WINTHER: An international study to select rational therapeutics based on the analysis of matched tumor and normal biopsies in subjects with advanced malignancies.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11625-TPS11625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Soria ◽  
Jordi Rodon Ahnert ◽  
Raanan Berger ◽  
Wilson H. Miller ◽  
Irene Brana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Normal Tissue ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
International Study ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Matched Normal Tissue ◽  
Prior Therapy

TPS11625 Background: Today, personalized cancer medicine implies matching the patient’s tumor genomic characteristics with molecularly and immune targeted agents. Although there are an increasing number of DNA aberrations that can now be matched to a cognate therapy, some patients do not display such druggable oncogene drivers. Methods: WINTHER is an open non-randomized study involving 6 cancer centers in France, Spain, Israel, Canada and USA applying genomic and also transcriptomic assays to guide treatment decisions. The novelty of the WINTHER approach lies in the use of tumor and matched normal tissue biopsies together and an algorithm for predicting efficacy of therapies. The aim is to provide a rational therapeutic choice for all of the patients enrolled in the study whether or not they harbor actionable DNA alterations. The study endpoint is the comparison of the progression-free-survival (PFS) under the WINTHER selected therapy to the PFS of the last therapeutic line. Patients included have refractory metastatic cancer of any histological type, with at least one prior therapeutic regimen and performance status of 0 to 1. Patients who have received a matched treatment based on a molecular anomaly as their immediate prior therapy were excluded. After consent, patients undergo a tumor and histologically-matched normal tissue biopsy. Extracted DNA and RNA of both tumor and normal from frozen tissues at the local center under common standard operating procedures are sent to centralized laboratories for omics investigations. DNA is investigated at Foundation Medicine Inc. and RNA at Gustave Roussy using Agilent technology. For RNA, the WINTHER algorithm is applied on the differential RNA expression data between tumor and normal tissues and establishes the list of drugs with the presumed higher score of efficacy for each patient. Patients with actionable genomic events enter in ARM A, and patients without any druggable anomaly of the DNA enter in ARM B and are treated using the WINTHER algorithm RNA-based treatment decision tool. To date, the trial has recruited 303 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01856296.

Immunotherapy and Sonpavde score validation in advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective study by the Italian Network for Research in Urologic-Oncology

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Bersanelli ◽  
Giulia Mazzaschi ◽  
Patrizia Giannatempo ◽  
Daniele Raggi ◽  
Elena Farè ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Urologic Oncology ◽  
Upper Tract ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Few Data

Background: Few data are available regarding the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients. Methods: To provide a real-world experience with anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy in UTUC patients, we involved an Italian network in a multicenter retrospective analysis. Results: A total of 78 UTUC patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 25.1 months. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 2.2 months (95% CI 1.8–2.6), and the median OS (mOS) was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.6–8.4). The Sonpavde score (including performance status > 0, hemoglobin < 10 g/dl, liver metastases, time from prior chemotherapy ≥ 3 months) split the patients into three groups (0 vs 1 vs 2–4 factors), efficiently predicting the OS and PFS outcome at the multivariate analyses (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The prognosis of unselected UTUC patients is still unsatisfactory. The Sonpavde score was validated for the first time in an UTUC population, as a useful tool for the treatment decision-making process.

Retrospective analysis of gefitinib versus docetaxel in never-smoking patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17154-17154
Author(s):  
Y. Kogure ◽  
S. Ueda ◽  
Y. Nakamura ◽  
M. Ebisawa ◽  
G. Asai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Never Smoker

