CLIA validation of a novel HER2 FISH test involving image-based cell-sorting to recover pure tumor cell populations from formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12519-e12519
Author(s):  
Farideh Z. Bischoff ◽  
Amanda Gerber ◽  
Valeria Sero ◽  
Aditi Khurana ◽  
Marc Ting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Cell ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Chromosome 17 ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Her2 Positive

e12519 Background: The use of the DEPArray™ system to prepare pure tumor cell populations for more reliable and accurate downstream molecular sequence analysis has been previously demonstrated. To formally evaluate the utility of the DEPArray™ for sample preparation prior to molecular testing, we conducted a CLIA validation study to investigate the analytical performance of the instrument as well as accuracy in determining HER2 status in FFPE tumor specimens using a standard FISH assay. Methods: An initial cohort consisting of 93 FFPE samples (68 from Breast and 25 from Stomach) were selected based on defined inclusion criteria (tumor type and tumor content). For each sample, a single 50µm FFPE scroll was dissociated and then stained using fluorescently labeled Vimentin and Cytokeratin markers to distinguish between putative stromal and tumor populations, respectively. Following separation of these populations on the DEPArray™, a minimum of 100 single cells from each population was recovered and used for subsequent HER2 FISH testing. In addition, an H&E of each sample was evaluated by a Pathologist to confirm the presence of tumor content. Single-cell HER2-FISH analysis was then performed on the DEPArray™ processed samples to assess the number of signals present for each of the chromosome 17 and HER2 loci. Results were compared to the conventional tissue section FISH score. Results: Of the 93 specimens, 80 samples met pre-analytical acceptability criteria that were also confirmed by conventional methods to be either HER2-positive (n = 43) or HER2-negative (n = 37). Overall, a 95% concordance between HER2 results derived from the conventional as compared to the DEPArray™ method was observed. In addition, the instrument performance in terms of reproducibility and reliability was reported as 100%. Conclusions: DEPArray™ for preparation of FFPE-derived tumor cells was analytically validated and shown to yield high confidence in performing HER2-FISH analysis on recovered pure tumor cells. Current strategies to establish clinical utility and efficacy of this approach are underway for cases characterized as equivocal for HER2 or indeterminate by FISH.

scholarly journals Single HER2-positive tumor cells are detected in initially HER2-negative breast carcinomas using the DEPArray™–HER2-FISH workflow

Breast Cancer ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Grüntkemeier ◽  
Aditi Khurana ◽  
Farideh Zamaniyan Bischoff ◽  
Oliver Hoffmann ◽  
Rainer Kimmig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Chromosome 17 ◽  
Antigen Retrieval ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Cell Recovery ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Ffpe Tumor

Abstract Background In breast cancer (BC), overexpression of HER2 on the primary tumor (PT) is determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to stratify samples as negative, equivocal and positive to identify patients (pts) for anti-HER2 therapy. CAP/ASCO guidelines recommend FISH for analyzing HER2/neu (ERBB2) gene amplification and for resolving equivocal HER2 IHC results. However, pre-analytical and analytical aspects are often confounded by sample related limitations and tumor heterogeneity and HER2 expression may differ between the PT and circulating tumor cells (CTCs), the precursors of metastasis. We used a validation cohort of BC patients to establish a new DEPArray™-PT-HER2-FISH workflow for further application in a development cohort, characterized as PT-HER2-negative but CTC-HER2/neu-positive, to identify patients with PT-HER2 amplified cells not detected by routine pathology. Methods 50 µm FFPE tumor curls from the validation cohort (n = 49) and the development cohort (n = 25) underwent cutting, deparaffinization and antigen retrieval followed by dissociation into a single-cell suspension. After staining for cytokeratin, vimentin, DAPI and separation via DEPArray™, single cells were processed for HER2-FISH analysis to assess the number of chromosome 17 and HER2 loci signals for comparison, either with available IHC or conventional tissue section FISH. CTC-HER2/neu status was determined using the AdnaTest BreastCancer (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Results Applying CAP/ASCO guidelines for HER2 evaluation of single PT cells, the comparison of routine pathology and DEPArray™-HER2-FISH analysis resulted in a concordance rate of 81.6% (40/49 pts) in the validation cohort and 84% (21/25 pts) in the development cohort, respectively. In the latter one, 4/25 patients had single HER2-positive tumor cells with 2/25 BC patients proven to be HER2-positive, despite being HER2-negative in routine pathology. The two other patients showed an equivocal HER2 status in the DEPArray™-HER2-FISH workflow but a negative result in routine pathology. Whereas all four patients with discordant HER2 results had already died, 17/21 patients with concordant HER2 results are still alive. Conclusions The DEPArray™ system allows pure tumor cell recovery for subsequent HER2/neu FISH analysis and is highly concordant with conventional pathology. For PT-HER2-negative patients, harboring HER2/neu-positive CTCs, this approach might allow caregivers to more effectively offer anti-HER2 treatment.

