Hospice use at end of life in children with cancer: The effect of insurance.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10558-10558
Author(s):  
Emily E. Johnston ◽  
Elizabeth Davis ◽  
Smita Bhatia ◽  
Kelly Kenzik

10558 Background: The National Quality Forum has endorsed hospice care as a metric of high quality end-of-life (EOL) care for adults with cancer. Specific hospice-related quality metrics include hospice enrollment, hospice enrollment for ≥3d, and death outside of the acute care setting. These metrics have been examined extensively in adults and disparities related to a number of clinical and sociodemographic factors, including insurance, have been identified. However, for children with cancer, hospice utilization data is lacking. We addressed this gap by examining location of death and hospice utilization at EOL for children with cancer and determining whether these metrics varied with insurance status. Methods: We used national insurance claims data (Truven) to conduct a population-based analysis of patients with cancer who died between 2011 and 2017 at age 0-21y. The dataset was queried for hospice claims, inpatient claims, and location of death. The association between insurance (private vs. Medicaid) and 1) location of death, 2) hospice enrollment, and 3) days between first hospice claim and death was examined using multivariable regression analysis, adjusting for age at death, gender, and cancer diagnosis (hematologic malignancies vs. solid tumor). Results: A total of 1,492 children died at a mean age of 11y (SD: 6y); 56% were privately-insured, 56% were male, and 30% had hematologic malignancies. Overall, 58% died in the hospital (privately-insured: 54% vs. Medicaid: 63%). Forty-five percent enrolled in hospice (privately-insured: 46% vs. Medicaid: 43%) with 2% returning to the hospital to die after enrolling in hospice. The average time between first hospice claim and death was 3d (privately-insured: 10d vs. Medicaid: 2d, p = < 0.001). When compared to privately-insured children, children on Medicaid had similar likelihood of hospice enrollment (RR = 1.0, 95%Cl = 0.6-1.8). However, children on Medicaid were more likely to die in the hospital (RR = 1.3, 95%CI = 1.1-1.4) and have fewer days between hospice enrollment and death if enrolled in hospice (IRR: 0.5, 95%CI = 0.3-0.8). Conclusions: In this first study to examine national hospice utilization in children with cancer, care varies significantly with insurance status. Children on Medicaid are more likely to die in the hospital and have shorter hospice enrollment duration than children with private insurance. Whether this variation represents EOL care preferences, provider biases, differences in quality and availability of hospice or home care to different insurers, or other barriers needs to be examined.

Author(s):  
Ladawna Gievers ◽  
Sheevaun Khaki ◽  
Abby Dotson ◽  
Zunqiu Chen ◽  
Robert C. Macauley ◽  
...  

Background: End of life (EOL) care planning is important for aging adults given the growing prevalence of chronic medical conditions in the US. The Portable Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) program promotes communication between clinicians and patients with advanced illness about EOL treatment preferences. Despite growing resources for EOL care, utilization remains unequal based on social determinants of health (SDOH), including race, language, urbanization, and education. We evaluated the relationship between POLST form selections and completion rates and SDOH. Methods: Oregon POLST Registry and American Community Survey data from 2013 to 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. POLST form completion rates and selections, and various SDOH, including age, income, insurance status, urbanization, etc. were recorded. Data were merged based on ZIP codes and analyzed using χ2 or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests. Logistic regression was performed. Results: 127,588 POLST forms from 319 ZIP codes were included. POLST form completion rates were highest among urban ZIP codes, and urban registrants more often selected CPR and full treatment. ZIP codes with higher incomes tended to select CPR. ZIP codes with higher rates of private insurance completed POLST forms, and selected CPR and full treatment more frequently. ZIP codes with higher rates of Bachelor’s degrees (or higher) completed POLST forms and selected full treatment more frequently. Conclusions: Various SDOH-specifically, urbanization, insurance status, income level and educational level achieved-may influence POLST form completion rates and selections. The expanding socioeconomic diversity and growth of urban communities, highlight the need for broader access to EOL planning and POLST.


2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110111
Author(s):  
Krista L. Haines ◽  
Benjamin P. Nguyen ◽  
Ioana Antonescu ◽  
Jennifer Freeman ◽  
Christopher Cox ◽  
...  

