A randomized trial of selenium and vitamin E for primary prevention of non-melanoma skin cancer: Trial results and experience from a low-resource setting.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1511-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Argos ◽  
James J. Dignam ◽  
Faruque Parvez ◽  
Mahfuzar Rahman ◽  
Samar K Hore ◽  
...  

1511 Background: Selenium and vitamin E supplementation previously have shown some evidence of a beneficial effect in the secondary prevention of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). More than 100 million people worldwide are at increased risk of NMSC and other cancers due to arsenic exposure from drinking water and diet – a risk that persists for several decades even after the exposure has terminated. Here, we report on the design, methods and main results of the Bangladesh Vitamin E and Selenium Trial (BEST) – a population-based chemoprevention study conducted among 7,000 adults with visible arsenic toxicity. Methods: BEST is a 2 × 2 full factorial, double-blind, randomized placebo controlled trial of 7,000 adults having manifest arsenical skin lesions evaluating the efficacy of 6-year supplementation with alpha-tocopherol (100 mg daily) and L-selenomethionine (200 μg daily) for the prevention of NMSC incidence. Results: Excellent compliance was maintained through the course of the trial, based on data from pill counts, self-reported compliance, and bioadherence. Among participants on treatment through the end of the 6-year intervention period, > 85% were adherent to at least 80% of study supplements. More than 500 new NMSC cases were ascertained using a three-tiered biopsy protocol. No significant beneficial effects were observed on NMSC incidence during the study period for selenium or vitamin E. Among more than 500 observed deaths (including 182 cancer-related deaths), there were also no significant treatment effects on total mortality, cancer-related mortality or arsenical cancer-related mortality. Conclusions: This large population-based trial does not support any beneficial effect of vitamin E or selenium supplementation for the primary prevention of NMSC or mortality in an arsenic-exposed population. With the rapidly increasing burden of preventable cancers in low- and middle-income countries, efficient and feasible chemoprevention study designs and approaches, such as employed in Bangladesh, may prove impactful in conceiving large scale cancer chemoprevention trials in low-resource settings. Clinical trial information: NCT00392561.

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Jensen ◽  
AL Lamberg ◽  
JB Jacobsen ◽  
A Braae Olesen ◽  
HT Sørensen

2013 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
pp. 1950-1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah N. Robinson ◽  
Michael S. Zens ◽  
Ann E. Perry ◽  
Steven K. Spencer ◽  
Eric J. Duell ◽  
...  

Rheumatology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 683-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Montastruc ◽  
Christel Renoux ◽  
Sophie Dell’Aniello ◽  
Teresa A Simon ◽  
Laurent Azoulay ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To assess whether abatacept as initial biological DMARD (bDMARD) in the treatment of RA, when compared with other bDMARDs, is associated with an increased risk of cancer overall and by specific cancer sites (breast, lung, lymphoma, melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer). Methods We performed a population-based cohort study among patients newly treated with bDMARDs within the US-based Truven MarketScan population and Supplemental US Medicare from 2007 to 2014. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% CIs of any cancer (and specific cancers) associated with initiation of abatacept, compared with initiation of other bDMARDs, adjusted for age and deciles of the propensity score. Results The cohort included 4328 patients on abatacept and 59 860 on other bDMARDs, of whom 409 and 4197 were diagnosed with any cancer during follow-up (incidence rates 4.76 per 100 per year and 3.41 per 100 per year, respectively). Compared with other bDMARDs, the use of abatacept was associated with an increased incidence of cancer overall (hazard ratioadjusted 1.17; 95% CI 1.06, 1.30). Analyses by specific cancer sites showed a significantly increased incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (hazard ratioadjusted 1.20; 95% CI 1.03, 1.39), but no significant difference for other specific cancer sites. Conclusion The use of abatacept as first bDMARD in the treatment of RA was associated with a slight increased risk of cancer overall and particularly non-melanoma skin cancer, compared with other bDMARDs. This potential signal needs to be replicated in other settings.


2016 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 6-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Rubió-Casadevall ◽  
A.M. Hernandez-Pujol ◽  
M.C. Ferreira-Santos ◽  
G. Morey-Esteve ◽  
L. Vilardell ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk Barber ◽  
Gordon E. Searles ◽  
Ronald Vender ◽  
Hwee Teoh ◽  
John Ashkenas

Background Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), including basal and squamous cell carcinoma (BCC and SCC), represents the most common malignancy. Objective To provide guidance to Canadian health care practitioners regarding primary prevention of NMSC. Methods Structured literature searches were conducted, using search terms including prevention, sunscreen, and sun prevention factor. All recommendations concern guidance that physicians should regularly discuss with their patients to help establish photoprotection habits. The GRADE system was used to assign strength to each recommendation. Results Ultraviolet exposure is the major modifiable risk factor for NMSC. Aspects of photoprotection, including effective sunscreen use and avoidance of both the midday sun and artificial tanning, are discussed. Several widespread misunderstandings that undermine responsible public health measures related to sun safety are addressed. Conclusions Photoprotection represents both an individual priority and a public health imperative. By providing accurate information during routine patient visits, physicians reinforce the need for ongoing skin cancer prevention.


2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 604-604

Guenther LC, Barber K, Searles GE, Lynde CW, Janiszewski P, Ashkenas J, for the Canadian Non-melanoma Skin Cancer Guidelines Committee. Non-melanoma Skin Cancer in Canada Chapter 1: Introduction to the Guidelines. J Cutan Med Surg. 2015;19(3):205-215. Original DOI: 10.1177/1203475415588652 Barber K, Searles GE, Vender R, Teoh H, Ashkenas J, for the Canadian Non-melanoma Skin Cancer Guidelines Committee. Non-melanoma Skin Cancer in Canada Chapter 2: Primary Prevention of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer. J Cutan Med Surg. 2015;19(3):216-226. Original DOI: 10.1177/1203475415576465 Poulin Y, Lynde CW, Barber K, Vender R, Claveau J, Bourcier M, Ashkenas J, for the Canadian non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Guidelines Committee. Non-melanoma Skin Cancer in Canada Chapter 3: Management of Actinic Keratoses. J Cutan Med Surg. 2015;19(3):227-238. Original DOI: 10.1177/1203475415583414 Zloty D, Guenther LC, Sapijaszko M, Barber K, Claveau J, Adamek T, Ashkenas J, for the Canadian Non-melanoma Skin Cancer Guidelines Committee. Non-melanoma Skin Cancer in Canada Chapter 4: Management of Basal Cell Carcinoma. J Cutan Med Surg. 2015;19(3):239-248. Original DOI: 10.1177/1203475415586664 Sapijaszko M, Zloty D, Bourcier M, Poulin Y, Janiszewski P, Ashkenas J, for the Canadian Non-melanoma Skin Cancer Guidelines Committee. J Cutan Med Surg. 2015;19(3):249-259. Original DOI: 10.1177/1203475415582318 In the above articles, the following disclaimer from the Canadian Dermatology Association should have been included: The Canadian Dermatology Association (CDA) recognizes the scientific merit of these guidelines. The CDA did not participate in their development or provide content.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document