Phase IB study of induction chemotherapy with XELOX, followed by radiation therapy, carboplatin, and everolimus in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15607-e15607
Author(s):  
Nabil F. Saba ◽  
Seth D Force ◽  
Charles A. Staley ◽  
Felix G Fernandez ◽  
Field F. Willingham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Poor Tolerance

e15607 Background: Preclinical studies have shown synergy between everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, radiation and platinum agents in EC. We conducted a multi-institutional phase IB trial to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of concurrent everolimus with carboplatin and radiation in non-metastatic EC pts. Methods: Patients with untreated, localized EC and ECOG performance status 0-1 were eligible. Following two cycles of induction Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin (XELOX), pts without evidence of disease progression, received concurrent chemoradiation (total dose: 50.4Gy in 28 fractions), weekly carboplatin (AUC = 2), and escalating doses of everolimus. A standard 3+3 dose escalation design was used. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled. There were two screen failures (thrombocytopenia, metastases) and 4 pts were removed due to poor tolerance of XELOX (2 pts) or disease progression (2 pts). A total of 13 pts with stage II/III (6/7) EC completed concurrent therapy. Median age 58 (44-71yrs), 85% males; all had adenocarcinoma deemed resectable. One pt at dose level 1 (2.5 mg/QOD), was replaced due to ongoing anxiety. One of 6 pts had a DLT (bowel ischemia). At dose level 2 (2.5mg/QD), 2 out of 6 patients had a DLT (fever with neutropenia and nausea). The RP2D of everolimus was 2.5 mg QOD. Clinically relevant ≥ grade 3 toxicities included lymphopenia (25%), dehydration (12%), fatigue, leukopenia, hyponatremia, abdominal pain, vomiting (each 6%). R0 resection was achieved in 100%; a pathologic response rate (RR) of 40% and a pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 23% were observed. The 2-year PFS and OS were 50% and 49.6% respectively. Conclusions: The RP2D of everolimus with concurrent weekly carboplatin and radiation is 2.5 mg QOD. Despite the 100% R0 resection rate, the pCR and OS rates were within the expected historical controls. (The study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals) Clinical trial information: NCT01490749.

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin as induction and concomitant with radiotherapy in rectal cancer: A phase II study.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 604-604
Author(s):  
J. A. Gutierrez ◽  
G. Martinez-Martinez ◽  
A. J. Silva ◽  
J. Gomez Rangel ◽  
M. Palmerin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Dermatologic Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

604 Background: Preoperative combined modality chemoradiation with fluoropyrimidine-based schedules is widely accepted as the current standard of care for localized rectal cancer. Current strategies have focused on intensifying the neoadjuvant systemic treatment to improve pCR. Methods: From January 2009 to January 2010, 18 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3, any N, M0) were included according to Simon's design. Treatment was 2 cycles of capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid (D1-14) and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (D1) every 3 weeks as induction followed by chemoradiation (45 Gy). During radiotherapy patients received 2 cycles of capecitabine 750 mg/m2 bid (D1-14) and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (D1 and 8) every 3 weeks. Surgery was planned 5-10 weeks after completion of radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was pCR. Results: 18 patients were assessable for response. Median age was 55 y (41-65), 11 patients with ECOG performance status of 1 (61%), all 18 patients were staged as T3, 10 were staged N+ (56%). Of the 18 patients, 17 patients were given CRT and 13 patients (76%) underwent radical resection. Of the patients who did not underwent resection, 1 patient was considered unresectable at the time of surgery, 2 patients refused surgery because of clinical complete response and 1 patient experienced progressive disease to the spine after chemoradiation. During induction treatment 1 patient (6%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicity (diarrhea). During chemoradiation 1 patient (6%) experienced grade 3 diarrhea and nausea and 1 patient (6%) experienced grade 3 radio-induced dermatologic toxicity; overall grade 3-4 toxicity of 12%. No grade 4 toxicity or treatment related deaths were observed. Of the 13 patients who underwent resection, 12 patients (92%) had a complete resection (R0). Pathologic complete response rate was observed in 1 patient (6%) according to intent to treat. The study was closed after the first stage because it did not reach the minimum required number of pCR. Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin before chemoradiation is feasible. Given that we did not reach the prespecified pCR rate required to continue the trial, the study was closed after the first stage. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Carboplatin (C), cetuximab (Cet), and everolimus (E) in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RMSCCHN). Results of a phase Ib study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6083-6083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabil F. Saba ◽  
Scott A Kono ◽  
Jennifer Robin Mendel ◽  
Selwyn J Hurwitz ◽  
Taofeek Kunle Owonikoko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Resistant Cell ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Phase Ib

