Retrospective multicenter study for assessment of association between imaging change and outcome after treatment of regorafenib: KSCC1603.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 509-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taito Esaki ◽  
Masahiro Kawahira ◽  
Tetsuya Kusumoto ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Kazuteru Hatanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Lung Metastasis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Liver Lesion ◽  
Lung Lesion ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Radiological Change ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Ecog Ps

509 Background: Molecular-targeted drugs are known to have angiogenesis-inhibiting properties, and thus can inhibit angiogenesis inside the tumor tissue to cause necrosis, even if the tumor diameter is unchanged. We retrospectively investigated relationship between imaging change associated with regorafenib (REGO) treatment and the treatment outcome in Japanese mCRC. Methods: Eligibility included ECOG-PS 0 or 1, treated with REGO with lung or liver metastasis, started dose with 120 or 160mg/day of regorafenib and duration of treatment (DOT) must be 35 days or more (excluding interruption). Patients (Pts) were performed baseline CT within 28 days before and first CT assessment were between eight and 12 weeks after start of regorafenib. The main objective of this analysis is to investigate the correlation between the imaging change and outcome. As imaging change, onset or increase of Cavitation of lung lesion (CLL), morphologic response of liver lesion (MRL), Change of liver metastasis density (CLD) were evaluated. In all cases, independent two radiologists are evaluating radiological change after regorafenib treatment. Results: We finally screened 671 cases and 231 cases were eligible. The pts background was male/female 147/84, median age　64.0 (range: 32-83), median DOT of REGO　86 days (range: 35-818). The pts with lung metastasis were 153, and with liver metastasis were 166. CLL were positive in 69 (40.0%) pts. The median progression free survival (PFS) of the pts with/without CLL were 3.2/2.4 months (HR 0.794; 95% CI 0.584-1.080). Median overall survival (OS) of the pts with/without CLL were 10.5/9.0 months (HR 1.058; 95% CI 0.751-1.489). Median OS of pts with/without CLL in female were 11.4/7.9 months (HR 0.630; 95% CI 0.352-1.127). The MRL and CLD of liver metastasis were analyzed in 147 / 91 pt. Median OS of pts with/without MRL were 9.9/8.2 months (HR 1.015; 95% CI 0.581-1.774) and Median OS with/ without CLD were 11.6/7.0 months (HR 0.604; 95% CI 0.353-1.031). Conclusions: Cavitation of lung metastasis may predict PFS of the pts but not OS. Change of Liver metastasis density were predictor of favorable outcome to regorafenib. (UMIN000023329).

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Patients Treated with NAb-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: The NAPA Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 887-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Catalano ◽  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Raffaele Conca ◽  
Alberto D’Angelo ◽  
Valeria Emma Palmieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Prognostic And Predictive Markers

Background: The phase III MPACT trial demonstrated the superiority of gemcitabine (Gem) combined with Nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) versus gemcitabine alone in previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Gem/Nab-P in routine clinical practice. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2018, patients with metastatic PDAC receiving firstline treatment with a combination of gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel were included in a multicentre retrospective observational study. Exploratory analyses of efficacy, and prognostic and predictive markers, were performed. Results: The cohort comprised 115 patients (median age 65 [range 50-84] years) with good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1). The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95% CI; 9-13) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months (95% CI 5-7). Partial response and stable disease were achieved in 44 and 30 patients, respectively, yielding an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 64.3%. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity frequency was 22.61% for neutropenia, 5.22% for anemia, and 3.48% for thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 asthenia was recorded in 2.61% of patients. No grade 4 non-hematological events were reported. Dose reduction was necessary in 51.3% of the patients. Conclusions: Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen comprising gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel in metastatic PDAC in a real-life population.