Inter-laboratory evaluation of a novel DEPArray-HER2 FISH assay.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12506-e12506
Author(s):  
Amanda Gerber ◽  
Lisa Koenig ◽  
Lori Millner ◽  
Lindsay Strotman ◽  
Valeria Sero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sample Preparation ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Laboratory Evaluation ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Tumor Biomarker ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Her2 Gene ◽  
Her2 Positive

e12506 Background: Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) is a method currently used for detection and assessment of HER2 gene amplification. Although clinical guidelines set forth by CAP/ASCO exist to ensure accuracy, limitations in HER2test results due to sample preparation, assay-conditions and tumor heterogeneity remain unresolved. We have successfully demonstrated analytical confidence in performing HER2 FISH on DEPArray™ sorted and recovered tumor cells. In this study, we aimed to evaluate inter-laboratory concordance of the DEPArray™ HER2-FISH assay. Methods: Three laboratories equipped with the DEPArray™ were designated as testing sites for this study. Positive control SKBr3 cells embedded in paraffin as well as 20 invasive breast carcinoma FFPE samples were blinded and evaluated by each of the three labs. Control and patient samples were processed through the DEPArray™ beginning with dissociation of the FFPE curls followed by single-cell image-based cell sorting to separate and recover pure distinct tumor cell populations prior to HER2 FISH analysis. Data was only obtained when ∼200 intact cytokeratin+/vimentin-/DAPI+ tumor cells from each sample were recovered and used for subsequent FISH using a standard dual-color HER2/CEP17 FISH procedure. Results: Overall, 80% concordance between DEPArray™-HER2 and conventional HER2 (6 HER2 negative and 10 HER2 positive) was observed between lab(s) and the conventional HER2 method. In each of 4 cases, a discordant HER2 result was reported by one of three sites. In three of these discordant cases, the DEPArray™ HER2 ratio was reported as amplified while the conventional result was negative. In the remaining discordant case, the converse was observed by one site; however, this case was initially evaluated 15 years ago. All three sites correctly scored the SKBr3 positive control cells. Conclusions: The results showed a high concordance rate of correct HER2 status classification. This data further supports the understanding that tissue heterogeneity can indeed give rise to discordant results that may consequently affect treatment options for patients. We demonstrate that sample preparation by DEPArray™ may aid in a more precise classification for tumor biomarker status.

Serum HER2 in the context of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10599-10599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volkmar Mueller ◽  
Sabine Riethdorf ◽  
Brigitte Kathrin Rack ◽  
Wolfgang Janni ◽  
Peter A. Fasching ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cell ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Cellsearch System ◽  
Prognostic Information

10599 Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTC) reflect an aggressive tumor behavior by hematogenous tumor cell dissemination. Overexpression of HER2 in breast cancer (BC) is associated with increased angiogenesis and therefore potentially linked to increased hematogenous tumor cell spread. The aim of the analysis was to investigate whether concentrations of serum HER2 (sHER2) deliver prognostic information in the context of CTC detection in metastatic BC patients. Methods: Blood was obtained in a prospective multicenter setting from 254 patients with metastatic BC at the time of disease progression. sHER2 was determined using a commercial ELISA-kit (Wilex). CTC were detected with the CellSearch system (Veridex). Patients received systemic treatment according to national and international guidelines including HER2-targeted treatment. Results: Five or more CTC were detected in 122 of 245 evaluable patients (49.8%).119 of 251 (47%) metastatic patients had serum sHER2 levels above 15ng/mL. Median PFS was 9.2 months (95%-CI: 9.9 – 13.0 mths) with elevated sHER2 versus 11.4 mths (9.9 – 13.0 mths) with non-elevated levels (p=0.07). OS was 17.4 mths (14.6 – 20.3 mths) vs. 26.5 mths (23.1-29.8 mths; p<0.01). In patients with 5 or more CTC, serum levels were above the cut-off for sHER2 in 61% vs. 33% in those with less than 5 CTC (p< 0.01). Patients with elevated sHER and 5 or more CTC hat a PFS of 9.1 mths (7.2 – 11.1 mths) and a OS of 14.5 mths (11.8 – 17.2 mths), those with non-elevated sHER2 and less than 5 CTC a PFS of 12.1 (10.1 – 14.1 mths) and a OS of 29.5 month (25.4 – 33.6 mths) (p=0.15 for PFS and p< 0.01 for OS). Including sHER2, CTC and established prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis, the presence of CTC, line of therapy, ER and HER2 status of the primary tumor remained independent predictors of OS. Conclusions: Elevated serum levels of sHER2 are associated with the presence of CTC and indicate poor clinical outcome. However, sHER2 has no independent prognostic value when presence of CTC were taken into account.

