Avelumab (MSB0010718C), an anti-PD-L1 antibody, as a third-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: A phase Ib JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS188-TPS188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Albert C. Lockhart ◽  
Deborah Jean Lee Wong ◽  
Matthew Hiram Taylor ◽  
Marcis Bajars ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Recist 1.1

TPS188 Background: The programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) are key therapeutic targets in the reactivation of the immune response against cancer. Avelumab* (MSB0010718C) is a fully human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 antibody being investigated in clinical trials. The phase Ib study (NCT01772004) is an open-label, parallel-group expansion trial in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic (LA/M) solid tumors that includes a heavily pretreated cohort of pts with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJ) to evaluate safety and efficacy of avelumab in the 3rd-line setting. Prior to adding this 3rd-line cohort, this trial had enrolled a separate cohort with advanced GC/GEJ who had received prior 1st-line chemotherapy (Chung et al, ECC 2015). Methods: This trial cohort is enrolling pts with histologically confirmed unresectable LA/M GC/GEJ who have been previously treated with 1st-line combination chemotherapy and 2nd-line ramucirumab, alone or in combination, and whose disease has progressed during or after ramucirumab treatment. Pts who have received prior treatment with trastuzumab and pts with HER2+ status are allowed. Eligible pts also must have tumor archival material or fresh biopsy, an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 at the time of trial entry, and disease with ≥ 1 measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1. Exclusions include prior therapy with immune checkpoint drugs or history of autoimmune disease. Up to 150 eligible pts will receive avelumab at 10 mg/kg as an IV infusion Q2W. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any criterion for withdrawal occurs. Primary endpoint is confirmed best overall response (RECIST 1.1) as adjudicated by an IERC. Secondary objectives include assessment of progression-free survival, overall survival, and immune-related efficacy assessments. Association between tumor PD-L1 expression and efficacy will be evaluated. Adverse events will be assessed and graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Tumor evaluation will be performed every 6 wks until progression. Enrollment in this cohort began in June 2015. *Proposed INN Clinical trial information: NCT01772004.

ABC-08: A phase Ib, multi-centre, open-label study of a first-in-class nucleotide analogue NUC-1031 in combination with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancers.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS544-TPS544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mairead Geraldine McNamara ◽  
John A. Bridgewater ◽  
Daniel H. Palmer ◽  
Harpreet Singh Wasan ◽  
David Ryder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Cancer Resistance ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancers ◽  
Phase Ib

TPS544 Background: The UK ABC-02 study established cisplatin and gemcitabine as the reference regimen for first-line treatment of patients (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) (median overall survival (OS): 11.7 months). No clinical studies since ABC-02 have reported an extension in OS, and therefore effective new agents/combinations are required. NUC-1031 was designed to improve on gemcitabine’s relatively poor efficacy by overcoming its associated key cancer resistance mechanisms, through cellular uptake independent of nucleoside transporters, activation independent of deoxycytidine kinase and protection from cytidine deaminase inactivation, resulting in over 200x the intracellular levels of the anti-cancer metabolite, dFdCTP, greater stability and reduction in the generation of toxic metabolites. NUC-1031 showed activity as monotherapy in a phase I/II study in 7 pts with BTC, refractory to all standard treatments (Blagden et al ASCO 2015; abstract 2514). Methods: ABC-08 is a multi-centre phase Ib study of NUC-1031 combined with cisplatin in pts with non-resectable or recurrent/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder or ampullary carcinoma, aged ≥18 years with an ECOG performance status of 0-1, who have received no prior systemic therapy. The starting dose for NUC-1031 is 625 mg/m2 administered IV on days 1 and 8 in combination with cisplatin (standard dose of 25 mg/m2) (21 day schedule). The dose will be escalated sequentially in cohorts of 3-6 pts using an accelerated titration procedure (725mg/m2, 825mg/m2, 925mg/m2). Treatment will continue until intolerable toxicity/progressive disease. The primary endpoints are safety and RP2D. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, OS, response rate and pharmacokinetic endpoints, including assessments of multiple plasma and intracellular analytes: NUC-1031, cisplatin, dFdC, dFdCMP, dFdCDP, dFdCTP and dFdU, and will be correlated with safety profile and clinical activity. Planned accrual is 15-24 pts over 2 years. Cohort 1 has been completed without dose-limiting toxicities. Enrolment to cohort 2 is on-going. Clinical trial information: NCT02351765.