17154 Background: Docetaxel has been standard for second line treatment of NSCLC. In ISEL study, subgroup analyses showed significantly longer survival in the gefitinib group than the placebo group for never-smokers and Asians. It is not clear whether gefitinib has the clinical advantage in these selected patients with NSCLC. We aimed to compare the clinical benefit of gefitinib with that of docetaxel in never smoker previously treated with chemotherapy, retrospectively. Methods: We reviewed patients from August 2002 to September 2005 in Shizuoka Cancer Center. Patients with following conditions were analyzed: NSCLC, received gefitinib or docetaxel, never-smoker, not chemo-naived. We assessed the response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and over all survival for gefitinib and docetaxel respectively. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan Meier-method. Prognostic factors were estimated using multivariate analysis. Results: 108 patinets were selected. 69 patients were treated with gefitinib and 39 patients were treated with docetaxel. 28 patients overlapped each other. The patients treated with gefitinib following docetaxel and those with docetaxel following gefitinib were 17 and 13, respectively. 69 patients with gefitinib: the median age, 62 years (31–79); stage IIIB/IV, 14/55; ad/sq/ others, 61/3/5; PS 0/1/2/3, 19/35/13/2; prior therapy containing platinum regimen, 58. The response rate was 36%. 39 patients with docetaxel: the median age, 63 years (31–76); stage IIIB/IV, 8/31; ad/sq/others, 29/7/3; PS 0/1/2/3, 18/19/1/1; prior therapy containing platinum regimen, 34. The response rate was 10%. Gefitinib was superior in longer median PFS (148 days vs 43 days, p = 0.0002). Over all survivals were not significant between two arms. In multivariate analysis for PFS, following factors were significant: gefitinib therapy (hazard ratio 0.375, p = 0.0002); male (hazard ratio 1.854, p = 0.0011); good performance status (hazard ratio 0.450, p = 0.0057). Conclusions: Our results suggested that gefitinib therapy is very attractive for never smoker in the point of PFS. Many patients received cross-over therapies made difficult to analyze over all survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II randomized, open-label study of YM155 (sepantronium bromide) plus docetaxel versus docetaxel alone as first-line treatment for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 548-548
Author(s):  
Michael R. Clemens ◽  
Anne Therese Keating ◽  
Oleg Gladkov ◽  
Fei Jie ◽  
Joyce Steinberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Prior Therapy

548 Background: YM155 (YM) is a small molecule survivin suppressant. In a phase I/II study of YM plus docetaxel (D) in solid tumors evidence of anti-tumor activity was observed in women with human epidermal growth factor 2 non-overexpressing (HER2 negative) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Methods: This was a randomized study of YM plus D versus D as 1st line treatment in subjects with HER2 negative mBC. Eligibility criteria were: ECOG < 1, no prior chemotherapy for mBC, and at least one measurable lesion. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were: objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to response (TTR) and safety. YM was administered at 5 mg/m2/day as a 168 hr continuous infusion followed by 14 Day (d) observation and D was administered at 75 mg/m2over 1 hr on d1 every 21d. In the control arm, D was dosed per investigator choice q 21d. Results: 101 subjects were randomized (50 YM + D; 51 D). Median (m) age 55 (range: 25 – 79), 25% had triple negative disease, > 60% had bone and lymph mets, 86% had prior therapy for BC. mPFS (days) was 251 (95%CI: 176 – 333) YM + D vs 252 (95%CI: 202-433) D (p=0.34). ORR, CBR and TTR (YM+D; D): 26% vs. 25.5%; 82% vs. 84.3% and 45 vs 59 d. OS data are immature but showed no difference (p=0.911). Adverse events [AEs (> 25%)] [YM + D% vs D %]: neutropenia 83 vs 84, alopecia 62.5 vs 53, fatigue 50 vs 41.2, nausea 35.4 vs 41.2, leucopenia 27 vs 33 and dyspnoea 33 vs 14. Common (>10%) serious AEs [YM + D% vs D%]: febrile neutropenia 21 vs 8 and neutropenia 10 vs 8. Conclusions: Preclinical and clinical evidence suggested the combination of YM + D may offer additional benefit to D alone in subjects with mBC. This study showed no difference in efficacy, but the combination appeared to be well tolerated. Clinical trial information: NCT01038804.

