Molecular profiling (MP) for malignancies: Knowledge gaps and variable practice patterns among United States oncologists (Onc).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10510-10510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhavana Pendurthi Singh ◽  
Susan Lynne Britton ◽  
Petra Prins ◽  
Chao Yin ◽  
Maria L. Lankford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Audience Response ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Molecular Alteration ◽  
Molecular Alterations ◽  
The Us ◽  
Academic Practices

10510 Background: Clinically impactful therapies for malignancies require the identification of specific molecular alterations. Onc must be aware of these targets and how to interpret them to provide optimum care. The use of MP has become the standard of care for many cancers, and is recently FDA approved. Using 2 data sets, we assessed the current awareness and incorporation of MP in the treatment of cancer; comparing data from community based Onc (C) to academic Onc (A). Methods: C consisted of 292 physicians polled using an audience response system during 6 case-based research events across the US. Questions focused on various aspects of molecular testing. Data for A was obtained from a chart review focused on timing and extent of MP in disease specific academic practices (lung, breast, GI) (N = 59). Results: Within C, 257 (88%) were Onc from community-based practices. The frequency at which Onc ordered MP significantly varied depending on tumor type; 33% in lung cancer (LC), 18% in colorectal cancer (CRC) and less commonly in breast cancer (BC) (8%). In A, MP was ordered more frequently; 74% in LC, 27% in CRC and 0% in BC. These results reflect a gap in practice among community versus academic Onc, as C had lower utilization of MP for both LC and CRC. In C, Onc were also asked to match the molecular alteration with the appropriate targeted therapy. Onc incorrectly matched the molecular alteration to the targeted therapy or marked unknown in up to 69%. This reflects a large knowledge gap among community Onc with regards to the correct application of MP to currently FDA approved targeted therapies. Conclusions: Given the significant knowledge and practice gap, we conclude there is an urgent need for focused educational activities that facilitate improved knowledge of MP and corresponding personalized therapeutic strategies for Onc in the US.

Reanalysis of the efficacy of molecular targeted agents (MTAs) given in the randomized trial SHIVA01 according to the ESMO ESCAT scale of actionability.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14750-e14750
Author(s):  
Aurelie Moreira ◽  
Sophie Vacher ◽  
Claire Morel ◽  
Charlotte Lecerf ◽  
Maxime Frelaut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Molecular Alteration ◽  
Molecular Alterations ◽  
Tier Ii

e14750 Background: SIVHA01 was the first randomized precision medicine trial in patients (pts) with metastatic solid tumors comparing the efficacy of matched MTA outside their indications and conventional chemotherapy in pts with any kind of cancer who had failed standard of care therapy (Le Tourneau et al., Lancet Oncol 2015). No statistical difference was reported between the 2 groups in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), challenging the treatment algorithm used. Several scales of actionability have been developed to address this point, the latest one being the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) that defines clinical evidence-based criteria to prioritize genomic alterations to select MTAs for pts (Mateo et al., Ann Oncol 2018). We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of MTAs given in SHIVA01 according to ESCAT. Methods: All SHIVA01 molecular alterations targeted were ranked according to ESCAT by assessing the level of evidence reported in the literature, taking into account the tumor type and the administered MTA among 11. PFS and overall survival (OS) according to the ESCAT rank were compared using a log-rank test. Results: The 153 pts treated with a MTA in SHIVA01 were included. Molecular alterations were ranked as II, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA according to ESCAT in 38 (25%), 98 (64%), 7 (5%), and 10 pts (7%), respectively. Median PFS was 2.0 months (mo) in tier II, 3.1 mo in IIIA; 1.7 mo in IIIB, and 3.2 mo in IVA (p = 0.13). Median OS was 11.7 mo in tier II, 11.2 mo in IIIA, 6.3 mo in IIIB, and 12.1 mo in IVA (p = 0.002). Conclusions: The majority of molecular alterations taken into account in SHIVA01 were tier IIIA hypothetical targets according to ESCAT. Pts with a tier IIIB molecular alteration had the worst survival, highlighting the crucial impact of the types of molecular alterations beyond the gene and the signaling pathway.

scholarly journals Molecular Targets for Gastric Cancer Treatment and Future Perspectives from a Clinical and Translational Point of View

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 5216
Author(s):  
Justus Körfer ◽  
Florian Lordick ◽  
Ulrich T. Hacker
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Molecular Characterization ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Molecular Alterations ◽  
Definition Of

Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Systemic treatment comprising chemotherapy and targeted therapy is the standard of care in advanced/metastatic gastric cancer. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinomas by the TCGA Consortium and ACRG has resulted in the definition of distinct molecular subtypes. These efforts have in parallel built a basis for the development of novel molecularly stratified treatment approaches. Based on this molecular characterization, an increasing number of specific genomic alterations can potentially serve as treatment targets. Consequently, the development of promising compounds is ongoing. In this review, key molecular alterations in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers will be addressed. Finally, the current status of the translation of targeted therapy towards clinical applications will be reviewed.

