Clinical evidence from two phase 3 trials supporting statistical adjustment methods to assess confounding impact of treatment crossover on overall survival (OS).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22509-e22509
Author(s):  
Christian Kappeler ◽  
Andrea Wagner ◽  
Joachim Kalmus ◽  
Marcia S. Brose ◽  
Martin Schlumberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Methods ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
The Impact

e22509 Background: In controlled trials that allow patients to crossover from placebo (PBO) to active treatment (ACT) after progression, OS in PBO patients is confounded by ACT. Statistical methods to adjust OS for crossover rely on an assumption of common treatment effect (i.e. PBO to ACT crossover after progression has the same impact as ACT started at randomization). This exploratory analysis of two phase 3 trials (PBO-controlled and allowing crossover) with regorafenib in GIST and sorafenib in thyroid cancer provides evidence to support this assumption. Methods: Target lesions were assessed at baseline and at regular intervals post baseline. Progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed during double-blind (DB) treatment and secondary PFS (SPFS) in PBO patients during open-label (OL) treatment. Changes in target lesion diameter over time were estimated by a parametric model. Early tumor growth rate (TGR), defined as percent change from baseline/month in the sum of target lesion diameters, was calculated as the model curve slope at earliest time on the TGR curve. Results: SPFS during OL in PBO patients is closer to DB PFS in ACT patients than to DB PFS in PBO patients (Table). Early TGR during OL in PBO patients is closer to DB early TGR in ACT patients than to DB early TGR in PBO patients. Conclusions: Currently available statistical methods to adjust for the impact of treatment crossover are supported by clinical results from two independent randomized, controlled phase 3 studies. These results provide validity to crossover correction analyses. Clinical trial information: NCT01271712; NCT00984282. [Table: see text]

Everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET): Updated results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial (RADIANT-3).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 158-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Shah ◽  
T. Ito ◽  
C. Lombard-Bohas ◽  
E. M. Wolin ◽  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Patient Subgroups

158 Background: There is an unmet medical need for effective treatments for patients with advanced pNET. Systemic therapies for advanced pNET are limited both by toxicity and efficacy. Everolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, has shown promising antitumor activity in 2 phase II studies, leading to further investigation in the largest phase III randomized controlled trial completed in pNET patients. Methods: Patients with advanced low- or intermediate-grade pNET were randomly assigned to everolimus 10 mg/d orally + best supportive care (BSC; n = 207) or placebo + BSC (n = 203). Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs) were permitted as BSC during the study. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). At progression (RECIST), patients could be unblinded and those randomly assigned to placebo were offered open-label everolimus. Results: Compared with placebo, everolimus reduced the risk of progression by 65% and increased median PFS by more than 6 months, from 4.6 to 11.0 months (HR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.27-0.45; p < 0.0001), by investigator review (primary endpoint). Median PFS by central review was consistent (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.44; p < 0.001] in favor of everolimus. Eighteen-month PFS estimates were 34% for everolimus (95% CI: 26-43) vs 9% (95% CI: 4-16) for placebo. Everolimus demonstrated a significant PFS benefit across all patient subgroups according to baseline characteristics and prior SSA use. Prior SSA use was 49% in the everolimus arm and 50% in the placebo arm. Updated analyses of the impact of concomitant SSA will be reported. The most common drug-related adverse events were stomatitis, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, and infections (primarily upper respiratory); most were grade 1 or 2. Stomatitis (6.9% vs 0%), anemia (6% vs 0%), and hyperglycemia (5% vs 2%) were the most common grade 3-4 events. Conclusions: Everolimus significantly prolonged PFS compared with placebo in patients with advanced pNET in this large phase III clinical trial. This benefit was seen across all patient subgroups. Treatment resulted in a significant 6.4-month prolongation in median PFS. Everolimus had an acceptable and predictable safety profile. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Long-term safety and efficacy of dalfampridine for walking impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of open-label extensions of two Phase 3 clinical trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 1322-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D Goodman ◽  
Francois Bethoux ◽  
Theodore R Brown ◽  
Randall T Schapiro ◽  
Ron Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Walking Speed ◽  
Prolonged Release ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Maximum Exposure