6083 Background: Platinum-based therapy in combination with Cet is the standard first line systemic therapy in RMSCCHN. Preclinical studies suggest that mTOR inhibitors may restore sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors in resistant cell lines, and that in combination with Cet may augment anti-tumor activity. We conducted a phase Ib trial of C, Cet and E for untreated RMSCCHN. Methods: Patients received C at AUC=2 on a 3 weeks on 1 off schedule with Cet weekly at a fixed dose and E at escalating dose levels of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 mg daily using a 3+3 design. After 4 cycles of therapy patients without disease progression continued on maintenance Cet and E until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Patients had previously untreated RMSCCHN not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy, age ≥ 18 years and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-2. Results: After IRB approval, the study enrolled 18 patients with RMSCCHN between February 8, 2011 and Jan 25 2013. One patient was a screen failure. Four had an anaphylactic reaction to Cet and were excluded from the analysis. A total of 13 patients received E (M/F: 92%); median age 65 (44-75yrs). Two of six patients treated at dose level 1 (E-2.5 mg/day) experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT) with grade 3 hyponatremia and nausea. Additional 7 patients were treated with de-escalated dose of E (2.5 mg QOD). No DLTs were observed at this dose level. Salient clinically relevant Grade >2 toxicities included: leukopenia (23%), neutropenia (15%) hyponatremia (18%), hyperglycemia, nausea, rash, hypokalemia, urinary infection, bacteremia, (each 8%). Dose reductions of C were necessary for a total of 18/61 delivered cycles of therapy. A response rate (RR) of 62.5% with all responders having partial responses (PR) was observed. The PFS was 7.8 months. Conclusions: The MTD of E in combination with Cet and C is estimated at 2.5 mg QOD. Though this is less than the commonly utilized dose of E, the regimen was associated with encouraging response rate and PFS Clinical trial information: NCT01283334.

624 A PHASE III STUDY ON NEOADJUVANT TORIPALIMAB PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR LOCALLY RESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zheng ◽  
Jiangong Zhang ◽  
Wenqun Xing
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract   In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising results in the treatment of ESCC. More than 20 phase II clinical trials have been launched to explore combinations of ICIs in the neoadjuvant setting for ESCC. Based on our phase II clinical trial, a two-arm phase III trial was launched in our Hospital. Methods A two-arm phase III trial was launched in April 2020 in our Hospital. Patient recruitment will be completed within 18 months. The primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS). The secondary endpoints include pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS) rate, overall response rate (ORR), R0 resection rate, major pathologic response (MPR), adverse events (AEs), complication rate and quality of life (QOL). A biobank of pretreatment, resected tumor tissue and paired blood samples will be built for translational research in the future. Results Until Dec. 2021, one hundred and twenty ESCC patients recruited in the trial. The trial is ongoing. Conclusion This RCT directly compares NAC with neoadjuvant toripalimab plus chemotherapy in terms of EFS for locally advanced ESCC. The results may usher in a new era of resectable ESCC treatment.