Targeted therapy for gastrointestinaI (GI) tumors based on molecular profiles: Early results from MyPathway, an open-label phase IIa basket study in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 653-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Hurwitz ◽  
John D. Hainsworth ◽  
Charles Swanton ◽  
Edith A. Perez ◽  
Christopher Sweeney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Early Response ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Molecular Alterations ◽  
Response Data ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Open Label Phase

653 Background: Next-generation sequencing often reveals potentially actionable molecular alterations; however, data on approved targeted therapies in non-indicated tumors are limited. MyPathway (NCT02091141) evaluates agents targeting the HER2, EGFR, BRAF, or Hedgehog (Hh) pathways in tumors for which these therapies are not currently indicated. Here, we present early response data for patients with GI tumors. Methods: Eligible patients had metastatic tumors with potentially actionable genomic alterations, identified by a CLIA-certified lab, and progression on standard therapy. Based on the identified alteration, patients received standard doses of trastuzumab + pertuzumab (HER2), erlotinib (EGFR), vemurafenib (BRAF), or vismodegib (Hh). Response was evaluated by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. Results: As of Aug 21, 2015, 96 patients had enrolled, 36 of whom (38%) had GI tumors with the following alterations: HER2 (n=28 [22 amplifications, 5 activating mutations, 1 both]), BRAF (n=4), Hh (n=2 [2 PTCH-1 mutations]), and EGFR (n=2). Patients had a median of 4 (range, 1–8) prior lines of therapy. Tumor types and interim best response data are shown below. Among all evaluable patients with GI tumors (n=26), 5 have had a PR to targeted therapy (duration 3–10+ months). Conclusions: Targetable molecular alterations were found in a variety of GI tumors, resulting in clinical benefit from targeted treatments that would not have otherwise been realized. These early results support this molecular testing strategy. Accrual to the trial continues; based on activity observed, the HER2-positive colorectal cancer cohort will be expanded to ≥30 patients. Additional data will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02091141. [Table: see text]

Clinical utility of molecular testing to select therapy in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine experience.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11571-11571
Author(s):  
Nabila Nora Bennani ◽  
Stephen Maxted Ansell ◽  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
Andew L. Feldman ◽  
Tammy M McAllister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Precision Medicine ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Individualized Medicine ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Current Therapy ◽  
Molecular Profile ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Molecular Alterations

11571 Background: Relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) have a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. Our expanding knowledge of molecular alterations seen in R/R NHL allows identification of patients that potentially may benefit from a precision medicine approach. However, experience in routine clinical implementation of precision medicine has been limited. Here, we summarize our clinical experience in molecular characterization of RR NHL targeted therapy (TT) using next-generation sequencing (NGS), and selection of targeted therapy (TT) based on molecular profile. Methods: We conducted a prospective study in RR NHL through the Center for Individualized Medicine at Mayo Clinic. Consenting patients underwent NGS using FoundationOne Heme panel from biopsies done at time of relapse. Results of NGS were discussed at the Genomic Tumor Board and recommendations for TT were given based on matching specific molecular alteration(s) with potential agent(s) predicted to be active based on NGS. The agents could include FDA-approved, off-label use and clinical trial therapies. Results: 28 cases were enrolled: 18 aggressive NHL, 10 follicular lymphoma (FL). Molecular alterations were present in all cases. In aggressive B-cell NHL, CDKN2A/B gene cluster alterations were seen in 73% (8/11), while seen in only 1/7 T-cell lymphomas (TCL), and 1/10 FL. TP53 deletions were second most common genomic alterations in DLBCL (57%) and seen in 40% FL. JAK-STAT and ERBB pathways were altered in TCL (2/7 each). IGH-BCl-2 gene rearrangement were common in FL (70%), followed by MLL gene alterations (50%). Targetable mutations were present in 86% (24/28) of cases. A TT was recommended in all 24 cases, but received by 2 patients only. Remaining patients did not due to benefit from current therapy (10/24), ineligibility or lack of clinical trial (7/24) or interim clinical deterioration (5/24). Conclusions: Targetable mutations were identified in most cases of RR NHL with TT recommended for all cases. However, access to TT limits potential clinical benefit of molecular-based matching strategy. More studies are needed to assess impact on clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals The role of targeted therapy in the management of patients with AML