Central review of discordant samples for microarray-based ER, PR, and HER2 and local IHC/FISH assessment worldwide from 827 patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Jelle Wesseling ◽  
Corrado Tinterri ◽  
Anna Sapino ◽  
Fabrizio Zanconati ◽  
Martijn Lutke Holzik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Mrna Expression Level ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Standard Procedures ◽  
Local Standard ◽  
Er Positive

11 Background: Differences in fixation and IHC and subjective interpretation can substantially affect the accuracy and reproducibility of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 expression. The commercially available TargetPrint test measures the mRNA expression level of ER, PR and HER2 and is 98% concordant with centrally assessed ER as presented by Viale et al, SABCS 2011. This study compares results from the microarray-based TargetPrint with IHC and FISH (for HER2 IHC2+) generated by local standard procedures. Methods: Fresh tumor samples (core needle biopsies or surgical) were collected for 831 patients diagnosed with breast cancer stage I to IV (Feb 2008 - Jan 2011) from 22 hospitals from Europe, New Zealand, Japan and US. The results of the IHC/FISH assessments performed according to the local standards at the hospitals were compared to the quantitative gene expression readouts with TargetPrint. Discordant cases were centrally reviewed for IHC/FISH assessment. Results: Of the 831 samples, IHC assessment was unknown for 4 ER/ PR samples; HER2 was unknown for 12 samples. Comparison of IHC and gene expression read out by TargetPrint showed a concordance of 95% for ER; 83% for PR and 94% for HER2. In this study, 3% of all IHC ER positive samples were classified negative by microarray, and 11% of IHC PR positive samples were classified negative by microarray. For HER2, 4% of IHC/FISH HER2 positive samples were classified negative by microarray and 2% of IHC/FISH HER2 negative samples were classified positive by microarray. Most notably, all available 5 ER IHC negative/TargetPrint positive samples turned out to be positive with central re-assessment. HER2 IHC2+ samples with discordant classifications for TargetPrint and local assessment are currently being reviewed for FISH/SISH assessment. Conclusions: Microarray based readout of ER, PR and HER2 status using TargetPrint is fairly comparable to local IHC and FISH analysis in 827 analyzed samples in various hospitals worldwide. However, re-assessment of discordant cases–especially IHC ER-/TargetPrint ER+ cases- confirms TargetPrint to be a useful high quality second opinion for local IHC/FISH assessment.

Persistence of HER2 overexpression on circulating tumor cells in patients after systemic treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer: Follow-up results of the German Success B trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11043-11043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Katharina Neugebauer ◽  
Brigitte Kathrin Rack ◽  
Bernadette Anna Sophia Jaeger ◽  
Ulrich Andergassen ◽  
Aurelia Pestka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Before And After

