who had both an initial and a follow-up visit were included in the analysis. Patients were assessed using the ESAS at initial visit and at a follow-up visit an average of 5.9 weeks later (RANGE 1.0-30.6), and significant reductions were found in self-reported pain (4.0 v. 3.0), shortness of breath (3.0 v. 2.1), lack of appetite (2.8 v. 2.1), and overall well-being (4.7 v 3.8) (p < 0.05). Emotional symptoms (anxiety and depression) also decreased but were not statistically significant. Aggregate scores (emotional symptoms plus physical symptoms plus well-being) demonstrated a 6 point reduction in severity (26.2 baseline to 20.3 at follow-up, p = 0.17). Conclusions: These findings are suggestive of improvement in cancer-related symptoms and distress after enrollment in an embedded palliative oncology program. More rigorous study designs are needed to better understand the impact of the intervention on symptom management.

The Effect of Combined Drug Management and an Exercise Program on Symptoms and the Happiness Level in Elderly Women

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Seçil Gülhan Güner ◽  
Arzu Erden ◽  
Nesrin Nural
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Women ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Drug Management ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of combined drug management and an exercise program on symptoms and the happiness levels of elderly women people living at home. This interventional study included a total of 35 women, aged 65 to 74 years, who were registered at the Family Healthcare Centre. A 14-week program was combined with exercise and drug management. Pre-test and post-test evaluations results were recorded. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), Oxford Happiness Questionnaire-Short Form (OHQ-SF) and a sociodemographic form and Follow-Up form were used for data collection. The mean ESAS points of the symptoms of pain, tiredness, sadness, and insomnia showed a significant decrease after intervention and the sense of well-being improved ( p < .001). A statistically significant increase was determined in the happiness levels of the participants after intervention. The combined program of drug management and exercise was found to be effective in raising happiness levels and reducing symptoms in elderly women.

scholarly journals Patterns of Opioid Prescription, Use, and Costs Among Patients With Advanced Cancer and Inpatient Palliative Care Between 2008 and 2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e74-e83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sriram Yennurajalingam ◽  
Zhanni Lu ◽  
Suresh K. Reddy ◽  
EdenMae C. Rodriguez ◽  
Kristy Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Symptom Changes

PURPOSE: An understanding of opioid prescription and cost patterns is important to optimize pain management for patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to determine opioid prescription and cost patterns and to identify opioid prescription predictors in patients with advanced cancer who received inpatient palliative care (IPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed data from 807 consecutive patients with cancer who received IPC in each October from 2008 through 2014. Patient characteristics; opioid types; morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) in milligrams per day of scheduled opioids before, during, and after hospitalization; and in-admission opioid cost per patient were assessed. We determined symptom changes between baseline and follow-up palliative care visits and the in-admission opioid prescription predictors. RESULTS: A total of 714 (88%) of the 807 patients were evaluable. The median MEDD per patient decreased from 150 mg/d in 2008 to 83 mg/d in 2014 ( P < .001). The median opioid cost per patient decreased and then increased from $22.97 to $40.35 over the 7 years ( P = .03). The median MEDDs increased from IPC to discharge by 67% ( P < .001). The median Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale pain improvement at follow-up was 1 ( P < .001). Younger patients with advanced cancer (odds ratio [OR[, 0.95; P < . 001) were prescribed higher preadmission MEDDs (OR, 1.01; P < .001) more often in the earlier study years (2014 v 2009: OR, 0.18 [ P = .004] v 0.30 [ P = .02]) and tended to use high MEDDs (> 75 mg/d) during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: The MEDD per person decreased from 2008 to 2014. The opioid cost per patient decreased from 2008 to 2011 and then increased from 2012 to 2014. Age, prescription year, and preadmission opioid doses were significantly associated with opioid doses prescribed to patients with advanced cancer who received IPC.

