Outcomes of EGFR-TKI therapy in EGFR mutated metastatic lung adenocarcinoma in an inner city population.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20635-e20635
Author(s):  
Romy Jose Thekkekara ◽  
Rohit Kumar ◽  
Thomas E. Lad

e20635 Background:Metastatic lung cancer with systemic chemotherapy has a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5-6 months and median overall survival time (OS) of around 12 months. In Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor gene (EGFR) mutated metastatic lung cancer the use of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has increased the median PFS to12 months and the median OS to 30 months. The objective of this study is to evaluate the response to TKIs in EGFR mutated metastatic lung cancer in racially diverse inner city population with high smoking rates. Methods:Consecutive patients diagnosed with EGFR mutant metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and treated with TKIs in John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County in Chicago, IL between January 2009 to June 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic data was collected and PFS and OS were analyzed. Results:35 patients with EGFR mutated metastatic lung cancer received EGFR-TKI during the study period. There was a female preponderance (63%). Hispanics formed the most common racial group (37%), followed by Asians (26%), African Americans (AA) (20%) and Caucasians (17%). Mean age of diagnosis of metastatic disease was 56.5± 11.5 years. 20% of the patients were ever smokers. Stage 4 disease at presentation was seen in 88.6 %. Sites of metastatic disease included lungs/pleura (60%), bone (60%), brain (22.9%) and liver (14.3%). 82.9% had TKI as first line treatment. Median PFS and OS were 9.89 (95% CI: 7.8-11.9) months and 19.3 (95% CI: 1.9-36.8) months respectively. The median PFS and OS were 12.88 and 17 months for Asians, 10.8 and 24.4 months for Caucasians and 9.2 and 33 months for Hispanics respectively. Among AA, PFS at 19 months and OS at 35 months was 0.58%, not reaching the median. Patients who continued to smoke had a median OS of 8.5 months vs 19.3 months in nonsmokers/ex-smokers. Conclusions: In an underserved population, patients treated with EGFR mutated metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR-TKI have similar survival compared previously known data. Race of the patient does not appear to alter response to EGFR-TKI therapy. Active smokers had a lower OS. Studies in minority populations with larger samples are required to further validate the above findings.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuyu Gu ◽  
Chanchan Gao ◽  
Longfei Wang ◽  
Shiya Zheng

Abstract Background: Lung adenocarcinoma with breast metastasis is rare. In the present study, a case of an advanced patient with breast metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR 21 exon p.L858R mutation who underwent EGFR TKI combined with PD1 inhibitor is reported.Case presentation: A 62-year-old female patient diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma who had undergone six times disease progress and breast metastasis in fifth-time disease progress.The patient underwent left breast puncture and axillary lymph node in ultrasound-guided and the postoperative pathological diagnosis of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma was confirmed. And then gene detection showed EGFR 21 exon p.L858R mutation. Breast metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma was diagnosed and the patient is being treated with Almonertinib combined with PD1 inhibitor.Conclusion: Breast metastasis is rare and lung adenocarcinoma might be the primary disease. Gene indection is important. And for lung cancer patients with recurrent pleural effusion, visit of the breast should be included in the follow-up process. In addition, the treatment model of interspersed immunotherapy after EGFR resistance has brought new ideas for the treatment of lung cancer with breast metastasis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Daniel Grados-Saso ◽  
Isaac Lacambra ◽  
Ana Callejo ◽  
Guillermo Pinillos ◽  
Jara Gayán ◽  
...  

Summary We present a sole intracardiac mass with no other cardiac involvement in a patient with metastatic lung cancer disease. This mass can be well characterized by advanced 3D echocardiography and echocardiographic contrast.


Author(s):  
M. Kaous ◽  
D.D. Balachandran ◽  
G. Pacheco ◽  
S.A. Mahoney ◽  
J.N.T. Po ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 0272989X2199895
Author(s):  
Adinda Mieras ◽  
Annemarie Becker-Commissaris ◽  
Hanna T. Klop ◽  
H. Roeline W. Pasman ◽  
Denise de Jong ◽  
...  

Background Previous studies have investigated patients’ treatment goals before starting a treatment for metastatic lung cancer. Data on the evaluation of treatment goals are lacking. Aim To determine if patients with metastatic lung cancer and their oncologists perceive the treatment goals they defined at the start of systemic treatment as achieved after treatment and if in hindsight they believe it was the right decision to start systemic therapy. Design and Participants A prospective multicenter study in 6 hospitals across the Netherlands between 2016 and 2018. Following systemic treatment, 146 patients with metastatic lung cancer and 23 oncologists completed a questionnaire on the achievement of their treatment goals and whether they made the right treatment decision. Additional interviews with 15 patients and 5 oncologists were conducted. Results According to patients and oncologists, treatment goals were achieved in 30% and 37% for ‘quality of life,’ 49% and 41% for ‘life prolongation,’ 26% and 44% for ‘decrease in tumor size,’ and 44% for ‘cure’, respectively. Most patients and oncologists, in hindsight, felt they had made the right decision to start treatment and also if they had not achieved their goals (72% and 93%). This was related to the feeling that they had to do ‘something.’ Conclusions Before deciding on treatment, the treatment options, including their benefits and side effects, and the goals patients have should be discussed. It is key that these discussions include not only systemic treatment but also palliative care as effective options for doing ‘something.’


1971 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin E. MacGee

✓ Results in 27 cases of intracranial surgery for metastatic lung cancer are evaluated with regard to both the quality and duration of survival; 56% of the patients lived more than 1 year, with the longest survivor still living 32 months after operation. The operative mortality was 26%. These data suggest that intracranial surgery is worthwhile in patients with lung cancer when the cerebral metastasis is either solitary or single.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document