Correlation of Breast Cancer Index (BCI) prognostic and predictive results to Ki67 and tumor grade in early stage HR+ breast cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12075-e12075
Author(s):  
Carla Isadora Falkson ◽  
Jeffrey Kepes ◽  
Graham M. Poage ◽  
Junmei Liu ◽  
Catherine A. Schnabel

e12075 Background: Markers of tumor proliferative status, e.g., Ki67 and grade (G), are prognostic for early distant recurrence (DR) in HR+ breast cancer and integrated in adjuvant chemotherapy decisions; however, their impact on late DR and extended endocrine therapy (EET) decisions is less clear. BCI is a genomic assay that provides 2 results: BCI Predictive, based on HoxB13/IL17BR (H/I ratio), reports a prediction of likelihood of benefit from EET; BCI Prognostic, based on the algorithmic combination of H/I and proliferation genes, reports risk of late DR. In this study, BCI results were examined within clinicopathologic risk categories based on Ki67 and G. Methods: The BCI Clinical Database for Correlative Studies is an IRB-approved de-identified database that contains > 50 clinicopathologic and molecular variables from cases submitted for BCI testing in clinical practice (N = 14,463). Clinicopathologic variables were abstracted from pathology reports, and were available for a subset of cases. High Ki67 was defined as ≥14%. Chi-squared tests were used to compare BCI results between Ki67 and G subgroups. Results: Analyses included 3395 LN- pts (median age 59.1y; 73% ≥ 50y). BCI Prognostic showed a wide distribution of individual risk assessments in pts with high or low Ki67. A greater proportion of pts with high Ki67 was classified by BCI as high risk of late DR compared to low Ki67 (68.2% vs 26.5%; P < 0.0001); however, substantial proportions of high Ki67 pts were classified as BCI low risk (31.8%) and pts with low Ki67 classified as BCI high risk (26.5%). Overall, there was a moderate correlation between individual BCI Scores and individual Ki67 scores (Correlation = 0.519). 45.5% of pts with high Ki67 were classified as High BCI Predictive (H/I) compared to 35.5% of pts with low Ki67 (p < 0.001). Both BCI Prognostic and BCI Predictive (H/I) classified increasing proportions of pts as high risk or high benefit with increasing G (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: These findings help characterize differential stratification based on tumor biology vs Ki67/G for pts considering EET. While moderately correlated, both BCI Prognostic and BCI Predictive (H/I) identified distinct populations compared to Ki67 and G.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 551-551
Author(s):  
Reshma L. Mahtani ◽  
Vijayakrishna K. Gadi ◽  
Theresa N. Operana ◽  
Harris S Soifer ◽  
Brock Schroeder ◽  
...  

551 Background: Randomized trials demonstrated a modest (3-5%) absolute benefit from EET in patients (pts) with early stage HR+ breast cancer (BC), but also a risk of toxicities. BCI is a validated gene expression-based assay that provides 2 results: BCI Prognostic, based on the algorithmic combination of HoxB13/IL17BR (H/I ratio) and a set of proliferation-based genes, reports individualized risk of late distant recurrence (DR); BCI Predictive, based on H/I alone, reports a prediction of high vs low likelihood of benefit from EET. The objective of this study was to assess clinical and pathologic patient characteristics, prognostic and predictive assay results, and physician testing patterns in >14,000 clinical cases. Methods: The BCI Clinical Database for Correlative Studies is a de-identified database developed under an IRB approved protocol that contains >50 clinicopathologic and molecular variables from cases submitted for BCI in clinical practice. Clinicopathologic variables were abstracted from pathology reports, and were available for a subset of cases. Results: Across all pts (N=14,463), median age was 58.2y (range: 23-92y; 73.9% ≥50y). The majority were Stage I (47.3% IA, 3.5% IB, 29.1% IIA, 14.1% IIB, 6% III). Cases were 29%, 51%, and 20% Grade 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Most pts were ER+/PR+ (87.7%) or ER+/PR- (11.3%); 11.3% were HER2+. The majority of cases (55.7%) were ordered 4-6y postdiagnosis, with 23.1% >6y, 14.4% between 1-4y, and 6.8% <1y postdiagnosis. In LN- pts (n=3395), BCI Prognostic identified 50.6% as low risk for late DR vs 49.4% as high risk, while BCI Predictive (H/I) classified 41.0% as high vs 59.0% as low likelihood of benefit. In LN+ pts tested with the BCIN+ Prognostic algorithm (BCI + size/grade, n=818), 77.3% were classified as high risk vs 22.7% as low risk, while BCI Predictive (H/I) classified 44.6% and 55.4% as high vs low likelihood of benefit. Conclusions: Findings from this large cohort characterize utilization of BCI in clinical practice for pts with early-stage, HR+ BC. BCI stratification of pts with high risk and high likelihood of benefit from EET may facilitate selection of pts for prolonged regimens.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117727191878910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charusheila Ramkumar ◽  
Ljubomir Buturovic ◽  
Sukriti Malpani ◽  
Arun Kumar Attuluri ◽  
Chetana Basavaraj ◽  
...  