Background: In Phase 3 double-blind trials (MS-F203 and MS-F204), dalfampridine extended release tablets 10 mg twice daily (dalfampridine-ER; prolonged-release fampridine in Europe; fampridine modified or sustained release elsewhere) improved walking speed relative to placebo in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Objectives: Evaluation of long-term safety and efficacy of dalfampridine-ER in open-label extensions (MS-F203EXT, MS-F204EXT). Methods: Patients received dalfampridine-ER 10 mg twice daily; and had Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) assessments at 2, 14 and 26 weeks, and then every 6 months. Subjects were categorized as dalfampridine-ER responders or non-responders, based on their treatment response in the double-blind parent trials that assessed T25FW. Results: We had 269 patients enter MS-F203EXT and 154 patients complete it; for a maximum exposure of 5 years. We had 214 patients enter MS-F204EXT and 146 complete it; for a maximum exposure of 3.3 years. No new safety signals emerged and dalfampridine-ER tolerability was consistent with the double-blind phase. Improvements in walking speed were lost after dalfampridine-ER was discontinued in the parent trial, but returned by the 2-week assessment after re-initiation of the drug. Throughout the extensions, mean improvement in walking speed declined, but remained improved, among the double-blind responders as compared with non-responders. Conclusions: The dalfamipridine-ER safety profile was consistent with the parent trials. Although walking speed decreased over time, dalfampridine-ER responders continued to show improved walking speed, which was sustained compared with non-responders.

scholarly journals P334 Impact of disease duration on tofacitinib efficacy in patients with ulcerative colitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S321-S323
Author(s):  
S Travis ◽  
I Dotan ◽  
S Danese ◽  
M Chiorean ◽  
J Yamamoto-Furusho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with UC were evaluated in two Phase 3 induction studies (OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2; NCT01465763, NCT01458951), a 52-week, Phase 3 maintenance study (OCTAVE Sustain, NCT01458574) [1], and an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension study (NCT01470612) [2]. We evaluated the impact of disease duration on tofacitinib efficacy in the OCTAVE trials. Methods Patients received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo in OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2, and responders at Week 8 were eligible to receive tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID or placebo during OCTAVE Sustain (final efficacy assessment at Week 52). Non-responders from OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 and completers/treatment failures from OCTAVE Sustain could enter the OLE study. In the OLE study, patients who did not show clinical response to 8 weeks of tofacitinib 10 mg BID in OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 (induction non-responders [IndNR]) received an additional 8 weeks of tofacitinib 10 mg BID; all patients underwent endoscopy at Month 2 (data as of Sep 2018). Patients were stratified by UC disease duration (&lt;3, 3–6 and &gt;6 years) at OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 baseline (ie prior to study treatment). Associations between disease duration category and efficacy endpoints were assessed using the Cochran-Mantel–Haenszel Chi-square test. Results Among patients who received tofacitinib 10 mg BID in OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2, remission and mucosal healing rates at Week 8 were numerically higher in those with shorter disease duration than those with longer disease duration, but associations were not statistically significant (Table). Clinical response rates were similar across disease duration categories. At Week 52 of OCTAVE sustain, remission and mucosal healing rates were highest in patients with the shortest disease duration (&lt;3 years; Table). Among IndNR, the proportions of patients achieving efficacy endpoints at Month 2 of the OLE study were lowest in those with disease duration &lt;3 years, but associations were not statistically significant (Table). Conclusion In general, disease duration did not impact tofacitinib efficacy. Patients diagnosed with UC &lt;3 years prior to starting tofacitinib treatment were numerically more likely to achieve remission and mucosal healing in induction and maintenance trials than those with longer disease duration, but the associations were not statistically significant. These analyses are post hoc and limited by the small sample size, and further data are needed to understand whether disease duration may have an impact on the response to tofacitinib treatment. References

scholarly journals Safe and persistent growth-promoting effects of vosoritide in children with achondroplasia: 2-year results from an open-label, phase 3 extension study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Savarirayan ◽  
Louise Tofts ◽  
Melita Irving ◽  
William R. Wilcox ◽  
Carlos A. Bacino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Velocity ◽  
Bone Growth ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Extension Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Growth Promoting