Results of a randomized phase II trial of amrubicin (AMR) versus topotecan (Topo) in patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) sensitive to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8028-8028
Author(s):  
R. Jotte ◽  
P. Conkling ◽  
C. Reynolds ◽  
L. Klein ◽  
J. F. Fitzgibbons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Ecog Ps

8028 Background: SCLC presents as ED-SCLC in 60%-70% of patients (pts). AMR, a synthetic anthracycline, is approved for these pts in Japan. We compare the efficacy and safety of single-agent AMR vs topotecan in non-Japanese pts with 2nd-line ED-SCLC sensitive to 1st-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: This phase II, open-label, multicenter study enrolled pts with ED-SCLC sensitive to 1st-line platinum-based chemotherapy (recurrence or progression ≥90 days from 1st-line treatment). Pts aged ≥18 years with ECOG performance status (PS) ≤2 and only 1 prior therapy were eligible. Pts were randomized (2:1) to receive IV AMR 40 mg/m2/d (d, 1–3) or IV topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d (d 1–5) and treated every 21 days until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint, overall response rate (ORR, complete + partial response), used RECIST criteria. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: In all, 76 pts were randomized to AMR (n=50) or topotecan (n=26) with AMR given for a median of 6 cycles (range 1–16) and topotecan 3 cycles (1–16). AMR significantly improved ORR rates vs topotecan (p<0.012; Table ). Median PFS/OS was 4.3 months (95% CI 2.0, 6.1)/9.3 months (95% CI 5.7, 12.0) with AMR vs 3.5 months (95% CI 2.1, 6.3)/8.9 months (95% CI 4.8, 13.8) with topotecan. There was a higher proportion of ECOG PS 2 pts in the AMR group (n=6) vs the topotecan group (n=2). A trend towards improved OS was observed in the ECOG 0–1 subgroup of 68 pts: median OS was 10.5 months with AMR vs 9.7 months with topotecan. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events with AMR vs topotecan were neutropenia (53% vs 74%), thrombocytopenia (31% vs 52%) and leukopenia (27% vs 30%). Three AMR pts (6%) and 1 topotecan pt (4%) died of neutropenic infection. Conclusions: AMR significantly improves ORR and has acceptable tolerability as 2nd-line treatment in pts with sensitive ED-SCLC. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

The association of tissue tumor mutational burden (tTMB) using the Foundation Medicine genomic platform with efficacy of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel in patients (pts) with gastric cancer (GC) from KEYNOTE-061.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4537-4537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Mustafa Özgüroğlu ◽  
Yung-Jue Bang ◽  
Maria Di Bartolomeo ◽  
Mario Mandalà ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wald Test ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

4537 Background: KEYNOTE-061 (NCT02370498) was a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of pembrolizumab vs paclitaxel in pts with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma with tumor progression after first-line therapy (N = 592). In this analysis, we evaluated tTMB using FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx; Foundation Medicine) in pts with gastric or GEJ cancer in KEYNOTE-061. Methods: In pts with evaluable F1CDx tTMB data (n = 204), we analyzed the association of tTMB with confirmed objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) within each treatment arm using one-sided (pembrolizumab) and two-sided (paclitaxel) Wald test nominal P for logistic regression (ORR) and Cox proportional hazards regression (PFS; OS) adjusted for ECOG performance status; significance was prespecified at 0.05. The clinical utility of tTMB was assessed using the prespecified cutoff of 10 mut/Mb for F1CDx. Clinical data cutoff: Oct 26, 2017. Results: tTMB was positively associated with ORR ( P < 0.001; AUROC, 0.68), PFS ( P < 0.001), and OS ( P = 0.003) with pembrolizumab but not paclitaxel (ORR, P = 0.047; AUROC, 0.30; PFS, P = 0.605; OS, P = 0.084). Pt outcomes by tTMB cutoff are reported in the Table; prevalence of TMB ≥10 mut/Mb was 17%. In pts with microsatellite stable disease-only, HRs (95% CI) by treatment arm for OS by F1CDx cutoff were 0.40 (0.14-1.17) for tTMB ≥10 mut/Mb (n = 21) vs 0.97 (0.70-1.34) for tTMB <10 mut/Mb (n = 168). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis from KEYNOTE-061, tTMB as determined by F1CDx demonstrated a positive association with clinical outcomes with pembrolizumab, but not paclitaxel, in pts with GC; these findings are consistent with those reported with whole exome sequencing. Pembrolizumab demonstrated an OS benefit vs paclitaxel in the subgroup with tTMB ≥10 mut/Mb, which remained when pts with microsatellite instability-high disease were excluded. Clinical trial information: NCT02370498 . [Table: see text]