Hyaluronan heterogeneity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, primary tumors, and sites of metastasis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16231-e16231
Author(s):  
Veronica Placencio-Hickok ◽  
Marie Lauzon ◽  
Natalie Moshayedi ◽  
Michelle Guan ◽  
Sungjin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
High Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Pdac Tissue ◽  
Treatment Naïve

e16231 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive cancers with an estimated five-year survival rate of 10%. The dense desmoplastic stroma in PDAC contributes to its aggressive nature and treatment resistance. Among the components comprising the stroma, hyaluronan (HA) has been demonstrated to play a critical role in tumor progression and survival. Previous preliminary studies have suggested differences in HA expression in primary and metastatic foci in PDAC. However, the effects of treatment and location of HA expression as well as the role of CD44, a known receptor for HA, on HA as a biomarker signature remain unknown. Thus, we investigated the potential of HA as a biomarker in primary PDAC and metastases. Methods: PDAC tissue from primary (n = 43) and metastatic (n = 66) sites were obtained from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center along with associated clinical data. Tissue slides were stained with H&E, HA using a histochemical assay, and CD44 by immunohistochemistry. HA staining was scored according to the proportion of stromal staining at an intensity greater than the background stroma. HA status was defined as ≥ 50% staining being HA high and < 50% as being HA low. CD44 staining was recorded as an H-score (percentage of tumor cells staining multiplied by intensity of staining on a scale from 0 to 3). Associations between HA levels and the requested variables were examined with t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, or Cox regression model where appropriate. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to assess progression free survival and overall survival. Analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 with two-sided tests and a significance level of 0.05. Results: HA score was significantly higher in primary PDAC tissue compared to sites of metastases (p = 0.0148). Within the metastases, HA score was significantly higher in liver metastasis compared to other sites of metastasis (p = 0.0478). In the liver metastasis tissue, HA score trended lower in patients with previously treated tissue compared to treatment naïve tissue (p = 0.0622). In the treatment naive liver metastasis cohort, patients with HA high status had decreased progression free survival and overall survival compared to patients with HA low status (p = 0.0032 and p = 0.0478, respectively). Using HA score and CD44 in a Cox regression model demonstrated that for every one unit increase in HA score, the risk for recurrence/progression increased by 4.4% at any fixed point in time, adjusting for CD44 score (p = 0.0049). Conclusions: HA score is variable between primary PDAC, PDAC metastatic to the liver, and PDAC metastatic to other sites. Within liver metastases, patients with HA high status had decreased progression free survival and overall survival compared to patients with HA low status. HA levels can serve as a potential biomarker to guide pancreatic cancer treatments and trial design for agents targeting the stroma.

scholarly journals Real-World Data for Lenvatinib in Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (RELEVANT): A Retrospective Multicentric Analysis of Clinical Practice in Austria

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
G. Rendl ◽  
B. Sipos ◽  
A. Becherer ◽  
S. Sorko ◽  
C. Trummer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Proven Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions ◽  
Retrospective Multicenter Study

Background. Lenvatinib has proven efficacy in progressive, radioiodine- (RAI-) refractory thyroid cancer (TC). Dose reductions are commonly performed due to decreased tolerability and adverse effects. This retrospective multicenter study analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and tolerability in the Austrian patient population treated with lenvatinib. Methods. Clinical data of 43 patients (25 males and 18 females) with a median age of 70 years (range: 39–91 years) and RAI-refractory TC with metastases to the lymph nodes (74%), lungs (86%), bone (35%), liver (16%), and brain (12%) were analyzed. The mean duration of treatment with lenvatinib was 26.6 ± 15.4 months with dosage reductions required in 39 patients (91%). Results. PFS after 24 months was 71% (95% CI: 56–87), and overall survival (OS) was 74% (95% CI: 60–88), respectively. OS was significantly shorter ( p = 0.048 ) in patients with a daily maintenance dosage ≤ 10 mg (63%) (95% CI: 39–86) as compared to patients on ≥ 14 mg lenvatinib (82%) (95% CI: 66–98) daily. Dose reduction was noted in 39 patients (91%). Grade ≥3 toxicities (hypertension, diarrhea, weight loss, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome) were most common leading to discontinuation of lenvatinib in 7 patients (16%). Conclusion. Lenvatinib showed sustained clinical efficacy in patients with metastatic RAI-refractory TC even with reduced maintenance dosages over years. The effects were comparable to the registration trial, although patients had a higher median age and, more commonly, dose reductions.