740 CAMRELIZUMAB IN COMBINATION WITH PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: A SINGLE-ARM, OPEN-LABEL, PHASE II STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Yu Qi ◽  
Xiangrui Meng ◽  
Qingxia Fan
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Reduction Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

Abstract   At present, ESCC has a dismal prognosis with huge unmet clinical needs. With the potential benefit of combining PD-1 inhibitor with nCT, we conducted a phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of Camrelizumab plus nCT for locally advanced ESCC. Methods 45 patients (pts) with histologically confirmed stage II/III/IVa(cT2-4aN0-3 M0) ESCC were enrolled from February 2020 to March 2021.The study was divided into two stages, stage1: we administered 1 cycle of Camrelizumab for induction therapy (200 mg q2 weeks); stage2: pts received 2 cycle of Camrelizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) plus docetaxel and nedaplatin, followed by surgery within 4 ~ 6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy completion. Primary endpoint was major pathologic response (MPR). Secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR), R0 resection rate, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results At the cutoff date of Mar 9, 2021, 45 eligible pts were enrolled, neoadjuvant treatment was completed in 39 pts. Thus far 32 pts were resected, all patients underwent an R0 resection. Postoperative pathology showed that TNM stage decreased in 28 pts with 87.5% reduction rate. 19 pts (59.38%) reached major pathologic response, 9 pts (28.13%) reached pathologic complete response (no surgery related mortality). A total of 75.56% had AEs with 13.33% of grade ≥ 3 AEs. Date for median DFS and OS were not matured. Conclusion Camrelizumab in combination with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery for locally advanced ESCC showed promising downstaging effect and MPR with good tolerance, and its efficacy and safety could be further studied in later trials. Clinical trial information: NCT03917966.

Association of total neoadjuvant therapy with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (LA-GEJ CA).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 231-231
Author(s):  
Lauren Jurkowski ◽  
Aditya Varnam Shreenivas ◽  
Sakti Chakrabarti ◽  
Mandana Kamgar ◽  
James P. Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Metabolic Imaging ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Curative Intent

231 Background: Both peri-operative chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiation have been shown to improve outcomes in patients (pts) with LA-GEJ CA compared to surgery alone. Rates of post-operative chemotherapy delivery remain suboptimal. Total neo-adjuvant therapy (TNT) in LA-GEJ CA - induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) - may improve systematic delivery of neoadjuvant therapy and result in favorable clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 135 pts with LA-GEJ CA at our institution between 2/2007 and 11/2019; pertinent clinical data were abstracted with Institutional Review Board approval. Patients treated with IC and curative-intent CRT with ≥40 Gy dose of radiation for adenocarcinoma were included in this analysis (N = 59). Doublet or triplet IC regimens utilizing 5-Flurouracil(5-FU), Cisplatin/Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel were commonly administered while combinations of Carboplatin +Paclitaxel or 5-FU + Oxaliplatin were used in CRT. Clinical complete response (CCR) was defined as metabolic imaging and endoscopic biopsies negative for residual malignancy after completion of TNT. Patients were followed from diagnosis to recurrence and overall survival. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using a log-rank test. Results: Out of 59 evaluable pts, 69% were clinical stage T3, 71% were node positive. 37 pts (63%) underwent surgery, R0 resection rate was 89% (33/37), pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 19% (7/37). Among the pts who did not undergo surgery, 41% (9/22) opted to forego surgery since they attained a CCR. For the entire cohort, median Disease-Free Survival (mDFS), median Overall Survival (mOS), and 3-yr OS were 2.4 yrs, 4.7 yrs, and 67% respectively. Pts who did not undergo surgery had a mDFS, mOS, and 3-yr OS of 1.5 yrs, 4.2 yrs, and 59% respectively. Median DFS, mOS, and 3-yr OS of patients who underwent surgery were 3.5 yrs, 5.8 yrs and 72% respectively. Patients who achieved a CCR and opted to forego surgery (N = 9) had a 3 -yr DFS of 42% vs 83% for pts (N = 7) who demonstrated a pCR after curative intent tri-modality therapy. (P = 0.0099) Interestingly, the same group that achieved CCR and opted out of surgery had 3yr OS of 89% vs 83% of those who demonstrated a pCR (p = 0.0042). Conclusions: TNT for pts with LA-GEJ CA is associated with high rates of R0 resection as well as excellent DFS and OS compared to historical controls, warranting prospective evaluation. The remarkable DFS and OS in patients who opted to forego surgery due to achieving CCR is reflective of the local and systemic control rendered by this approach. Careful characterization and close longitudinal follow-up of patients who achieve CCR may help identify a subgroup of LA-GEJ CA pts who may benefit from surgery sparing approaches.