Use of proteomic strategies to identify a risk classifier that estimates probability of distant recurrence in early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer is relevant to physiological cellular function and therefore to intrinsic tumor biology. We used a 298-sample retrospective training set to develop an immunohistochemistry-based novel risk classifier called CanAssist-Breast (CAB) which combines 5 prognostically relevant biomarkers and 3 clinico-pathological parameters to arrive at probability of distant recurrence within 5 years from diagnosis. Five selected biomarkers, namely, CD44, ABCC4, ABCC11, N-cadherin, and pan-cadherin, were chosen based on their role in tumor metastasis. The chosen biomarkers represent the hallmarks of cancer and are distinct from other proliferation and gene expression–based prognostic signatures. The 3 clinico-pathological parameters integrated into the machine learning–based CAB algorithm are tumor size, tumor grade, and node status. These features are used to calculate a “CAB risk score” that classifies patients into low- or high-risk groups and predicts probability of distant recurrence in 5 years. Independent clinical validation of CAB in a retrospective study comprising 196 patients indicated that distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was significantly different in the 2 risk groups. The difference in DMFS between the low- and high-risk categories was 19% in the validation cohort ( P = .0002). In multivariate analysis, CAB risk score was the most significant independent predictor of distant recurrence with a hazard ratio of 4.3 ( P = .0003). CanAssist-Breast is a precise and unique machine learning–based proteomic risk-classifier that can assist in risk stratification of patients with early-stage HR+ breast cancer.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 546-546
Author(s):  
Yuan Yuan ◽  
Yu Cao ◽  
Mason Israel ◽  
Junmei Liu ◽  
Catherine A. Schnabel ◽  
...  

546 Background: Older patients with HR+ BC may present distinct challenges for treatment decision-making. BCI is a validated gene expression assay for pts with early stage HR+ BC that provides 2 results: BCI Predictive, based on HoxB13/IL17BR (H/I ratio), reports a prediction of likelihood of benefit from extended endocrine therapy (EET); BCI Prognostic, based on the combination of H/I and proliferation-based genes, reports individualized risk of late distant recurrence (DR). Here, the predictive and prognostic value of BCI results across the aging spectrum ( < 64y, 65-74y, ≥75y) and correlation with clinical risk factors were examined. Methods: The BCI Clinical Database for Correlative Studies is an IRB-approved de-identified database that contains > 50 clinicopathologic and molecular variables from cases submitted for BCI in clinical practice (N = 14,463). Clinicopathologic variables were abstracted from pathology reports, and were available for a subset of cases. Chi-squared tests were used to compare BCI results between age groups and clinical subsets. Results: Analyses included LN- pts (N = 3,395): median age 59.1y; 5.5% ≥75y (N = 188), 24.0% 65-74y (N = 814), 70.5% ≤64y (N = 2,393). BCI Prognostic had a wide distribution of individual risk assessments in all age groups. The proportion of pts classified as high risk was similar between age groups (48.4%, 48.4% and 49.8% in ≥75y, 65-74y and ≤64y; p = 0.76). The proportion of pts with high risk results increased with increasing tumor size and grade in all age groups (P < 0.05 for all). Notably, in pts ≥75y, BCI identified 31.9% of T1a/b and 21.1% of Grade 1 tumors as high risk of late DR. BCI Predictive (H/I) also identified similar proportions as High H/I across age groups (42.0%, 41.8%, and 40.6% in ≥75y, 65-74y, and ≤64y; p = 0.81). Similar proportions of pts ≥75y were identified as high H/I across size and grade subsets (P = 0.702, P = 0.193, respectively). Conclusions: BCI identifies pts with high risk disease and who may benefit from EET across the aging spectrum. Individualized decisions for EET also must include life expectancy, competing comorbidities and potential toxicities from therapy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 594-594
Author(s):  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Catherine A. Schnabel ◽  
Brock Schroeder ◽  
Piiha-Lotta Jerevall ◽  
Rachel Catherine Jankowitz ◽  
...  