JAVELIN Gastric 100: Phase 3 trial of avelumab (anti-PD-L1) maintenance therapy versus continuation of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS195-TPS195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus H. Moehler ◽  
Min-Hee Ryu ◽  
Keun-Wook Lee ◽  
Hasan Senol Coskun ◽  
Rachel Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Prior Therapy

TPS195 Background: Outcomes with first-line (1L) chemotherapy for GC/GEJC are limited and new strategies to increase efficacy without added toxicity are needed. Avelumab, a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (US and EU) and advanced urothelial carcinoma after progression on platinum therapy (US). In phase 1 studies in advanced GC/GEJC, avelumab showed antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile, including in a subgroup of patients (pts) without progression on 1L chemotherapy who received avelumab as maintenance therapy. JAVELIN Gastric 100 (NCT02625610) is a global, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing maintenance therapy with avelumab vs continuation of 1L chemotherapy in pts with advanced GC/GEJC who have not progressed after 12 weeks of 1L oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. Methods: Eligible pts have histologically confirmed, unresectable, measurable, locally advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC adenocarcinoma, no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease, no prior therapy targeting T-cell coregulatory proteins, and ECOG PS of 0–1. Pts are not preselected based on PD-L1 expression and pts with HER2+ tumors are excluded. Approximately 466 pts who achieve at least stable disease following 12 weeks of 1L oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy will be randomized 1:1 to receive maintenance therapy with either avelumab 10 mg/kg by IV infusion Q2W or continuation of 1L chemotherapy. Maintenance therapy is given until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoints are overall survival and progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include best overall response, quality of life measures, safety (NCI-CTCAE v4.03), and tumor biomarkers. Responses are evaluated per RECIST 1.1 and adjudicated by independent review committee. Enrollment is ongoing at sites in North/South America, Asia-Pacific, and Europe. Clinical trial information: NCT02625610.

Phase II study of zolbetuximab plus pembrolizumab in claudin 18.2: Positive locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJ)—ILUSTRO Cohort 3.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS260-TPS260
Author(s):  
Samuel J Klempner ◽  
Jaffer A. Ajani ◽  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran ◽  
Yung-Jue Bang ◽  
Daniel V.T. Catenacci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Junction Protein

TPS260 Background: Five-year survival with advanced G/GEJ is poor, and limited biomarkers exist to inform optimal treatment selection. Pembrolizumab, an anti–programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1) antibody, is approved for advanced/metastatic PD-ligand 1–positive (PD-L1+) G/GEJ that progressed after ≥2 lines of therapy. The transmembrane tight junction protein claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is normally confined to gastric mucosa but is often overexpressed in G/GEJ with roughly one-third of patients (pts) having high expression (≥75%). Zolbetuximab, a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody, binds to CLDN18.2 and mediates cancer cell death through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Phase 2 (NCT01630083) results showed prolonged survival with zolbetuximab + epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOX) vs EOX alone in G/GEJ. Results of nonclinical studies showed enhanced antitumor activity with zolbetuximab + anti-murine PD-1 antibody, and it was hypothesized that a combination with pembrolizumab (new Cohort 3) might augment ADCC and antitumor immune response in CLDN18.2 overexpressing G/GEJ. Methods: This phase 2 open-label study (NCT03505320) will enroll ~112 adult pts from 22 sites in 5 countries into 3 cohorts; this abstract describes Cohort 3 (~62 pts). Key eligibility criteria are advanced/metastatic G/GEJ, measurable disease (RECIST v1.1), adequate organ function and performance status, and high/intermediate (Cohort 3A) or high (Cohort 3B) expression of CLDN18.2. Central testing of tumor tissue will determine CLDN18.2 expression; pts are considered CLDN18.2 positive (CLDN18.2+) if ≥75% (high) or ≥50% to < 75% (intermediate) of tumor cells demonstrate moderate-to-strong membranous IHC staining. Patients in Cohort 3B are required to be PD-L1+, defined as a combined positive score ≥1 (IHC staining per the Dako 22C3 PD-L1 assay). Patients will receive zolbetuximab + pembrolizumab in the third/later line in Cohort 3A and third line in Cohort 3B. In Cohort 3A (safety cohort), zolbetuximab will be administered at a loading dose of 800 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 Cycle 1 followed by 600 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks; a reduction from 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks is permitted. Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV will be administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Cohort 3B (expansion cohort) zolbetuximab dose is determined from results of Cohort 3A. Imaging will occur every 6 weeks for 24 weeks and every 12 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint is objective response rate; additional endpoints include duration of response, disease control rate, and progression-free survival by independent review committee and investigator assessment. Pharmacokinetics, safety/tolerability, quality of life, and immunogenicity will be assessed. The study is currently recruiting pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03505320.

