Phase 1b/2 study of enzalutamide (ENZ) with LY3023414 (LY) or placebo (PL) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after progression on abiraterone.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5009-5009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Sweeney ◽  
Ivor John Percent ◽  
Sunil Babu ◽  
Jennifer Cultrera ◽  
Bryan Allyn Mehlhaff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
P Value ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase 1B

5009 Background: Preclinical and phase 1 results suggest PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition may enhance androgen receptor inhibition. We report the results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 1b/2 study of ENZ±LY (a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor) in pts with mCRPC who progressed on abiraterone. Methods: Phase 1b pts received single-agent LY 200 mg twice daily (BID) for 1 wk prior to starting LY+ENZ. Phase 2 pts were randomized 1:1 to 160 mg daily ENZ with PL or 200 mg BID LY on a 28-d cycle. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS: serological, radiographic [rPFS], or death) by PCWG2 criteria. Secondary objectives were rPFS, safety, decline in PSA, and PK. Exploratory biomarker analyses included outcomes by presence of androgen receptor variant 7 (AR-V7). 92 primary PFS events were needed for the study to have at least 80% power at one-sided alpha=0.20. Results: LY+ENZ was tolerable during Phase 1b with 1 dose limiting toxicity observed in 13 enrolled pts. Mean LY exposures remained in an efficacious range despite a 30% average decrease when combined with ENZ. In Phase 2, 129 pts were randomized to LY+ENZ (N=65) and PL+ENZ (N=64) (Table). Median PCWG2-PFS was 3.7 mos (LY+ENZ) vs 2.9 mos (PL+ENZ) (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.43, 0.99; p-value 0.0208). Conclusions: Combination LY+ENZ had a clinically manageable safety profile. The primary end-point of PCWG2-PFS was met and is supported by a clinically meaningful delay in rPFS in AR-V7 negative pts. The biomarker data provide important insights to inform future development strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT02407054. [Table: see text]

Results from a phase 2 trial of bortezomib (B) and sorafenib (S) in unresectable or metastatic renal cell cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 495-495
Author(s):  
Richard C. Lauer ◽  
Ian Rabinowitz ◽  
Terry Novak ◽  
Martin J. Edelman
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Cancer ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor

495 Background: B is a small molecule proteasome inhibitor that affects multiple signaling pathways. S is an orally active multikinase inhibitor with known activity in renal cell cancer. In vitro data has shown that S and B interact synergistically in a number of neoplastic cell lines to cause apoptosis. A phase 1 trial of S and B demonstrated no unexpected toxicities. We now report the results of this phase 2 efficacy trial. Methods: Eligibility included cytologically confirmed clear cell cancer with no prior chemotherapy, PS 0-1, Cr < 1.5 mg/dl, normal LFTs. Regimen: S 200 mg PO BID and B 1mg/m2 IV days 1,4,8, & 11 every 21 days. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective of the study was to achieve a PFS of 70 weeks. Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled between April of 2011 and January of 2013. Median age was 62y (range 44-75). Four of 17 patients had known brain metastasis on entry to the trial. Median number of cycles = 4 (range 1-45+). Response: CR/PR/SD/PD =0/1/12/4 (RR: 6%, 95% CI = 0%, 29%) Median progression free survival was 13.7 weeks; median overall survival was 110 weeks Toxicity: See table. Only 1 pts. treatment was stopped due to an AE of pancreatitis. There were no toxic deaths. The study was halted for futility. Conclusions: 1.The combination of S and B was well tolerated. 2. The RR of 6% and PFS of 13.7 weeks is not superior to S as a single agent. 3. The combination of SB is not recommended for further development. Clinical trial information: NCT 01100242.