Abstract Purpose Achondroplasia is caused by pathogenic variants in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene that lead to impaired endochondral ossification. Vosoritide, an analog of C-type natriuretic peptide, stimulates endochondral bone growth and is in development for the treatment of achondroplasia. This phase 3 extension study was conducted to document the efficacy and safety of continuous, daily vosoritide treatment in children with achondroplasia, and the two-year results are reported. Methods After completing at least six months of a baseline observational growth study, and 52 weeks in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, participants were eligible to continue treatment in an open-label extension study, where all participants received vosoritide at a dose of 15.0 μg/kg/day. Results In children randomized to vosoritide, annualized growth velocity increased from 4.26 cm/year at baseline to 5.39 cm/year at 52 weeks and 5.52 cm/year at week 104. In children who crossed over from placebo to vosoritide in the extension study, annualized growth velocity increased from 3.81 cm/year at week 52 to 5.43 cm/year at week 104. No new adverse effects of vosoritide were detected. Conclusion Vosoritide treatment has safe and persistent growth-promoting effects in children with achondroplasia treated daily for two years.

scholarly journals Primary and Secondary Kinase Genotypes Correlate With the Biological and Clinical Activity of Sunitinib in Imatinib-Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (33) ◽  
pp. 5352-5359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Heinrich ◽  
Robert G. Maki ◽  
Christopher L. Corless ◽  
Cristina R. Antonescu ◽  
Amy Harlow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Imatinib Resistant ◽  
Exon 9 ◽  
Exon 11 ◽  
The Impact

PurposeMost gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harbor mutant KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) kinases, which are imatinib targets. Sunitinib, which targets KIT, PDGFRs, and several other kinases, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with GIST after they experience imatinib failure. We evaluated the impact of primary and secondary kinase genotype on sunitinib activity.Patients and MethodsTumor responses were assessed radiologically in a phase I/II trial of sunitinib in 97 patients with metastatic, imatinib-resistant/intolerant GIST. KIT/PDGFRA mutational status was determined for 78 patients by using tumor specimens obtained before and after prior imatinib therapy. Kinase mutants were biochemically profiled for sunitinib and imatinib sensitivity.ResultsClinical benefit (partial response or stable disease for ≥ 6 months) with sunitinib was observed for the three most common primary GIST genotypes: KIT exon 9 (58%), KIT exon 11 (34%), and wild-type KIT/PDGFRA (56%). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for patients with primary KIT exon 9 mutations (P = .0005) or with a wild-type genotype (P = .0356) than for those with KIT exon 11 mutations. The same pattern was observed for overall survival (OS). PFS and OS were longer for patients with secondary KIT exon 13 or 14 mutations (which involve the KIT-adenosine triphosphate binding pocket) than for those with exon 17 or 18 mutations (which involve the KIT activation loop). Biochemical profiling studies confirmed the clinical results.ConclusionThe clinical activity of sunitinib after imatinib failure is significantly influenced by both primary and secondary mutations in the predominant pathogenic kinases, which has implications for optimization of the treatment of patients with GIST.

scholarly journals POS0928 NETAKIMAB EFFICACY IN ANTI-TNF-NAIVE AND ANTI-TNF-EXPERIENCED PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS: RESULTS OF SUBANALYSIS OF PHASE 3 ASTERA TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 726.2-727
Author(s):  
S. Erdes ◽  
V. Mazurov ◽  
T. Dubinina ◽  
I. Gaydukova ◽  
A. Kundzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Interleukin 17 ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Asas Criteria

