Age distribution of tumor gene expression in patients with stage II/III colon cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 552-552
Author(s):  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
Anna Lau ◽  
Michelle Turner ◽  
Christy Ann Russell

552 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality have been rising in the US among adults <55 y. Younger patients with CRC are more likely than older patients to receive postoperative systemic chemotherapy, despite lack of consensus on the prognostic value of age in this disease. CRC diagnosed in younger patients may be biologically different from that in older patients, but characteristics are unknown. Thus, we examined whether age-specific differences were measurable by tumor gene expression using the 12-gene Oncotype DX Colon Recurrence Score (RS) test (Genomic Health, Inc. [GHI]; Redwood City, CA). The Colon RS test is validated to predict risk of recurrence in patients with stage II/III colon cancer. Methods: We analyzed Colon RS test results and single-gene results for the 12 genes by age group (age <40, 40-54, 55-64, and ≥65) using data from the GHI clinical laboratory dated 1/2010 to 7/2017. Results: As of 7/2017, 21,925 Colon RS reports have been delivered. Median age was 63 y; 50% were male. About 23% of patients were <55 y (Table). Mean (SD) RS result was 25 (11). Colon RS result distributions were similar by age group (Table). Expression of individual tumor genes measured in the Colon RS test were also similar by age group (data to be presented). Conclusions: The etiology of the increase in both incidence and mortality from CRC in adults <55 y is poorly understood. Our findings suggest that colon cancer in younger patients is not biologically different from that in older patients, as measured by the Colon RS test in a large cohort referred for testing. As shown by this test in the GHI clinical laboratory experience, most patients with stage II/III colon cancer have low-risk disease, including patients <55 years. Our findings support a biology-driven approach to disease management of patients with stage II/III colon cancer regardless of age. This well-validated genomic assay may identify a group of younger patients for whom adjuvant chemotherapy might represent overtreatment. [Table: see text]

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (25) ◽  
pp. 3937-3944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. O'Connell ◽  
Ian Lavery ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Soonmyung Paik ◽  
Kim M. Clark-Langone ◽  
...  

Purpose These studies were conducted to determine the relationship between quantitative tumor gene expression and risk of cancer recurrence in patients with stage II or III colon cancer treated with surgery alone or surgery plus fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) to develop multigene algorithms to quantify the risk of recurrence as well as the likelihood of differential treatment benefit of FU/LV adjuvant chemotherapy for individual patients. Patients and Methods We performed quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) on RNA extracted from fixed, paraffin-embedded (FPE) tumor blocks from patients with stage II or III colon cancer who were treated with surgery alone (n = 270 from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project [NSABP] C-01/C-02 and n = 765 from Cleveland Clinic [CC]) or surgery plus FU/LV (n = 308 from NSABP C-04 and n = 508 from NSABP C-06). Overall, 761 candidate genes were studied in C-01/C-02 and C-04, and a subset of 375 genes was studied in CC/C-06. Results A combined analysis of the four studies identified 48 genes significantly associated with risk of recurrence and 66 genes significantly associated with FU/LV benefit (with four genes in common). Seven recurrence-risk genes, six FU/LV-benefit genes, and five reference genes were selected, and algorithms were developed to identify groups of patients with low, intermediate, and high likelihood of recurrence and benefit from FU/LV. Conclusion RT-qPCR of FPE colon cancer tissue applied to four large independent populations has been used to develop multigene algorithms for estimating recurrence risk and benefit from FU/LV. These algorithms are being independently validated, and their clinical utility is being evaluated in the Quick and Simple and Reliable (QUASAR) study.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 478-478
Author(s):  
Seamus Coyle ◽  
Zia Rehman ◽  
Chalen Lee ◽  
Sandra Deady ◽  
Harry Comber ◽  
...  

478 Background: Colon cancer is predominantly a disease of the elderly, with recent evidence supporting the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the older population. However, it remains unclear to what degree such patients are receiving adjuvant therapy in clinical practice. We examined uptake of adjuvantchemotherapy and it’s impact on survival in older patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer in a national cohort. Methods: Using the National cancer Registry of Ireland, we identified 3,486 patients with stage II and III colon cancer who were treated with curative resection from 2004-2009. Clinopathological features and chemotherapy use were compared between those ≥70 years and those < 70 years. Results: A total of 2,026 patients with stage II disease were identified, 56% male and 60% ≥ 70 years. T3 tumors accounted for 81%, T4 19% and 89% were grade 2/3. Adjuvant chemotherapy was utilized in 10% and 40% of ≥ 70 and <70 years, respectively (p<0.0001). A benefit for chemotherapy over observation alone was seen in both the older [HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.36 – 0.68; p <0.0001] and younger patient groups [HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.2701 - 0.6881; p<0.0004]. Of 1,460 patients with stage III disease, 51% were ≥ 70 years, 54% male. 34% of older and 83% of younger patients received adjuvant therapy (p<0.0001). A similar magnitude of benefit from chemotherapy compared to observation was seen in patients ≥ 70 years [HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.29 - 0.45 ; p <0.0001] and <70 years [HR 0.22 95%CI 0.1 – 0.2; p<0.0001] with stage III disease. Conclusions: Adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy appears to be associated with significant survival benefit in older patients (age ≥ 70 years), however, is still underutilized in clinical practice. The impact of sociodemographic and clinicopathological features as potential drivers of treatment decisions in a cohort of this population will be reported.


