Capturing the patient voice in radiotherapy trials: An analysis of trends and future directions of patient-reported outcomes.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 216-216
Author(s):  
Noelle L. Williams ◽  
Ayesha Ali ◽  
Tu Dan ◽  
Kyle Ziemer ◽  
Benjamin E. Leiby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Cooperative Groups ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Chi Squared

216 Background: The importance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been recognized and this data is increasingly being incorporated into modern radiotherapy (RT) trial design. Despite this, there is a lack of published data regarding collection and reporting of PRO data in the RT setting. We sought to systematically evaluate RT protocols to assess trends of PRO data collection and factors associated with reporting. Methods: We queried multi-institutional RT trials indexed on ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane database, and MEDLINE and identified trials with full protocols available. We collected information in regards to study population, primary and secondary endpoints, quality of life measures, and PRO data. Descriptive and chi-squared analyses were employed to investigate trends and factors associated with PRO reporting. Results: 232 protocols were evaluable (1971-2014) from multiple cooperative groups. Of these, 198 were completed and 34 were in progress. Overall, only 41% of trials had protocol-specified collection of PROs. Of the 155 trials that had at least 1 published report, only 34 (22%) reported PRO data. All nine trials with PRO as a primary endpoint (9/9) had published reports with this information. Treatment era was associated with PRO collection, with 30% of trials collecting PRO data prior to 2005, 48% between 2006 and 2010, and 66% between 2011 and 2015 ( X2 [4, N = 232] = 15.79, p = 0.003). PROs were most likely to be collected in phase III trials ( X2 [4, N = 226] = 59.6, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: PROs are historically under collected and reported in cooperative group RT trials. Despite increasing PRO collection in modern trials, reporting remains suboptimal and may inaccurately inform survivorship issues. As digital literacy progresses, electronic PRO data may offer a potential avenue for improvement. Ultimately, PRO data will serve as a vital component to help define value in newly proposed payment models focused on improving quality of care while reducing cost of care.

Patient-reported outcomes in a randomized trial of everolimus with metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17516-e17516
Author(s):  
J. Beaumont ◽  
D. Cella ◽  
T. Hutson ◽  
S. Bracarda ◽  
V. Grünwald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Secondary Analyses

e17516 Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO), including health-related quality of life (HRQL), were assessed in a Phase III trial of everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. Methods: Patients with mRCC were randomized (n=416) to receive everolimus or placebo plus best supportive care. Patients completed the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index- Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) and EORTC-QLQ C30 at baseline and monthly during treatment. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was also assessed at baseline and monthly during treatment. Primary analyses included time to deterioration defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 3 points for FKSI-DRS, at least 10% for EORTC Physical Function (PF) and Global Quality of Life (QL) scales, and at least 10 points for KPS. Secondary analyses considered tumor progressions that occurred prior to deterioration or censoring date as FKSI deterioration events and compared time to PRO deterioration by tumor progression. Comparisons were made using stratified log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Time to deterioration in KPS was longer in the everolimus arm, and time to deterioration in FKSI-DRS was slightly longer ( Table ). There was no difference in time to deterioration in PF or QL. Secondary analyses showed median time to deterioration in FKSI-DRS was approximately doubled for the everolimus arm compared to placebo, and patients who progressed experienced a more rapid deterioration in FKSI-DRS and QL scores. Conclusions: Compared to placebo everolimus delayed progression of disease-related symptoms and KPS. No effect on time to deterioration of PF or QL could be determined. Secondary analyses suggest a delay in deterioration in kidney cancer related symptoms via tumor control. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Patient-reported outcomes from a phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of gefitinib versus placebo in esophageal cancer progressing after chemotherapy: Cancer Oesophagus Gefitinib (COG).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
Susan J. Dutton ◽  
Jane M. Blazeby ◽  
Russell D. Petty ◽  
Wasat Mansoor ◽  
Joyce Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Global Quality Of Life ◽  
Eortc Qlq