Phase 3 clinical Trial Evaluating 90y glass microspheres in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma of the liver who have failed first-line chemotherapy.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 474-474
Author(s):  
Maria Angela Karpf
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Glass Microspheres ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

474 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the US. Half of pts diagnosed with CRC develop liver disease. Unresectable liver metastases are responsible for morbidity/mortality. Typically, pts with metastatic CRC receive an oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based regimen as first-line chemotherapy, +/- bevacizumab. On progression, pts are treated with the regimen they did not receive during first-line chemo. A study to evaluate yttrium 90 glass microspheres (TheraSphere; 90Y) in pts with unresectable mCRC of the liver showed that pts with good performance status, no extrahepatic metastases, and ≤ 25% tumor may benefit most from 90Y. 90Y glass microspheres are approved by FDA under a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE). This study will evaluate outcomes in this patient subset when 90Y is added to second-line SOC chemo. The objective is to evaluate efficacy/safety of 90Y in patients with liver mCRC that has progressed after first-line chemo. Methods: Open-label, multi-center, randomized study to evaluate 90Y treatment in ~340 eligible pts, in whom SOC 2nd-line chemo with either an oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based regimen is planned. Eligible pts will be randomized 1:1 to control or treatment. Treatment pts will receive a first cycle of second-line chemo within 21 days of randomization and at least 14 days after the last dose of first-line agents including VEGF inhibitors. 90Y will be administered in place of the second chemotherapy cycle. Control pts will receive planned SOC second-line chemo. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary: overall survival, hepatic progression-free survival, time to symptomatic progression, tumor response rate, and adverse events. Pts will have regular study visits as long as they participate, at which time safety/efficacy data will be collected and recorded. Results: NA Conclusions: Given the potential benefit to mCRC pts, this Phase 3 study will evaluate 90Y in the second-line setting in patients who have progressed following SOC first-line chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01483027.

Updated survival results of the randomized phase II study comparing cisplatin/capecitabine (CX) with epirubicin plus CX (ECX) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 46-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Lim ◽  
J. Yun ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
S. Park ◽  
J. Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

46 Background: We previously reported results of a randomized study showing that CX is equally active to ECX in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (Yun et al. Eur J Cancer. 2010). Here we report updated overall survival (OS) results with an additional 12 months' follow-up. Methods: Ninety-one chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically-confirmed, measurable AGC were randomized to receive CX (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 iv on day 1 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 bid po on days 1-14, n=45) or ECX (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 plus CX, n=44) every 3 weeks. After CX or ECX had failed, second-line chemotherapy (SLC) was recommended for all patients if their performance status was preserved. Results: Treatment duration was similar for both arms (4.4 for CX v 4.2 months for ECX). There was no relevant difference in the occurrence of overall grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the CX and ECX arms (80% v 78%, respectively; p=0.516). However, none in the CX and 12% in the ECX arm discontinued treatment because of toxicity. There were no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy between CX and ECX with respect to the response rate (38% v 37%, respectively), PFS (6.4 v 6.5 months), as well as OS (12.7 v 13.8 months; p=0.51). After failure, 60% of patients (26 CX and 28 ECX patients) received SLC. However, OS was not differed whether a patient was treated with SLC or not (13.1 v 11.2 months; p=0.94). Conclusions: The present analysis confirms previous findings that both CX and ECX appear to be comparatively active as first-line chemotherapy for AGC. Furthermore, the role of SLC in AGC warrants further evaluation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

NGR-hTNF as second-line treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7076-7076
Author(s):  
Gilda Rossoni ◽  
Vanesa Gregorc ◽  
Maria Grazia Viganò ◽  
Alessandra Bulotta ◽  
Domenico Ghio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Ngr Peptide ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