BCL6 Expression and Treatment Delay Correlate with Adverse Outcome in Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma: Final Report of CALGB 50202 (Alliance)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 301-301
Author(s):  
James L. Rubenstein ◽  
Eric D. Hsi ◽  
Jeffrey L. Johnson ◽  
Sin-Ho Jung ◽  
Barbara Grant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Delay ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Brain Irradiation ◽  
Bcl6 Expression ◽  
Ecog Ps

Abstract Abstract 301 Background: While whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has long been considered the standard consolidative therapy in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), concerns regarding irreversible neurocognitive effects of brain irradiation have prompted development of dose-intensive induction and consolidative chemotherapeutic approaches, with the aim to eliminate brain irradiation. We present the updated results of the first Phase II multicenter trial, conducted by a major cooperative group within the United States, to evaluate an intensive chemotherapy-alone strategy in newly diagnosed patients with PCNSL. Methods: Induction chemotherapy consisted of methotrexate (MTX), temozolomide, rituximab (MT-R) with HD-MTX (8 gm/m2) administered every 2 weeks × 8, weekly rituximab × 6 and temozolomide (150 mg/m2) starting day +7 and continued monthly × 5. Patients who achieved a CR received intensive consolidation cytarabine 2 gm/m2 BID on days 1–4 with etoposide 40 mg/kg over 96 h (EA). Assessment of BCL6 and MYC expression by lymphoma cells was performed by immunohistochemical analysis of diagnostic specimens and scored (10% increments) by a pathologist who was blinded to clinical outcome. Results: 44 newly diagnosed, immunocompetent patients with PCNSL were treated at 12 CALGB centers between 2005 and 2009. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age was 61 yr (range 12–76), median ECOG PS was 1, 58% were IELSG risk group 2–3. 98% of tumors were large B-cell lymphoma. 66% of patients exhibited CR to induction MT-R. With median overall follow-up of 5.3 years, 21 out of 46 patients exhibited disease progression and 17 have died. There was one treatment-related death (sepsis) during consolidation. There has been no evidence for significant treatment-related neurotoxicity. The median progression-free survival (PFS) is 4.0 years and estimated PFS rates with 95% confidence limits at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years are 0.66 (0.50, 0.76), 0.59 (0.43, 0.72), 0.52 (0.36, 0.64) and 0.47 (0.32, 0.61). The probability of 2-year PFS for patients who completed the entire regimen is 0.69 (0.47, 0.94). The estimated overall survival (OS) rate with 95% confidence limits at 4 years is 0.65 (0.49,0.77). Remarkably, event-free survival (EFS) was similar in patients older and younger than 60 (p< 0.47). While ECOG PS>1 and high IELSG score showed a trend toward inferior EFS, the most significant clinical prognostic variable was treatment delay: those patients who started remission induction therapy more than 30 days after diagnosis exhibited shorter EFS than patients who received MT-R within a month (2-sided p-value = 0.05). There was no relationship between treatment delay and IELSG prognostic score. While high MYC expression (>50% lymphoma nuclei) was detected in 54% of cases, MYC was not prognostic. By contrast, high BCL6 expression (≥30% of lymphoma nuclei) was detected in 59% of cases and correlated as a continuous variable with inferior progression-free survival, event-free survival and overall survival. The 2-sided p-values for these models were p=0.045, p=0.019 and p=0.045 (log-rank test). Conclusions: CALGB 50202 (Alliance) demonstrates that induction MT-R followed by EA consolidation is feasible in the multicenter setting and yields rates of PFS and OS in newly diagnosed PCNSL patients that are at least comparable to combined modality treatment involving reduced dose whole brain irradiation. The MT-R-EA regimen is well-tolerated in patients age >60 and has similar efficacy in this population as in younger patients. Based upon these encouraging results, a successor, intergroup, randomized phase II trial, CALGB 51101 (Alliance) has been activated that compares dose-intensive consolidation (EA) with myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant in this first randomized trial in PCNSL in which neither arm involves WBRT. Our observations regarding the association of treatment delay with adverse prognosis suggest that prompt initiation of therapy for PCNSL patients may translate into improved outcomes. In this first prospective analysis of molecular biomarkers in PCNSL in the setting of a clinical trial, high BCL6 expression was found to correlate with inferior outcome. This observation raises the possibility that in future studies BCL6 could be used as a biomarker in risk-adapted therapy and supports the investigation of BCL6 antagonists in the treatment of this disease. Supported by LLS and by NCI CA13908301. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Dose intensive chemotherapy (Cx) in advanced thymoma: Initial report of Japan Clinical Oncology Group trials (JCOG 9605 and 9606)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7080-7080
Author(s):  
H. Kunitoh ◽  
T. Tamura ◽  
H. Fukuda ◽  
K. Nakagawa ◽  
K. Takeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thymic Carcinoma ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Initial Report ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Ecog Ps