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (24) ◽  
pp. 2281-2294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Perl
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Drug Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
The Us ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Drug therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is finally undergoing major changes in 2017. This is due to the US Food and Drug Administration’s approval of several new, targeted agents (midostaurin, enasidenib, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin). Paired with the recent approval of a novel liposomal formulation of daunorubicin/cytarabine (CPX-351/Vyxeos), the standard of care is changing rapidly in AML for subgroups. This review will focus on currently approved agents and promising novel agents in development and will highlight controversial areas in targeted treatment.

scholarly journals Molecular Characterization of Ovarian Yolk Sac Tumor (OYST)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalil Hodroj ◽  
Aleksandra Stevovic ◽  
Valery Attignon ◽  
Domenico Ferraioli ◽  
Pierre Meeus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Analysis ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Yolk Sac ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Molecular Alteration ◽  
Molecular Alterations

Most malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGTCs) have a very good prognosis and can be cured by chemotherapy, with yolk sac tumors (OYSTs) having the worse prognosis among MOGCTs. These tumors are rare and can benefit in the next future from specific therapeutic strategies after failure of platinum-based first-line and salvage regimens. In collaboration with EORTC SPECTA, we have developed a project to explore the molecular characteristics of OYST. The pilot part of the project was performed using retrospective samples and ten OYST patients including relapsed and disease free patients. The molecular analysis was performed using FoundationOne CDx. For each patient, the following variables are described in the molecular report provided by FMI (Fondation Medicine Incorporation): alteration type (SNV, deletion), actionable gene alteration, therapies approved in EU (patient's tumor type and other tumor types), tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. A total of 10 patients with OYST diagnosed between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed. Four patients (40%) had a molecular alteration, according to the FMI test. A subset of three patients (33.3% of all patient) harbored targetable (KRAS, KIT, ARID1A) oncogenic mutations. Two patients at relapse harbored a targetable mutation. In this retrospective study, we were able to identify clinically relevant molecular alterations for all relapsed patients with molecular analysis. Dedicated studies are needed to demonstrate if they could benefit from specific therapeutic strategies after failure of platinum-based first-line and salvage regimens and if the presence of a molecular alteration could be linked to patients’ outcome.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer: Identification of molecular alterations and analysis of associations with treatment on phase I studies at MD Anderson Cancer Center.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1051-1051
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Wheler ◽  
Roman Yelensky ◽  
Stacy L. Moulder ◽  
Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou ◽  
Gerald Steven Falchook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Molecular Alteration ◽  
Molecular Alterations ◽  
Md Anderson

1051 Background: Matching molecular alterations in patients with breast cancer to targeted therapy may increase response rates. Methods: We analyzed 22 sequential breast cancer patients with next generation sequencing (NGS) profiling of their tumors profiling (FoundationOne) treated on Phase I trials at the Clinical Center for Targeted Therapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Objectives included: (1) characterize molecular alterations including mutations, amplifications and deletions, (2) evaluate associations between molecular alterations and response to therapy. Results: Twenty-two breast cancer patients, all female with median age 56 years were included. Twenty-one of 22 of patients (95%) analyzed demonstrated at least one molecular alteration. Twenty-one of 22 patients were evaluable for response to therapy (1 patient had not yet reached restaging). Sixteen patients were treated on Phase I trials with targeted therapy that was either directly or indirectly associated with a molecular alteration. Seven of these 16 patients (44%) achieved stable disease (SD) ≥6 months/partial response (PR)/complete response (CR) including 3 patients with PR and 1 patient with CR. Examples of molecular alterations include: mutations in PIK3CA (8 patients), PIK3R1 (2 patients), PTEN (1 patient), cMET (1 patient), NF1 (one patient); amplifications in CCND1 (8 patients), FGFR1 (4 patients), MYC (3 patients), MCL1 (3 patients), IRS2 (2 patients) and CCNE1(1 patient). Conclusions: A majority of patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose tumors underwent NGS profiling demonstrated molecular alterations. Of the 9 patients who had either SD≥6 months/PR/CR on Phase I treatment, 7 (78%) had molecular alterations, either directly or indirectly associated with therapy. Further investigation of larger cohorts of patients with NGS is ongoing.

scholarly journals The role of targeted therapy in the management of patients with AML

Hematology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Perl
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Drug Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
The Us ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractDrug therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is finally undergoing major changes in 2017. This is due to the US Food and Drug Administration’s approval of several new, targeted agents (midostaurin, enasidenib, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin). Paired with the recent approval of a novel liposomal formulation of daunorubicin/cytarabine (CPX-351/Vyxeos), the standard of care is changing rapidly in AML for subgroups. This review will focus on currently approved agents and promising novel agents in development and will highlight controversial areas in targeted treatment.

