Using digital engagement to proactively manage symptoms in patients on capecitabine.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12079-12079
Author(s):  
Mandeep Sohal ◽  
Sarah McLarty ◽  
Kayla E Friend ◽  
Kathryn D Johnson ◽  
Melissa Johlie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Secure Messaging ◽  
Clinical Interventions ◽  
Nurse Care ◽  
Care Managers ◽  
Digital Engagement ◽  
Nurse Intervention

12079 Background: Adherence to oral chemotherapy is a challenge due to the toxic adverse events (AEs) patients’ experience. Capecitabine (CAP) may cause patients to experience AEs such as diarrhea and hand and foot syndrome (HFS), leading to therapy non-adherence. Digital patient engagement has successfully improved patient adherence and has been used to monitor AEs in a variety of cancer types. We used proprietary secure messaging to engage specialty patients receiving CAP and to message them at the expected onset of diarrhea and HFS; nurse care management was deployed for patients reporting an AE. The objective of this study was to determine whether nurse engagement using digital tools to manage oncology AEs resulted in improved medication adherence. Methods: CAP patients were sent outgoing SMS branching logic messages during November 2019, and respondents reporting AEs were engaged by nurses using a proprietary secure messaging platform. Nurses made clinical interventions in these patients by either making a pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic recommendation or referring the patient to an oncologist. The number of patients responding to outgoing SMS and secure messaging, nurse interventions, and medication fill history were measured. We compared 30-day post-intervention proportion of days covered (PDC) in the intervention group (those that engaged with nurses and received digital adherence and clinical messages) to standard of care (those who received digital adherence and clinical messages but did not engage) using the Student’s t-test. Results: 1,421 outgoing messages were sent to utilizers of CAP; 95 patients replied indicating the occurrence of either diarrhea or HFS. Nurse care managers reached 49 (52%) unique patients resulting in 54 interventions where care coordination was provided. The majority of engaged patients reached (74%) had symptom resolution as a result of nurse intervention. PDC was 79.3% in the intervention group and 68.8% (p = 0.038) in the standard of care group. Conclusions: SMS and secure messaging patients with AEs on CAP resulted in clinical interventions by nurse care managers. Nurse intervention resulted in the majority of patients having symptomatic resolution and therapy continuation. PDC indicated greater medication adherence in the engaged group. These results for one drug suggest that nurse digital engagement can be effective in increasing adherence for patients treated with oral oncolytics suffering from AEs. Proactive symptom tracking supports the early identification of potential AEs and effective nurse care coordination.

P578Use of a smartphone application to increase adherence to medical treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a randomized clinical trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C M Garmendia ◽  
P Miranda ◽  
E Verello ◽  
M A Goyeneche ◽  
J F Furmento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Abstract Background Adherence to cardiovascular medications following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) hospitalization is generally poor and is associated with increased risk of rehospitalization and mortality. There are still significant opportunities to identify simple and low-cost interventions that improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes. Purpose To evaluate the use of a digital platform for smartphones to improve adherence to medical treatment and outcomes for 90-days post discharge in patients hospitalized for ACS with or without ST-elevation. Methods This was a unicentric, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial enrolling 90 patients with an ACS event requiring hospitalization. The intervention consisted of a smartphone application which allowed for the loading of medication prescription together with reminder of the daily compliance. Patients in the intervention group (n=46) were equipped with the smartphone application. Patients in the control group (n=44) received written and oral instructions as per standard of care. The primary outcome was adherence to medical treatment measured at 90-days post discharge using the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). The secondary outcome was a composite of re-hospitalizations for ACS, consultations to the emergency department (ED), or unplanned visits to the clinic. Results The mean age of the population was 63.2±9.9 and 75.6% were male. At 90 days, 64.7% of patients using the smartphone application were adherent compared with 20.5% of patients in the control group (p<0.001). Patients in the intervention group had higher adherence (mean MMAS-8 score 7.52±1.25) compared with the control group (mean MMAS-8 score 6.47±1.23; p<0.001). The secondary outcome measures showed that there were no significant differences in patients using the smartphone application versus the standard of care (4.3% vs 15.9%, p=0.07, respectively). Table 1 Variables Global (n=90) Control (n=44) Intervention (n=46) p MMAS-8 score 7±1.34 6.47±1.23 7.52±1.25 <0.001 Adherents 40 (44.4%) 9 (20.5%) 31 (67.4%) <0.001 Events 9 (10.1%) 7 (15.9%) 2 (4.3%) 0.071 ED consultations 9 7 2 Score assessment 8.85±1.4 Conclusions In patients with ACS, the use of a smartphone application increased the medication adherence compared with the standard of care. These data suggest that there is potential for a simple, low-cost intervention to help patients adhere to medications. ClinicalTrials.gov unique identifier: NCT03766789.

scholarly journals Stakeholder perceptions of components of a Parkinson disease care management intervention, care coordination for health promotion and activities in Parkinson’s disease (CHAPS)

BMC Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen I. Connor ◽  
Hilary C. Siebens ◽  
Brian S. Mittman ◽  
Donna K. McNeese-Smith ◽  
David A. Ganz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Promotion ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Care Management ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Management Model ◽  
Nurse Care ◽  
Management Intervention ◽  
Care Managers ◽  
Domain Management