Introduction Advanced directives (ADs) provide a framework from which families may understand patient’s wishes. However, end-of-life planning may not be prioritized by everyone. This analysis aimed to determine what populations have ADs and how they affected trauma outcomes. Methods Adult trauma patients recorded in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) from 2013-2015 were included. The primary outcome was presence of an AD. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of stay (LOS), mechanical ventilation, ICU admission/LOS, withdrawal of life-sustaining measures, and discharge disposition. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed for outcomes. Results 44 705 patients were included in the analyses. Advanced directives were present in 1.79% of patients. The average age for patients with ADs was 77.8 ± 10.7. African American (odds ratio (OR) .53, confidence intervals [CI] .36-.79) and Asian (OR .22, CI .05-.91) patients were less likely to have ADs. Conversely, Medicaid (OR 1.70, CI 1.06-2.73) and Medicare (OR 1.65, CI 1.25-2.17) patients were more likely to have ADs as compared to those with private insurance. The presence of ADs was associated with increased hospital mortality (OR 2.84, CI 2.19-3.70), increased transition to comfort measures (OR 2.87, CI 2.08-3.95), and shorter LOS (CO −.74, CI −1.26-.22). Patients with ADs had an increased odds of hospice care (OR 4.24, CI 3.18-5.64). Conclusion Advanced directives at admission are uncommon, particularly among African Americans and Asians. The presence of ADs was associated with increased mortality, use of mechanical ventilation, admission to the ICU, withdrawal of life-sustaining measures, and hospice. Future research should target expansion of ADs among minority populations to alleviate disparities in end-of-life treatment.


Author(s):  
James Alton Croker ◽  
Julie Bobitt ◽  
Sara Sanders ◽  
Kanika Arora ◽  
Keith Mueller ◽  
...  

Introduction: Between 2013 and 2019, Illinois limited cannabis access to certified patients enrolled in the Illinois Medical Cannabis Program (IMCP). In 2016, the state instituted a fast-track pathway for terminal patients. The benefits of medicinal cannabis (MC) have clear implications for patients near end-of-life (EOL). However, little is known about how terminal patients engage medical cannabis relative to supportive care. Methods: Anonymous cross-sectional survey data were collected from 342 terminal patients who were already enrolled in ( n = 19) or planning to enroll ( n = 323) in hospice for EOL care. Logistic regression models compare patients in the sample on hospice planning vs. hospice enrollment, use of palliative care vs. hospice care, and use standard care vs non-hospice palliative care. Results: In our sample, cancer patients ( OR = 0.21 (0.11), p < .01), and those who used the fast-track application into the IMCP ( OR = 0.11 (0.06), p < .001) were less likely to be enrolled in hospice. Compared to patients in palliative care, hospice patients were less likely to report cancer as their qualifying condition ( OR = 0.16 (0.11), p < .01), or entered the IMCP via the fast-track ( OR = 0.23 (0.15), p < .05). Discussion: Given low hospice enrollment in a fairly large EOL sample, cannabis use may operate as an alternative to supportive forms of care like hospice and palliation. Clinicians should initiate conversations about cannabis use with their patients while also engaging EOL Care planning discussions as an essential part of the general care plan.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alisha Kassam ◽  
Rinku Sutradhar ◽  
Kimberley Widger ◽  
Adam Rapoport ◽  
Jason D. Pole ◽  
...  

Purpose Children with cancer often receive high-intensity (HI) medical care at the end-of-life (EOL). Previous studies have been limited to single centers or lacked detailed clinical data. We determined predictors of and trends in HI-EOL care by linking population-based clinical and health-services databases. Methods A retrospective decedent cohort of patients with childhood cancer who died between 2000 and 2012 in Ontario, Canada, was assembled using a provincial cancer registry and linked to population-based health-care data. Based on previous studies, the primary composite measure of HI-EOL care comprised any of the following: intravenous chemotherapy < 14 days from death; more than one emergency department visit; and more than one hospitalization or intensive care unit admission < 30 days from death. Secondary measures included those same individual measures and measures of the most invasive (MI) EOL care (eg, mechanical ventilation < 14 days from death). We determined predictors of outcomes with appropriate regression models. Sensitivity analysis was restricted to cases of cancer-related mortality, excluding treatment-related mortality (TRM) cases. Results The study included 815 patients; of these, 331 (40.6%) experienced HI-EOL care. Those with hematologic malignancies were at highest risk (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8 to 3.6; P < .001). Patients with hematologic cancers and those who died after 2004 were more likely to experience the MI-EOL care (eg, intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, odds ratios from 2.0 to 5.1). Excluding cases of TRM did not substantively change the results. Conclusion Ontario children with cancer continue to experience HI-EOL care. Patients with hematologic malignancies are at highest risk even when excluding TRM. Of concern, rates of the MI-EOL care have increased over time despite increased palliative care access. Linking health services and clinical data allows monitoring of population trends in EOL care and identifies high-risk populations for future interventions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1366-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Wang ◽  
Rohit P Ojha ◽  
Sonia Partap ◽  
Kimberly J Johnson