7076 Background: NGR-hTNF exploits the asparagine-glycine-arginine (NGR) peptide for selectively targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) to cancer endothelial cells. Tumor hypervascularity is an independent predictor of poor overall survival (OS) in MPM patients (pts). Methods: We report long-term results of a phase II trial that assessed NGR-hTNF in MPM pts with performance status (PS) ≤ 2 and radiologic progressive disease (PD) after a pemetrexed-based regimen. NGR-hTNF was given at 0.8 µg/m2 every 3 weeks (q3w) in 43 pts and weekly (q1w) in 14 pts. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), with restaging done q6w by MPM-modified RECIST criteria, while secondary aims included disease control (DC) rate and OS. We also tested the impact on outcome of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at baseline (median 3; interquartile range 2-5). Median follow-up was 32.5 months (95% CI 27.5-37.5). Results: Baseline characteristics were (n=57): median age 57 years; M/F 35/22; PS 0/1-2 31/26; EORTC score good/poor 45/12. Median treatment free interval on prior therapy was 4.3 months. Only one drug-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) was noted, common grade 1/2 AEs being transient chills (75%). No higher toxicity was reported using the q1w schedule. Median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.2-3.3). DC rate was 46% (95% CI 32-59; 26/57 pts; 1 partial response, 25 stable diseases) and was maintained for a median time of 4.7 months (95% CI 4.0-5.4). OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 47% and 16%, respectively. Median OS was longer in pts with DC than in those with early PD (16.2 and 8.3 months, respectively; p=.02). According to schedule, 6-month PFS rates were 11% and 36% and 2-year OS rates were 12% and 29% for q3w and q1w, respectively. In pts with DC, median PFS were 4.4 and 9.1 months and median OS were 13.3 and 24.8 months for q3w and q1w, respectively. By Cox analyses, a PS of 0 (p=.01) and a low baseline NLR (p=.004) were the only variables associated with improved OS. Median OS in pts stratified by NLR ≤ 2, 3 to 4, and ≥ 5 were 15.7, 10.5, and 4.2 months, respectively (p=.0002 for trend). Conclusions: NGR-hTNF showed promising PFS and OS in this study. A double-blind phase III trial is currently testing best investigator choice ± NGR-hTNF q1w in pemetrexed-pretreated MPM pts (NCT01098266).

Phase III AXIS trial for second-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Effect of prior first-line treatment duration and axitinib dose titration on axitinib efficacy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 354-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Bernard J. Escudier ◽  
M Dror Michaelson ◽  
Sylvie Negrier ◽  
Martin Eric Gore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Sunitinib Treatment ◽  
Prior Therapy

354 Background: Axitinib is a potent and selective second-generation inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) 1, 2, and 3. In the phase 3 AXIS trial of axitinib vs sorafenib for second-line mRCC, axitinib significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (mPFS) (6.7 vs 4.7 months; hazard ratio 0.665; P<0.0001). Here, we evaluated the effect of prior sunitinib treatment duration and axitinib dose titration on subsequent axitinib efficacy. Methods: Eligible patients had clear-cell mRCC; measurable RECIST-defined progressive disease after 1 prior first-line systemic therapy; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology performance status (PS) 0/1. Patients were stratified by PS and prior therapy, and randomized 1:1 to either axitinib, at a starting dose of 5 mg twice daily (BID), or sorafenib, 400 mg BID. Patients without toxicity >grade 2 and BP <150/90 mmHg without antihypertensive medication for >2 weeks were eligible to increase axitinib dose to 7 mg BID and then to 10 mg BID. Results: The mPFS for patients receiving at least one total daily axitinib dose >10 mg (dose-titrated group; n=132) was 6.6 months [95% CI 4.7–8.3] and 8.3 months [95% CI 6.0–10.2] for patients receiving axitinib ≤10 mg (n=227). A total of 194 patients (53.7%) in the axitinib arm and 195 patients (53.9%) in the sorafenib arm had prior sunitinib treatment. The mPFS for patients with duration of prior sunitinib treatment ≥6 months and <6 months were 4.8 months [95% CI 4.5–6.5] and 4.6 months [95% CI 2.8–8.3] for axitinib patients; and 4.6 months [95% CI 2.9–4.9] and 2.9 months [95% CI 2.8–4.6), for sorafenib patients. The mPFS for duration of prior sunitinib ≥9 months and <9 months were 6.3 months [95% CI 4.6–6.7] and 4.5 months [95% CI 2.8–6.4] for axitinib patients; and 4.6 months [95% CI 2.8–4.9] and 2.9 months [95% CI 2.8–4.7]) for sorafenib patients. Conclusions: Duration of prior sunitinib ≥9 months may be associated with a longer PFS on second-line VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Both axitinib dose-increased and non-increased patients had longer PFS compared with the sorafenib arm.