6 Background: There are no randomised trials of 2nd line chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. The phase III COG trial of gefitinib versus placebo in patients with esophageal cancer progressing after chemotherapy did not show significant overall survival (OS) benefit, however the trial incorporated patient reported outcomes (PRO) using validated tools. The PRO data are therefore critical to inform practice and the initial results are presented here. Methods: Adults with measurable/evaluable metastatic esophageal or types I/II junctional adeno or squamous cell carcinoma progressing after prior chemotherapy, with performance status 0-2 were randomised 1:1 to 500mg gefitinib (G) or placebo (P), treated until progression. Primary outcome: OS. Secondary outcomes include safety, PFS, PRO (assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-OG25 at baseline 4, 8 and 12 weeks until progression) and predictive biomarkers. Pre-specified PRO domains were global quality of life, dysphagia, eating and odynophagia. Analysis by ANCOVA of change in PRO at 4 weeks adjusted for baseline. Results: 450 patients were recruited from 51 UK centres and no difference in OS was detected. There was evidence that PFS was better in the intervention arm (P 35 days, G 49 days; HR=0.795, 95%CI 0.66, 0.96, p=0.017). Questionnaire compliance rates were excellent at baseline (94%) and at 4 weeks (77%). Patients in the gefitinib arm reported significantly better social function (9.26; 95%CI 1.94 to 16.58; p=0.013) and significantly fewer problems with odynophagia (-8.61; 95%CI -14.49 to -2.73; p=0.004), constipation (-15.24; 95%CI -22.83 to -7.65; p=0.0001) and speech (-10.40; 95%CI -16.13 to -4.67; p=0.0004) than patients receiving placebo but more problems with diarrhoea (19.23; 95%CI 11.79 to 26.27; p<0.0001). All other PRO domains were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Gefitinib did not improve overall survival in esophageal cancer patients after chemotherapy however there was significant PFS improvement and improvement in quality of life and palliation of symptoms albeit with an excess of diarrhoea. Clinical trial information: 29580179.

Health-related quality of life/patient-reported outcomes in relapsed ovarian cancer: Results from a randomized phase III study of trabectedin with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus PLD alone

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5526-5526
Author(s):  
C. N. Krasner ◽  
A. Poveda ◽  
T. Herzog ◽  
J. Vermorken ◽  
B. Monk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gi Symptoms ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
The Impact

5526 Background: In an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III study comparing the combination of trabectedin and PLD to PLD alone in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer, the combination demonstrated significantly improved progression free survival and response rates, manageable non-cumulative toxicity, and fewer PLD-associated adverse events. We studied the impact of the combination of trabectedin with PLD on the quality of life (QoL)/patient-reported outcomes (PRO) evaluated as part of the trial. Methods: QoL/PRO questionnaires, EORTC-QLQ C30, OV28, and EQ-5D were completed by patients at screening and on Day 1 of every other treatment cycle starting with Cycle 1, and at the end-of-treatment visit. Global health status/QoL, fatigue, rain subscales from QLQ C30, and abdominal pain/GI symptoms scale from OV28 were chosen a priori for primary analyses. Other scales of the three questionnaires were analyzed on a supportive basis. Results: A total of 672 patients were randomized. 663 (98%) completed at least the baseline questionnaires. Median cycles of treatment was 6 (131 days) for the combination arm and 5 (143 days) for the monotherapy arm. Mixed effects models (using a covariance structure of AR[1]) predicting the score at baseline and follow-up scores as a function of treatment, days after baseline, and interaction between treatment and days after baseline showed no significant differences between the treatment arms for any of the prespecified scales. Similar analyses of other scales, including EQ-5D Health Index scores and Health State on the Visual Analog Scale, support the findings. Conclusions: The addition of trabectedin to PLD results in superior efficacy in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer, with no added decrement to overall health status as assessed by PRO. [Table: see text]