A multicenter, randomized phase 1b/2 study of gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without CPI-613 as first-line therapy for patients with advanced unresectable biliary tract cancer (BilT-04).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4158-TPS4158
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Sahai ◽  
Amy E. Chang ◽  
Oxana V. Crysler ◽  
David Bing Zhen ◽  
Muhammad Shaalan Beg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Gemcitabine And Cisplatin

TPS4158 Background: Patients (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) have poor prognosis despite systemic chemotherapy. Gemcitabine and cisplatin is a standard first-line systemic therapy with an overall response rate (ORR) of 26% and a median overall survival of 11.7 months. This investigator-initiated, multi-institutional phase 1b/2 trial is designed to investigate the role of gemcitabine, cisplatin and CPI-613 in pts with advanced BTC. CPI-613 is a stable intermediate of a lipoate analog that inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase and a-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase enzymes of the tricarboxylic (TCA) cycle preferentially within the mitochondria of cancer cells. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed, metastatic or unresectable BTC (intra- or extra-hepatic and gallbladder) without prior systemic treatment, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and ECOG PS 0-1. Primary objective of the phase 1b portion (n = 20 pts; TiTE-CRM methodology) is to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of the combination, and for the phase 2 portion, ORR (n = 48-58 pts; 2:1 randomization). Assuming a null hypothesis ORR of 25% and an alternative hypothesis of 43%, this ongoing trial has at least 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to identify treatment efficacy of the study arm. Secondary objectives include evaluation of progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety in this patient population. Exploratory objectives include identification of molecular markers of response and resistance in tumor samples and serially collected blood (pre-, on-, and post-therapy), including whole exome/transcriptomic analysis, and immunohistochemical staining (PDK, PDH, KGDH, SOD2 and CD79a). Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 with or without CPI-613 (dose levels: 500 mg/m2, 1000 mg/m2, 1500 mg/m2, and 2000 mg/m2) will be given IV on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. In the absence of disease progression, pts may continue therapy for up to 2 years. Total accrual goal is 68-78 evaluable pts. To date, 5 of planned 20 pts enrolled on the phase 1b portion are without dose limiting toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT04203160.

VERU-111, an oral cytoskeleton disruptor, to treat men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who failed an androgen receptor targeting agent.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5056-5056
Author(s):  
Mark Christopher Markowski ◽  
Ronald F. Tutrone ◽  
Mario A. Eisenberger ◽  
Christopher Michael Pieczonka ◽  
Robert H. Getzenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Multidrug Resistance Proteins ◽  
Receptor Targeting ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Moderate Nausea

5056 Background: VERU-111 is an oral cytoskeletal disruptor that disrupts microtubules supporting the cytoskeleton and has no affinity for multidrug resistance proteins. A phase 1b/2 clinical study has been conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the preliminary efficacy in men with mCRPC also resistant to androgen receptor targeting agents. Methods: In the phase 1b component of the study, a 3+3 design with escalating oral dosing of 4.5 mg to 81 mg (7 days on drug/14 days off per 21-day cycle) was utilized. The schedule was also expanded to continuous dosing/cycle. The phase 2 portion utilized 63 mg daily dosing to evaluate efficacy in approximately 40 taxane-naïve men with mCRPC that have failed at least one androgen receptor targeting agent. Results: In the phase 1b portion of the study, 30 taxane-naïve men with mCRPC and a median age of 76 (61-92) were enrolled. 8 had received prior enzalutamide, 12 abiraterone and 10 both. 8 men had bone mets, 5 lymph node, 5 mixed and 1 had soft tissue metastases at study entry. The MTD of VERU-111 is 72mg (3/11 men had grade 3 diarrhea) and the recommended phase 2 dose is 63mg. Grade 3 diarrhea was not observed at doses ≤ 63mg per day and the most common non-dose limiting AEs were mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue, with no observed neurotoxicity or neutropenia. Efficacy was assessed by PSA and bone/CT scans. In men treated for ≥ 4 continuous 21-day cycles, 6/10 (60%) had PSA declines, 4(40%) men had ≥ 30% declines and 2(20%) ≥ 50% declines compared to their 21-day cycle baseline PSA. Median PFS is currently 12 months (6-23+ months) with 3 patients continuing on study, 2 of which have been on study for approximately 2 years. In patients receiving at least a single dose of ≥ 63 mg daily (n=19), objective tumor responses were seen in 3 men (16%). The median rPFS in these patients is currently 12.4 months. In the phase 2 portion of the study, 55% of the patients had bone only metastases, 11% had nodal only, 32% had mixed bone and nodal disease and 3% had visceral disease at study entry. 6/32 (19%) were previously treated with abiraterone alone, 12/32 (38%) with enzalutamide alone, and 14/32 (44%) had abiraterone in combination with enzalutamide, proxalutamide or apalutamide. The phase 2 portion of the study is ongoing and objective tumor responses have been observed including a CR and PRs and PSA decreases >50%. Patients have been on study as long as 9 months. Conclusions: This phase 1b/2 clinical trial, demonstrates that oral daily dosing of VERU-111 has a favorable safety profile and that chronic dosing is feasible. The recommended phase 2 dose of 63mg daily has significant durable antitumor activity. These data support a potential prominent role of VERU 111 for the treatment of men with mCRPC who previously failed an androgen receptor targeting agent and prior to the administration of intravenous chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03752099.