Abstract Background Differences in access, delivery and utilisation of health care may impact childhood and adolescent cancer survival. We evaluated whether insurance coverage impacts survival among US children and adolescents with cancer diagnoses, overall and by age group, and explored potential mechanisms. Methods Data from 58 421 children (aged ≤14 years) and adolescents (15–19 years), diagnosed with cancer from 2004 to 2010, were obtained from the National Cancer Database. We examined associations between insurance status at initial diagnosis or treatment and diagnosis stage; any treatment received; and mortality using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression, restricted mean survival time (RMST) and mediation analyses. Results Relative to privately insured individuals, the hazard of death (all-cause) was increased and survival months were decreased in those with Medicaid [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22 to 1.33; and −1.73 months, 95% CI: −2.07 to −1.38] and no insurance (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.46; and −2.13 months, 95% CI: −2.91 to −1.34). The HR for Medicaid vs. private insurance was larger (pinteraction &lt;0.001) in adolescents (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.41 to 1.64) than children (HR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.23). Despite statistical evidence violation of the PH assumption, RMST results supported all interpretations. Earlier diagnosis for staged cancers in the Medicaid and uninsured populations accounted for an estimated 13% and 19% of the survival deficit, respectively, vs. the privately insured population. Any treatment received did not account for insurance-associated survival differences in children and adolescents with cancer. Conclusions Children and adolescents without private insurance had a higher risk of death and shorter survival within 5 years following cancer diagnosis. Additional research is needed to understand underlying mechanisms.


Author(s):  
Sheng-Yu Fan ◽  
Jyh-Gang Hsieh

Physicians have a responsibility to discuss do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions and end-of-life (EOL) care with patients and family members. The aim of this study was to explore the DNR and EOL care discussion experience among physicians in Taiwan. A qualitative study was conducted with 16 physicians recruited from the departments of hospice care, surgery, internal medicine, emergency, and the intensive care unit. The interview guidelines included their DNR experience and process and EOL care discussions, as well as their concerns, difficulties, or worries in discussions. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data. Four themes were identified. First, family members had multiple roles in the decision process. Second, the characteristics of the units, including time urgency and relationships with patients and family members, influenced physicians’ work. Third, the process included preparation, exploration, information delivery, barrier solution, and execution. Fourth, physicians shared reflections on their ability and the conflicts between law, medical professionals, and the best interests of patients. Physicians must consider not only patients’ but also family members’ opinions and surmount several barriers in decision-making. They also experienced negative and positive impacts from these discussions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Chen ◽  
Eben L. Rosenthal ◽  
Vasu Divi

The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative has several metrics related to end-of life (EOL) care, including hospice enrollment ≤3 days, with lower scores signaling better performance. Of privately insured patients with head and neck cancer, 3.5% were enrolled in hospice prior to death and 21.3% spent ≤3 days in hospice, indicating aggressive EOL care. Patients with late hospice enrollment had higher spending in the last 30 days of life (DOL). Patients in hospice ≤3 days spent $37,426, while those in hospice >3 days spent $24,418 ( P = .002). The largest portion of this difference was attributable to inpatient services. Patients in hospice ≤3 days spent $22,089 on inpatient services in the last 30 DOL, while those in hospice >3 days spent $8361 ( P < .001). Further research is needed to determine if more high-value care can be provided with earlier hospice enrollment and to ensure that goal concordance is included in defining high-value care.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Su-Jin Koh ◽  
Shinmi Kim ◽  
JinShil Kim

11 Background: The Korean advance directives (K-ADs) consist of a value statement, treatment directives (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], preferences for artificial ventilation, tube feeding, and hospice care). K-ADs can facilitate a patient’s decision-making for end-of-life (EOL) care. This study aims to examine the extent to which patient-caregiver dyads agreed on decisions for EOL care using the K-ADs. Methods: Using a descriptive study design, 81 cancer patients were invited to participate. The final sample consisted of 44 patient-caregiver dyads who completed K-ADs; 36 (44.4%) of the initial 81 patients declined to participate. Results: Patient participants had different cancerdiagnoses: 29.5% colorectal cancer, 29.5% breast, and 15.9% liver/biliary tract cancers; 59% of the sample had advanced stage cancer. Spouse (70.5%) and adult children of the patient (20.4%) were primary caregivers with perceived bonding rated as fair (31.8%) or good (65.9%). Rejection of K-ADs was mainly because of difficulty in deciding EOL care (50%). Comfort in dying was the most common theme of the value statement for patients (73.8%) and caregivers (66.7%). For treatment directives, dyads advocated for hospice care (66.7%) and reduced support for aggressive treatments of CPR or artificial ventilation, k = .43, p = .004 and k = .28, p = .046, respectively. These approaches showed significantly mild to moderate concordance among the dyads. Sixteen out of the 21 dyads identified their spouses as a proxy, with others designating their adult children. Conclusions: The findings of the study are exploratory but suggest the need for ongoing EOL discussion where patient-caregiver dyads are encouraged to participate in the decision-making for EOL care.


