scholarly journals Liver Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Laparoscopic versus Open Approach

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. Ker ◽  
J. S. Chen ◽  
K. K. Kuo ◽  
S. C. Chuang ◽  
S. J. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Full Diet ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
Significant Difference

In this study, we try to compare the benefit of laparoscopic versus open operative procedures.Patients and Methods. One hundred and sixteen patients underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LR) and another 208 patients went for open liver resection (OR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients' selection for open or laparoscopic approach was not randomized.Results. The CLIP score for LR and OR was 0.59 ± 0.75 and 0.86 ± 1.04, respectively, (). The operation time was 156.3 ± 308.2 and 190.9 ± 79.2 min for LR and OR groups, respectively. The necessity for blood transfusion was found in 8 patients (6.9%) and 106 patients (50.9%) for LR and OR groups. Patients resumed full diet on the 2nd and 3rd postoperative day, and the average length of hospital stay was 6 days and 12 days for LR and OR groups. The complication rate and mortality rate were 0% and 6.0%, 2.9% and 30.2% for LR and OR groups, respectively. The 1-yr, 3-yr, and 5-yr survival rate was 87.0%, 70.4%, 62.2% and 83.2%, 76.0%, 71.8% for LR and OR group, respectively, of non-significant difference. From these results, HCC patients accepted laparoscopic or open approach were of no significant differences between their survival rates.

scholarly journals Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Open or Laparoscopic Approach?

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2281
Author(s):  
Jong Man Kim ◽  
Sangjin Kim ◽  
Jinsoo Rhu ◽  
Gyu-Seong Choi ◽  
Choon Hyuck David Kwon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Treatment Naïve

It remains unclear whether the short-term benefits and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) accrue to elderly patients with medical comorbidities. The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes between LLR and open liver resection (OLR) in elderly patients (≥65 years) with solitary, treatment-naïve solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). From January 2013 to August 2017, 256 elderly patients with solitary treatment-naive HCC underwent liver resection. All patients were Child–Pugh class A and older than 65 years. The OLR and LLR groups contained 160 and 96 patients, respectively. The median tumor size in the OLR group was significantly larger than that in the LLR group (3.9 vs. 2.6 cm), but the tumor size did not differ between the two groups after matching. The median operation time, blood loss, transfusion rate, and postoperative complications in the OLR group did not differ from those in the LLR group, but the operation time in the LLR group was longer than that in the OLR group after matching. The median hospitalization in the LLR group was significantly shorter than that in the OLR group. Disease-free survival (DFS) in the LLR group was better than that in the OLR group before and after matching, but the difference was not significant. Patient survival (PS) in the LLR group was similar to that in the OLR group. LLR is feasible and safe for elderly patients with solitary, treatment-naïve HCC. The short- and long-term benefits of LLR are evident in geriatric oncological liver surgery patients.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic versus Open Liver Resection: Differences in Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Outcome among Cirrhotic Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma—A Retrospective Observational Study

HPB Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Siniscalchi ◽  
Giorgio Ercolani ◽  
Giulia Tarozzi ◽  
Lorenzo Gamberini ◽  
Lucia Cipolat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Laparoscopic Technique ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Introduction. Laparoscopic liver resection is considered risky in cirrhotic patients, even if minor surgical trauma of laparoscopy could be useful to prevent deterioration of a compromised liver function. This study aimed to identify the differences in terms of perioperative complications and early outcome in cirrhotic patients undergoing minor hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with open or laparoscopic technique. Methods. In this retrospective study, 156 cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma were divided into two groups according to type of surgical approach: laparoscopy (LS group: 23 patients) or laparotomy (LT group: 133 patients). Perioperative data, mortality, and length of hospital stay were recorded. Results. Groups were matched for type of resection, median number of nodules, and median diameter of largest lesions. Groups were also homogeneous for preoperative liver and renal function tests. Intraoperative haemoglobin decrease and transfusions of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma were significantly lower in LS group. MELD score lasted stable after laparoscopic resection, while it increased in laparotomic group. Postoperative liver and renal failure and mortality were all lower in LS group. Conclusions. Lower morbidity and mortality, maintenance of liver function, and shorter hospital stay suggest the safety and benefit of laparoscopic approach.