A multicenter phase I study of cabazitaxel, mitoxantrone, and prednisone for chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 202-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mallika Sachdev Dhawan ◽  
Mina Lee ◽  
Alan H. Bryce ◽  
Vivian K. Weinberg ◽  
Charles J. Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Number Of Treatment

202 Background: Cabazitaxel and prednisone (Cbz/pred) extend survival in mCRPC patients (pts) following docetaxel and first-line studies comparing Cbz to docetaxel are ongoing. Mito/pred also has anti-tumor activity in mCRPC and a non-overlapping mechanism of action and toxicity profile with Cbz. A multicenter phase 1 trial was initiated to establish the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of Cbz, Mito, and Pred(CAMP). Methods: Chemotherapy (chemo)-naive pts with mCRPC were enrolled in an accelerated titration design. The primary objective was to determine the MTD and RP2D of CAMP; secondary objectives included PSA response rate and duration of response. Cbz 20 and 25 mg/m2 were evaluated in combination with escalating doses of Mito (starting dose 4 mg/m2), both administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Pred 5 mg BID and pegfilgrastim were given with each cycle. Results: 23 pts were enrolled. The median age was 66 (range 51-78) and the median baseline PSA was 62.5 (range 3-791.2). There were 2 DLTs (sepsis and febrile neutropenia) observed at the dose level of Cbz 25 mg/m2 + Mito 10 mg/m2 (n = 4). There was 1 DLT (febrile neutropenia) observed with Cbz 20 mg/m2 (N = 12), establishing Cbz 20 mg/m2 + Mito 12 mg/m2 as the MTD and RP2D. The most common grade ³ 3 related adverse events were hematologic (neutropenia, n = 9; thrombocytopenia, n = 3; febrile neutropenia, n = 3). The median number of treatment cycles was 7.5 (range 2-16), and 2 pts remain on study. Greater than or equal to 50% maximal PSA declines from baseline were observed in 12 of 19 evaluable pts(63%). The median duration of response has not been reached (range 4.9-10.0+ months). Conclusions: The approved single-agent dose of Mito (12 mg/m2) was safely combined with Cbz 20 mg/m2, a dose with demonstrated activity in mCRPC and potentially less hematologic toxicity than 25 mg/m2. Preliminary efficacy data are encouraging with durable control of disease observed in a subset of pts. Further study of the treatment combination is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01594918.

A phase 2 trial of lenvatinib 18 mg versus 14 mg once daily (QD) in combination with everolimus (5 mg QD) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after 1 prior VEGF-targeted treatment.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS707-TPS707
Author(s):  
Hilary Glen ◽  
Javier Puente ◽  
Daniel Yick Chin Heng ◽  
Sun Young Rha ◽  
Di Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3

