Risk of Cardiovascular Ischemic Events After Surgical Castration and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (32) ◽  
pp. 3697-3705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Yi Chen ◽  
Lai-Chu See ◽  
Jia-Rou Liu ◽  
Cheng-Keng Chuang ◽  
See-Tong Pang ◽  
...  

Purpose Our aim was to determine whether cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) differs between those who receive androgen-deprivation therapy by surgical castration and those who receive gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) therapy. Patients and Methods By using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we analyzed data from 14,715 patients with PCa diagnosed from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2011. The patients were treated with bilateral orchiectomy or GnRHa therapy. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores to adjust for the imbalance in covariate baseline values between these two groups. Cox regression models were used to identify risk factors for myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke (IS), and cardiac-related complications. Results Overall, 3,578 patients with PCa (24.3%) underwent bilateral orchiectomy and 11,137 patients (75.7%) received GnRHa therapy. Both groups had a similar risk of CV ischemic events (ie, MI or IS; hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.38) during a median follow-up time of 3.3 years. However, during the first 1.5 years of follow-up, there were higher CV ischemic events in the orchiectomy group than in the GnRHa group (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.88), particularly in patients who were ≥ 65 years of age, had hypertension, had a Charlson comorbidity index score ≥ 3, and had a previous history of MI, IS, or coronary heart disease. Conclusion Compared with bilateral orchiectomy, use of GnRHa does not increase the risk of CV ischemic events in patients with PCa. Nonetheless, orchiectomy is associated with higher rates of CV ischemic events in older patients and those with a history of CV comorbidities within 1.5 years of initiating androgen-deprivation therapy. These findings can help clinicians decide on the optimal castration strategy for individual patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16570-e16570
Author(s):  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Naohiro Fujimoto ◽  
Ario Takeuchi ◽  
Eiji Kashiwagi ◽  
Takashi Dejima ◽  
...  

e16570 Background: Serum testosterone suppression during androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) have been reported to affect ADT efficacy. However, the factor affecting hormonal variations during ADT was less explored. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the missense polymorphisms in gonadotropin releasing hormone (GNRH) and hormonal variations during ADT as well as the prognosis among men treated with primary ADT for metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: This study included 80 Japanese patients with metastatic prostate cancer, whose serum testosterone levels during ADT were available. The association of the GNRH1 gene polymorphism (rs6185, S20W) and the GNRH2 gene polymorphism (rs6051545, A16V) with clinicopathological parameters including serum testosterone levels during ADT as well as the prognosis including progression-free survival and overall survival was examined. Results: The CT allele and the CT/TT alleles in the GNRH2 gene (rs6051545) were associated with higher serum testosterone levels during ADT compared with the CC allele. Consequently, the CT alleles was associated with higher progression risk after adjustment with age and serum testosterone levels during ADT [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 1.73 (1.00-3.00), P = 0.049]. Conclusions: Taken together, these findings suggested that genetic variation in rs6051545 ( GNRH2) may result in the inadequate suppression of on serum testosterone during ADT, which may lead to detrimental effect of ADT on prognosis among men with metastatic prostate cancer.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e043844
Author(s):  
Natalia Araujo ◽  
Samantha Morais ◽  
Ana Rute Costa ◽  
Raquel Braga ◽  
Ana Filipa Carneiro ◽  
...  

IntroductionProstate cancer is the most prevalent oncological disease among men in industrialised countries. Despite the high survival rates, treatments are often associated with adverse effects, including metabolic and cardiovascular complications, sexual dysfunction and, to a lesser extent, cognitive decline. This study was primarily designed to evaluate the trajectories of cognitive performance in patients with prostate cancer, and to quantify the impact of the disease and its treatments on the occurrence of cognitive decline.MethodsParticipants will be recruited from two main hospitals providing care to approximately half of the patients with prostate cancer in Northern Portugal (Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto and São João Hospital Centre), and will comprise a cohort of recently diagnosed patients with prostate cancer proposed for different treatment plans, including: (1) radical prostatectomy; (2) brachytherapy and/or radiotherapy; (3) radiotherapy in combination with androgen deprivation therapy and (4) androgen deprivation therapy (with or without chemotherapy). Recruitment began in February 2018 and is expected to continue until the first semester of 2021. Follow-up evaluations will be conducted at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years. Sociodemographic, behavioural and clinical characteristics, anxiety and depression, health literacy, health status, quality of life, and sleep quality will be assessed. Blood pressure and anthropometrics will be measured, and a fasting blood sample will be collected. Participants’ cognitive performance will be evaluated before treatments and throughout follow-up (Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Cube Test as well as Brain on Track for remote monitoring). All participants suspected of cognitive impairment will undergo neuropsychological tests and clinical observation by a neurologist.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospitals involved. All participants will provide written informed consent, and study procedures will be developed to ensure data protection and confidentiality. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation in scientific meetings.


1996 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 1176-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Denti ◽  
G Pasolini ◽  
P Cortellini ◽  
S Ferretti ◽  
L Sanfelici ◽  
...  

Abstract No clear relation between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and endogenous gonadal hormones has been demonstrated. In this study, we compared the effects on Lp(a) of pharmacological castration in 50 patients with prostate cancer who were undergoing therapy with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (goserelin), with effects on 58 age-matched controls. We also studied 16 untreated patients under baseline conditions and after 3 months of therapy with goserelin alone or combined with an antiandrogen (flutamide). Neither cross-sectional nor prospective studies showed any significant effects of therapy on Lp(a). However, cluster analysis identified a subgroup of patients showing slight but significant increases in Lp(a) concentrations, as well as greater declines of testosterone and estradiol, suggesting that androgen, like estrogen, can exert some slight, though not easily detectable, influence on Lp(a).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document