7080 Background: Thymoma is considered to be sensitive to Cx. Dose intensive Cx might well be suitable for such tumors, especially in combination with local therapy. Objectives of the trials were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the dose intensive CODE (cisplatin[C]- vincristine[O]- doxorubicin[D]- etoposide[E]) Cx in thymoma. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival time (PFS). Methods: Patients (pts) with 15–70 years of age with histologically documented Cx-naïve thymoma with stage IVa/IVb disease (JCOG 9605) or unresectable stage III disease (JCOG 9606) were eligible. Tumors of other histology, such as thymic carcinoma, carcinoid or lymphoma were excluded; pts were to have ample organ function and ECOG PS of 0–2. Myasthenia was allowed. Signed consent form was obtained. Pts received CODE Cx of 9 weeks (w): C 25 mg/m2 Cx day 1 on each w1–9; O 1mg/m2 d1 on w1,2,4,6,8; D 40 mg/m2 d1 and E 80 mg/m2 d1,2,3 on w 1,3,5,7,9. Cx courses were supported by GCSF. Steroids were used only for antiemesis. Those with stage III disease (JCOG 9606) went on to surgery, if judged to be resectable, and post-operative radiotherapy (RT) of 48Gy; those with unresectable disease received 60Gy RT. Results: From Jul./97 to Apr./05, 53 pts were entered to the studies. Five were found ineligible because of different histology. Pt characteristics and response to the Cx were summarized in the table . Toxicity of the Cx was mainly hematologic and generally well tolerated, with no toxic death; 70% of the pts completed planned 9 weeks. Thirteen pts in JCOG 9606 (stage III) received thoracotomy; tumor was resected in 11 pts, completely in 9 (39% of enrolled pts). Pathologic CR was observed in 3. The median PFS was 9.5m for stage IV and 4.5 y for stage III diseases. Overall survival at 2 & 5 yrs were 82% & 57% for stage IV and 96% & 77% for stage III pts. Conclusions: Short-course, dose intensive Cx was active against thymoma. Although it does not seem to bring long PFS in stage IV pts, it could improve resectability in limited disease. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Difference between duration of treatment (DOT) and progression-free survival (PFS) as a marker of unbalanced censoring.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2548-2548
Author(s):  
Laleh Amiri-Kordestani ◽  
Julia Wilkerson ◽  
Sanjeeve Balasubramaniam ◽  
Susan Elaine Bates ◽  
Antonio Tito Fojo
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure ◽  
Clinical Trial Results ◽  
And Control ◽  
Phase Iii Studies ◽  
The Ideal

2548 Background: In the conduct of randomized trials Kaplan and Meier envisioned rates of censoring as similar between arms, providing accurate assessment of clinical trial results. Censoring is used when patients withdraw consent, leave study due to toxicity, or reach data cut-off without disease progression or death. Censoring can lead to erroneous conclusions as it can be either beneficial or detrimental to the arm under study. Such censoring can also explain how a statistically valid difference in PFS “disappears” when overall survival (OS) is examined. We hypothesized that censoring, especially that due to toxicity, would lead to a discrepancy between DOT and PFS since two different patient populations would be scored. Methods: We reviewed all phase III randomized studies of drugs approved by FDA since 2005 for pts with metastatic solid tumors, looking for DOT and PFS. We used standard statistical analyses using SAS. Results: We identified 55 Phase III studies conducted with abiraterone, axitinib, bevacizumab, cabazitaxel, cetuximab, eribulin, erlotinib, everolimus, ipilimumab, ixabepilone, lapatinib, panitumumab, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus and vandetinib. DOT was not provided in 27%. Forty-four comparisons (88 arms) were included in the analysis. The median PFS, DOT, delta PFS (difference in PFS between experimental and control arms) and delta DOT were: 161, 126, 51 and 36 days, respectively. The slopes of PFS vs DOT and delta PFS vs delta DOT were 1.16 and 1.03, respectively close to the ideal of 1.0. Five trials fell above the 90% CI boundary with delta PFS/delta DOT of 3 to 36, including two everolimus studies (PNET and breast cancer) two sunitinb studies (RCC and PNET) and one bevacizumab study (E2100, breast cancer). Conclusions: PFS and DOT as well as delta PFS and delta DOT should be concordant. The most likely explanation for a discordance between these values is toxicity-driven censoring and its occurrence raises concerns regarding the degree of efficacy. A greater utilization of “Time to Treatment Failure”, an endpoint that includes toxicity in its definition would be valuable in oncology trials, particularly those with high levels of toxicities.