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara B. Dassel ◽  
Rebecca Utz ◽  
Katherine Supiano ◽  
Nancy McGee ◽  
Seth Latimer

Background: Differences in end-of-life (EOL) care preferences (eg, location of death, use of life-sustaining treatments, openness to hastening death, etc) based on hypothetical death scenarios and associated physical and/or cognitive losses have yet to be investigated within the palliative care literature. Aim: The purpose of this study was to explore the multidimensional EOL care preferences in relation to 3 different hypothetical death scenarios: pancreatic cancer (acute death), Alzheimer disease (gradual death), and congestive heart failure (intermittent death). Design: General linear mixed-effects regression models estimated whether multidimensional EOL preferences differed under each of the hypothetical death scenarios; all models controlled for personal experience and familiarity with the disease, presence of an advance directive, religiosity, health-related quality of life, and relevant demographic characteristics. Setting/Participants: A national sample of healthy adults aged 50 years and older (N = 517) completed electronic surveys detailing their multidimensional preferences for EOL care for each hypothetical death scenario. Results: The average age of the participants was 60.1 years (standard deviation = 7.6), 74.7% were female, and 66.1% had a college or postgraduate degree. Results revealed significant differences in multidimensional care preferences between hypothetical death scenarios related to preferences for location of death (ie, home vs medical facility) and preferences for life-prolonging treatment options. Significant covariates of participants’ multidimensional EOL care preferences included age, sex, health-related quality of life, and religiosity. Conclusion: Our hypothesis that multidimensional EOL care preferences would differ based on hypothetical death scenarios was partially supported and suggests the need for disease-specific EOL care discussions.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3290-3290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oreofe O. Odejide ◽  
Angel M. Cronin ◽  
Nolan B. Condron ◽  
Sean A. Fletcher ◽  
Craig Earle ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Hematologic malignancies have been associated with poor performance on standard measures of quality of end-of-life (EOL) care in oncology (eg, Hui, Cancer, 2014); however, these measures were originally developed primarily for solid tumors, and they may not appropriately address EOL quality issues for patients with blood cancers. We sought to explore hematologic oncologists' perspectives regarding the acceptability of current oncology EOL quality measures, hypothesizing that they would report them to be largely unacceptable. Methods: In 2014, we mailed a 30-item survey to a national sample of hematologic oncologists randomly selected from the American Society of Hematology clinical directory. The survey was developed through focus groups (n=20) and cognitive debriefing (n=5) with hematologists whose practices focus on patients with blood cancers. In the resulting survey, we provided a list of standard EOL quality measures (Earle, JCO, 2003; Keating, Cancer, 2010; Phelps, JAMA, 2009; see table) and two novel hematology-based measures (no red cell transfusions ≤ 7 days before death, and no platelet transfusions ≤ 7 days before death) and asked "Please indicate whether or not you feel each is an acceptable indicator of good quality EOL care for patients with hematologic malignancies." We decided a priori that we would consider a measure to be "highly acceptable" if there were at least 75% agreement among hematologic oncologists on its acceptability. Worrying that they might reject them all, we also asked them to identify three measures they would choose in a scenario where three had to be adopted. Results: We received 349 surveys from 48 states (response rate: 57.3%). Non-responders were not significantly different across known variables (gender and region of practice). Among respondents, median age was 52 years, median time in practice was 25 years, and 43% practiced primarily in tertiary centers. Eighty-seven percent were board-certified in oncology, 81% in hematology, and 71% in both specialties. The table below shows acceptability of the quality measures as rated by respondents. In the exercise where three measures had to be chosen, the one chosen most often was no CPR within 30 days of death (54%), followed by enrollment in hospice >7 days before death (46%). Conclusions: In contrast to our hypothesis, all of the measures we presented were considered acceptable by a substantial proportion of the hematologic oncologists in our national cohort. Moreover, while four of the measures reached our a priori designation of being highly acceptable, the two hematology-focused measures did not meet this same threshold. These data suggest that in hematologic oncology, resources should be directed towards addressing barriers to performance on established EOL quality measures in addition to creating new ones. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document