Cancer survivorship care in rural community: Provider perspective.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 50-50
Author(s):  
Katia Noyes ◽  
David Holub ◽  
Irfan Rizvi ◽  
Alex Swanger ◽  
Coty Reisdorf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Successful Implementation

50 Background: Advances in oncologic sciences have resulted in successful treatments for many cancers with improved survival for millions of patients. Efficient delivery of cancer care now requires not only skills and professionalism of each provider but also well-orchestrated performances of multiple oncology, primary care and social services providers acting as one multidisciplinary team. It is unknown, however, whether providers are prepared for and accept their new roles in patient cancer care teams across region. This study assessed perspectives of providers involved in care for patients with cancer about their changing roles. Methods: We conducted a focus group with a diverse group of stakeholders involved in cancer care (2 primary care physicians, 1 rural surgeon, 2 rural oncologists, 2 oncology nurses, 2 cancer patients and a caregiver). The focus group was conducted using ThinkTank software, a collaborative tool that allows participants to communicate virtually in real time, screen share, express preferences and confidentially rank each other responses. We also conducted two traditional focus groups with rural care managers, nurses, social workers and public health providers. Results: The focus groups identified significant differences in attitudes and beliefs toward regional team-based cancer care between various providers. PCPs ranked oncology issues as less important to their practices compared to other chronic conditions associated with performance metrics and financial incentives. APPs ranked care coordination issues as more important compared to PCP rankings from the same practices. Rural providers identified limited staffing, outdated health IT systems, and lack of expertise as major barriers to multidisciplinary team care. Both patients and providers highlighted importance of trust and face-to-face communication in treatment adherence and choice of care setting. Conclusions: Current health information systems, performance metrics and payment models represent significant barriers to integrated care delivery in oncology and survivorship. Successful implementation of efficient and sustainable regional oncology program will require a multi-dimensional intervention to address each of these barriers.

scholarly journals An assessment of implementation of Community Oriented Primary Care in Kenyan family medicine postgraduate medical education programmes

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian J. Nelligan ◽  
Jacob Shabani ◽  
Stephanie Taché ◽  
Gulnaz Mohamoud ◽  
Megan Mahoney
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Community Empowerment ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Postgraduate Students

Background and objectives: Family medicine postgraduate programmes in Kenya are examining the benefits of Community-Oriented Primary Care (COPC) curriculum, as a method to train residents in population-based approaches to health care delivery. Whilst COPC is an established part of family medicine training in the United States, little is known about its application in Kenya. We sought to conduct a qualitative study to explore the development and implementation of COPC curriculum in the first two family medicine postgraduate programmes in Kenya. Method: Semi-structured interviews of COPC educators, practitioners, and academic stakeholders and focus groups of postgraduate students were conducted with COPC educators, practitioners and academic stakeholders in two family medicine postgraduate programmes in Kenya. Discussions were transcribed, inductively coded and thematically analysed. Results: Two focus groups with eight family medicine postgraduate students and interviews with five faculty members at two universities were conducted. Two broad themes emerged from the analysis: expected learning outcomes and important community-based enablers. Three learning outcomes were (1) making a community diagnosis, (2) understanding social determinants of health and (3) training in participatory research. Three community-based enablers for sustainability of COPC were (1) partnerships with community health workers, (2) community empowerment and engagement and (3) institutional financial support. Conclusions: Our findings illustrate the expected learning outcomes and important communitybased enablers associated with the successful implementation of COPC projects in Kenya and will help to inform future curriculum development in Kenya.

scholarly journals Primary care teams’ experiences of delivering mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachelle Ashcroft ◽  
Catherine Donnelly ◽  
Maya Dancey ◽  
Sandeep Gill ◽  
Simon Lam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Virtual Care ◽  
Primary Care Teams ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Integrated primary care teams are ideally positioned to support the mental health care needs arising during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding how COVID-19 has affected mental health care delivery within primary care settings will be critical to inform future policy and practice decisions during the later phases of the pandemic and beyond. The objective of our study was to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care teams’ delivery of mental health care. Methods A qualitative study using focus groups conducted with primary care teams in Ontario, Canada. Focus group data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results We conducted 11 focus groups with 10 primary care teams and a total of 48 participants. With respect to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care in primary care teams, we identified three key themes: i) the high demand for mental health care, ii) the rapid transformation to virtual care, and iii) the impact on providers. Conclusions From the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care quickly responded to the rising mental health care demands of their patients. Despite the numerous challenges they faced with the rapid transition to virtual care, primary care teams have persevered. It is essential that policy and decision-makers take note of the toll that these demands have placed on providers. There is an immediate need to enhance primary care’s capacity for mental health care for the duration of the pandemic and beyond.