Treatment of venous leg ulcers using bilayered living cellular construct

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (13) ◽  
pp. 907-918
Author(s):  
Aseel Bin Sawad ◽  
Fatema Turkistani
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare System ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Psychological Status ◽  
Leg Ulcers ◽  
Venous Leg Ulcers ◽  
Time Period ◽  
The Us ◽  
Economic Analyses

Background: Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) present a significant economic burden on the US healthcare system and payers (US$14.9 billion). Aim: To evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of patients with VLUs; to analyze the limitations of standard of care (SOC) for VLUs; and to explain how using bilayered living cellular construct (BLCC) with SOC for treatment of VLUs can help heal more VLUs faster (than using SOC alone) as well as help improve QoL and help reduce the burden on the US healthcare system and payers. Materials & methods: This is a review study. The search was conducted in February 2020 by way of electronic databases to find relevant articles that provided information related to QoL of patients with VLUs, limitations of SOC for VLUs and economic analyses of using BLCC for treatment of VLUs. Results: VLUs impact patients’ physical, functional and psychological status and reduce QoL. A total 75% of VLU patients who used SOC alone failed to achieve healing in a timely fashion, which led to increased healthcare costs and healthcare resource utilization. Although the upfront cost is high, the greater effectiveness of BLCC offsets the added cost of the product during the time period of the studies. Therefore, BLCC helps to improve the QoL of VLU patients. As an example, for every 100 VLU patients in a healthcare plan, the use of BLCC can create cost savings of US$1,349,829.51. Conclusion: Payers’ coverage of BLCC results in reduction of the overall medical cost for treating VLU patients.

282 Pan-tumor analysis of the association between PD-L1 combined positive score and response to pembrolizumab monotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A308-A308
Author(s):  
Lingkang Huang ◽  
Jared Lunceford ◽  
Junshui Ma ◽  
Kenneth Emancipator
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Positive Score ◽  
Combined Positive Score ◽  
Line Of Therapy ◽  
Tumor Types

BackgroundPD-L1 is expressed on both tumor and immune cells; however, the mechanism by which PD-L1 modulates the adaptive immune response on tumor versus immune cells may differ. Additionally, the prevalence of PD-L1 expression and the partitioning between tumor and immune compartments varies by tumor type. While PD-L1 expression on tumor or immune cells can be scored separately, the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) captures both tumor and immune cell expression in one aggregate score. We performed a retrospective, exploratory analysis of the effectiveness of CPS as an enrichment biomarker across several studies of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with multiple tumor types.MethodsPD-L1 expression was assessed using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. Expression was measured using CPS (defined as the number of PD-L1–staining cells [tumor cells, lymphocytes, macrophages] divided by the total number of tumor cells, multiplied by 100) in tumor samples from single-arm (KEYNOTE-052 [UC], KEYNOTE-059 cohort 1 [G/GEJ], KEYNOTE-086 [TNBC], KEYNOTE-158 [cervical; SCLC], KEYNOTE-180 [EC], KEYNOTE-224 [HCC], KEYNOTE-427 [RCC]) and randomized (KEYNOTE-040 [HNSCC], KEYNOTE-045 [UC], KEYNOTE-061 [G/GEJ], KEYNOTE-119 [TNBC], KEYNOTE-240 [HCC]) pembrolizumab studies. Data were pooled across tumor types for pembrolizumab and for standard-of-care (in controlled studies), and then estimates of response rate, prevalence, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were performed over various CPS cutpoints. CPS distribution by response, tumor type, and line of therapy were also assessed.ResultsThere were 3769 treated patients with available PD-L1 CPS (pembrolizumab, n=2678; standard-of-care, n=1091). The area under the ROC curve for ORR was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.61–0.66) for pembrolizumab and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.43–0.53) for standard-of-care when a positive association was evaluated between CPS and ORR (figure 1); individual cutpoints of 1, 10, 20, and 50 were examined (table 1). Figure 2 shows a boxplot of CPS distribution for response in pembrolizumab-treated patients.Abstract 282 Table 1Response Rates and Sensitivity at Individual CPS Cutpoints for Pembrolizumab-Treated PatientsAbstract 282 Figure 1ROC analysis of PD-L1 CPS for pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care therapyAbstract 282 Figure 2Boxplot of PD-L1 CPS distribution for responders versus nonresponders in pembrolizumab-treated patients by tumor type and line of therapy in order of descending median CPSConclusionsThis retrospective, exploratory pan-tumor analysis demonstrates that CPS is an effective scoring method for measuring PD-L1 expression and can be used as a predictive biomarker to identify patients likely to respond to pembrolizumab monotherapy. CPS demonstrated enrichment of response to pembrolizumab monotherapy across most, but not all, tumor types, including some tumor types for which efficacy favors pembrolizumab regardless of PD-L1 expression, and for which a companion diagnostic is therefore not needed. In the randomized studies, CPS did not show a consistent association with ORR for standard-of-care therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document