594 Background: Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a continuous risk index based on the combination of HOXB13:IL17BR (H:I) and the Molecular Grade Index (MGI) that estimates the individual risk of recurrence in ER+, LN- breast cancer patients. In the current study, a modified BCI model was developed using untreated breast cancer patients in order to evaluate its pure prognostic value, and to better optimize BCI for both early and late risk assessment. Methods: A model was built by linearly combining H:I and MGI weighted by their corresponding Cox regression coefficients using ER+ LN- patients from the untreated arm of the prospective Stockholm trial (N=283). Validation was performed in 2 independent ER+, LN- cohorts: the TAM arm of the Stockholm trial (N=317), and a multisite cohort of TAM-treated patients (N=358). Correlation of BCI with distant metastasis was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis using the log rank test, and multivariate analysis adjusting for standard prognostic factors was performed using Cox proportional hazards. Results: The BCI linear model was significantly associated with risk of cumulative (0-10y), early (<5y) and late (≥5y) distant metastasis. Based on pre-specified cutpoints, BCI classified 64% and 55% patients as low-, 21% and 22% as intermediate-, and 16% and 23% as high-risk, with 10-y rates of distant recurrence (95% CI) of 4.8% (1.7-7.8%) and 6.6% (2.9–10.0%), 11.7% (3.1–19.5%) and 23.3% (12.3-33.0%), 21.1% (18.5–32.0%) and 35.8% (24.5–45.5%), in the Stockholm TAM and multisite cohort, respectively. Conclusions: BCI demonstrated significant prognostic performance beyond clinicopathological factors to predict cumulative, early and late risk of recurrence in early stage breast cancer patients. Use of BCI at diagnosis should enable clinicians to identify patients who are at high risk of late recurrence and may benefit from an additional 5y of hormonal therapy. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12025-e12025
Author(s):  
Raquel Nunes ◽  
Max Salganik ◽  
Junmei Liu ◽  
Catherine A. Schnabel ◽  
Andrea Lynn Richardson

e12025 Background: Women with HR+ breast cancer remain at risk for late distant recurrences (DR) despite optimal adjuvant therapy. Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the 2nd most common subtype of invasive breast cancer. When compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), ILC has distinguishing clinical and pathologic characteristics that may result in different response to therapy and long term prognosis. BCI is a validated gene expression-based assay for pts with early stage HR+ breast cancer that provides risk of late (5-10 y) DR and predicts likelihood of benefit of extended endocrine therapy (EET). Here, we compared BCI assay results in pts with HR+, LN- ILC vs IDC. Methods: The BCI Clinical Database for Correlative Studies is an IRB-approved de-identified database that contains >50 clinicopathologic and molecular variables from cases submitted for BCI in clinical practice (N=14,463). Molecular variables include BCI Prognostic score, HoxB13/IL17BR ratio (H/I), and molecular grade index (MGI). Clinicopathologic variables were abstracted from pathology reports (available for a subset of cases). LN- pts with available pathologic data were analyzed. Chi-squared tests were used to compare BCI results between IDC and ILC subgroups. Results: Analyses included 2554 LN- pts with available histologic subtype data (80.7% IDC; 13.7% ILC; 2.6% mixed; 2.9% other). Median age was 59.3y (range 27-89y; 74% ≥ 50y). BCI Prognostic had a broad distribution of individual risk assessment in both IDC and ILC. However, BCI Prognostic had a lower median BCI scores (P<0.0001) in ILC, and classified a smaller proportion of pts with ILC as high risk for late DR compared to IDC (36.5% vs 53.1%; P<0.0001). IDC had a higher median molecular proliferative status (MGI) compared to ILC (P<0.0001). BCI Predictive (H/I) identified a slightly decreased proportion of pts with ILC benefiting from extended endocrine therapy compared to IDC (38.2% vs 41.1%). There was no difference in quantitative ER or PR (by PCR) between groups. Conclusions: BCI identified a smaller proportion of pts with ILC at high risk of late DR compared to IDC. Further studies evaluating outcomes are warranted to further validate BCI in pts with ILC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 527-527
Author(s):  
Julia Foldi ◽  
Catherine A. Schnabel ◽  
Max Salganik ◽  
Lajos Pusztai ◽  
Tara B. Sanft