Delivery of Survivorship Care by Primary Care Physicians: The Perspective of Breast Cancer Patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 933-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun J. Mao ◽  
Marjorie A. Bowman ◽  
Carrie T. Stricker ◽  
Angela DeMichele ◽  
Linda Jacobs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
General Care

Purpose Most of the 182,460 women diagnosed with breast cancer in the United States this year will become long-term survivors. Helping these women transition from active treatment to survivorship is a challenge that involves both oncologists and primary care physicians (PCPs). This study aims to describe postmenopausal breast cancer survivors' (BCS) perceptions of PCP-related survivorship care. Patients and Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 300 BCSs seen in an outpatient breast oncology clinic at a large university hospital. The primary outcome measure was a seven-item self-reported measure on perceived survivorship care (Cronbach's α = .89). Multivariate regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with perceived care delivery. Results Overall, BCSs rated PCP-related survivorship care as 65 out of 100 (standard deviation = 17). The areas of PCP-related care most strongly endorsed were general care (78%), psychosocial support (73%), and health promotion (73%). Fewer BCSs perceived their PCPs as knowledgeable about cancer follow-up (50%), late effects of cancer therapies (59%), or treating symptoms related to cancer or cancer therapies (41%). Only 28% felt that their PCPs and oncologists communicated well. In a multivariate regression analysis, nonwhite race and level of trust in the PCP were significantly associated with higher perceived level of PCP-related survivorship care (P = .001 for both). Conclusion Although BCSs perceived high quality of general care provided by their PCPs, they were not as confident with their PCPs' ability to deliver cancer-specific survivorship care. Interventions need to be tested to improve oncology-primary care communication and PCP knowledge of cancer-specific survivorship care.

scholarly journals Primary care physicians’ educational needs and learning preferences in end of life care: A focus group study in the UK

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Ellen Selman ◽  
Lisa Jane Brighton ◽  
Vicky Robinson ◽  
Rob George ◽  
Shaheen A. Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Learning Preferences ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
The Uk

scholarly journals What are the opportunities for cancer care and related research in primary care? A qualitative study of the views of patients, carers, and practice staff

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp19X703505
Author(s):  
Joseph Clark ◽  
Elvis Amoakwa ◽  
John Blenkinsopp ◽  
Florence Reedy ◽  
Miriam Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Information Needs ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Trial Participation

BackgroundResearch to identify the role of primary care in cancer care is important. However, trials in primary care are difficult.AimTo understand how patients, families, and primary care clinicians view their role in cancer care and identify opportunities for cancer primary care research.MethodQualitative study embedded within a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a primary care based needs assessment intervention. The Supportive Cancer Needs Survey (SCNS) was the main outcome. In-depth interviews with patients/carers and focus groups with primary care staff explored views on cancer care and trial participation. Data were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically by three independent researchers.ResultsFifteen cancer patients and three carers were interviewed and four focus groups (n = 11) were conducted. Three themes were generated satisfaction with current care; key time-points for improved cancer care; and information and research. Satisfaction with current care among patients was high in spite of 72% reporting at least one moderate-high unmet need at baseline. Most patients undergoing cancer treatment were unsure when to access primary care. Patients and carers highly valued proactive contact from their practice following diagnosis though this was uncommon. Post-oncology discharge was a key time-point for information needs and support for patients. Patients were reluctant to consider palliative care in spite of palliative care needs. Some felt therapeutic benefit from completing study measures.ConclusionPatients are satisfied with cancer primary care despite unmet needs. Palliative care is poorly understood by many who may benefit. Research participation may benefit some patients.

Physician Characteristics and EMR Attitudes

2011 ◽  
pp. 138-149
Author(s):  
David Meinert ◽  
Dane K. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Medical Profession ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Specialty Clinic ◽  
Medical Specialists ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
Physician Characteristics

Despite the numerous purported benefits of Electronic Medical Records (EMR), the medical profession has been extremely reluctant to embrace the technology. One of the barriers believed to be responsible for the slow adoption of EMR technology is resistance by many physicians who are not convinced of the advantages of using EMR systems. This study examined potential characteristics of physicians that might help identify those individuals that are most likely to pose a threat to the successful implementation of an EMR system in a multi-specialty clinic. The results demonstrated that older physicians and physicians with only minimal computer skills are more likely to have negative attitudes regarding EMR technology. Medical specialists were most likely to have positive attitudes with respects to the use of EMR systems, while primary care physicians were most likely to have doubts regarding the purported benefits of EMR technology. [Article copies are available for purchase from InfoSci-on-Demand.com]

The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Scott ◽  
Sivey Peter ◽  
Driss Ait Ouakrim ◽  
Lisa Willenberg ◽  
Lucio Naccerella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Of Health Care ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Primary Care Physicians

scholarly journals Perceptions of Malaysian medical students from different academic years on primary care: a qualitative research

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000188
Author(s):  
Sook Ching Chan ◽  
Jaya Vinoshairine Ganeson ◽  
Jee Tat Ong ◽  
Sandheep Sugathan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Focus Group Discussions ◽  
Group Discussions ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Career Pathway

