Osteoponstin expression and presence of EGFR-positive liver macrophage to predict outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15664-e15664
Author(s):  
Kaoru Tsuchiya ◽  
Wolfgang Sieghart ◽  
Merima Herac ◽  
Florian Hucke ◽  
Georg Oberhuber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Standard Size ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Liver Macrophage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Selection For

e15664 Background: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the most effective therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of limited extent. We focused on biomarkers, which could serve as tools for patient selection for OLT with good outcome even when transplanted beyond the standard size limits. Methods: Osteopontin(OPN) expression and presence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-positive liver macrophage had been shown previously to be associated with the risk of tumor recurrence post OLT and were investigated immunohistochemically in 125 HCC-patients undergoing OLT between 1982 and 2002. Multivariate analyses of these and other well-described factors associated with median overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR) were performed. Results: The OS rates of the 125 patients at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years were 77%, 52%, 43%, 37% and 32%. The 3-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates for patients without expression of both biomarkers (OPN and EGFR-positive liver macrophage) were 66.1%, 61.0% and 54.1%. These were significantly better than for the other groups (p < .0001), whereas the 3- and 7-year survival rates for patients with expression of both biomarkers were 25.0% and 5.0%. Fifty-eight patients (38.4%) developed tumor recurrence.There was no significant difference in OS and TTR between the patients beyond the Milan criteria (MC) without expression of both biomarkers (n = 26) and the patients within MC with expression of one or two biomarkers (n = 20).On multivariate analysis, vascular invasion and presence of EGFR-positive liver macrophage in HCC were independent factors associated with OS. Both biomarkers were independent factors associated with TTR.On multivariate analysis, morphologic criteria including MC and Up-to-7 criteria were not significantly associated with OS and TTR once OPN and EGRF+ macrophage presence was introduced into the analysis. Conclusions: Staining for OPN and EGFR-positive liver macrophage in HCC can give important prognostic information. The discussion about the selection for OLT in HCC patients should likely consider the expression of biomarkers in addition to relying on morphologic criteria.

Impact of up-to-seven criteria and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in liver transplantation for patients who received pretreatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14536-e14536
Author(s):  
Tomoharu Yoshizumi ◽  
Toru Ikegami ◽  
Shohei Yoshiya ◽  
Takashi Motomura ◽  
Yohei Mano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

e14536 Background: There is currently no consensus on how to manage patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) while awaiting liver transplantation (LT). The guideline published in UK states that locoregional therapy should be considered for all listed patients with HCC. Living donor LT (LDLT) is a choice for treating HCC patients in organ shortage era. The aim of the present study is to clarify the risk factors of tumor recurrence after LDLT in patients who had received pre-transplant treatments (pre-Tx) for HCC. Methods: One hundred two adult patients (39 females and 63 males) who had undergone LDLT due to end-stage liver disease with recurrent HCC after pre-Tx were enrolled. The primary end-point of this study was HCC recurrence after LDLT. Recurrence-free survival rates after LDLT were calculated. Risk factors of tumor recurrence were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 89.4%, 80.7%, and 78.8%, respectively. Seventy-four of 102 patients underwent pre-Tx more than twice. Moreover, the times of pre-Tx, the interval between the first treatment and LDLT, and the interval between the last treatment and LDLT did not affect the outcome of LDLT. On univariate analysis, the factors affecting recurrence-free survival were exceeding the up-to-seven criteria (p<0.0001), exceeding the Kyushu University criteria (p<0.0001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 4 (p=0.0001), Alpha-fetoprotein > 400 ng/ml (p<0.0001), and bilobar tumor distribution (p=0.047). A multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for post-LDLT tumor recurrence were exceeding the up-to-seven criteria (p=0.001) and NLR > 4 (p=0.002). The 1- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates in the recipients with exceeding the up-to-seven criteria and NLR > 4 were 30.0% and 15.0%, respectively. Conclusions: The kind or duration of pre-Tx did not affect the outcome of LDLT, but LDLT should not be performed for the patients with exceeding the up-to-seven criteria and NLR more than 4 after pre-Tx for HCC to prevent tumor recurrence.

scholarly journals It’s a Man’s World: Does Orthotopic Liver Transplantation in the Elderly Male Confer an Additional Risk on Survival?