The influence of a cachexia clinic on palliative care integration in oncology.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 124-124
Author(s):  
Diane Portman ◽  
Sarah Thirlwell ◽  
Kristine A. Donovan
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
The Impact

124 Background: Appetite and weight loss are common in patients with advanced cancer and specialized cachexia clinics have been established to address these symptoms. Given the association between anorexia/cachexia and other adverse symptoms, these patients may also benefit from specialty level palliative care (PC). However, referral to outpatient specialty level PC is often delayed or does not occur. We sought to examine the prevalence of other factors associated with appetite and weight loss in patients with advanced cancer and the impact of a specialized cachexia clinic on identification and treatment of other PC needs. Methods: The records of patients referred by their Oncologist to the cachexia clinic of a cancer center from August 2016 to June 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Subjects who had been referred to PC by their Oncologist were excluded. Patients had been assessed for symptom burden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r). Patients identified with PC needs had been referred to the PC clinic for follow-up within 30 days after cachexia clinic consultation. Results: Thirty subjects were evaluated in the cachexia clinic (average age 68 years; 63% female). The predominant diagnosis was lung cancer (70%). An average of 6 symptoms per patient were in the moderate to severe range on ESAS, excluding appetite. Depression, fatigue and pain were most common. The average cachexia clinic total ESAS score was 51.61. Only 17% of patients had completed advance directives. Ninety-three % of patients were referred to PC and 68% were seen. The average number of PC visits was 2.79. Within the PC clinic, advance directive completion increased to 37%, goals of care discussion occurred with 50% and 17% received hospice referrals. At the most recent follow-up in the PC clinic, the average total ESAS score had decreased by 11.44 (22%) and all ESAS item scores were improved on average. Conclusions: The cachexia clinic proved a useful means to identify other PC needs and achieve effective PC referrals. We suggest this is proof of concept that specialty clinics can be a meaningful way to achieve an earlier entry point to comprehensive PC in patients who were not previously referred by their Oncologists.

scholarly journals “Truly holistic?” Differences in documenting physical and psychosocial needs and hope in Portuguese palliative patients

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Miguel Julião ◽  
Maria Ana Sobral ◽  
Paula Calçada ◽  
Bárbara Antunes ◽  
Baltazar Nunes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Life Experience ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Shortness Of Breath ◽  
Psychosocial Needs ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Will To Live ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale

Abstract Objective Palliative care (PC) aims to improve patients' and families' quality of life through an approach that relieves physical, psychosocial, and spiritual suffering, although the latter continues to be under-assessed and under-treated. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of physical, psychosocial, and hope assessments documented by a PC team in the first PC consultation. Method The retrospective descriptive analysis of all first PC consultations registered in our anonymized database (December 2018–January 2020), searching for written documentation regarding (1) Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) physical subscale (pain, tiredness, nausea, drowsiness, appetite, shortness of breath, constipation, insomnia, and well-being), (2) the single question “Are you depressed?” (SQD), (3) the question “Do you feel anxious?” (SQA), (4) feeling a burden, (5) hope-related concerns, (6) the dignity question (DQ), and (7) will to live (WtL). Results Of the 174 total of patients anonymously registered in our database, 141 PC home patients were considered for analysis; 63% were male, average age was 70 years, the majority had malignancies (82%), with a mean performance status of 52%. Evidence of written documentation was (1) ESAS pain (96%), tiredness (89%), nausea (89%), drowsiness (79%), appetite (89%), shortness of breath (82%), constipation (74%), insomnia (72%), and well-being (52%); (2) the SQD (39%); (3) the SQA (11%); (4) burden (26%); (5) hope (11%); (6) the DQ (33%); and (7) WtL (33%). Significant differences were found between the frequencies of all documented items of the ESAS physical subscale (29%), and all documented psychosocial items (SQD + SQA + burden + DQ) (1%), hope (11%), and WtL (33%) (p = 0.0000; p = 0.0005; p = 0.0181, respectively). Significance of results There were differences between documentation of psychosocial, hope, and physical assessments after the first PC consultation, with the latter being much more frequent. Further research using multicenter data is now required to help identify barriers in assessing and documenting non-physical domains of end-of-life experience.

The conversion ratio for opioid rotation from hydrocodone to other strong opioids in cancer patients.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 164-164
Author(s):  
Akhila Sunkepally Reddy ◽  
Sriram Yennu ◽  
Jimin Wu ◽  
Diane Liu ◽  
Suresh K. Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Conversion Ratio ◽  
Opioid Rotation ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Strong Opioids