Efficacy and toxicity of q 2 weeks docetaxel versus weekly versus q 3 weeks in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16087-e16087
Author(s):  
Akshiv Malhotra ◽  
Paula Rosenbaum ◽  
Bernard J. Poiesz
Keyword(s):  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Significant Toxicity ◽  
Number Of Patients

e16087 Background: Standard treatment for metastatic CRPC is docetaxel 75 mg/m2q3weeks. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients treated with q 1, 2, or 3 weeks docetaxel regimens at 30, 60 and 75 mg/m2, respectively. The choice of regimen and duration of treatment was decided by their oncologist. Patients who had been in a clinical trial previously, or treated with any other chemotherapy before docetaxel were excluded. On this basis 41 patients were studied. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was used as the primary method to assess response and progression. Response was a decline of >/=50% from baseline value with no clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression. For patients whose PSA did not decrease, progression was a >/= 25% increase from baseline. If the PSA decreased without reaching response criteria, progression was a >/= 25% increase from nadir. In those who responded, progression was a >/= 50% increase from nadir. The increase had to be at least 5ng/ml. Toxicity was graded on the basis of CTCAE version 4.0. Response rate and toxicity in the 3 arms was compared using a two by two square t-test. Results: There were 12, 14 and 15 patients in the q1w, q2w and q3w arms, respectively. Response rates, mean progression free survival (PFS), median PFS, mean overall survival (OS), median OS, mean cumulative dose (MCD) and toxicity are shown in table 1. Toxicity was similar in the q1w, q2w and q3w arms, except grade 1/2 neuropathy was higher in the q2w arm vs. the q1w arm (p=0.005). Conclusions: The MCD, response rates, PFS and OS in the q1w and q3w arms were similar to previously published reports. Patients in the q2w arm received a statistically significant higher MCD. Our data suggest a better outcome in the q2w arm as compared to the q1w and q3w arms. However, given the small number of patients studied, the results are not statistically significant. Toxicity was similar save for grade1/2 neuropathy. [Table: see text]

Long-term response to sunitinib treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 598-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nizar M. Tannir ◽  
Robert A. Figlin ◽  
Martin Eric Gore ◽  
Dror Michaelson ◽  
Robert J. Motzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Sunitinib Treatment ◽  
Expanded Access Program ◽  
Response Table ◽  
Access Program ◽  
Term Response

598 Background: A subset of patients (pts) with mRCC treated with sunitinib achieves a long-term response. This study aimed to characterize the duration of treatment and clinical outcomes of pts with mRCC who were long-term responders (LTRs), defined as pts who had progression-free survival (PFS) > 2 years, while on sunitinib therapy. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from 5714 pts with mRCC treated with sunitinib in 8 phase II or III clinical trials and pts treated in the expanded access program (EAP). Data on treatment duration and response to treatment were compared between LTRs and pts who had PFS ≤ 2 years (others). Results: A total of 529 (9.3%) pts achieved a long-term response, 5162 (90.3%) achieved other response, and data were missing for 23 (0.4%) pts. Overall, 309 (5.4%) pts achieved PFS between >2 and ≤3 years, 125 (2.2%) pts achieved PFS between >3 and ≤4 years, 62 (1.1%) pts achieved PFS between >4 and ≤5 years, and 33 (0.6%) pts achieved PFS between >5 and ≤6 years. The median (range) duration of sunitinib treatment was 36.7 (23.4–71.7) months for LTRs versus 6.5 (0–69.8) months for others. Response rates comparing LTRs versus others are presented in Table. Conclusions: With over 500 pts with mRCC achieving PFS >2 years and 33 achieving PFS >5 years, this analysis of sunitinib LTRs is the largest published to date. Additional analyses are being conducted to describe the clinical characteristics of these LTRs and identify risk factors that may predict long-term response. [Table: see text]

Intermediate-term outcomes from the DISSRM registry: A prospective analysis of active surveillance in patients with small renal masses.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 430-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ridwan Alam ◽  
Hiten D. Patel ◽  
Mark F. Riffon ◽  
Bruce J. Trock ◽  
Akachimere Uzosike ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Small Renal Masses ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Renal Masses ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Primary Intervention ◽  
Delayed Intervention