11043 Background: The discordance between HER2-expression on circulating tumor cells (CTC) in peripheral blood and the primary tumor has already been shown by our study group for early breast cancer patients with HER2-positive tumors. Here, we compare the results to CTC prevalence and HER2-status of CTC after adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: The SUCCESS B trial compares FEC-Docetaxel vs. FEC-Docetaxel-Gemcitabine and HER2-targeted therapy as adjuvant treatment for patients with early, HER2-positive, node positive or high risk node negative primary breast cancer. We prospectively analyzed 23ml peripheral blood before and after chemotherapy. CTC and HER2-status were assessed with the CellSearchSystem (Veridex, USA). After immunomagnetic enrichment with an anti-Epcam-antibody, cells were labeled with anti-CK 8/18/19, anti-CD45 antibodies as well as a fluorescein conjugate antibody for HER2-phenotyping. Cutoff for CTC positivity was ≥ 1 CTC. HER-positivity of CTC was assigned if at least one CTC showed strong HER2 staining (3+). Results: CTCs and their HER2-status both before and after chemotherapy were available for 392 patients. In 179 (45.7%) patients no CTC were detected before and after chemotherapy. CTC status changed from positive before to negative after chemotherapy in 104 (26.5%) patients and from negative before to positive after chemotherapy in 69 (17.6%) patients, while 40 (10.2%) patients had a consistently positive CTC status. Patients were significantly more likely to change their CTC status from positive to negative than from negative to positive (p = 0.01). Of the 40 patients with CTC both before and after chemotherapy, 14 (35%) patients had HER2-positive CTC before and after therapy, and 9 (22%) patients had HER2-negative CTC at both time points. 7 (18%) patients had HER2-positive CTC before but not after chemotherapy, while 10 (25%) patients showed the reverse pattern (p = 0.63). Conclusions: Cytotoxic treatment does not seem to influence the HER2-status on CTC. Follow-up data within the Success B trial will analyze the relevance of the HER2-expression of CTC to predict the efficacy of targeted treatment.

Quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 status in breast cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1036-1036
Author(s):  
Rie Horii ◽  
Masaaki Matsuura ◽  
Hiro Nitta ◽  
Yoshinori Ito ◽  
Shinji Ohno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Intratumoral Heterogeneity ◽  
Gene Copy ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Her2 Gene ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Positive Breast Cancer ◽  
Protein Status ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

1036 Background: Intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) occurs as a consequence of epigenetic aberrations in tumor cells with genetic diversity. HER2 ITH can be classified into genetic (a mixture of tumor cells with and without HER2 gene amplification) and epigenetic ITH (a mixture of HER2 gene-amplified tumor cells with and without HER2 protein overexpression). However, the both effects of genetic and epigenetic ITH on HER2-targeted therapy have not been clearly demonstrated. In order to implement ITH as a referenced factor for treatment selection, the ITH quantification is necessary. Gene-protein assay (GPA), in which immunohistochemistry and dual in situ hybridization are simultaneously performed on a single slide, allows bright-field analyses of both gene and protein status. We aimed to quantify HER2 ITH by the combination of gene and protein status and clarify its clinical significance. Methods: Fifty three patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, who underwent neoadjuvant trastuzumab with chemotherapy, were examined. Five representative microscopic images were captured from a GPA slide of a pre-therapeutic biopsy material. All evaluable tumor cells in the images were scored according to the HER2 status determined by the combination of gene copy number and protein expression (Table). We investigated the relationship between the HER2 scores and pathological complete response (pCR) to the neoadjuvant treatment by the logistic analysis. Results: The average of HER2 scores, indicating the degree of the HER2 status, varied from 2.21 to 5.98. It was significantly related to pCR (Estimate: 1.21, Std. error: 0.46, RR: 3.34, P=0.009, 95%CI: 1.35-8.25). The standard deviation of HER2 scores, indicating the degree of the HER2 ITH, varied from 0.13 to 1.37. It was significantly related to pCR (Estimate: -2.09, Std. error: 0.83, RR: 0.12, P=0.012, 95%CI: 0.02-0.63). Conclusions: HER2 ITH, quantified by GPA, is a predictive factor for the therapeutic effect to trastuzumab-based treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Outcome of HER2 Testing by FISH applying ASCO/CAP 2007 and 2013 guideline in IHC equivocal group of breast cancer: Experience at tertiary cancer care centre

2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 045-046
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar Panigrahi ◽  
Dushyant Kumar ◽  
Anurag Mehta ◽  
Kandarpa Kumar Saikia
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Chromosome 17 ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Testing ◽  
Polysomy 17 ◽  
Cancer Experience ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and Objectives: HER2 testing guideline of ASCO/CAP for interpretation and reporting has recently been revised. The study is aimed to measure the impact of 2013 CAP guideline on equivocal HER2 test outcome (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 2+) when tested by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). The study also aims at finding the frequency of polysomy and monosomy of chromosome 17. Materials and Methods: Specimens were collected in Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India. IHC was performed in every case, and FISH was performed in IHC2+ cases. Results: In final analysis includes 557 subjects on the basis of CAP guideline 2007 and CAP guideline 2013. One hundred ninety-two subjects (34.4%) were HER2 amplified according to CAP scoring 2007, and 246 subjects (44%) according to 2013 CAP scoring. Conclusions: FISH results were evaluated (IHC2 + interpreted according to CAP 2007 guideline) with both 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP scoring criteria, we identified significantly more HER2 positive cases as compared to cases evaluated using the 2007 criteria (P < 0.05). We also found that in breast carcinoma, HER2 status in the presence of polysomy 17 may vary with the scoring criteria used. Evaluation of FISH result using 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria means that more patients with breast cancer may be appropriate for targeted treatment with trastuzumab, potentially improving their outcome.