Phase II study with preoperative oxaliplatin (O), cisplatin (P), 5-fluorouracil (F) (OPF) and radiation (XRT) in patients with esophageal (ES), gastroesophageal (GE), and gastric (G) cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15612-e15612
Author(s):  
M. Pera ◽  
R. Gallego ◽  
M. Martin-Richard ◽  
C. Montagut ◽  
M. Iglesias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Surgical Oncology ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

e15612 Background: A phase I study showed the feasibility of the triplet combination (OPF) with XRT in ES and GE cancer (Maurel et al, IJRBOP, 2005). We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of the regimen. Methods: Enrolled pts had resectable, high-risk (HR) based on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) (uT3, uN1 or uT4 if deemed resectable) ES, GE and G cancer. The primary objective was to determine the pathologic complete response (pCR). If 2 or more pCR were reported in the first 18 pts treated, enrollment continues with 23 additional pts. Eligibility criteria: squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the ES, GE or G cancer and ECOG Performance status (PS) 0–1. Staging was done with EUS and computed spiral tomography. Laparoscopic staging was mandatory for pts with ES, GE and G adenocarcinoma. Pts received 2 cycles of O 85 mg/m2, P 55 mg/m2, F (3 g/m2 in 96h CI) q4w, with concomitant 45 Gy XRT in 25 fractions; surgery was planned 5–8 weeks after XRT. All pathological specimens were reviewed by a unique pathologist and regression analysis was recorded using Cologne (C) and M.D.Anderson (MDA) classification for ES and European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO) for GE and G. Results: Between 5/04 to 12/07, 41 pts were enrolled in 5 Spanish Institutions. Median age 62 yrs (39–75 yrs); Male/female 83%/17%; PS 0/1 27%/73%; ES/GE/G 39%/32%/29%; EUS stageT3N0 (20%), T2–3N1 (65%) and T4 (10%). G3/4 adverse events included asthenia (27%), infection (7%), diarrhea (7%) and stomatitis (5%). There were 2 toxic deaths. Of the 31 pts who underwent surgery, there were R0=94%/R1=3%/R2= 3%. 7/41 pts (17%) achieved pCR. Using C and MDA classification, 9/14 (61%) and 12/14 (85%) ES achieved grade IV/III and P0/P1 regression, respectively. With EJSO classification 3/17 (18%) GE and G tumors achieved pCR. Median time to progression or death (PFS) was 16.2 (CI:12.2-NR) months (mo). Median overall survival (OS) was 28.9 mo. (CI: 22.5-NR). Conclusions: Although in the whole group pCR, PFS and OS does not appear superior to results achieved in other trials with preoperative P/F/XRT in HR pts, the OPF regimen seems specially active in ES cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cisplatin (CDDP) and radiation versus cetuximab (Cx) and radiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (SCHNC): A retrospective review.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16009-e16009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash Peddi ◽  
Runhua Shi ◽  
Lori Panu ◽  
Fred Ampil ◽  
Cherie-Ann Nathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Group A