430 Background: Active surveillance is an alternative to primary intervention aimed at reducing the overtreatment of small renal masses, defined as solid renal masses ≤4.0 cm (clinical stage T1a). Methods: Since 2009, the Delayed Intervention and Surveillance for Small Renal Masses (DISSRM) registry prospectively enrolled 615 patients with small renal masses who chose to undergo primary intervention or active surveillance. Intervention was recommended to patients for masses with an elevated growth rate (>0.5 cm/year) or increased tumor diameter (>4.0 cm). Primary outcomes were cancer-specific survival and overall survival; secondary outcomes included progression-free survival. Progression was strictly defined as growth rate >0.5 cm/year, greatest tumor diameter >4.0 cm, metastatic disease, or elective crossover. Outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and comparisons were performed using the log-rank test. Results: Of the 615 enrolled patients, 298 (48.5%) chose primary intervention and 317 (51.5%) chose active surveillance. From the active surveillance cohort, 45 (14.2%) patients underwent delayed intervention. Median follow-up time for the entire registry was 2.9 years, with 203 (33.0%) patients followed for 5 years or more. At baseline, patients who chose active surveillance were older (p < 0.001) and had higher comorbidity status (p < 0.001) than those who chose primary intervention. There was no difference in cancer-specific survival at 7 years between primary intervention and active surveillance (99.0% vs. 100%, respectively, p = 0.3). However, overall survival was higher in patients with primary intervention when compared to active surveillance at 5 years (93.0% vs. 80.2%, respectively) and 7 years (91.7% vs. 65.9%, respectively, p = 0.002). The 5-year and 7-year progression-free survival rate in the active surveillance cohort was 76.7% and 48.4%, respectively. Conclusions: In the intermediate-term, active surveillance appears to be as safe as primary intervention for carefully selected patients with small renal masses. As the registry matures, further studies will elucidate the effectiveness of active surveillance in the long-term. Clinical trial information: NCT02346435.

Phase II study of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) in metastatic uveal melanoma (UM).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9522-9522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith Pelster ◽  
Stephen K. Gruschkus ◽  
Roland Bassett ◽  
Dan S. Gombos ◽  
Michael Shephard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
One Year ◽  
Ecog Ps

9522 Background: UM is the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Approximately 40-50% of patients (pts) with UM will ultimately develop metastatic disease. There is currently no standard approach for metastatic UM. Early studies of single agent immunotherapy (IO) in metastatic UM have yielded meager results. Combination checkpoint inhibitor IO has the potential to improve response rates and survival. Herein, we report the safety and efficacy of ipi/nivo in metastatic UM. Methods: We performed a single-arm phase II study in metastatic UM (CA184-187) for pts with at least 1 measureable lesion and ECOG PS 0-1. Any number of prior treatments were permitted. Pts received nivolumab 1mg/kg IV plus ipilimumab 3mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses; maintenance nivolumab was dosed 3mg/kg every 2 weeks or 480mg IV every 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was best overall response rate (BORR) as determined by irRC. Secondary endpoints were median progression free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), and one-year OS. Results: As of the January 31, 2019 data cutoff, 39 pts were enrolled. 35 pts received at least one treatment and were evaluable for toxicity. 5 pts were inevaluable for response due to lack of follow-up imaging, leaving 30 pts evaluable for efficacy. 32 pts (91%) experienced any adverse event (AE), and 29 pts (83%) experienced any treatment related AE (TRAE). Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 14 pts (40%). 10 pts (29%) were removed from the study due to AEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. Median duration of follow up is 60.5 weeks. 19 pts (63%) completed all 4 cycles of ipi/nivo; median duration of treatment was 16 weeks. The BORR was partial response for 5 pts (17%), stable disease (SD) for 16 pts (53%), and progression of disease for 9 pts (30%). 8 pts had SD for at least 6 months. Median PFS was 26 weeks. Median OS was 83 weeks (1.6 years), and one-year OS was 62%. Conclusions: Full results of ipi/nivo safety and efficacy including immune-related AE and clinical characteristics of the responders will be presented at the meeting. Preliminary translational tumor work including RNA analysis has been performed on a subset of responders. Clinical trial information: NCT01585194.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document