527 Background: Evidence suggests continuing endocrine therapy (ET) beyond 5 years (yr) may reduce breast cancer recurrence in early stage HR+ breast cancers. Given the modest benefit and potentially serious adverse effects of extended ET (EET), improved approaches to identify patients who are at increased risk of late distant recurrence and who derive benefit from EET are critical. Guidelines recommend shared decision-making between oncologists and patients. The adherence rate to EET by 5 yr is only 50-60%. BCI is a gene-expression assay used to predict late distant recurrence and is predictive of benefit from EET. We assessed adherence to EET in women who had BCI testing. Methods: Women with stage I-III HR+ breast cancer s/p 3.5 yr of adjuvant ET and had BCI testing at our institution (8/2013-7/2015) were included. Pts who had < 4 yr of follow-up since BCI testing were excluded. Information including demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment history, number DXA scans, history of osteopenia/osteoporosis were collected. Data on medication adherence was based on prescriptions in the electronic health record. Results: 102 pts were included in our analysis. The median age was 61yr (46-89 yr). The majority of pts had stage I (63%), N0 (77%) and HER2- (90%) disease. 50 pts (46%) received chemotherapy. 44 (43%) received tamoxifen and 79 (77%) had an aromatase inhibitor. BCI categorized 61 (60%) pts as low risk, 26 (25%) as intermediate, and 15 (15%) as high risk for late distant recurrence. 61 (60%) and 41 (40%) pts were predicted to have low and high likelihood of benefit from EET, respectively. All 15 (100%) pts categorized as high risk for late recurrence were predicted to have a high likelihood to benefit from EET; all were recommended to continue EET by their oncologist and all 15 elected EET. 11 (73%) completed 10 yr or were on EET at last follow-up. Of the 4 (27%) pts who stopped before 10 yr, 1 pt had metastatic recurrence and 3 had intolerable side effects. Pts on EET underwent an avg of 1.91 DXA scans, compared with 1.23 for those who stopped ET at 5 yr (p = 0.003). At a median follow-up of 10 yr from diagnosis, there were 2 metastatic (1/15 in the high risk and 1/26 in the intermediate risk group) and 1 local recurrence (1/61 in the low risk group). Conclusions: In pts who continued ET beyond 5 years based on BCI testing and discussion with their oncologist, the rates of adherence and persistence to EET were higher than those previously published. EET may increase the number of DXA scans performed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12561-e12561
Author(s):  
Parvaneh Fallah ◽  
Nasser Khleel Mulla ◽  
Raquel Aloyz ◽  
Olga Aleynikova ◽  
Anca Florea ◽  
...  

e12561 Background: Ki-67 is a marker of proliferating cells. The recurrence score based on the 21-gene breast cancer assay also called Oncotype Dx provides prognostic and predictive information for recurrence in early stage breast cancer patients. We previously showed that there is a moderate correlation between Ki67 and oncotype Dx recurrence score. In this retrospective study, we aimed to examine whether high Ki67 could predict the distant recurrence in early stage breast cancer with low oncotype Dx scores ( < 25). Methods: This retrospective study included 278 consecutive cases of hormone receptor-positive, HER2 negative (T1-2 N0 M0) breast cancer who were diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 with low oncotype Dx ( < 25). Patients’ clinical outcome in terms of distant recurrence after breast surgery was determined up to December 2020 (median follow-up of 7 years). Patients were divided in to low risk (Ki67 < 15%) and high risk (Ki67 > = 15%) groups. Results: Of 278 cases with average and median age of 59 and 60 respectively, 148 (53%) were in Ki67 low risk and 130 (47%) were in Ki67 high risk group. Average and median oncotype Dx were 13.86 and 15 respectively in Ki67 low risk versus 15.23 and 16 respectively in Ki67 high risk group. 13 patients (4%) experienced distant metastasis in lung, liver, bone and skin. Of these 13 cases with average and median oncotype Dx 15.84 and 19 respectively, 12 (92%) were in the Ki67 high risk group and only 1 (8%) belonged to the low risk category. High Ki67 patients were overrepresented in group with recurrent distant metastasis compare to group without recurrent disease (Pearson Chi-Square = 51.18 with 1 degree of freedom and P = < 0.001). Conclusions: Ki67 high patients in the low risk oncotype Dx group are relapsing at a significantly higher rate suggesting that Ki67 combined with low oncotype Dx further refines the risk of distant relapse.


