Investigation of PD-L1 expression and response to pembrolizumab (pembro) in gastric cancer (GC) and cervical cancer (CC) using combined positive score (CPS) and tumor proportion score (TPS).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4065-4065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Kulangara ◽  
Lindsay Guerrero ◽  
Alex Posch ◽  
Scott Boyer ◽  
Debra Ann Hanks ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A68-A68
Author(s):  
Francisco Ponce ◽  
Stephanie Hund ◽  
Lindsay Peltz ◽  
Chris La Placa ◽  
Monika Vilardo ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe Combined Positive Score (CPS)1 algorithm includes tumor and immune cells for determination of Programed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression in tumor tissues and has been analytically and clinically validated for use with PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx across multiple indications and cutoffs.2 PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDx is a qualitative immunohistochemical assay using anti-PD-L1, Clone 22C3 to detect PD-L1 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues using Autostainer Link 48. PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx is FDA-approved as an aid in identifying patients for treatment with KEYTRUDA® for six tumor indications at clinically validated CPS diagnostic cutoffs2: gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GC/GEJ) adenocarcinoma (CPS ≥ 1), cervical cancer (CPS ≥ 1), urothelial carcinoma (CPS ≥ 10), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (CPS ≥ 1), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (CPS ≥ 10)3, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (CPS ≥ 10).MethodsPrecision of PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx using CPS was assessed for all six indications at the corresponding clinically validated diagnostic cutoffs and at additional exploratory cutoffs under normal, day-to-day testing conditions. Precision testing included Combined Precision (inter-instrument/operator/run (day)), Intra-Run Repeatability, and Observer (inter-/intra-) Scoring Reproducibility studies. FFPE specimens were stained with PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx and scored using CPS as described in the package insert.2 Four CPS cutoffs were evaluated: CPS ≥ 1 (GC/GEJ, urothelial carcinoma, ESCC, cervical cancer, HNSCC, TNBC), CPS ≥ 10 (GC/GEJ, urothelial carcinoma, ESCC, TNBC), CPS ≥ 20 (HNSCC), and CPS ≥ 50 (HNSCC). Data were analyzed using negative percent agreement (NPA), positive percent agreement (PPA), and overall agreement (OA) with two-sided 95% percentile bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) based on PD-L1 binary status at the applicable cutoff(s). For each study, data from each CPS cutoff-indication pair were individually analyzed. Meta-analyses were also performed by pooling data from all indications per (i) study and cutoff, and (ii) per study for all tested cutoffs.ResultsNearly all agreement analyses (142/144) for each CPS cutoff-indication pair showed NPA/PPA/OA point estimates (PE) ≥ 90% and CI lower bounds (CILB) ≥ 85%. Meta-analyses showed PE ≥ 90% for NPA/PPA/OA and CILB ≥ 85% per study and cutoff, and per study for all tested cutoffs. Discordant comparisons accounted for <5% of total comparisons performed for each study type.ConclusionsCPS used with PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx provides precise evaluation of PD-L1 expression across multiple tumor indications and cutoffs under normal, day-to-day testing conditions.AcknowledgementsWe thank the IUSCC Cancer Center at Indiana University School of Medicine, for the use of the Tissue Procurement and Distribution Core, which provided Dako North America, Inc. service.The data and biospecimens used in this project were provided by US Biolab (Gaithersburg, MD, USA), Sofia Bio LLC (New York, NY, USA), Contract Research Ltd (Charlestown, Nevis), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nice (Nice, France) with appropriate ethics approval and through Trans-Hit Biomarkers Inc. Tissue samples were provided by the Cooperative Human Tissue Network which is funded by the National Cancer Institute. Other investigators may have received specimens from the same subjects. Tissue samples supplied by BioIVT (Hicksville, NY, USA).Trial RegistrationN/AReferencesCPS = (# PD-L1 staining cells (tumor cells, lymphotcytes, macrophages))/(Total # viable tumor cells )×100PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx [Instructions for Use]. Available at: www.agilent.com/library/eifu. Code SK006. Accessed July 2, 2021ESCC was analytically validated as a subtype of esophageal cancer [2].Ethics ApprovalN/AConsentN/A


Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 218
Author(s):  
Hung-Yuan Yu ◽  
Chung-Pin Li ◽  
Yi-Hsiang Huang ◽  
Shao-Jung Hsu ◽  
Yen-Po Wang ◽  
...  