Central review of discordant samples for microarray based on ER, PR, and HER2 and local IHC/FISH assessment worldwide from 827 patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10554-10554
Author(s):  
Jelle Wesseling ◽  
Corrado Tinterri ◽  
Anna Sapino ◽  
Fabrizio Zanconati ◽  
Martijn Lutke Holzik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Mrna Expression Level ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Standard Procedures ◽  
Local Standard ◽  
Er Positive

10554 Background: Differences in fixation and IHC and subjective interpretation can substantially affect the accuracy and reproducibility of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 expression. The commercially available TargetPrint test measures the mRNA expression level of ER, PR and HER2 and is 98% concordant with centrally assessed ER as presented by Viale et al, SABCS 2011. This study compares results from the microarray-based TargetPrint with IHC and FISH (for HER2 IHC2+) generated by local standard procedures. Methods: Fresh tumor samples (core needle biopsies or surgical) were collected for 831 patients diagnosed with breast cancer stage I to IV (Feb 2008 - Jan 2011) from 22 hospitals from Europe, New Zealand, Japan and US. The results of the IHC/FISH assessments performed according to the local standards at the hospitals were compared to the quantitative gene expression readouts with TargetPrint. Discordant cases were centrally reviewed for IHC/FISH assessment. Results: Of the 831 samples, IHC assessment was unknown for 4 ER/ PR samples; HER2 was unknown for 12 samples. Comparison of IHC and gene expression read out by TargetPrint showed a concordance of 95% for ER; 83% for PR and 94% for HER2. In this study, 3% of all IHC ER positive samples were classified negative by microarray, and 11% of IHC PR positive samples were classified negative by microarray. For HER2, 4% of IHC/FISH HER2 positive samples were classified negative by microarray and 2% of IHC/FISH HER2 negative samples were classified positive by microarray. Most notably, all available 5 ER IHC negative/TargetPrint positive samples turned out to be positive with central re-assessment. HER2 IHC2+ samples with discordant classifications for TargetPrint and local assessment are currently being reviewed for FISH/SISH assessment. Conclusions: Microarray based readout of ER, PR and HER2 status using TargetPrint is fairly comparable to local IHC and FISH analysis in 827 analyzed samples in various hospitals worldwide. However, re-assessment of discordant cases –especially IHC ER-/TargetPrint ER+ cases- confirms TargetPrint to be a useful high quality second opinion for local IHC/FISH assessment.

Profiling of circulating tumor cells isolated from 105 metastatic gastric cancer patients revealed HER2 overexpression/activation for potential use in clinical setting.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10535-10535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saswati Hazra ◽  
Jeeyun Lee ◽  
Phillip Sangwook Kim ◽  
Kyoung-Mee Kim ◽  
Limin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Over Expression

10535 Background: Gastric cancer (GCA) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the world. Survival of patients with advanced GCA treated with chemotherapy remains low. New targeted therapies are urgently needed. There is mounting evidence of the role of HER2 overexpression in patients with GCA, and it has been highly correlated to poor outcomes with more aggressive disease. The ability to accurately determine HER2 status by testing circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may improve patient treatment by allowing ongoing assessment of HER2 status during treatment and/or identifying additional patients who could potentially benefit from HER2- targeted therapy. Methods: The Collaborative Enzyme Enhanced Reactive-immunoassay (CEER) was utilized to determine the expression and activation (phosphorylation) levels of HER2 in CTCs isolated from blood specimens obtained from 105 metastatic GCA patients. Results: Utilizing the CEER platform, the levels of HER2 expression and phosphorylation were determined for CTCs isolated from metastatic GCA patients. Evaluable CTCs were found in 33% (35/105) of enrolled patients. Out of 35 patients, 7 patients (20%) have high HER2 over expression, 6 patients (17%) have moderate HER2 expression and 11 patients (31%) have HER2 activation (phospho positive) with no HER2 over-expression. Conclusions: When CTCs were present, the CEER assay identified varying levels of HER2 involvements in 68% of metastatic GCA patients. HER2 positive CTCs could serve as a prognostic and/or predictive marker in patients with advanced GCA and CTC-HER2 profile shifts can be utilized to monitor the treatment efficacy.