Author(s):  
Florian Fitzal ◽  
Michael Bolliger ◽  
Daniela Dunkler ◽  
Angelika Geroldinger ◽  
Luca Gambone ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Recent data suggest that margins ≥2 mm after breast-conserving surgery may improve local control in invasive breast cancer (BC). By allowing large resection volumes, oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCII; Clough level II/Tübingen 5-6) may achieve better local control than conventional breast conserving surgery (BCS; Tübingen 1-2) or oncoplastic breast conservation with low resection volumes (OBCI; Clough level I/Tübingen 3-4). Methods Data from consecutive high-risk BC patients treated in 15 centers from the Oncoplastic Breast Consortium (OPBC) network, between January 2010 and December 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. Results A total of 3,177 women were included, 30% of whom were treated with OBC (OBCI n = 663; OBCII n = 297). The BCS/OBCI group had significantly smaller tumors and smaller resection margins compared with OBCII (pT1: 50% vs. 37%, p = 0.002; proportion with margin <1 mm: 17% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). There were significantly more re-excisions due to R1 (“ink on tumor”) in the BCS/OBCI compared with the OBCII group (11% vs. 7%, p = 0.049). Univariate and multivariable regression analysis adjusted for tumor biology, tumor size, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment demonstrated no differences in local, regional, or distant recurrence-free or overall survival between the two groups. Conclusions Large resection volumes in oncoplastic surgery increases the distance from cancer cells to the margin of the specimen and reduces reexcision rates significantly. With OBCII larger tumors are resected with similar local, regional and distant recurrence-free as well as overall survival rates as BCS/OBCI.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12016-e12016
Author(s):  
Brittney Shulman Zimmerman ◽  
Krystal Pauline Cascetta ◽  
Julia Blanter ◽  
Lauren Eggert ◽  
Madeline Molot ◽  
...  

e12016 Background: Oncotype RS is a 21-gene assay used to predict the likelihood of distant recurrence and benefit of chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, tamoxifen treated breast cancer (BC). We developed a database to determine rates of SIBE and identify cases of discordance between Oncotype RS and tumor grade (TG). Our goal was to recognize patients with discordant tumors who had SIBE, with implications for patient management. Methods: We identified 618 patients (645 samples) with early-stage, hormone positive BC treated between 2006-2018, with tumor characteristics available for analysis. Among these patients, there were 24 SIBE (n = 24) from 23 patients (3.7%). When stratified by RS using traditional cutoffs (Paik, 2004), rates of SIBE were 2.8%, 5.0% and 4.5% in low, intermediate and high-risk groups respectively. Discordance was defined as 1 or 2-step difference between RS (low, intermediate, high risk) and TG (well (WD), moderately (MD) and poorly (PD) differentiated). Prior studies demonstrated 7-19% “2-step discordance” between TG and RS (i.e. PD tumors with low-risk RS or WD tumors with high-risk RS). N(%) or median were used to describe patients’ characteristics between groups and compared by Mann-Whitney U test at the confidence level of 5%. Results: Of the 24 SIBE, 42% had low RS ( < 18), 46% had intermediate RS (18-30) 12% had high RS ( > 31). Median RS was 22 and median age at secondary event was 61 (67% post-menopausal). At time of SIBE, 54% were metastatic, 25% locally recurrent and 21% contralateral. Within this dataset, 63% were 1-step and 4% were 2-step discordant. Significantly fewer patients were treated with systemic chemotherapy in the discordant group (p < 0.01), though 94% displayed MD or PD TG. Discordant tumors tended to have lower RS (median 14 vs. 24) and be larger. There were no significant differences in menopausal status or Oncotype ER/PR score. Conclusions: Although the sample size of patients with SIBE is small, our data suggests that patients with discordant tumors of low-risk RS but higher TG may be receiving inadequate treatment (i.e. no chemotherapy). In addition to RS, other factors such as discordance, TG and size should perhaps be considered when determining treatment plans.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document