Assessment of Safety and Applicability of Laparoscopic vs Open Non Anatomical Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Mahfouz Mohammed ◽  
Hany Saeed Abdel Basset ◽  
Mohammed Abd Almegeed Elsayed ◽  
Ahmed Abdel Basset Hegazi
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Laparoscopic Liver Resection ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Open Liver Resection ◽  
Resection Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been progressively developed along the past two decades. Liver surgery was one of the last frontiers reached by minimally invasive surgery. Surgical technique and equipment evolved to overcome technical limitations, making laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) safe and feasible. Surgeons developed skills in a stepwise approach, beginning with low complexity operations for benign diseases and reaching high-complexity surgeries for malignant cases and living donor organ harvesting. Objective s: The aim of the study is to compare short term results of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy regarding to intra operative details and post-operative management and complications for achieving a safe hepatic resection for treatment of HCC in cirrhotic patients. Patients and Methods In this prospective study, a comparison between laparoscopic resection and open resection was done to compare short-term results between laparoscopic and open liver resection. This study was conducted on 30 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. 15 patients (50%) were treated by laparoscopic liver resection (Group A) while the other 15 patients (50%) were treated by open liver resection (Group B). Results Regarding the demographic data, the presence of past history of medical condition and the preoperative laboratory results, no statistical significance was found. The mean operative time has statistically significant difference between the 2 groups, with decreased operative time in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). The mean blood loss has no statistically significant difference relations between the 2 groups, (P = 0.866) with conversion rate of (13.3%) happened in two cases. Conclusion Laparoscopic liver resection is a safe and feasible treatment option for HCC in cirrhotic patient needing minor resection at laparoscopic segments (II, III, IVa,V,VI). Laparoscopic liver resection for HCC has superior short- term and comparable oncological outcomes to open liver resection. LLR should be performed for carefully selected patients and by an expert surgical team.

Relationship between platelet count and hepatic failure and residual liver regeneration after hemihepatectomy in patients with hepatitis B-related primary hepatocellular carcinoma

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuhui Ye ◽  
Banghao Xu ◽  
Kaiyi Lu ◽  
Tingting Lu ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Liver Failure ◽  
Liver Regeneration ◽  
Liver Volume ◽  
Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Postoperative Liver Failure ◽  
Regeneration Rate ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objective A retrospective analysis of the influences of platelet (PLT) counts on liver failure and liver regeneration in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) provides a treatment strategy for clinical prevention and treatment of postoperative liver failure and residual liver regeneration. Method The clinical data of 111 patients with a background of hepatitis B virus infection and who underwent (expanded) half liver resection at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from June 2012 to June 2017 were collected and statistically analyzed. Results　On the basis of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery liver failure-grading standards and Dino–Clavien postoperative complication criteria, the incidence of grade B and above liver failure was 55%, and complication II level and above was 47.5% in the PLT decline group after semihepatectomy. The incidence rates in the normal group were 26.8% and 23.9%. A statistically significant difference was determined in the two groups (P1=0.003, P2 = 0.011). The average volumes of liver hyperplasia (residual liver volume (RLV)80.4 days − RLV) in the PLT decline and normal groups were 132.09 ± 61.89 cm3 and 190.89 ± 91.98c cm3, respectively; the average rates of hyperplasia ((RLV80.4days−RLV)/RLV) were 16.59%± 7.36% and 24.78% ± 10.82%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (PProliferation = 0.001, PProliferation rate = 0.001). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of postoperative liver failure grade and proliferation rate in patients who underwent semihepatectomy suggested that the decrease in postoperative PLT count (PLT < 125 × 109/L) might be an independent risk factor of severe posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) (PHLF-B or above) and residual liver regeneration rate for patients with primary HCC after half liver resection. No death occurred. Conclusions A correlation existed between PLT count and postoperative PHLF or liver regeneration. Monitoring PLT counts after liver resection may help us predict the suffering from PHLF-B or above and severe postoperative complications.

