Phase II HEPANOVA trial of tumor treating fields concomitant with sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS470-TPS470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anca Grosu ◽  
Eleni Gkika ◽  
Thomas B. Brunner ◽  
Robert Thimme ◽  
Uri Weinberg
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields

TPS470 Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality, which has been approved for the treatment of glioblastoma by the FDA. TTFields predominantly act by disrupting the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase. TTFields were effective in multiple preclinical models of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), leading to a significant increase in cell death. The Phase 2 HEPANOVA study is the first trial testing TTFields in HCC patients, and is designed to test the safety and efficacy of adding TTFields to sorafenib in advanced HCC. Methods: Patients (N = 25) with unresectable HCC who are not amenable to any local treatment will be enrolled in this prospective, single-arm study. The study enrolls patients with ECOG score of 0-2 and Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage 0-C. Patients must have a measurable disease per RECIST Criteria. Having implanted electronic devices in the torso is exclusionary. Sorafenib will be administered at standard dose (400 mg twice daily). TTFields (150 kHz) will be delivered for 18 hours/day until local disease progression per RECIST Criteria. Clinical follow up will be performed q4w, and a CT/MRI scan q12w. Following disease progression in the liver, patients will discontinue TTFields and be followed monthly for survival. Overall response rate will be the primary endpoint and in-field control rate, progression-free survival rate at 12 month (PFS12), OS rate at 1 year and toxicity will all be secondary endpoints. Sample size was calculated using an Exact test for proportions considering the weighted average of ORR of patients who had either complete or partial response per RECIST criteria in historical studies with sorafenib is 4.5%. A sample size of 25 patients was required to achieve a power of approximately 80% at a one-sided alpha level of 0.05 using a single sample Exact test for proportions. Clinical trial information: NCT03606590.

Phase II HEPANOVA trial of tumor treating fields concomitant with sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS603-TPS603
Author(s):  
Anca Grosu ◽  
Eleni Gkika ◽  
Thomas B. Brunner ◽  
Robert Thimme
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields

TPS603 Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality, which has been approved for the treatment of glioblastoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma by the FDA. TTFields predominantly act by disrupting the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase. TTFields were effective in multiple preclinical models of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), leading to a significant increase in cell death. The Phase 2 HEPANOVA [NCT03606590] study is the first trial testing TTFields in HCC patients, and is designed to test the safety and efficacy of adding TTFields to sorafenib in advanced HCC. Methods: (N = 25) with unresectable HCC who are not amenable to any local treatment will be enrolled in this prospective, single-arm study. The study enrolls patients with ECOG score of 0-2 and Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage 0-C. Patients must have a measurable disease per RECIST Criteria. Having implanted electronic devices in the torso is exclusionary. Sorafenib will be administered at standard dose (400 mg twice daily). TTFields (150 kHz) will be delivered for 18 hours/day until local disease progression per RECIST Criteria. Clinical follow up will be performed q4w, and a CT/MRI scan q12w. Following disease progression in the liver, patients will discontinue TTFields and be followed monthly for survival. Overall response rate will be the primary endpoint and in-field control rate, progression-free survival rate at 12 month (PFS12), OS rate at 1 year and toxicity will all be secondary endpoints. Sample size was calculated using an Exact test for proportions considering the weighted average of ORR of patients who had either complete or partial response per RECIST criteria in historical studies with sorafenib is 4.5%. A sample size of 25 patients was required to achieve a power of approximately 80% at a one-sided alpha level of 0.05 using a single sample Exact test for proportions. Clinical trial information: NCT03606590.

KEYNOTE-224: Phase II study of pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS504-TPS504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew X. Zhu ◽  
Jennifer J. Knox ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Stephen L. Chan ◽  
Richard S. Finn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Locoregional Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Previously Treated

TPS504 Background: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib is the standard of care for first-line hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For patients with HCC after disease progression on sorafenib or for those with intolerance to sorafenib, no approved therapies are available. Because HCC is often driven by inflammation and is also associated with a suppressed immunoenvironment, there is a strong rationale to evaluate immunotherapy in patients with this type of cancer. The single-arm, multisite, phase 2 KEYNOTE-224 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02702414) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti–PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced HCC. Methods: Approximately 100 patients will be enrolled. Inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of HCC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease or BCLC stage B disease not amenable to or refractory to locoregional therapy, and disease not amenable to a curative treatment approach (eg, transplantation, surgery, or ablation). Patients must also have measurable disease based on RECIST v1.1 as confirmed by central imaging vendor review, documented objective radiographic progression after stopping treatment with sorafenib or intolerance to sorafenib, Child-Pugh liver score A, ECOG performance status 0-1, and predicted life expectancy > 3 months. Patients will be allocated to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (~2 years) or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal of consent, or investigator decision. Response will be assessed every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review. Adverse events (AEs) will be assessed throughout treatment and for 30 days thereafter (90 days for serious AEs) and graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. The primary end point is objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review. Secondary end points are overall survival; safety and tolerability; and duration of response, disease control rate, time to progression, and progression-free survival per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review. Enrollment in KEYNOTE-224 is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02702414.

Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Oxaliplatin Plus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin Versus Doxorubicin As Palliative Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma From Asia

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (28) ◽  
pp. 3501-3508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Yuxian Bai ◽  
Ho Yeong Lim ◽  
Sumitra Thongprasert ◽  
Yee Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
End Point

Purpose To determine whether FOLFOX4 (infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) administered as palliative chemotherapy to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) provides a survival benefit and efficacy versus doxorubicin. Patients and Methods This multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III study in mainland China, Taiwan, Korea, and Thailand involved 371 patients age 18 to 75 years who had locally advanced or metastatic HCC and were ineligible for curative resection or local treatment. They were randomly assigned at a ratio of one to one to receive either FOLFOX4 (n = 184) or doxorubicin (n = 187). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) by RECIST (version 1.0), and safety. Results At the prespecified final analysis, median OS was 6.40 months with FOLFOX4 (95% CI, 5.30 to 7.03) and 4.97 months with doxorubicin (95% CI, 4.23 to 6.03; P = .07; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.02). Median PFS was 2.93 months with FOLFOX4 (95% CI, 2.43 to 3.53), and 1.77 months with doxorubicin (95% CI, 1.63 to 2.30; P < .001; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79). RR was 8.15% with FOLFOX4 and 2.67% with doxorubicin (P = .02). On continued follow-up, the trend toward increased OS with FOLFOX4 was maintained (P = .04; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99). Toxicity was consistent with previous experiences with FOLFOX4; proportions of grade 3 to 4 adverse events were similar between treatments. Conclusion Although the study did not meet its primary end point, the trend toward improved OS with FOLFOX4, along with increased PFS and RR, suggests that this regimen may confer some benefit to Asian patients, but an OS benefit cannot be concluded from these data.

scholarly journals Phase 1b/2 trial of tepotinib in sorafenibpretreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with MET overexpression

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Decaens ◽  
Carlo Barone ◽  
Eric Assenat ◽  
Martin Wermke ◽  
Angelica Fasolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Risk Balance ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background This Phase 1b/2 study evaluated tepotinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor, in US/European patients with sorafenibpretreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) with MET overexpression. Methods Eligible adults had aHCC, progression after ≥4 weeks of sorafenib, and, for Phase 2 only, MET overexpression. Tepotinib was administered once daily at 300 or 500 mg in Phase 1b (‘3 + 3’ design), and at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) in Phase 2. Primary endpoints were dose-liming toxicities (DLTs; Phase 1b) and 12-week investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; Phase 2). Results In Phase 1b (n = 17), no DLTs occurred and the RP2D was confirmed as 500 mg. In Phase 2 (n = 49), the primary endpoint was met: 12-week PFS was 63.3% (90% CI: 50.5–74.7), which was significantly greater than the predefined null hypothesis of ≤15% (one-sided binomial exact test: P < 0.0001). Median time to progression was 4 months. In Phase 2, 28.6% of patients had treatment-related Grade ≥3 adverse events, including peripheral oedema and lipase increase (both 6.1%). Conclusions Tepotinib was generally well tolerated and the RP2D (500 mg) showed promising efficacy and, therefore, a positive benefit–risk balance in sorafenibpretreated aHCC with MET overexpression. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02115373.