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 697-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eoin Slattery ◽  
John E Hegarty ◽  
P Aiden McCormick
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Orthotopic Liver Transplantation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Male ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Elderly Cohort

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in a well-selected population is a highly successful procedure, with one-year survival rates reported to be as high as 90%. Advanced age is considered to be a contraindication. Survival rates in patients >60 years of age appear to be comparable with those of younger patients. However, little objective data exist on the outcomes of patients >65 years of age undergoing OLT.OBJECTIVE: To review the outcomes of OLT in the Irish National Transplant Unit in patients >65 years of age and to compare outcomes with patients ≤65 years of age. Second, to identify any factors that may provide valuable prognostic information regarding outcomes.METHOD: Patients >65 years of age who underwent OLT since the inception of the National Liver Unit in 1993 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Medical records were reviewed. Survival was compared with the overall cohort using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Independent variables between the two groups were assessed using logistic regression analysis.RESULTS: Between January 1993 and December 2009, 551 patients underwent 639 transplants in the Irish National Liver Transplant Unit. Forty-three transplants were performed in 40 patients >65 years of age. Unadjusted one- and three-year survival rates for the elderly cohort were 77.8% and 64.5%, respectively. This compared with 93% and 85%, respectively, in the unselected cohort. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, a significant benefit in survival was observed in patients ≤65 years of age (P=0.017). Similarly, when adjusted for sex, a significant difference was noted between the groups. Male patients >65 years of age had poorer survival compared with their female counterparts >65 years of age and all patients ≤65 years of age (P=0.02). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to preoperative variables such as bilirubin, creatinine and sodium levels, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score. A significant difference was seen in male patients >65 years of age with more than one comorbidity, compared with female patients and male patients ≤65 years of age.CONCLUSION: Male sex was associated with poorer survival in patients >65 years of age undergoing OLT. Multiple comorbidities in elderly male patients should be considered a relative contraindication in patients being assessed for OLT.

scholarly journals Incidence, Characteristics, and Prognosis of Incidentally Discovered Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walid El Moghazy ◽  
Samy Kashkoush ◽  
Glenda Meeberg ◽  
Norman Kneteman
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Steady Increase ◽  
Liver Transplants ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year ◽  
Over Time

Background. We aimed to assess incidentally discovered hepatocellular carcinoma (iHCC) over time and to compare outcome to preoperatively diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (pdHCC) and nontumor liver transplants.Methods.We studied adults transplanted with a follow-up of at least one year. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Results.Between 1990 and 2010, 887 adults were transplanted. Among them, 121 patients (13.6%) had pdHCC and 32 patients (3.6%) had iHCC; frequency of iHCC decreased markedly over years, in parallel with significant increase in pdHCC. Between 1990 and 1995, 120 patients had liver transplants, 4 (3.3%) of them had iHCC, and only 3 (2.5%) had pdHCC, while in the last 5 years, 263 patients were transplanted, 7 (0.03%) of them had iHCC, and 66 (25.1%) had pdHCC (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between groups regarding patient survival; 5-year survival was 74%, 75.5%, and 77.3% in iHCC, pdHCC, and non-HCC groups, respectively (P=0.702). Patients with iHCC had no recurrences after transplant, while pdHCC patients experienced 17 recurrences (15.3%) (P=0.016).Conclusions.iHCC has significantly decreased despite steady increase in number of transplants for hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with iHCC had excellent outcomes with no tumor recurrence and survival comparable to pdHCC.

scholarly journals Liver Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Laparoscopic versus Open Approach

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. Ker ◽  
J. S. Chen ◽  
K. K. Kuo ◽  
S. C. Chuang ◽  
S. J. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Full Diet ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
Significant Difference

In this study, we try to compare the benefit of laparoscopic versus open operative procedures.Patients and Methods. One hundred and sixteen patients underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LR) and another 208 patients went for open liver resection (OR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients' selection for open or laparoscopic approach was not randomized.Results. The CLIP score for LR and OR was 0.59 ± 0.75 and 0.86 ± 1.04, respectively, (). The operation time was 156.3 ± 308.2 and 190.9 ± 79.2 min for LR and OR groups, respectively. The necessity for blood transfusion was found in 8 patients (6.9%) and 106 patients (50.9%) for LR and OR groups. Patients resumed full diet on the 2nd and 3rd postoperative day, and the average length of hospital stay was 6 days and 12 days for LR and OR groups. The complication rate and mortality rate were 0% and 6.0%, 2.9% and 30.2% for LR and OR groups, respectively. The 1-yr, 3-yr, and 5-yr survival rate was 87.0%, 70.4%, 62.2% and 83.2%, 76.0%, 71.8% for LR and OR group, respectively, of non-significant difference. From these results, HCC patients accepted laparoscopic or open approach were of no significant differences between their survival rates.