ROCHOP study: A phase III randomized study of CHOP compared to romidepsin-CHOP in untreated peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8616-TPS8616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Delarue ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Mark S. Hertzberg ◽  
Won Seog Kim ◽  
Dolores Caballero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
T Cell Lymphomas ◽  
Ann Arbor ◽  
Efficacy Parameters

TPS8616 Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) account for 10-15% of lymphomas. They share an aggressive clinical behaviour and a poor prognosis when treated by CHOP-like regimen which is nevertheless consider as a standard because others regimens failed to demonstrate survival advantage. Romidepsin is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with promising results in PTCL. First trials showed a response rate of 38% in heavily pre-treated PTCL patients. These results were confirmed with 15% of patients reaching a CR/CRu, 89% of them without disease progression at 13 months. Adverse events include gastrointestinal, hematologic and asthenic conditions. A phase I study of romidepsin combined with CHOP was conducted by LYSA. A total of 18 patients were included. The recommended dose was 12 mg/m² administered at day 1 and day 8 of each cycle. Methods: Ro-CHOP study is an international phase III study comparing 6 cycles of CHOP21 with 6 cycles of romidepsin-CHOP21 (EUDRACT 2012-001580-68). Primary endpoint is Progression-Free Survival assessed independently. Secondary objectives include overall survival, other efficacy parameters, analysis of response rate according to 18FDG-PET, safety, quality of life and biological ancillary studies. A total of 420 subjects aged from 18 to 80 years will be enrolled in the study. Main inclusion criteria are untreated PTCL whatever Ann Arbor stage and a performance status of 0-2. Main exclusion criteria are other subtypes of lymphoma, HTLV1 positivity, any cardiac abnormality, poor renal, hepatic and marrow functions unless related to lymphoma. Patients are randomized 1:1 between the two regimens. A stratification is performed with IPI score, age and histology. The first patient has been included in January 2013. A recruitment of 10.5 patients per month is anticipated, with a total duration of the study of 60 months. An update on enrolment will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: 2012-001580-68.

Biomarker-based phase II study of sapanisertib (TAK-228), an mTORC1/2 inhibitor in patients with refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 306-306
Author(s):  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
Elio Adib ◽  
Wanling Xie ◽  
Walter Michael Stadler ◽  
Yousef Zakharia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Antitumour Activity ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Pten Loss ◽  
Prior Therapy