ObjectiveTo explore the perception of medical students from a private medical college in Perak, Malaysia, on primary care practice and induce the factors influencing their perception and willingness to consider primary care as a career pathway.DesignQualitative study using focus group discussions. Participants’ responses were audio recorded, transcribed, grouped under various domains and listed out and analysed.SettingA private medical college in Perak state, Malaysia.ParticipantsForty-six medical students from years 2 to 5 were included. Eight focus groups were formed with two focus groups from each academic year (six students each in seven groups and four students in one group). Students were informed through their respective student leader of each year and received a participant information sheet and an informed consent form which were completed and returned if they decided to participate in the focus group discussions.ResultsThe participants had different levels of understanding of primary care depending on their level of exposure to primary care. Senior students with more exposure had a better understanding about primary care and its services. Attractive factors towards choosing primary care as a career included short working hours with a more balanced family and social life, being able to treat patients as a whole with continuity of care and closer relationship with patients. Unattractive factors included routine, unchallenging and boring practice, poor salary, work overload and administrative work in government clinics, being less recognised by other specialties; and the poor perception by other doctors that those pursuing primary care were not ‘brilliant enough’ for more ‘sophisticated disciplines like surgery or paediatrics’.ConclusionThis study showed that the medical students’ level of exposure to primary care played a crucial role in determining their understanding of primary care practice and their choice of career in primary care. Issues to be addressed include remuneration, workload and the prejudice against primary care as a career pathway. Suggestions included introducing early exposure to fun and challenging primary care postings in the medical curriculum and producing well trained, skilled and enthusiastic role models.

Nationwide disparities in testicular cancer care delivery: Racial, ethnic, and economic markers of patient vulnerability.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 421-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liam Connor Macleod ◽  
Shannon Cannon ◽  
Oliver Ko ◽  
Jonathan L. Wright ◽  
George Schade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Testis Cancer ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Early Presentation ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Large Primary

421 Background: Testis cancer is often curable, yet early presentation is a key determinant of survival and treatment morbidity. Testis cancer affects the young, who have less consistent primary care access. This may impede timely mobilization of complex healthcare resources needed for cancer care. We analyze the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for disparity in disease-specific outcomes. Methods: The NCDB identified adult males with testicular tumors (2004-2013). Four outcomes were selected as markers of care delays: higher stage presentation (defined as stage III+), large primary lesion at diagnosis, time to orchiectomy and overall mortality. Key exposures included race/ethnicity, socioeconomic factors and insurance status. Outcomes were assessed with multivariable hazards regression (survival) or logistic regression (others). Results: 31,964 men were eligible. Seventeen percent had higher stage presentation, 29% had a large primary, and 9.9% had delayed orchiectomy and 4.8% died during follow up. All outcomes were associated with multiple markers of patient vulnerability at the p < 0.001 level. The most consistent and greatest magnitude association was insurance status (e.g. for mortality Medicaid HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.3, uninsured HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5-2.1, for large primary Medicaid OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7-2.0, uninsured OR 2.1, 95% CI 2.0-2.3 [referent private payer]). In addition to markers of vulnerability, center case volume and travel burden were also associated with poor outcomes (p < 0.001). Conclusions: We find association between severity of disease and markers of patient vulnerability. Insurance had the greatest magnitude and most consistent association with poor outcomes and is therefore a priority for quality improvement. As access to primary care is expanded for the testis cancer population with the Affordable Care Act, it will be important to assess whether gains in coverage translate to improvements in cancer outcomes.

Delivery of survivorship care from rural primary care and oncology practices.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
Jennifer R. Klemp ◽  
Becky N. Lowry ◽  
Judy A Johnston ◽  
Kyla Alsman ◽  
Danielle Peereboom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Rural Primary Care ◽  
Education Of Patients ◽  
Office Management ◽  
Primary Care Practices

85 Background: While evidence-based guidelines for survivorship care exist, implementation in oncology and primary care practices has fallen short. There is little evidence of the barriers preventing successful implementation in rural primary care and oncology practices. We sought to assess knowledge gaps and barriers to successful implementation of evidence-based survivorship care guidelines in rural Kansas practices. Methods: Midwest Cancer Alliance, outreach arm of the University of Kansas Cancer Center, and Kansas Patients and Providers Engaged in Prevention Research, completed interviews in rural primary care and oncology practices. Results: Primary Care (n=7) and Oncology Practices (n=4): Interviews with primary care physicians, medical oncologists, advanced practice providers, nurses, tumor registrar, outreach coordinator, and office management & staff. Conclusions: Rural primary care and oncology practices experienced barriers to delivering survivorship care including: educational gaps, communication of history, treatment, and recommendations, EHR integration, and lack of resources. Next steps focus on a unified approach to state-wide survivorship education of patients, primary care and oncology practices. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document