scholarly journals Breast Cancer Survival Defined by Biological Receptor and Menopausal Status in Vietnamese Women

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327481986527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thang Vu Hong ◽  
Duc Nguyen Ba ◽  
Lambert Skoog ◽  
Van Ta Thanh ◽  
Edneia Tani
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Vietnamese Women ◽  
Significant Difference

Little is known about breast cancer in Vietnamese women. Previous studies have reported the frequencies of prognostic factors of breast cancer in this population. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic factors associated with the survival rates of patients with breast cancer treated at the National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam. We recruited 248 women with operable breast cancer treated with surgery and adjuvant therapy. Tumor tissue samples were stained by many immunohistochemical approaches and analyzed for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 gene amplification status. A Cox model was used to determine the relationship between survival and the prognostic factors. The disease-free survival rate, overall survival rate, and cancer-specific survival rate were 75.8%, 80.6%, and 86.4%, respectively, at 5 years and 62.3%, 68.1%, and 78.9%, respectively, at 10 years. The lung was the most common metastatic site. Women with factors associated with a poor prognosis (eg, advanced clinical stage, high tumor grade, progesterone receptor [PR] negativity, HER2 amplification) had significantly lower survival rates. Patients with PR-negative breast cancer had significantly worse survival rates compared to those who were PR positive, according to multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 1.77, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-3.11, P = .045); however, there was only a statistically significant difference in postmenopausal patients. The PR was a prognostic factor in postmenopausal women with breast cancer, but not in premenopausal women.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes of Hepatic Resection versus Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matching Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshimi Kaido ◽  
Satoshi Morita ◽  
Sachiko Tanaka ◽  
Kohei Ogawa ◽  
Akira Mori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hepatic Resection ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Living Donor ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Recurrence Rates

Hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation (LT) are surgical treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is clinically impossible to perform a randomized, controlled study to determine the usefulness of these treatments. The present study compared survival rates and recurrence rates of HR versus living donor LT (LDLT) for HCC by using the propensity score method. Between January 1999 and August 2012, 936 patients (732 HR, 204 LDLT) underwent surgical therapy for HCC in our center. Using the propensity score matching, 80 well-balanced patients were defined. The 1- and 5-year overall survival rates were 90% and 53% in the HR group and 82% and 63% in the LT group, respectively. They were not significantly different between the two groups. The odds ratio estimated using the propensity score matching analysis was 0.842 (P=0.613). The 1- and 5-year recurrence rates were significantly lower in the LT group (9% and 21%) than in the HR group (43% and 74%) (P<0.001), and the odds ratio was 0.214 (P=0.001). In conclusion, HR should be considered a valid alternative to LDLT taking into consideration the risk for the living donor based on the results of this propensity score-matching study.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: prognostic factors associated long-term survival

1996 ◽  
pp. 109-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Colella ◽  
G. F. Rondinara ◽  
L. De Carlis ◽  
C. V. Sansalone ◽  
A. O. Slim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Factors Associated

scholarly journals Liver Transplantation from Voluntary Organ Donor System in China: A Comparison between DBD and DCD Liver Transplants

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Wei Chen ◽  
Dipesh Kumar Yadav ◽  
Xueli Bai ◽  
Jianying Lou ◽  
Risheng Que ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Organ Donor ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Donor System