2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1170-1173
Author(s):  
George J Chang ◽  
Y Nancy Y You ◽  
Christy A Russell ◽  
Marni B Tierno ◽  
Michelle Turner ◽  
...  

Abstract The incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer in younger adults (younger than 55 years) is increasing. We reviewed the complete database of a gene-expression test, Oncotype DX Colon Recurrence Score test, to determine age-related differences in recurrence score (RS) and single-gene results (7 cancer-related of the 12-gene assay). We included 20 478 stage II and III A and B colon cancer patients submitted to Genomic Health. RS results were grouped by low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Single-gene scores were described using median and interquartile range. Of all patients 72.5% and 72.6% of those younger than 40 years had low-risk RS. Comparing older with younger patients, RS or single-gene expression did not differ by age group or stage. Young-onset colon cancer does not differ by expression of the RS component genes. Most patients with stage II and III colon cancer have low-risk disease as measured by the 12-gene assay, regardless of age.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Summer L. Cox ◽  
Amy I. Zlot ◽  
Kerry Silvey ◽  
Debi Elliott ◽  
Tara Horn ◽  
...  

Introduction. Appropriate use of genetic tests for population-based cancer screening, diagnosis of inherited cancers, and guidance of cancer treatment can improve health outcomes. We investigated clinicians’ use and knowledge of eight breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer genetic tests.Methods. We conducted a randomized survey of 2,191 Oregon providers, asking about their experience with fecal DNA, OncoVue,BRCA,MMR,CYP2D6, tumor gene expression profiling,UGT1A1, andKRAS.Results. Clinicians reported low confidence in their knowledge of medical genetics; most confident were OB-GYNs and specialists. Clinicians were more likely to have ordered/recommendedBRCAandMMRthan the other tests, and OB-GYNs were twice as likely to have ordered/recommendedBRCAtesting than primary care providers. Less than 10% of providers ordered/recommended OncoVue, fecal DNA,CYP2D6, orUGT1A1; less than 30% ordered/recommended tumor gene expression profiles orKRAS. The most common reason for not ordering/recommending these tests was lack of familiarity.Conclusions. Use of appropriate, evidence-based testing can help reduce incidence and mortality of certain cancers, but these tests need to be better integrated into clinical practice. Continued evaluation of emerging technologies, dissemination of findings, and an increase in provider confidence and knowledge are necessary to achieve this end.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. 2334-2339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joleen Hubbard ◽  
David M. Thomas ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Erin Green ◽  
Charles Blanke ◽  
...  

Purpose Limited data exist regarding the outcomes of adjuvant therapy in younger patients with stage II and III colon cancer. We examined disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), and grade 3+ adverse events (AEs) in younger patients in the 33,574 patient Adjuvant Colon Cancer Endpoints Group data set. Patients and Methods Individual patient data from 24 randomized phase III clinical trials were obtained for survival outcomes, which included 10 clinical trials for AE outcomes. Two age-based cutoff points were used to define younger patients: age younger than 40 years and younger than 50 years. Adjuvant therapy benefit analyses were limited to the nine clinical trials in which the investigational chemotherapeutic arm demonstrated benefit. Results One thousand seven hundred fifty-eight patients (5.2%) were younger than 40 years, 5,817 patients (17.3%) were younger than 50 years, and only 299 patients (0.9%) were younger than 30 years. No meaningful differences in sex or stage were noted in younger versus older patients. Younger and older patients did not differ in RFI (age, < 40 years: hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; P = .62 and age < 50 years: HR, 1.02; P = .35). Younger patients (both cutoff points), had longer OS and DFS than older patients. In trials demonstrating adjuvant therapy benefit, similar DFS benefit was observed by age. Younger patients experienced less leukopenia and stomatitis, but more frequent nausea/vomiting. Conclusion Among patients on clinical trials, younger and older patients with stage II and III colon cancer had similar RFI and adjuvant therapy benefit. Younger patients have longer OS and DFS, which is likely primarily because of fewer competing causes of death. Adjuvant therapy is beneficial for colon cancer in patients younger than 50 years who meet typical clinical trial eligibility criteria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document