164 Background: Cancer pain is initially treated with intermediate strength analgesics such as hydrocodone and subsequently escalated to stronger opioids. There are no studies on the process of opioid rotation (OR) from hydrocodone to strong opioids in cancer patients. Our aim was to determine the conversion ratio (CR) for OR from hydrocodone to morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) in cancer outpatients. Methods: We reviewed records of 3,144 consecutive patient visits at our Supportive Care Center in 2011-12 for OR from hydrocodone to stronger opioids. Data regarding demographics, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), and MEDD were collected in patients who returned for follow up within 6 weeks. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the CR between hydrocodone and MEDD. Successful OR was defined as 2-point or 30% reduction in the pain score and continuation of the new opioid at follow up. Results: 170/3,144 patients underwent OR from hydrocodone to stronger opioid. 72% were white, 56% male, and 81% had advanced cancer. The median time between OR and follow up was 21 days. 53% had a successful OR with significant improvement in the ESAS pain and symptom distress scores. In 100 patients with complete OR and no worsening of pain at follow up, the median CR (Q1-Q3) from hydrocodone to MEDD was 1.5 (0.9-2) and hydrocodone dose to MEDD correlation was.52 (P<0.0001). The correlation of CR with hydrocodone dose was -0.52 (P<0.0001). The median CR of hydrocodone to MEDD was 2 in patients receiving < 40mg of hydrocodone/day and 1 in patients receiving ≥ 40mg of hydrocodone/day (P<0.0001). The median conversion ratio of hydrocodone to morphine was 1.5 (n=44) and hydrocodone to oxycodone was 0.9 (n=24). Conclusions: Hydrocodone is 1.5-fold stronger than Morphine. The median conversion ratio from hydrocodone to MEDD varied according to hydrocodone dose/day. [Table: see text]

The Opioid Rotation Ratio (ORR) to transdermal fentanyl (TDF) in cancer patients.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 181-181
Author(s):  
Akhila Sunkepally Reddy ◽  
Ali Haider ◽  
Supakarn Tayjasanant ◽  
Jimin Wu ◽  
Diane D Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Transdermal Fentanyl ◽  
Opioid Rotation ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Frequent Reason

181 Background: Cancer patients frequently undergo opioid rotation (OR) for uncontrolled pain or opioid induced neurotoxicity. TDF is one of the most common opioids prescribed to cancer patients. However, the accurate ORR from other opioids to TDF is unknown and various currently used methods result in a wide variation of ORRs. Our aim was to determine the ORR of morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) to TDF when correcting for MEDD of breakthrough opioids (net MEDD) in cancer outpatients. Methods: We reviewed records of 22,532 consecutive patient visits at our Supportive Care Center in 2010-13 for OR from to TDF by a palliative medicine specialist. Data regarding Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and MEDD were collected in patients who returned for follow up within 5 weeks. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the ORR between TDF dose and net MEDD (MEDD prior to OR minus MEDD of breakthrough opioid used along with TDF after OR). Successful OR was defined as 2-point or 30% reduction in pain score and continuation of the new opioid at follow up. Results: 129 patients underwent OR to TDF from other opioids. The mean age was 56 years, 59% male, and 88% had advanced cancer. The median time between OR and follow up was 14 days. Uncontrolled pain (80%) was the most frequent reason for OR and 59% had a successful OR with significant improvement in ESAS pain, constipation, and symptom distress scores. In 101 patients with OR and no worsening of pain at follow up, the median ORR (range) from net MEDD to TDF mg/day was .01 (-0.02-0.04) and correlation of TDF dose to net MEDD was .77 (P < .0001). The ORR was not significantly impacted by variables such as mucositis, serum albumin, and body mass index (BMI). The ORR of .01 suggests that MEDD of 100mg is equivalent to 1mg TDF/day or 40mcg/hour TDF patch (1000mcg/24hours). Conclusions: The median ORR from MEDD to TDF mg/day is .01 and the ORR from MEDD to TDF mcg/hour patch is 0.4. Further validation studies are needed. [Table: see text]

Increased symptom expression among patients (PTS) with delirium admitted to an acute palliative care unit (APCU).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 56-56
Author(s):  
Maxine Grace De la Cruz ◽  
Sriram Yennu ◽  
Diane D Liu ◽  
Jimin Wu ◽  
Akhila Sunkepally Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Delirium Assessment ◽  
Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale

56 Background: Previous case reports found that delirium-induced disinhibition may lead to overexpression of symptoms. Our aim was to determine the effect of delirium on the reporting of symptom severity in pts with advanced cancer. Methods: We reviewed 329 consecutive pts admitted to the APCU without a diagnosis of delirium from Jan 2011-Dec 2011. Demographics, Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), ECOG, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) on 2 time points were collected. Pts who developed delirium and those who did not develop delirium during the entire course of admission were compared using Chi-Squared test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Paired t-test was used to assess if the change of ESAS from baseline to follow-up was associated with delirium. Results: 96/329 (29%) of pts developed delirium during their admission to the APCU. The median time to delirium was 2 days. There was no difference in the length of stay in the APCU for both groups. Table 1 shows the changes in the ESAS scores of the two groups from baseline to follow-up. Pts who did not have delirium expressed improvement in all their symptoms while those who developed delirium during the hospitalization showed no improvement in physical symptoms and worsening in depression, anxiety, appetite and wellbeing. Conclusions: Pts with delirium reported no improvement or worsening symptoms as compared to pts without delirium. Screening for delirium is important in pts who continue to report worsening symptoms despite appropriate management. [Table: see text]

Aberrant opioid use behaviour in advanced cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002606
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Mercadante ◽  
Claudio Adile ◽  
Walter Tirelli ◽  
Patrizia Ferrera ◽  
Italo Penco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Brief Pain Inventory ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale

ObjectivesTo evaluate the presence of aberrant behaviour in a consecutive sample of patients with advanced cancer treated with opioids in a country like Italy, with its peculiar attitudes towards the use opioids. The second objective was to detect the real misuse of opioids in clinical practice.MethodsProspective observational study in two palliative care units in Italy in a period of 6 months. At admission the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale were measured. For detecting the risk of aberrant opioid use, the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain (SOAAP), the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT), the Cut Down-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye Opener (CAGE) questionnaire adapted to include drug use (CAGE-AID) were used. Aberrant behaviours displayed at follow-up within 1 month were recorded.ResultsOne-hundred and thirteen patients with advanced cancer were examined. About 35% of patients were SOAPP positive. There was correlation between SOAPP, CAGE-AID and ORT. SOAPP was independently associated with a lower Karnofsky level, pain intensity, poor well-being, BPI pain at the moment. No patient displayed aberrant behaviours, despite having a moderate-high risk.ConclusionsDespite a high percentage of patients showed a high risk of aberrant behaviours, no patient displayed clinical aberrant behaviours after 1 month-follow-up. This does not exempt from continuous monitoring for patients who are at risk.

The Quebec Cannabis Registry: a pharmacovigilance and effectiveness study on the use of medical cannabis in cancer patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12109-12109
Author(s):  
Antonio Vigano ◽  
Michelle Canac-Marquis ◽  
Rihab Gamaoun ◽  
Pierre Beaulieu ◽  
Andrée Neron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Brief Pain Inventory ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Pain Severity ◽  
Medical Cannabis ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale

12109 Background: The Quebec Cannabis Registry (QCR) was launched in 2015 to allow physicians to prescribe medical cannabis (MC) in the province of Quebec, Canada. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of MC in cancer patients using pharmacovigilance data prospectively collected for up to 24 months. Methods: Patients were enrolled in the QCR between May 2015 and October 2018 and followed every 3 months. Study outcomes included adverse events (AE), pain severity and interference (Brief-Pain Inventory), wellbeing (Revised-Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale) and overall health scale (EQ5D5L) at baseline and at each follow-up (F-UP). Significance of changes over time were assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: Out of the 2991 patients enrolled in the QCR, 358 (12.8%) were cancer patients (mean age 57.7 (± 14.6); 171 (47.8%) males). The main cancer types were breast (16.2%), lung (11.7%), leukemia (11.5%) and colorectal (11.2%). MC was prescribed primarily for pain (72.1%), anxiety (4.7%), nausea (4.5%), anorexia (3.9%), and insomnia (3.1%). A total of 13 patients (3.6%) reported AE with only three being serious (one unrelated to MC: stroke; and two possibly related: diarrhea, from CBD oil overdose and pneumonia from smoking MC). Mean scores significantly (p < 0.05) improved between baseline and 3 months F-UP for pain severity (4.8 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 1.8), pain interference (4.6 ± 1.8 vs 3.8 ± 1.7), and the overall health scale (60 ± 21 vs 71 ± 18). Well-being scores also significantly improved between baseline and 6 months F-UP (4.4 ± 2.1 vs 3.5 ± 2.8). Conclusions: Population-based data shows that cancer patients can benefit safely and effectively from MC as a complementary treatment, when prescribed and monitored under medical-nursing supervision.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document