Immunotherapy benefits selected cases of gastric cancer (GC), but the correlation between biomarkers and prognosis is still unclear. Fifty-two patients with GC who underwent immunotherapy were enrolled from June 2016 to December 2020. Their clinical features and biomarkers—microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), and Epstein–Barr encoding region (EBER)—were analyzed. Eight patients had MSI-H, five patients had EBER, 29 patients had CPS ≥ 1, and 20 patients had no biomarker. The overall response rates (ORRs) of the MSI-H, EBER, PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1, and all-negative group were 75%, 60%, 44.8%, and 15%, respectively. Compared with that of the all-negative group, progression-free survival (PFS) was better in the MSI-H (p = 0.018), CPS ≥ 5 (p = 0.012), and CPS ≥ 10 (p = 0.006) groups, but not in the EBER (p = 0.2) and CPS ≥ 1 groups (p = 0.35). Ten patients had combined biomarkers, CPS ≥ 1 with either MSI-H or EBER. The ORRs were 66.7% for CPS ≥ 1 and MSI-H and 75% for CPS ≥ 1 and EBER. PFS was better in patients with combined biomarkers (p = 0.01). MSI-H, EBER, and CPS are useful biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1215
Author(s):  
Daisuke Takayanagi ◽  
Sou Hirose ◽  
Ikumi Kuno ◽  
Yuka Asami ◽  
Naoya Murakami ◽  
...  

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare and highly aggressive tumor with no efficient treatment. We examined genetic features of NECC and identified potential therapeutic targets. A total of 272 patients with cervical cancer (25 NECC, 180 squamous cell carcinoma, 53 adenocarcinoma, and 14 adenosquamous carcinoma) were enrolled. Somatic hotspot mutations in 50 cancer-related genes were detected using the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positivity was examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based testing and in situ hybridization assays. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was examined using immunohistochemistry. Somatic mutation data for 320 cases of cervical cancer from the Project GENIE database were also analyzed. NECC showed similar (PIK3CA, 32%; TP53, 24%) and distinct (SMAD4, 20%; RET, 16%; EGFR, 12%; APC, 12%) alterations compared with other histological types. The GENIE cohort had similar profiles and RB1 mutations in 27.6% of NECC cases. Eleven (44%) cases had at least one actionable mutation linked to molecular targeted therapies and 14 (56%) cases showed more than one combined positive score for PD-L1 expression. HPV-positivity was observed in all NECC cases with a predominance of HPV-18. We report specific gene mutation profiles for NECC, which can provide a basis for the development of novel therapeutic strategies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujun Park ◽  
Jiwon Koh ◽  
Hee Young Na ◽  
Yoonjin Kwak ◽  
Keun-Wook Lee ◽  
...  

Purpose We provide a comparison between 22C3 pharmDx and SP263 assay, for evaluating programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients.Materials and Methods The PD-L1 immunohistochemistry by 22C3 pharmDx and SP263 assays was performed in the center of the tumor (CT) and invasive margin (IM) in 379 GC tissues using tissue microarrays and interpreted as combined positive score (CPS) and tumor proportion score (TPS). Of the total samples, 55 samples were independently reviewed by five pathologists.Results The two assays showed a high correlation in both the CPS and TPS. At a CPS ≥ 1 cut-off, 219 (57.8%) and 231 (60.9%) GCs were positive for PD-L1 with the 22C3 and SP263 assays, and at ≥ 10 cut-off, 37 (9.8%) and 36 (9.5%) GCs were positive, respectively. The overall percent agreement (OPA) was greater than 90% with CPS ≥ 1 and ≥ 10 cut-offs, and TPS ≥ 1% and ≥ 10% cut-offs. There was higher OPA between the two assays with a CPS cut-off ≥ 10 (99.2%) than ≥ 1 (94.7%). The percent agreement between the CT and IM was higher with a CPS cut-off ≥ 10 (92.9%) than ≥ 1 (77.6%). Patient with positive expression at CPS ≥ 5 cut-off had a significantly better outcomes in both assays. Interobserver variability among five pathologists was higher than the assay variability.Conclusion Two assays for PD-L1 expression in GC showed high agreement. These results provide guidance for selecting eligible patients with GC for pembrolizumab treatment.