Background:According to previous studies, the effectiveness of interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors was higher in anti-TNF-naïve patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) [1,2]. Netakimab (NTK) is a humanized anti-IL-17A antibody approved for the treatment of AS, psoriatic arthritis, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Russia and Belarus.Objectives:To compare the efficacy of NTK in anti-TNF-naïve patients with anti-TNF-experienced patients with active AS at week 16 of therapy.Methods:ASTERA (NCT03447704) is an ongoing phase 3 placebo (PBO)-controlled clinical study, aimed at evaluating NTK efficacy in AS [3]. 228 adult patients with active AS (BASDAI ≥ 4) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 120 mg NTK or PBO subcutaneously at week 0,1,2 and then q2w. This analysis includes 112 patients in NTK group. Efficacy endpoints included ASAS20/40, ASAS5/6 and ASAS partial remission (PR) at week 16 of therapy.Results:28 (25.0%) of 112 patients in NTK group had previous inadequate response/intolerance to anti-TNF (anti-TNF-IR): 24 (21.4%) – one anti-TNF, and 4 (3.6%) – two anti-TNF. 84 (75.0%) patients were TNF-naive. Achievement of ASAS criteria response at week 16 was similar in both groups (Table 1).Table 1.Efficacy of NTK at week 16ParameterTNF-naïve (n = 84)anti-TNF-IR (n = 28)p-value*ASAS20, n (%)52 (61.9%)17 (60.7%)0.91ASAS40, n (%)35 (41.7%)11 (39.3%)0.82ASAS5/6, n (%)39 (46.4%)11 (39.3%)0.51ASAS(PR), n (%)15 (17.9%) 4 (14.3%)0.78*- Fisher’s exact testConclusion:NTK 120 mg provided sustained improvements in signs and symptoms of AS in anti-TNF-naive and anti-TNF-IR patients at 16 weeks of therapy.References:[1]Blair HA, Dhillon S. Secukinumab: A Review in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Drugs. 2016;76(10):1023-30.[2]Dougados M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab through 52 weeks in two phase 3, randomised, controlled clinical trials in patients with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (COAST-V and COAST-W). Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(2):176-185.[3]Mazurov VI, et al. Efficacy and safety of Netakimab, anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Results of phase III international, multicenter, randomized double-blind clinical trial BCD-085-5/ASTERA. Nauchno-Practicheskaya Revmatologia=Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2020;58 (4):376–386 (In Russ).Acknowledgements:This study was sponsored by JSC BIOCAD.Disclosure of Interests:Shandor Erdes: None declared, V Mazurov: None declared, Tatiana Dubinina: None declared, Inna Gaydukova Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Biocad, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Alena Kundzer: None declared, Nikolaj Soroka: None declared, Anna Eremeeva Employee of: Biocad

scholarly journals A phase 3 randomised study of enzalutamide plus leuprolide and enzalutamide monotherapy in high-risk non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with rising PSA after local therapy: EMBARK study design

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e046588
Author(s):  
Stephen J Freedland ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Martin Gleave ◽  
Brad Rosbrook ◽  
Qi Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomised Study ◽  
Definitive Therapy

IntroductionLimited data from controlled clinical trials are available for men who experience biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy for prostate cancer. In the absence of overt metastases, patients with non-metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC) often receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). There is no standard-of-care consensus on optimal ADT timing, although most men are treated prior to metastases, especially those with high-risk features (Gleason score 8–10 or prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) <9–12 months). Given data that ADT plus novel hormonal agents improve survival in men with metastatic CSPC, there is a desire to evaluate these agents earlier in the disease course. The main objective of EMBARK is the comparative assessment of enzalutamide plus leuprolide (luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa)) or enzalutamide monotherapy versus monotherapy LHRHa to improve metastasis-free survival (MFS) in patients with high-risk nmCSPC PSA recurrence after definitive therapy.Methods and analysisEMBARK is a randomised, phase 3 study of high-risk patients with nmCSPC, a PSADT of ≤9 months and a screening PSA of ≥2 ng/mL above the nadir after radiotherapy (RT) or ≥1 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without postoperative RT. Men (n=1050) are randomised 1:1:1 to enzalutamide 160 mg/day plus LHRHa or placebo plus LHRHa (double-blind arms) or enzalutamide monotherapy (open-label arm). Treatment is suspended at week 37 if PSA concentrations are <0.2 ng/mL and reinstated if levels rise to ≥2.0 ng/mL with RP or ≥5.0 ng/mL without RP. Patients with PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL at week 37 continue until treatment discontinuation criteria are met. The primary endpoint is MFS comparing enzalutamide plus LHRHa versus placebo plus LHRHa.Ethics and disseminationThe study is conducted under the guiding principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be disseminated at research conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT02319837.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document