Predictive Value of Charlson Comorbidity Index and Cofactors on 2-Year Mortality in Older Patients With Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianda Xu ◽  
Homma Yasuhiro ◽  
Yuta Jinnai ◽  
Tomonori Baba ◽  
Zhuang Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Time Operation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Time

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of Charlson comorbidities index (CCI) and cofactors on 2-year mortality in older patients with intertrochanteric fractures. 60 cases with unilateral intertrochanteric fracture were retrospectively analyzed and divided into Low-CCI group (CCI: 1-4) or high-CCI groups (CCI: 5-6). All the patients’ electronic hospital records were reviewed. The preoperative situations (demographic data, comorbidities and fracture conditions), perioperative situations (wait time, operation time, implant choice, blood loss, transfusion or not) and postoperative situations (complications, first time out of bed, function about 1-/2- week and 2-year mortality) were recorded. 51.67% were in low-CCI group and 48.33% in high-CCI group. The survival rates in low- and high-CCI group were 93.5% and 86.2 % respectively. According to the functional results of 1- or 2- week after operation, no significant difference was found (P=0.955, 0.140). Log-rank analysis showed that the main prognostic factors were blood loss, first time out of bed and complication (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that complication and first time out of bed were significant factor on survival rate (P=0.029, 0.010). Charlson comorbidities index maybe not the indicator of 2-year mortality in older patients with intertrochanteric fractures. In order to improve the prognosis, more attentions should be paid to reduce the complications and encourage postoperative earlier excise out of bed.

scholarly journals Response to Lenvatinib Is Associated with Optimal RelativeDose Intensity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Experience in Clinical Settings

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasaki ◽  
Fukushima ◽  
Haraguchi ◽  
Miuma ◽  
Miyaaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Hepatic Function ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Lenvatinib is currently available as the first-line treatment for advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. We evaluated the relationship between its relative dose intensity (RDI) and response in clinical settings. Methods: From March 2018 to May 2019, 93 patients were administered lenvatinib at the Nagasaki University Hospital and its related facilities. Among these, 81 patients (66 men, 15 women, median age 72.0) who received lenvatinib were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Fourteen patients were Child–Pugh grade B, and 15 had received other systemic therapy. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), the objective response (OR) rate was 17.3%. The overall survival (OS) was significantly better in the OR group (p = 0.011). There was a significant difference in RDI between the OR and non-OR groups (p < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for OR prediction by the 4, 8, 12, and 16-week RDI were 0.666, 0.747, 0.731, and 0.704, respectively. In the 8-week RDI 67.0% group, OS was significantly better than in the 8-week RDI< 67.0% group (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Because a sufficient RDI is required to achieve an OR, it is strongly recommended that lenvatinib should be administered to patients with good hepatic function and status.

scholarly journals Ganji Formulation for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Have Undergone Surgery: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jing-Hao Zhang ◽  
Chao Zheng ◽  
Xiao-Jun Zhu ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Zhi-Jun Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Local Ablation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Control

Objective. To ascertain the efficacy and safety of Ganji Formulation (GF) for patients with Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had undergone surgery. Materials and Methods. A total of 262 HCC patients who had undergone liver resection, local ablation, or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) were divided randomly into the treatment group and control group. The former was treated with GF and the later with placebo, both for 6 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Second endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) or time to disease progression (TTP). Results. OS of the treatment group was significantly longer than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that, for patients who received TACE, the TTP was significantly longer in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05). However, for patients who underwent liver resection or local ablation, there was no significant difference in DFS between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion. GF could improve postoperative cumulative survival and prolong the TTP. This clinical trial number is registered with ChiCTR-IOR-15007349.

scholarly journals Efficacy and factors affecting the choice of enucleation and liver resection for giant hemangioma: a retrospective propensity score-matched study

BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingguang Ju ◽  
Feng Xu ◽  
Wenyan Zhao ◽  
Chaoliu Dai
Keyword(s):  
Liver Resection ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Hepatic Hemangioma ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Multiple Tumors ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Liver resection (LR) and enucleation (EN) are the main surgical treatment for giant hepatic hemangioma (HH), but how to choose the type of surgery is still controversial. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and the factors affecting the choice of open procedure for HH. Methods The data for patients with pathologically confirmed HH who underwent open surgery from April 2014 to August 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses with logistic regression were performed to disclose the factors associated with the choice of EN or LR. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compare the efficacy of the two procedures. Results A total of 163 and 110 patients were enrolled in the EN and LR groups. Following 1:1 matching by PSM analysis, 66 patients were selected from each group. Centrally located lesions (OR: 0.131, 95% CI 0.070–0.244), tumors size > 12.1 cm (OR: 0.226, 95% CI 0.116–0.439) and multiple tumors (OR: 1.860, 95% CI 1.003–3.449) were independent factors affecting the choice of EN. There was no significant difference in the median operation time (156 vs. 195 min, P = 0.156), median blood loss (200 vs. 220 ml, P = 0.423), blood transfusion rate (33.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 1.000), mean postoperative feeding (3.1 vs. 3.3 d, P = 0.460), mean postoperative hospital stay (9.5 vs. 9.0 d, P = 0.206), or the major complication rates between the two groups. Conclusions Peripherally located lesions, tumors size ≤ 12.1 cm and multiple tumors were more inclined to receive EN. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of EN or LR.