e16009 Background: SCHNC is a common malignancy and approximately 60% of patients present with locally advanced disease. There is paucity of data directly comparing Cx and CDDP with concurrent radiation in locally advanced SCHNC. We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients treated with CDDP and/or Cx along with radiation in locally advanced SCHNC comparing efficacy and outcomes in an academic cancer center. Methods: Ninety-five patients with locally advanced SCHNC were treated with concurrent CDDP (100 mg/m2 day 1, 22, 43) or Cx (400mg/m2 on day -7 and 250mg/m2 weekly) at our institution between January 2006 and June 2011. Forty-four patients were treated with CDDP (group A), 24 with Cx (group B) and 27 were initially started on CDDP but were switched to Cx secondary to toxicity (group C). All patients received concurrent radiation treatments (66-70 Gy, 2.0 Gy/fraction). The selection of CDDP versus Cx was largely based on ECOG performance status (PS) and baseline renal function of the patients. Chi-square test, analysis of variance, and log-rank test was used for analysis. The three groups had similar baseline characteristics except for mean age of 61, 56 and 55 years in group A, B and C respectively; T4 tumors consisted of 44%, 75% and 41% in groups A, B and C respectively. Groups A, B and C had a combined ECOG 0 and I (PS) of 93%, 75% and 92%. Patients with ECOG III PS were excluded. Results: Oropharynx was the most common treated site (38%) followed by Larynx (35%). Complete response (CR) was seen in 77%, 17% and 67% in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.001). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 16.6, 4.3 and 22.8 in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.001) and median overall survival (OS) was >35, 11.6 and >32 months in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Concurrent CDDP with radiation leads to better response rate PFS and OS as opposed to Cx though many patients treated with CDDP could not complete treatment due to toxicity. Randomized trial comparing the two should be considered.

Phase Ib/II study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with CRLX101 and capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15144-e15144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Wang ◽  
Autumn Jackson McRee ◽  
A. William Blackstock ◽  
Bert H. O'Neil ◽  
Dominic T. Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Grade 3

e15144 Background: There is strong interest in the development of novel agents to further improve the therapeutic ratio of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. CRLX101 is an investigational nanoparticle-drug conjugate with a camptothecin payload. The purpose of this Phase Ib/II study is to assess toxicity and to evaluate whether the addition of CRLX101 to chemoradiotherapy can improve pathologic complete response (pCR) for rectal cancer. Methods: This is a single-arm multicenter Phase Ib/II study examining the addition of CRLX101 to a standard capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy regimen. Phase Ib employs a 3+3 dose escalation design with starting dose of 12 mg/m2 every other week (QOW). Dose level +1 was 15 mg/m2 (MTD for CRLX101 single agent QOW). Upon reaching MTD for QOW dosing, protocol was modified to evaluate QW CRLX101 dosing starting at 12 mg/m2 and 15 mg/m2as +1 level. Secondary endpoints included pCR and clinical outcome. Results: A total of 32 patients were enrolled on the trial. 26/32 had T3-4, 9/32 had N2 and 16/32 had N1 disease. For QOW dosing, 9 patients completed treatment without DLT and MTD was identified as 15 mg/m2 QOW. 14 patients were treated on the Phase II portion of the study at 15 mg/m2 QOW prior to the initiation of weekly dosing Phase Ib cohorts. For QW dosing, 0/3 patients experienced DLT at 12 mg/m2 and 1/6 patients experienced DLT at 15 mg/m2. The DLT was skin desquamation requiring treatment delay. QW MTD was identified as 15 mg/m2. Toxicities (all grade 3 except lymphopenia) that could possibly be attributed to CRLX101 are in Table 1. Full clinical and pathologic staging were available for 29/32 patients. Mean neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score was 19 with standard deviation of 15. At the weekly MTD, 3/6 patients had pCR. Conclusions: CRLX101 weekly at 15 mg/m2+ standard capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy appears to be well tolerated, with promising pCR rates that warrants further evaluation. A larger PhII trial should be considered with this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT02010567. [Table: see text]

ABC-08: A phase Ib, multi-centre, open-label study of a first-in-class nucleotide analogue NUC-1031 in combination with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancers.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS544-TPS544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mairead Geraldine McNamara ◽  
John A. Bridgewater ◽  
Daniel H. Palmer ◽  
Harpreet Singh Wasan ◽  
David Ryder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Cancer Resistance ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancers ◽  
Phase Ib