TPS707 Background: Based on findings from a randomized phase 2 study (Study 205), lenvatinib (LEN) + everolimus (EVE) was approved in the United States and European Union for patients (pts) with advanced RCC following 1 prior anti-angiogenic therapy. In that study, LEN 18 mg QD + EVE 5 mg QD significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with either monotherapy. In the LEN+EVE cohort, grades 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 71% of pts. We report the design of an ongoing, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 study (Study 218) to evaluate if a lower LEN starting dosage regimen provides similar efficacy with a better safety profile than LEN 18 mg + EVE 5 mg (NCT03173560). Methods: Eligible pts are aged ≥ 18 years with advanced clear cell RCC, 1 prior anti-VEGF therapy, ≥ 1 measurable target lesion per RECIST 1.1, a KPS score of ≥ 70, and prior nivolumab is allowed. Pts will receive LEN 18 mg or 14 mg QD + EVE 5 mg QD in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The LEN 14-mg dose will be escalated to 18 mg if no intolerable grade 2, or any grade ≥ 3 TEAEs requiring dose reduction occur in cycle 1. The primary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR) at week 24 (ORR24W) and the proportion of pts with intolerable grade 2 and any grade ≥ 3 TEAEs within 24 wks after randomization. Secondary endpoints include PFS and ORR. An estimated 306 pts will be randomized. Sample size is based on detecting noninferiority (NI) of ORR24W and superiority of the primary safety endpoint. Two interim analyses (IA) will be performed when 150 and 200 pts have completed 24 wks of follow-up or discontinue earlier. Each analysis will test NI and futility of the LEN 14-mg arm ORR24W vs the 18-mg arm ORR24W. An O’Brien-Fleming boundary will be used for NI. If the 1-sided P-value is ≤ 0.005 at the first IA, ≤ 0.014 at the second IA, or ≤ 0.045 at the final analysis, then NI in ORR24W will be claimed. If the futility boundary is crossed (ie, 1-sided P-value is ≥ 0.776 at the first IA or ≥ 0.207 at the second IA), then futility will be claimed. Clinical trial information: NCT03173560.

Initial results of a phase III investigation of safety/efficacy of nivolumab and ABI-009 (nab-sirolimus) in advanced undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), liposarcoma (LPS), chondrosarcoma (CS), osteosarcoma (OS), and Ewing sarcoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21-21
Author(s):  
Victoria S. Chua-Alcala ◽  
Katherine Kim ◽  
Nupur Assudani ◽  
Ahmad Al-Shihabi ◽  
Doris Quon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ewing Sarcoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma ◽  
Pleomorphic Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3

21 Background: Objectives: (1) To investigate the MTD of ABI-009 when given with nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in previously treated advanced undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, liposarcoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma; (2) To investigate the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of this combination therapy in the above mentioned patient group, and (3) To correlate PFS with PD-L1 and other biomarker expression in patients’ tumors. Methods: This is an IRB approved protocol with 2 parts. The Phase 1 part is a dose-finding study using the “cohort of three design”, wherein standard doses of nivolumab 240 mg is given iv every 3 weeks (Day 1 of every 21-day Cycle). ABI-009 will be given IV on Days 8 and 15 of each cycle starting on Cycle 2 following the 2nd nivolumab dose. The starting dose of ABI-009 is 56 mg/m2, and sequentially escalating doses are 75, and 100 mg/m2. The Phase 2 part of study will enroll 31 additional patients to further assess efficacy and safety at the MTD. Results: The Phase 1 part of study is closed, after 9 patients were treated successfully at 3 dose levels. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, the MTD was not reached, and 100 mg/m2 ABI-009 was designated as the recommended phase 2 dose. Safety analysis: At Dose 1 (n=3): Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included hyperdyslipidemia (n=1), and hyperglycemia (n=1). At Dose 2 (n=3): Grade 3 TRAEs included increased ALT (n=1). At Dose 3 (n=3): Grade 3 TRAEs included hypophosphatemia (n=1). Seven of 9 patients have discontinued treatment: 5 patients due to PD, 2 with SD opted to stop treatment due to drug-related Grade 2 AEs (pruritus, acneiform rash, and 2 with SD are still on therapy at Dose 3. Conclusions: The primary objective has been met with no DLTs, the MTD was not reached and Dose 3 has been designated as the phase 2 dose of ABI-009 which is on-going. Clinical trial information: NCT03190174.

A phase Ib trial of IPI-926, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 213-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Anthony Richards ◽  
Joe Stephenson ◽  
Brian M. Wolpin ◽  
Carlos Becerra ◽  
John Turner Hamm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