Secukinumab improves patient-reported outcomes in subjects with active psoriatic arthritis: results from a randomised phase III trial (FUTURE 1)

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vibeke Strand ◽  
Philip Mease ◽  
Laure Gossec ◽  
Ori Elkayam ◽  
Filip van den Bosch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Global Disease Activity

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of secukinumab on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in subjects with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the FUTURE 1 study.MethodsSubjects were randomised 1:1:1 to receive intravenous (i.v.) secukinumab 10 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by subcutaneous secukinumab 150 or 75 mg every 4 weeks or matching placebo until week 24.ResultsAt week 24, subjects receiving secukinumab i.v.→150 mg or i.v.→75 mg reported greater least squares mean changes from baseline than those receiving placebo in patient global assessment of disease activity (−20.6 and −20.0 vs −7.4, respectively), patient assessment of pain (−20.8 and −20.4 vs −6.7), psoriatic arthritis quality of life (−3.5 and −3.2 vs −0.4), Dermatology Life Quality Index (−8.8 and −7.9 vs 0.7); p<0.0001 vs placebo for both secukinumab groups for above PROs and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (6.74 (p<0.05 vs placebo) and 6.03 vs 4.00); all of which well exceeded minimum clinically important differences.ConclusionsIn subjects with PsA, secukinumab treatment resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in global disease activity, pain, generic and disease-specific measures of health-related quality of life and fatigue.Trial registration numberNCT01392326; Results.

scholarly journals Utilizing Digital Health to Collect Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Prostate Cancer: Single-Arm Pilot Trial

10.2196/12689 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. e12689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Tran ◽  
Adam Dicker ◽  
Benjamin Leiby ◽  
Eric Gressen ◽  
Noelle Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Literacy Level

Background Measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs) requires an individual’s perspective on their symptoms, functional status, and quality of life. Digital health enables remote electronic PRO (ePRO) assessments as a clinical decision support tool to facilitate meaningful provider interactions and personalized treatment. Objective This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of collecting ePROs using validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires for prostate cancer. Methods Using Apple ResearchKit software, the Strength Through Insight app was created with content from validated HRQoL tools 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) or EPIC for Clinical Practice and 8-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Advanced Prostate Symptom Index. In a single-arm pilot study with patients receiving prostate cancer treatment at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and affiliates, participants were recruited, and instructed to download Strength Through Insight and complete ePROs once a week over 12 weeks. A mixed methods approach, including qualitative pre- and poststudy interviews, was used to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of Strength Through Insight for the collection and care management of cancer treatment. Results Thirty patients consented to the study; 1 patient failed to complete any of the questionnaires and was left out of the analysis of the intervention. Moreover, 86% (25/29) reached satisfactory questionnaire completion (defined as completion of 60% of weekly questions over 12 weeks). The lower bound of the exact one-sided 95% CI was 71%, exceeding the 70% feasibility threshold. Most participants self-identified with having a high digital literacy level (defined as the ability to use, understand, evaluate, and analyze information from multiple formats from a variety of digital sources), and only a few participants identified with having a low digital literacy level (defined as only having the ability to gather information on the Web). Interviews were thematically analyzed to reveal the following: (1) value of emotional support and wellness in cancer treatment, (2) rise of social patient advocacy in online patient communities and networks, (3) patient concerns over privacy, and (4) desire for personalized engagement tools. Conclusions Strength Through Insight was demonstrated as a feasible and acceptable method of data collection for ePROs. A high compliance rate confirmed the app as a reliable tool for patients with localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nearly all participants reported that using the smartphone app is easier than or equivalent to the traditional paper-and-pen approach, providing evidence of acceptability and support for the use of remote PRO monitoring. This study expands on current research involving the value of digital health, as a social and behavioral science, augmented with technology, can begin to contribute to population health management, as it shapes psychographic segmentation by demographic, socioeconomic, health condition, or behavioral factors to group patients by their distinct personalities and motivations, which influence their choices. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NC03197948; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NC03197948

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document