TPS544 Background: The UK ABC-02 study established cisplatin and gemcitabine as the reference regimen for first-line treatment of patients (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) (median overall survival (OS): 11.7 months). No clinical studies since ABC-02 have reported an extension in OS, and therefore effective new agents/combinations are required. NUC-1031 was designed to improve on gemcitabine’s relatively poor efficacy by overcoming its associated key cancer resistance mechanisms, through cellular uptake independent of nucleoside transporters, activation independent of deoxycytidine kinase and protection from cytidine deaminase inactivation, resulting in over 200x the intracellular levels of the anti-cancer metabolite, dFdCTP, greater stability and reduction in the generation of toxic metabolites. NUC-1031 showed activity as monotherapy in a phase I/II study in 7 pts with BTC, refractory to all standard treatments (Blagden et al ASCO 2015; abstract 2514). Methods: ABC-08 is a multi-centre phase Ib study of NUC-1031 combined with cisplatin in pts with non-resectable or recurrent/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder or ampullary carcinoma, aged ≥18 years with an ECOG performance status of 0-1, who have received no prior systemic therapy. The starting dose for NUC-1031 is 625 mg/m2 administered IV on days 1 and 8 in combination with cisplatin (standard dose of 25 mg/m2) (21 day schedule). The dose will be escalated sequentially in cohorts of 3-6 pts using an accelerated titration procedure (725mg/m2, 825mg/m2, 925mg/m2). Treatment will continue until intolerable toxicity/progressive disease. The primary endpoints are safety and RP2D. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, OS, response rate and pharmacokinetic endpoints, including assessments of multiple plasma and intracellular analytes: NUC-1031, cisplatin, dFdC, dFdCMP, dFdCDP, dFdCTP and dFdU, and will be correlated with safety profile and clinical activity. Planned accrual is 15-24 pts over 2 years. Cohort 1 has been completed without dose-limiting toxicities. Enrolment to cohort 2 is on-going. Clinical trial information: NCT02351765.

Triple induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer: Final results of a multicenter phase II trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4568-4568
Author(s):  
W. M. Eisterer ◽  
A. De Vries ◽  
B. Spechtenhauser ◽  
D. Kendler ◽  
A. Königsrainer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Blurred Vision ◽  
Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy

4568 Background: Surgery is the standard treatment for patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma, but 5-year survival rates rarely exceed 20%. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may lead to downstaging of the tumor and thus improve the possibility of complete oncologic resection. Docetaxel (Dx) showed considerable activity in combination with hyperfractionated radiotherapy and only moderate toxicity. We evaluated a triple neoadjuvant regime including Dx in patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) or squamos cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods: 24 patients (pts) with AC (n=8) or SCC (n=16) medically fit, no prior therapy, ECOG-performance status = 2 were included. Pts received 2 cycles of cisplatin (Cis) 15mg/ms2 d1–5, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 750mg/m2 continuous infusion (CI) d1–5, and Dx 75mg/m2 d1 repeated every 29 days followed by radiotherapy (RT) 39.6 Gy total dose (daily fraction 1.8Gy) concomitant to Dx 15mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 5-FU 300mg/m2 CI on the days of RT followed by resection or definitive RT up to 59.6 Gy in case of inoperability. Results: See table . Grade 3/4 toxicity (n/%): neutropenia 10/43%, diarrhea 4/18%, alopecia 2/9%; deep vein thrombosis 1/5%, blurred vision 1/5%, fever 1/5%, pulmonary embolus 1/5%, arterial hypertension 1/5%. 1 pt died 39 days post resection due to fatal anastomical bleeding. 6/16 operated pts (37%) showed morbidity (anastomical stenosis/insufficiency, fistula, nervus recurrens palsy). 4/22 pts (18%) died 7- 25 months after therapy due to metastatic disease. At a median follow-up of 12 months 18 pts (82%) are alive, median survival has not been reached yet. Conclusions: Triple induction CT and CRT with Dx, Cis, and 5-FU is safe, feasible, and effective with CPR in 31%, downstaging in 81% and R0-resection in 100% of pts. Main toxicities are neutropenia (43%) and postoperative morbidity (37%). A follow-up phase II trial of triple induction therapy in combination with an EGFR-directed antibody is planned. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document