Background. In China, the cases of liver transplantation (LT) from donation after citizens’ death have rose year by year since the citizen-based voluntary organ donor system was initiated in 2010. The objective of our research was to investigate the early postoperative and late long-term outcomes of LT from donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) according to the current organ donation system in China. Methods. Sixty-two consecutive cases of LT from donation after citizens’ death performed in our hospital between February 2012 and June 2017 were examined retrospectively for short- and long-term outcomes. These included 35 DCD LT and 27 DBD LT. Result. Subsequent median follow-up time of 19 months and 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were comparative between the DBD group and the DCD group (81.5% and 66.7% versus 67.1% and 59.7%; P=0.550), as were patient survival rates (85.2% and 68.7% versus 72.2% and 63.9%; P=0.358). The duration of ICU stay of recipients was significantly shorter in the DBD group, in comparison with that of the DCD group (1 versus 3 days, P=0.001). Severe complication incidence (≥grade III) after transplantation was identical among the DBD and DCD groups (48.1% versus 60%, P=0.352). There was no significant difference in postoperative mortality between the DBD and DCD groups (3 of 27 cases versus 5 of 35 cases). Twenty-one grafts (33.8%) were lost and 18 recipients (29.0%) were dead till the time of follow-up. Malignancy recurrence was the most prevalent reason for patient death (38.8%). There was no significant difference in incidence of biliary stenosis between the DBD and DCD groups (5 of 27 cases versus 6 of 35 cases, P=0.846). Conclusion. Although the sample size was small to some extent, this single-center study first reported that LT from DCD donors showed similar short- and long-term outcomes with DBD donors and justified the widespread implementation of voluntary citizen-based deceased organ donation in China. However, the results should be verified with a multicenter larger study.

Role of Sorafenib in Patients With Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola de’Angelis ◽  
Filippo Landi ◽  
Marco Nencioni ◽  
Anais Palen ◽  
Eylon Lahat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Early Recurrence ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Sorafenib Group ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Hcc Recurrence

Context: The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is challenging, especially if it is not treatable by surgery or embolization. Objectives: The present study aims to compare the survival rates of liver transplanted patients receiving sorafenib or best supportive care (BSC) for HCC recurrence not amenable to curative intent treatments. Design: This is a retrospective comparative study on a prospectively maintained database. Participants: Liver transplanted patients with untreatable HCC recurrence receiving BSC (n = 18) until 2007 or sorafenib (n = 15) thereafter were compared. Results: No group difference was observed for demographic characteristics at the time of transplantation and at the time of HCC recurrence. On the explant pathology of the native liver, 81.2% patients were classified within the Milan criteria, and 53.1% presented with microvascular invasion. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence was diagnosed 17.8 months (standard deviation: 14.5) after LT, with 17 (53.1%) patients presenting with early recurrence (≤12 months). The 1-year survival from untreatable progression of HCC recurrence was 23.9% for the BSC and 60% for the sorafenib group ( P = .002). The type of treatment (sorafenib vs BSC) was the sole independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio: 2.98; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-8.1; P = .033). In the sorafenib group, 8 (53.3%) patients required dose reduction, and 2 (13.3%) patients discontinued the treatment due to intolerable side effects. Conclusion: Sorafenib improves survival and is superior to the BSC in cases of untreatable posttransplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence.

Therapeutic Efficacy of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization as Compared With Hepatic Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Compensated Liver Function in a Hepatitis B Virus–Endemic Area: A Prospective Cohort Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 4459-4465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyo-Suk Lee ◽  
Kang Mo Kim ◽  
Jung-Hwan Yoon ◽  
Tae-Rim Lee ◽  
Kyung Suk Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Hepatic Resection ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tace Group ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

PURPOSE: Identifying a special subgroup of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who may benefit from transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) when compared with the standard treatment of hepatic resection (HR) warrants research in Asian countries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1993 to December 1994, 182 patients with operable HCC (Child-Pugh class A and International Union Against Cancer [UICC] stage T1-3N0M0) were enrolled. After initial TACE and lipiodol computed tomography, 91 received HR and 91, who refused the operation, received repeated sessions of TACE. After stratification according to the tumor stage (UICC and Cancer of the Liver Italian Program [CLIP]) and lipiodol retention pattern, the survival rates of the two treatment groups were compared. The median follow-up period was 83 months. RESULTS: As of December 31, 2000, 48 patients who underwent HR and 68 patients who underwent TACE had died. In a subgroup analysis according to tumor stage, the HR group survival rate was significantly higher than the TACE group in both UICC T1-2N0M0 (P = .0058) and CLIP 0 (P = .0027) subgroups. However, there was no significant difference in either UICC T3N0M0 (P = .7512) or CLIP 1-2 (P = .5366) subgroups. Even in patients with UICC T1-2N0M0 HCC, when lipiodol was compactly retained, the survival rate of the HR group was comparable to that of the TACE group (P = .0596). CONCLUSION: TACE proved to be as effective as HR in the subpopulations with UICC T3N0M0 or CLIP 1-2 HCC and adequate liver function, and even with UICC T1-2N0M0 HCC when lipiodol was compactly retained in the tumor. In such cases, the choice of treatment modality between TACE and HR may be left to the patient’s preference.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document