213 Background: IPI-926 is a novel, natural product-derived small molecule that targets the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway by inhibiting smoothened. In preclinical models of pancreatic cancer, repressing activation of the Hh pathway diminishes tumor-associated desmoplasia and improves chemotherapy delivery. Methods: This is the final report of the Phase 1b portion of a Phase 1b/2 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of IPI-926 plus gemcitabine. Eligible patients (pts) with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer and ECOG status 0-1 were administered oral IPI-926 daily (QD) for 28-day cycles, in 3 to 6 pt dose cohorts. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) was administered IV weekly for 3 weeks with 1 week off. DLTs were evaluated during Cycle 1. Results: 16 pts (median age 69 years; range 58-86) were enrolled at IPI-926 doses of 110, 130 or 160 mg QD (single agent MTD). Pts received a median of 5 cycles (1-13). Two pts remain on trial. No IPI-926-related serious AEs have been observed. One DLT of Grade 3 AST increase was observed (130 mg dose cohort) and was asymptomatic; it resolved with dose interruption, and did not recur with dose reduction. The most common AEs occurring were fatigue (75% total, 6% ≥ Grade 3), thrombocytopenia (63%, 25%), anemia (56%, 13%), nausea (50%, 0%), diarrhea (44%, 0%), vomiting (44%, 0%), peripheral edema (44%, 0%), pyrexia (44%, 0%), and AST increase (44%, 13%). Dose reductions of IPI-926 occurred in 3 (19%) pts. Dose reductions of gemcitabine occurred in 11 (69%) pts, primarily for thrombocytopenia (9 pts). One pt (6%) discontinued due to an AE (microangiopathic hemolytic anemia). Five (31%) radiographic partial responses were observed (1/3 at 110 mg, 2/6 at 130 mg, 2/7 at 160 mg). Median progression-free survival is > 7 months. 74% of pts were alive 6 months after study entry. Conclusions: IPI-926 plus gemcitabine is well tolerated in pts with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer, with evidence of activity and no unexpected toxicity. Complete Phase 1b data, including final overall survival, will be presented. Clinical evaluation of this combination continues in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 portion of the trial.

Phase 1b/2 trial of ribociclib+binimetinib in metastatic NRAS-mutant melanoma: Safety, efficacy, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9519-9519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin H. Schuler ◽  
Paolo A. Ascierto ◽  
Filip Yves Francine Leon De Vos ◽  
Michael Andrew Postow ◽  
Carla M.L.- Van Herpen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Ecog Ps

9519 Background: Simultaneous inhibition of MEK and CDK4/6 may suppress MAPK pathway activation and cell-cycle checkpoint dysregulation in NRAS-mutant melanoma, resulting in enhanced antitumor activity. Phase 1b data are reported. Methods: The phase 1b primary objective was to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/RP2D. A 28-d cycle of oral ribociclib (RIBO) once daily (QD) for 21 d + oral binimetinib (BINI) twice daily (BID) for 28 d, and a 21-d cycle of RIBO QD + BINI BID, both for 14 d per cycle, were evaluated. Secondary objectives were to evaluate efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics. Results: Based on dose escalation (van Herpen, ESMO 2015), MTD was 600mg RIBO/45mg BINI for the 21-d and 200/45 for the 28-d regimens. Due to promising activity, the 28-d cycle was selected as RP2D(unconfirmed partial response [PR] with limited follow-up occurred in 35% of pts). This finding was supported by comparable and manageable safety and the Bayesian logistic regression model.As of Jan 2017, the RP2D was received by 16 pts in phase 1b (ECOG PS 0/1/2, 63%/31%/6%; elevated lactate dehydrogenase, 44%; stage IVM1c disease, 50%; prior ipilimumab [ipi], 44%; prior anti–programmed death [PD]-1/PD-L1, 31%). Median (range) exposure was 4 (0–13) mo. Common adverse events (AEs) were increased blood creatine phosphokinase, elevated AST, peripheral edema, acneiform dermatitis, diarrhea and fatigue. Common grade 3/4 AEs were elevated AST and ALT (19%/6%), nausea (19%/0%), rash (19%/0%), vomiting (6%/6%) and neutropenia (12%/0%). Confirmed PR (cPR) occurred in 4 pts (25%; time to response, 48–168 d), stable disease in 7 pts (44%), disease progression in 3 pts (19%); 2 pts (12%) were not evaluable. Among cPR pts, 3 had prior ipi and/or anti–PD-1/PD-L1. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.7 (95% CI, 3.5–9.2) mo. Sequence analysis of synchronous non- RAS genetic alterations will be presented. Conclusions: Combined RIBO/BINI at the selected RP2D had a manageable safety profile and favorable efficacy (based on mPFS) for NRAS-mutant melanoma in phase 1b. Based on these promising data, the phase 2 expansion is underway to assess antitumor activity at the RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT01781572.