306 Background: Approved rapalogs inhibit mTORC1 and have limited activity in mRCC, possibly due to compensatory feedback loops. Sapanisertib addresses the incomplete inhibition of the mTOR pathway through targeting of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 with antitumour activity demonstrated in patients with mRCC. In this multicenter, single arm phase II trial, we evaluated the efficacy of sapanisertib in patients with mRCC progressing on standard therapies (NCT03097328). Methods: Eligible mRCC patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-2 and had progressed on standard therapies. Prior therapy with rapalogs (everolimus, temsirolimus) and variant RCC histologies were permitted. Patients had a baseline biopsy and received treatment with sapanisertib 30 mg by mouth weekly until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Tissue biomarkers of mTOR pathway activation were explored. Results: We enrolled 38 mRCC patients (clear cell = 28; variant histology = 10) between August 2017 and November 2019. The majority had intermediate (76%) or poor risk (11%) by IMDC criteria. Twenty (53%) had received ≥ 3 lines of therapy; 13 (34%) patients received prior rapalogs. Median follow-up was 10.4 months (range 1-27.4) and median duration of therapy was 1.6 (range 0.3-13.8) months. ORR by central review was 2 of 38 (5.3% 90%CI: 1%-15.6%). 31.6% of all patients and 30.7% of those with prior rapalog exposure had some tumor shrinkage during course of treatment. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 2.5 months (95% CI 1.8,3.7). Twelve patients (32%) developed treatment-related grade 3 adverse events (AEs) with no grade 4 or 5 toxicity reported; 6 patients (16%) required dose reduction and 4 (11%) discontinued therapy for AEs. Oncopanel tumor sequencing identified alterations in the mTOR pathway in 6 of 29 patients ( MTOR n = 2, PTEN n = 3, TSC1 n = 1.) Reduced PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry was seen in 7 of 19 patients. There was no association between mTOR pathway mutations or PTEN loss and response to sapanisertib. Conclusions: In this study we demonstrate minimal activity of sapanisertib in patients with treatment refractory mRCC with no clear benefit among patients with mTOR/PTEN pathway alterations. Additional treatment strategies are needed for patients with refractory mRCC.

Sunitinib versus cabozantinib, crizotinib or savolitinib in metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC): Results from the randomized phase II SWOG 1500 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 270-270
Author(s):  
Sumanta K. Pal ◽  
Catherine Tangen ◽  
Ian Murchie Thompson ◽  
Naomi B. Haas ◽  
Daniel J. George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Intent To Treat

270 Background: MET signaling is a key molecular driver in pRCC. Given that there is no optimal therapy for metastatic pRCC, we sought to compare an existing standard (sunitinib) to putative MET kinase inhibitors. Methods: Eligible patients had pathologically verified pRCC, Zubrod performance status 0-1, and measurable metastatic disease. Patients may have received up to 1 prior systemic therapy excluding VEGF-directed agents. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive either sunitinib 50 mg po qd (4 wks on/2 wks off), cabozantinib 60 mg po qd, crizotinib 250 mg po bid, or savolitinib 600 mg po qd. Patients were stratified by prior therapy and pRCC subtype (I vs II vs not otherwise specified [NOS]) based on local review. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) for each experimental arm versus sunitinib. With 41 eligible patients per arm, we estimated 85% power to detect a 75% improvement in median PFS with a 1-sided alpha of 0.10 using intent-to-treat analysis. A pre-planned futility analysis was performed after 50% of PFS events occurred. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, response rate, and overall survival. Results: Between 4/2016 and 12/2019, 152 patients were enrolled; 5 were ineligible. Median age was 66 (range:29-89) and 76% were male; 92% had no prior therapy. By local pathologic review, 18%, 54% and 28% of patients were characterized as having type I, type II and NOS histology, respectively. In contrast, the frequency of type I, type II, and NOS by central review was 30%, 45% and 25%, respectively. Accrual to the savolitinib and crizotinib arms was halted early for futility (PFS hazard ratio > 1.0 for both); accrual continued to completion in the sunitinib and cabozantinib arms. Median PFS was significantly higher with cabozantinib relative to sunitinib (Table). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 69%, 72%, 37% and 39% of patients receiving sunitinib, cabozantinib, crizotinib and savolitinib, respectively; one grade 5 adverse event was seen with cabozantinib. Overall survival and response data will be presented. Conclusions: In this multi-arm randomized trial, only cabozantinib resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful prolongation of PFS in pRCC patients compared to sunitinib. These data support cabozantinib as a reference standard for eligible patients with metastatic pRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02761057 . [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document