Pathology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. S48
Author(s):  
Lingkang Huang ◽  
Jared Lunceford ◽  
Junshui Ma ◽  
Kenneth Emancipator

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A308-A308
Author(s):  
Lingkang Huang ◽  
Jared Lunceford ◽  
Junshui Ma ◽  
Kenneth Emancipator

BackgroundPD-L1 is expressed on both tumor and immune cells; however, the mechanism by which PD-L1 modulates the adaptive immune response on tumor versus immune cells may differ. Additionally, the prevalence of PD-L1 expression and the partitioning between tumor and immune compartments varies by tumor type. While PD-L1 expression on tumor or immune cells can be scored separately, the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) captures both tumor and immune cell expression in one aggregate score. We performed a retrospective, exploratory analysis of the effectiveness of CPS as an enrichment biomarker across several studies of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with multiple tumor types.MethodsPD-L1 expression was assessed using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. Expression was measured using CPS (defined as the number of PD-L1–staining cells [tumor cells, lymphocytes, macrophages] divided by the total number of tumor cells, multiplied by 100) in tumor samples from single-arm (KEYNOTE-052 [UC], KEYNOTE-059 cohort 1 [G/GEJ], KEYNOTE-086 [TNBC], KEYNOTE-158 [cervical; SCLC], KEYNOTE-180 [EC], KEYNOTE-224 [HCC], KEYNOTE-427 [RCC]) and randomized (KEYNOTE-040 [HNSCC], KEYNOTE-045 [UC], KEYNOTE-061 [G/GEJ], KEYNOTE-119 [TNBC], KEYNOTE-240 [HCC]) pembrolizumab studies. Data were pooled across tumor types for pembrolizumab and for standard-of-care (in controlled studies), and then estimates of response rate, prevalence, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were performed over various CPS cutpoints. CPS distribution by response, tumor type, and line of therapy were also assessed.ResultsThere were 3769 treated patients with available PD-L1 CPS (pembrolizumab, n=2678; standard-of-care, n=1091). The area under the ROC curve for ORR was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.61–0.66) for pembrolizumab and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.43–0.53) for standard-of-care when a positive association was evaluated between CPS and ORR (figure 1); individual cutpoints of 1, 10, 20, and 50 were examined (table 1). Figure 2 shows a boxplot of CPS distribution for response in pembrolizumab-treated patients.Abstract 282 Table 1Response Rates and Sensitivity at Individual CPS Cutpoints for Pembrolizumab-Treated PatientsAbstract 282 Figure 1ROC analysis of PD-L1 CPS for pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care therapyAbstract 282 Figure 2Boxplot of PD-L1 CPS distribution for responders versus nonresponders in pembrolizumab-treated patients by tumor type and line of therapy in order of descending median CPSConclusionsThis retrospective, exploratory pan-tumor analysis demonstrates that CPS is an effective scoring method for measuring PD-L1 expression and can be used as a predictive biomarker to identify patients likely to respond to pembrolizumab monotherapy. CPS demonstrated enrichment of response to pembrolizumab monotherapy across most, but not all, tumor types, including some tumor types for which efficacy favors pembrolizumab regardless of PD-L1 expression, and for which a companion diagnostic is therefore not needed. In the randomized studies, CPS did not show a consistent association with ORR for standard-of-care therapy.


Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 404
Author(s):  
Ioan Alin Nechifor-Boilă ◽  
Andrada Loghin ◽  
Adela Nechifor-Boilă ◽  
Myriam Decaussin-Petrucci ◽  
Septimiu Voidăzan ◽  
...  