KEYNOTE-240: Randomized phase III study of pembrolizumab versus best supportive care for second-line advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS503-TPS503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Finn ◽  
Stephen L. Chan ◽  
Andrew X. Zhu ◽  
Jennifer J. Knox ◽  
Ann-Lii Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Locoregional Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

TPS503 Background: There are no approved therapies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after disease progression on sorafenib, or for patients with intolerance to sorafenib. HCC often arises in the background of chronic inflammation and is also associated with an immunosuppressed microenvironment, providing a strong rationale to evaluate immunotherapy in HCC. The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 KEYNOTE-240 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02702401) was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of the anti–PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab + best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo + BSC in patients with previously treated advanced HCC. Methods: Eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, confirmed diagnosis of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease or BCLC stage B disease not amenable to or refractory to locoregional therapy, disease not amenable to a curative treatment approach (eg, transplantation, surgery, or ablation), documented progression after treatment with sorafenib or intolerance to sorafenib, Child-Pugh liver score A, and ECOG performance status 0-1. ~408 patients will be randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks (Q3W) + BSC or placebo Q3W + BSC for up to 35 cycles or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal of consent, or investigator decision. Randomization will be stratified by geographic region, macrovascular invasion, and α-fetoprotein. BSC will be provided by the investigator per local treatment practices. Response will be assessed every 6 weeks per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review. Adverse events (AEs) will be assessed throughout treatment and for 30 days thereafter (90 days for serious AEs) and graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. Primary objectives are comparison of progression-free survival per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review and overall survival between treatment arms. Secondary objectives are comparison of objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, and time to progression per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review, and evaluation of safety and tolerability. Enrollment in KEYNOTE-240 is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02702401.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Real-World Practice in Korea

Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Myung Ji Goh ◽  
Joo Hyun Oh ◽  
Yewan Park ◽  
Jihye Kim ◽  
Wonseok Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Real World ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Lenvatinib has been recently approved as a first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib therapy in a real-world practice and to find prognostic factors related to survival and disease progression. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A hospital-based retrospective study was conducted on 111 consecutive patients who had unresectable HCC and were treated with lenvatinib at Samsung Medical Center from October 2018 to March 2020. Efficacy was determined using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria in 111 patients who completed 1st tumor assessment. Safety was evaluated in 116 HCC patients including 5 patients who discontinued lenvatinib due to adverse events (AEs) before 1st tumor assessment using Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 5.0. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 111 patients with a median age of 59 years were analyzed during a median follow-up duration of 6.2 (4.4–9.0) months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival was 10.5 months, and the median progression-free survival was 6.2 months. Based on mRECIST criteria, the objective response rate was 18.9% and disease control rate was 75.7%. AEs developed in 86/116 (74.1%) patients, and grade ≥3 AEs developed in 16/116 (13.8%) patients. Diarrhea, hand-foot skin rash, abdominal pain, hypertension, and anorexia were identified as the AEs with the highest frequencies of any grade. REFLECT eligibility criteria including tumor extent ≥50% liver occupation or inadequate bone marrow function and occurrence of anorexia were prognostic factors for survival, and occurrence of diarrhea was a favorable factor for disease progression. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Lenvatinib therapy showed a favorable efficacy and safety in a real-world practice. The REFLECT eligibility criteria and specific AEs could be one of the prognostic markers.

Sorafenib-Regorafenib Sequential Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Institute Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Naoshi Nishida ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives: Previously, no therapeutic agent has been known to improve the overall survival compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who have progressed after sorafenib. In this patient population, regorafenib was first demonstrated to confer a survival benefit in the RESORCE trial, and subsequently it was approved as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. An open-label expanded access program (EAP) of regorafenib was implemented for compassionate use. We investigated the efficacy and safety of regorafenib based on our experience of the RESORCE trial and the EAP. Methods: Data from 5 patients from the RESORCE trial and 6 from the EAP were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had tolerated prior sorafenib and were progressing during sorafenib treatment. Results: The median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (95% CI 2.3-16.1). One patient achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 9.1%, and the disease control rate was 72.7%. No treatment-associated mortalities were observed. Grade 3 hypophosphatemia was observed in 2 patients, grade 2 anorexia was observed in 5 patients, and grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 2 patients. Grade 2 and grade 3 thrombocytopenia were observed in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. All treatment-related adverse events were improved by reduction or interruption of regorafenib. Five patients showed decreased serum albumin levels. Conclusion: Sorafenib and regorafenib sequential therapy presents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with advanced HCC.