Temporal Dynamics of Tumor-Microenvironment Interaction and Treatment Responses Revealed through Time-Lapse Compartment-Specific Bioluminescence Imaging: Translational implications

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 276-276
Author(s):  
Eugen Dhimolea ◽  
Emily King ◽  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
Douglas W. McMillin ◽  
Jake E. Delmore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Cell ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Stromal Cells ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Kinetics Of

Abstract Most conventional methods to sensitively quantify tumor cell proliferation and viability in vitro involve processing of cells in ways that preclude continuation of the respective experiment or prevent the longitudinal collection of data. This common technical feature of conventional assays limits their ability to provide detailed insight into the kinetics of tumor cell responses to treatment(s). Additionally, these limitations hinder the use of these assays to monitor how the kinetics of treatment response can be altered by nonmalignant "accessory" cells of the tumor microenvironment (e.g. bone marrow stromal cells [BMSCs] for hematologic malignancies or bone metastases of solid tumors). To address these obstacles, we modified our previously developed tumor cell compartment-specific bioluminescence imaging (CS-BLI) platform (McMillin et al. Nat Med. 2010), to enable longitudinal assessment of tumor cell response to diverse experimental conditions; we cultured luciferase-expressing tumor cells, with or without stromal cells, in the presence of bioluminescent substrates, using optimized conditions which provide detectable bioluminescent signal even after several days of culture, while having no adverse effect on the viability of tumor or non-malignant cells in this system. This modified approach (time-lapse CSBLI, [TL-CSBLI]) preserved the linear correlation of bioluminescent signal with tumor cell viability. Furthermore, results obtained at the end of the experiment and during interim time-points are consistent with those generated using either non-time-lapse applications of CS-BLI or conventional techniques. We applied TL-CSBLI to delineate, in high-throughput manner, the temporal dynamics of the responses of tumor cells (e.g. multiple myeloma (MM) and other hematologic malignancies) to diverse treatments (e.g. conventional chemotherapeutics, glucocorticoids; proteasome inhibitors (PIs, bortezomib or carfilzomib), and kinase inhibitors). Using the time-lapse capabilities of this assay, we evaluated tumor cell responses in the presence vs. absence of stromal cells. We observed that the kinetics of tumor cell response to diverse therapeutic classes are heterogeneous, even within the same tumor type: for instance, tumor cells with pronounced responses at the end of drug incubation (e.g. 24, 48, 72, hrs after initiation of treatment with PIs, DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics, or dexamethasone respectively), can have different magnitude of responses at intermediate time points. This suggests that TL-CSBLI data can further stratify treatment-responsive tumor cells into those with early vs. late kinetics of response. We also observed that the kinetics of the proliferative / anti-apoptotic effect conferred by stromal cells on tumor cells are highly variable between different cell lines, even within the same tumor type. For instance, the time between initiation of coculture and maximum stimulation of tumor cell viability by stromal cells was variable between cell lines and did not correlate with the magnitude of stimulation by stromal cells. Importantly, TL-CSBLI identified that the response of diverse types of tumor cells to treatments can be delayed in the presence of stromal cells, compared to conventional tumor cell monocultures: this initial delay in treatment response of tumor cells in stromal co-cultures may be observed even in cases where similar cytoreductive responses are eventually observed at later time-points in both the presence and absence of stromal cells. This observation suggests that a more expansive definition of stroma-induced resistance to a given treatment may be warranted, to specifically incorporate the ability of stromal cells to delay the tumor cell response to such treatment. In summary, TL-CSBLI enables detailed characterization of the kinetics of tumor cell responses to diverse experimental conditions. Its use can provide insight into the underappreciated impact that cell-autonomous variations or stroma-induced changes in the kinetics of tumor cell response to a given anti-tumor therapy can have on determining its efficacy. This is particularly consequential for agents (e.g. PIs) which have clinical pharmacokinetic profiles associated with transient peak exposure. Disclosures McMillin: Axios Biosciences: Equity Ownership; DFCI: patent submission on stromal co-culture technologies Patents & Royalties. Negri:DFCI: patent submission on stromal co-culture technologies Patents & Royalties. Mitsiades:Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; DFCI: patent submission on stromal co-culture technologies Patents & Royalties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document