Silmitasertib (CX-4945) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: A phase Ib/II study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 312-312
Author(s):  
Mitesh J. Borad ◽  
Li-Yuan Bai ◽  
Ming-Huang Chen ◽  
Joleen M. Hubbard ◽  
Kabir Mody ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Almost All

312 Background: Silmitasertib (CX-4945), an oral small molecule inhibitor of casein kinase 2 (CK2), has exhibited preclinical antitumor activity and strong synergism with gemcitabine + cisplatin. We investigated the safety and efficacy of silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Methods: S4-13-001 is a multicenter, open-label, phase Ib/II study of silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA. The phase Ib portion included dose-escalation, expansion, and exploratory cohorts of silmitasertib with doses ranging from 200 to 1000 mg bid (6 days for the escalation/expansion cohorts and 10 and 21 days’ continuous dosing for the exploratory cohorts). In the phase II portion patients received silmitasertib 1000 mg bid for 10 days in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin on days 1 & 8 over a 21-day cycle. In this interim analysis, we present findings from the combined population of patients from the phase Ib and II portions of the study. Response to treatment was assessed by RECIST v1.1 every 6 weeks. Primary efficacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS). ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02128282). Results: A total of 87 patients were enrolled and received silmitasertib in the phase Ib (n=50) and phase II (n=37) portions of the study. Of these, 55 patients were evaluable for efficacy with details as follows: median PFS 11.1 (95% CI 7.6–14.7) months; median overall survival (OS) 17.4 (95% CI 13.4–25.7) months; overall response rate (ORR) 32.1%; and disease control rate (DCR) 79.3%. Almost all patients (79/87; 90.8%) evaluable for safety reported ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TEAE). The most common TEAEs (all grades) with silmitasertib were diarrhea (65.5%), nausea (50.6%), vomiting (33.3%), fatigue (31.0%), and anemia (21.8%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were diarrhea (13.8%), neutropenia (11.5%), nausea (9.2%), anemia (8.0%), and thrombocytopenia (8.0%). Eleven patients (12.6%) discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. Conclusions: Silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin yields promising preliminary evidence of efficacy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA. Based on these data a randomized phase III trial is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02128282.

A phase Ib/II, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study evaluating trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) monotherapy and combinations in patients with HER2-overexpressing gastric cancer (DESTINY-Gastric03).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS261-TPS261
Author(s):  
Yelena Y. Janjigian ◽  
Natasha Viglianti ◽  
Feng Liu ◽  
Ariadna Mendoza-Naranjo ◽  
Liz Croydon
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS261 Background: For patients (pts) with HER2-overexpressing metastatic gastric cancer, trastuzumab + chemotherapy is a standard first-line option but provides only a modest overall survival (OS) benefit vs chemotherapy. T-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-HER2 antibody, cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a membrane-permeable topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. Results from a phase 1 trial showed promising antitumor activity (confirmed objective response rate [ORR], 43.2%) in pts with heavily pretreated HER2+ metastatic gastric cancer who received T-DXd (5.4 or 6.4 mg/kg; Shitara K, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:827-836). Here we describe the phase 1b/2 DESTINY-Gastric03 trial (NCT04379596) evaluating T-DXd monotherapy and combinations in pts with HER2-overexpressing gastric cancer. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, 2-part, phase 1b/2 study in pts with HER2-overexpressing (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization positive) locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. In part 1 (dose escalation), pts who had received prior trastuzumab-containing therapy will be assigned to 1 of 5 arms: (1) T-DXd + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); (2) T-DXd + capecitabine (C); (3) T-DXd + durvalumab; (4) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + oxaliplatin (Ox); or (5) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + durvalumab. In part 2 (dose expansion), pts with no prior treatment for metastatic disease will be randomized across 4 arms: (1) T-DXd; (2) trastuzumab + 5-FU or C + Ox or cisplatin; (3) T-DXd + 5-FU or C ± Ox; or (4) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + durvalumab. In part 2, pts will be stratified by HER2 status. Primary endpoints are safety, determination of recommended phase 2 doses (part 1), and investigator-assessed confirmed ORR per RECIST v1.1 (part 2). Secondary endpoints include confirmed ORR (part 1), disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (all per investigator), OS, safety (part 2), pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Clinical trial information: NCT04379596.