Clinical Outcomes of 2nd- and 3rd-Line Regorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Kensuke Naruto ◽  
Tomokazu Kawaoka ◽  
Kei Amioka ◽  
Yutaro Ogawa ◽  
Kikukawa Chihiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> This study compared clinical outcomes of 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this retrospective cohort study, 48 patients were treated with regorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirty-five and 13 patients were initiated on 2nd- and 3rd-line therapy, respectively. We assessed the responses to and safety of the therapy. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were no statistically significant differences in clinical characteristics at the start of 2nd- or 3rd-line regorafenib therapy. The overall response rate of 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib was 20 and 8%, respectively. The disease control rate was 57 and 54%, respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) from the start of 2nd-line regorafenib was 17.5 months. mOS from the start of 3rd-line regorafenib was not obtained. Median progression-free survival of 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib was 4.9 and 2.3 months, respectively. mOS from 1st-line therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus sorafenib-regorafenib-lenvatinib was 29.5 months; that with lenvatinib-sorafenib-regorafenib was not obtained. Patients on 3rd-line therapy tended to have better Child-Pugh scores and tumor factors at the start of 1st-line therapy than other patients. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Patients on 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib showed favorable responses. Good Child-Pugh scores and tumor factors may be associated with a better response rate and OS.

scholarly journals Axitinib in combination with radiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase I clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Lin Yang ◽  
Mau-Shin Chi ◽  
Hui-Ling Ko ◽  
Yi-Ying Huang ◽  
Su-Chen Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Normal Liver ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc

Abstract Background To investigate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of axitinib, a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1–3 inhibitor, in combination with radiotherapy (RT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods This phase I study followed the rule of traditional 3 + 3 design. Major eligibility included: (1) patients with advanced HCC unsuitable for surgery, radiofrequency ablation or transarterial chemoembolization, or who failed after prior local–regional treatment; (2) failure on sorafenib or no grant for sorafenib from health insurance system. Eligible patients with advanced HCC received axitinib for total 8 weeks during and after RT. Three cohorts with axitinib dose escalation were planned: 1 mg twice daily (level I), 2 mg twice daily (level II) and 3 mg twice daily (level III). The prescribed doses of RT ranged from 37.5 to 67.5 Gy in 15 fractions to liver tumor(s) and were determined based on an upper limit of mean liver dose of 18 Gy (intended isotoxic RT for normal liver). The primary endpoint was MTD of axitinib in combination with RT. The secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), RT in-field response rate, acute and late toxicities, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results Total nine eligible patients received axitinib dose levels of 1 mg twice daily (n = 3), 2 mg twice daily (n = 3) and 3 mg twice daily (n = 3). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) did not occur in the 3 cohorts; the MTD was defined as 3 mg twice daily in this study. ORR was 66.7%, including 3 complete responses and 3 partial responses, at 3 months after treatment initiation. With a median follow-up of 16.6 months, median OS was not reached, 1-year OS was 66.7%, and median PFS was 7.4 months. Conclusions Axitinib in combination with RT for advanced HCC was well tolerated with an axitinib MTD of 3 mg twice daily in this study. The outcome analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the small total cohort. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02814461), Registered June 27, 2016—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02814461

Phase II Trial of the Combination of Bevacizumab and Erlotinib in Patients Who Have Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 843-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie B. Thomas ◽  
Jeffrey S. Morris ◽  
Romil Chadha ◽  
Michiko Iwasaki ◽  
Harmeet Kaur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Advanced Hcc

Purpose The study objective was to determine the proportion of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with the combination of bevacizumab (B) and erlotinib (E) who were alive and progression free at 16 weeks (16-week progression-free survival [PFS16]) of continuous therapy. Secondary objectives included response rate, median PFS, survival, and toxicity. Patients and Methods Patients who had advanced HCC that was not amenable to surgical or regional therapies, up to one prior systemic treatment; Childs-Pugh score A or B liver function; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, or 2 received B 10 mg/kg every 14 days and E 150 mg orally daily, continuously, for 28-day cycles. Tumor response was evaluated every 2 cycles by using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group criteria. A total of 40 patients were treated. Results The primary end point of PFS16 was 62.5%. Ten patients achieved a partial response for a confirmed overall response rate (intent-to-treat) of 25%. The median PFSevent was 39 weeks (95% CI, 26 to 45 weeks; 9.0 months), and the median overall survival was 68 weeks (95% CI, 48 to 78 weeks; 15.65 months). Grades 3 to 4 drug-related toxicity included fatigue (n = 8; 20%), hypertension (n = 6; 15%), diarrhea (n = 4; 10%) elevated transaminases (n = 4; 10%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n = 5; 12.5%), wound infection (n = 2; 5%) thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 2.5%), and proteinuria, hyperbilirubinemia, back pain, hyperkalemia, and anorexia (n = 1 each). Conclusion The combination of B + E in patients who had advanced HCC showed significant, clinically meaningful antitumor activity. B + E warrant additional evaluation in randomized controlled trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document