Phase II trial of single-agent ganetespib (STA-9090), a heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) post docetaxel-based chemotherapy: Results of a Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC) study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5085-5085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth I. Heath ◽  
Mark N. Stein ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
Glenn Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Stage 1

5085 Background: Hsp90 is a molecular chaperone required for the proper folding and activation of numerous client proteins and is critical to cell survival and proliferation. Ganetespib (G), a synthetic small molecule that binds to the ATP pocket in the N-terminus of Hsp90 causes the degradation of cellular proteins and ultimately death of cancer cells dependent on these proteins. G displays potent anticancer activity in prostate cancer cells. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥ 18 yrs old with ECOG performance status ≤ 2. Adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function was required. Patients were treated with G 200 mg/m2 intravenously once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks followed by 1 off-week. The primary objective was to evaluate the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall safety and tolerability of G and overall survival. Exploratory markers including maspin, cytokeratins 8 and 18, and HDAC1 were obtained pre, during, and post G treatment. We sought ≥ 4 patients with ≥ 6 months PFS (a success) in Stage 1 of a 2-stage near-optimal Simon design. Results: 18 patients were enrolled at 4 institutions. The patients’ median age was 68 (range 51-82), 13 were Caucasian, 4 were African American, and 1 was Asian. Median PSA was 210.7 ng/mL (range 25.9 – 3,489 ng/mL). One patient never started therapy. Among the 17 treated patients, the median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-5). The most frequent Grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (3 patients), fatigue (3), and dehydration (3). Prior therapy included abiraterone (8), sipuleucel-T (4), and other targeted therapy (4). With < 4 successes in Stage 1, the trial was terminated early. Median PFS was 1.9 months (90% CI: 1.7 – 2.7 months); median OS was 10.2 months (90% CI: 2.3 – 18.3 months). Exploratory markers have been evaluated and will be presented. Conclusions: Our study represents the first clinical trial of G in treating mCRPC patients. As a single agent therapy, G did not prolong PFS. Combination therapy is a consideration to improve therapeutic efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT01270880.

Outcomes in patients with liver or lung metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with the androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide: Results from the phase III AFFIRM trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5065-5065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Johann Sebastian De Bono ◽  
David Forer ◽  
Mohammad Hirmand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Psa Response

5065 Background: Enzalutamide (ENZA) inhibits multiple steps in the androgen receptor signaling pathway (Tran et al, Science. 2009;324:787). The phase III AFFIRM trial demonstrated that ENZA increased median overall survival (OS) by 4.8 months (P <0.001, HR 0.63) vs placebo (PBO) in post-docetaxel mCRPC patients (pts) (Scher et al, NEJM 2012; 367:1187). Here we assess the effect of ENZA on outcomes in pts with liver or lung metastases in the AFFIRM trial. Methods: The AFFIRM trial was a phase III multinational, randomized, double-blind study in post-docetaxel mCRPC pts. Randomization was 2:1 to ENZA 160 mg/day or PBO, stratified by baseline ECOG and mean pain score. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was a key secondary endpoint. PSA response defined as a decline of ≥50% compared to baseline, and soft tissue objective response per RECIST 1.1 were also assessed and reported here. Results: Pts with liver mCRPC comprised 11.5% (92/800) of ENZA pts and 8.5% (34/399) of PBO pts. Pts with lung mCRPC comprised 15.3% (122/800) of ENZA pts and 14.8% (59/399) of PBO pts. The median OS for patients with liver and/or lung mCRPC in the AFFIRM trial was 11.4 months (ENZA: 13.4 months; PBO: 9.5 months). Improved outcomes with ENZA treatment were observed in both liver and lung mCRPC pts. Conclusions: In the phase III AFFIRM trial, pts with lung mCRPC had higher median OS than pts with liver mCRPC. ENZA resulted in higher response rates in both liver and lung mCRPC pts. OS and rPFS were also improved in both pt groups treated with ENZA. Clinical trial information: NCT00974311. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document