A randomized phase III study of gemcitabine (G) versus GV1001 in sequential combination with G in patients with unresectable and metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4601-4601 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Buanes ◽  
J. Maurel ◽  
W. Liauw ◽  
M. Hebbar ◽  
J. Nemunaitis
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Peptide Vaccine ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Delayed Treatment ◽  
Sequential Combination ◽  
The Impact

4601 Background: A phase I/II study with GV1001, a telomerase peptide vaccine, showed a median overall survival (OS) of 8.6 months in non-resectable PC (Bernhardt SL et al, Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1474–1482). This phase III trial was conducted to determine the impact on overall survival of G monotherapy vs. GV1001 in sequential combination with G in unresectable and metastatic PC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had chemotherapy-naive, advanced PC and ECOG performance status 0–1. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive arm A: G (1,000 mg/m2 30 min i.v.) weekly for 7 weeks (w), 1w off and then 3w during 4-weekly cycles, or arm B: GV1001 0.56 mg s.c. plus GM-CSF as immune adjuvant on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 15, 22, 36, then every 4 weeks. Patients who progressed clinically or radiologically during GV1001 continued on GV1001 and concomitant gemcitabine. CT scans were performed every 8 weeks. The primary end-point was OS. A sample size of 520 patients allowed the detection of a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.73 (B/A), with 2α = 0.05 and 90% power. Results: Between June 2006 and May 2008, 365 pts were enrolled (A / B; 182 / 183). The study was stopped prematurely due to a preliminary analysis with 178 events showing no survival benefit of GV1001. Pts were well balanced for baseline characteristics: male 59.3% / 62.8%; median age 61y / 61y; ECOG PS 0 34.3% / 36.7%; locally advanced 22.4% / 20.7%. As of August 2008, 238 pts (A / B : 114 / 124) had died. Median OS was 7.3 / 5.9 months (HR 0.8; 95% CI 0.6–1.0). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 / 1.9 months (HR 0.5; 95%CI 0.4–0.7). Grade 3–4 AEs: gastrointestinal 6% / 8%, infection 5% / 5%, vascular disorders 2% / 3%, neutropenia 6% / 3%. Conclusions: GV1001 did not show efficacy in sequential combination with G in advanced PC. The advantage of G monotherapy over the sequential combination may be due to the delayed treatment with G in arm B. [Table: see text]

PROPEL: Results of the pivotal, multicenter, phase II study of pralatrexate in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8561-8561
Author(s):  
O. O'Connor ◽  
B. Pro ◽  
L. Pinter-Brown ◽  
L. Popplewell ◽  
N. Bartlett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
International Workshop ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
Prior Therapy

8561 Background: Pralatrexate is a novel targeted antifolate designed to accumulate preferentially in cancer cells. PROPEL, a pivotal phase 2, non-randomized, open-label, international study, is the largest prospective study in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory PTCL. Methods: Pts received 30 mg/m2 of pralatrexate intravenously weekly for 6 of 7 weeks, supplemented with B12 and folic acid. Primary endpoint = objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints = response duration, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Eligibility criteria: histologically confirmed PTCL, disease progression after ≥ 1 prior treatment, and ECOG performance status ≤ 2. Pathology was confirmed by independent central review, response to therapy was assessed by independent central review using International Workshop Criteria (IWC). Results: 115 pts were enrolled, 109 were evaluable for efficacy. 111 treated pts included 76 males (68%) and 35 females (32%). Pts had failed a median of 3 prior regimens and thus were heavily pre-treated. 78 pts (70%) failed CHOP, 18 (16%) had previous autologous stem cell transplant. 25% of pts never responded to any prior therapy; 53% did not respond to last prior therapy. The majority (59 pts, 53%) had PTCL not-otherwise specified. The ORR by central review was 27% (n = 29). 11 pts (10% overall, 38% of responders) had a complete response (CR), 18 pts (17%) had a partial response (PR), and 23 (21%) had stable disease. ORR by investigators assessment was 39% (n = 42). The median duration of response cannot be accurately estimated at this time, though responses of > 1 year have been observed. 69% of responses were after just 1 cycle. 5 responding pts went on to transplant. The most frequent Grade (Gr) 3–4 adverse events were mucosal inflammation (Gr 3 = 17%, Gr 4 = 4%) and thrombocytopenia (Gr 3 = 14%, Gr 4 = 19%). Conclusions: The results of PROPEL show that pralatrexate exhibits substantial activity in pts with relapsed or refractory PTCL, as assessed by a rigorous central review, with durable CRs /PRs, irrespective of the amount of prior therapy. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document