Therapeutic Efficacy of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization as Compared With Hepatic Resection in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Compensated Liver Function in a Hepatitis B Virus–Endemic Area: A Prospective Cohort Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 4459-4465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyo-Suk Lee ◽  
Kang Mo Kim ◽  
Jung-Hwan Yoon ◽  
Tae-Rim Lee ◽  
Kyung Suk Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Hepatic Resection ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tace Group ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

PURPOSE: Identifying a special subgroup of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who may benefit from transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) when compared with the standard treatment of hepatic resection (HR) warrants research in Asian countries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1993 to December 1994, 182 patients with operable HCC (Child-Pugh class A and International Union Against Cancer [UICC] stage T1-3N0M0) were enrolled. After initial TACE and lipiodol computed tomography, 91 received HR and 91, who refused the operation, received repeated sessions of TACE. After stratification according to the tumor stage (UICC and Cancer of the Liver Italian Program [CLIP]) and lipiodol retention pattern, the survival rates of the two treatment groups were compared. The median follow-up period was 83 months. RESULTS: As of December 31, 2000, 48 patients who underwent HR and 68 patients who underwent TACE had died. In a subgroup analysis according to tumor stage, the HR group survival rate was significantly higher than the TACE group in both UICC T1-2N0M0 (P = .0058) and CLIP 0 (P = .0027) subgroups. However, there was no significant difference in either UICC T3N0M0 (P = .7512) or CLIP 1-2 (P = .5366) subgroups. Even in patients with UICC T1-2N0M0 HCC, when lipiodol was compactly retained, the survival rate of the HR group was comparable to that of the TACE group (P = .0596). CONCLUSION: TACE proved to be as effective as HR in the subpopulations with UICC T3N0M0 or CLIP 1-2 HCC and adequate liver function, and even with UICC T1-2N0M0 HCC when lipiodol was compactly retained in the tumor. In such cases, the choice of treatment modality between TACE and HR may be left to the patient’s preference.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic and open repair of perforated peptic ulcer

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 2022
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdel Monem Ibrahim ◽  
Backeet Turkeyev ◽  
Mohammad Mahmood Al Alkatary
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Open Approach

Background: The study included patients diagnosed as perforated peptic ulcer. Outcomes are assessed by mortality and morbidity rate, operation time and hospital length of stay.Methods: On the period from January 2013 to December 2014 a total of 71 patients were operated in both facilities: 37 patients in Dubai hospital and 34 in Mafraq Hospital. Open repair with omental patch done in 34 patients (47.9%) and laparoscopically in 37 patients (52.1%). No cases of laparoscopy converted to laparotomy.Results: The data demonstrates homogeneous results for the outcome variables of morbidity and complications, while operation time and hospital length of stay differ significantly. Statistical significance could not be reached for any of these variables, although odd ratios were consistently in favour of the laparoscopic repair. Similarly, the laparoscopic approach resulted in a lower rate of minor complications (10% vs. 23%). Total lengths of stay post open repair made of 4.2±1.2 days, after laparoscopic repair 3.6±0.9 days. At the same time there were observed longer operating times for laparoscopic repair of PPU which constituted 62±10.6 minutes whereas open repair took only 45±12.9 minutes. Peritoneal lavage has been a factor of prolonged duration of laparoscopic surgery.Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair of a perforated peptic ulcer is an amenable and feasible technique within the hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeon. Current evidence does not clearly demonstrate the advantages of laparoscopic versus open repair. Growing interest in the laparoscopic approach may encourage the design of additional randomized trials to analyze its efficacy compared with the open approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document