In the present study, we analyzed Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in radical cystectomy (RC) specimens from patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC), in order to assess any correlations with specific clinicopathological features and its potential prognostic value. A multi-institutional study was performed within the departments of urology and pathology at the Mureș County Hospital, Romania, and Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, France. Sixty-nine patients with MIBC were included, for whom tumor histology (conventional versus histological variant/differentiation), tumor extension (T), lymph node involvement (N), and distant metastases (M) were recorded. PD-L1 immunostaining was performed using the 22C3 clone and was interpreted using the combined positive score (CPS) as recommended (Dako Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Positive PD-L1 immunostaining was more prevalent among UCs with squamous differentiation compared to conventional UCs and trended towards an improved OS (p = 0.366). We found the T stage to be a risk factor for poor survival in PD-L1-positive patients (HR 2.9, p = 0.021), along with the N stage in PD-L1-negative patients (HR 1.98, p = 0.007). No other clinicopathological factor was found to be significantly associated with PD-L1 positivity. Thus, we confirm the need for PD-L1 immunostaining prior to initiating immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for a more accurate assessment of the patients’ chances of responding to treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kono ◽  
K Matsuda ◽  
R Machii ◽  
K Saika ◽  
H Takahashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) establishes screening recommendations specifying screening methods, age, and interval for gastric, colon, lung, breast, and cervical cancers. Screening programs are provided via local healthcare departments (LHD), who are responsible for managing programs and reporting the screening status through a survey annually. Methods We analyzed screening status provided by LHDs in fiscal 2017 in regards to appropriate screening age and interval. Briefly, current recommended screening age by MHLW is followed: colon, lung, breast cancer screening are age 40 years and older, and cervical cancer for aged 20 and older, and gastric cancer for aged 50 and older. Screening intervals are gastric, breast, and cervical cancer screening are two years, and colon and lung cancer screening are one year. Results The survey was completed by 1736 LHD (response rate: 99.9%). Regarding age-appropriate compliance, in cervical cancer, 96.4% of LHDs reported following recommended target age, while compliance was lower for lung, colon, breast, and gastric cancers at 79.4%, 75.7%, 60.2% and 4.2%, respectively. High compliance with recommendations for screening interval was identified for colon (99.7%) and lung (98.7%) cancers; this was substantially less for breast, cervical, and gastric cancer screening at 39.8%, 34.1%, and 4.6%, respectively. Conclusions In 2016, MLHW changed the starting screening age for gastric cancer from 40 to 50 years old, likely resulting in the lowest compliance in our analysis. Though it may take time for screening facilities to come into compliance with newer recommendations. Many LHDs provide screening without adhering to recommended starting ages, with a general tendency to provide screening at younger than recommended ages. This is a barrier to maximizing effectiveness and minimize harms of screening and warrants closer monitoring to promote efficiency in cancer screening programs. Key messages There is relatively low compliance with cancer screening guidelines in Japan. Establishing an environment of appropriate monitoring and support to achieve the goal of cancer screening is warranted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6000-6000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Rischin ◽  
Kevin J. Harrington ◽  
Richard Greil ◽  
Denis Soulieres ◽  
Makoto Tahara ◽  
...  

6000 Background: KEYNOTE-048 is a phase 3 study of P or P + chemo (C) vs EXTREME (E) as 1L therapy for R/M HNSCC (NCT02358031). At the second interim analysis (IA2), P significantly improved OS in the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥20 and ≥1 populations and had noninferior OS in the total population with favorable safety; P+C significantly improved OS in the total population with comparable safety. We present the protocol-specified final results. Methods: 882 pts with locally incurable R/M HNSCC and no prior systemic therapy in the R/M setting who provided a tumor sample for PD-L1 testing were randomized to P 200 mg Q3W for 24 mo (n = 301), P for 24 mo + 6 cycles of C (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5 Q3W + 5-FU 1000 mg/m2/d for 4 d Q3W) (n = 281), or E (cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading/250 mg/m2 QW + 6 cycles of chemo) (n = 300). OS superiority was tested sequentially for P+C vs E in the CPS ≥20 population, then the CPS ≥1 population, and for P vs E in the total population (superiority thresholds: one-sided P = .0023, .0026, and .0059, respectively). Data cutoff was 25 Feb 2019 (~25 mo after last pt randomized). Results: P+C significantly improved OS vs E in the CPS ≥20 (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.82, P = .0004; median 14.7 vs 11.0 mo) and CPS ≥1 (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.80, P < .0001; median 13.6 vs 10.4 mo) populations. HR (95% CI) for PFS was 0.76 (0.58-1.01) for CPS ≥20 and 0.84 (0.69-1.02) for CPS ≥1. ORR (P+C vs E) was 42.9% vs 38.2% for CPS ≥20 and 36.4% vs 35.7% for CPS ≥1; median DOR was 7.1 vs 4.2 mo and 6.7 vs 4.3 mo, respectively. P did not significantly improve OS vs E in the total population (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, P = .0199; median 11.5 vs 10.7 mo). HR (95% CI) for PFS was 1.29 (1.09-1.53). ORR (P vs E) was 16.9% vs 36.0%; median DOR was 22.6 vs 4.5 mo. All-cause gr 3-5 AE rates were 54.7% for P, 85.1% for P+C, and 83.3% for E. Conclusion: Overall, KEYNOTE-048 showed that compared with E, P+C had superior OS in the PD-L1 CPS ≥20, CPS ≥1, and total populations with comparable safety and P had superior OS in the CPS ≥20 and ≥1 populations, noninferior OS in the total population, and favorable safety. These results support pembrolizumab and pembrolizumab + platinum + 5-FU as new 1L standards of care for R/M HNSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02358031.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document