Abstract Background A recent nurse-led proactive care management intervention, Care Coordination for Health Promotion and Activities in Parkinson Disease (CHAPS), improved care quality when compared to usual care in a randomized controlled trial. Therefore, stakeholder (patient participants, nurse care managers, and Parkinson disease (PD) specialists) perceptions of key intervention components merit evaluation to inform decisions about dissemination. Methods This multi-site study occurred in five southwest United States Veterans Health Administration medical centers. Stakeholders were surveyed on their perceptions of CHAPS including the CHAPS Assessment, CHAPS nurse care managers, the Siebens Domain Management Model™ (a practical clinical model), and the Siebens Health Care Notebook (Notebook) (self-care tool). Participants’ electronic medical records were abstracted for perceptions of the Notebook. Statistical analysis software was used to provide summary statistics; open card sorting methodology was used to identify themes and attributes in qualitative data including usability of some components. Results Participants, overall, highly rated their medication self-management, acknowledged some challenges with the CHAPS self-care tools, reported knowledge of PD specialist follow-up and PD red flags, and rated CHAPS nurse care managers as helpful. Nurse care manager responses indicated the CHAPS Assessment and Program highly facilitated care of their patients. Most all PD specialists would refer other patients to CHAPS. Nurse care manager and PD specialist responses indicated improved participant management of their PD. Three themes emerged in participant perceptions of the Notebook: Notebook Assets (e.g., benefits and features-liked); Deferring Notebook Review (e.g., no time to review); and Reasons for Not Using (e.g., participant preference). Shared attributes regarding the Siebens Domain Management Model and Notebook usability, reported by nurse care managers, were user-friendly, person/patient-centered, and organized. Some challenges to their use were also reported. Conclusions Overall, stakeholder perceptions of the proactive nurse-led CHAPS intervention indicated its value in the care of individuals with PD. Responses about the CHAPS Assessment, Siebens Domain Management Model, and Notebook self-care tool signified their usefulness. Stakeholders’ constructive suggestions indicated their engagement in CHAPS. These findings support CHAPS dissemination and contribute to research in care management. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01532986, registered on January 13, 2012.

Abstract 146: Medical Home Model in the management of Heart Failure

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Houston-Feenstra ◽  
Kenneth Jutzy ◽  
Reane Larsen
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Medical Home ◽  
Patient Adherence ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Sodium Balance ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Ed Visits

Purpose: Heart failure (HF) continues as the most expensive diagnosis to manage in the US. Patient failure to adhere to medication regimens and fluid overload have been identified as causative factors in frequent exacerbations requiring hospitalization. This study was designed to evaluate outcomes over time of a Medical Home interdisciplinary team management and patient education design compared to standard of care in HF. Methods: The study was designed as a prospective case-control study. Enrollment occurred post HF hospitalization. During hospitalization all pts received education in Guideline-driven management of HF, and were discharged on evidence-based medications. Patients provided informed consent allowing review of medical records for 5 years. One group of pts agreed to participate in a Medical Home for the management of HF (MHHF) while another group chose management of HF by their own cardiologists. Data analysis was performed using case controlled pairing of pts based on age, gender and socio-economic status. Data represents results at 48 months. The Intervention group (22 pts: mean age 60.8) was followed in a MHHF which includes a HF specific clinic and a 12 week comprehensive HF management and exercise program (both clinic and HF management program have the same disease management protocols) and the Control group (48 pts: mean age 62.2) returned to standard follow up care for HF. In MHHF medications were optimized per evidence -based recommendations and education included use of medications, diet and effective sodium balance. Results: Functional Capacity Results: Medication adherence/Hospitalizations/ED visits Note: * baseline to 48 months. Hosp. visits = # hospitalizations/yr/ patient, ED Visits = # ED visits/yr/ patient. Medical record review of medication use for Standard of Care pts failed to provide adequate information on dose /patient. **Adherence was often self reported so true adherence may be lower than reported for this group. Conclusions: 1. Patients participating in MHHF demonstrated long-term improvement in medication adherence and smoking cessation. 2. Patients participating in MHHF demonstrated significantly fewer HF related Hospitalizations and ED visits 48 months following their baseline hospitalization.

Effectiveness of a web-based medication adherence tool with patient centered communication: Results of a clustered randomized controlled trial (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan van Lieshout ◽  
Joyca Lacroix ◽  
Aart van Halteren ◽  
Martina Teichert
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Community Pharmacies ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Tailored Interventions ◽  
Increased Risk

BACKGROUND Growing numbers of people use medication for chronic conditions; non-adherence is common, leading to poor disease control. A newly developed web-based tool to identify an increased risk for non-adherence with related potential individual barriers might facilitate tailored interventions and improve adherence. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of the newly developed tool to improve medication adherence. METHODS A cluster randomized controlled trial assessed the effectiveness of this adherence tool in patients initiating cardiovascular or oral blood glucose lowering medication. Participants were included in community pharmacies. They completed an online questionnaire comprising an assessments of their risk for medication non-adherence and subsequently of barriers to adherence. In pharmacies belonging to the intervention group, individual barriers displayed in a graphical profile on a tablet were discussed by pharmacists and patients at high non-adherence risk in face to face meetings and shared with their general practitioners and practice nurses. Tailored interventions were initiated by the healthcare providers. Barriers of control patients were not presented or discussed and these patients received usual care. The primary outcome was the difference in medication adherence at 8 months follow-up between patients with an increased non-adherence risk from intervention and control group, calculated from dispensing data. RESULTS Data from 492 participants in 15 community pharmacies were available for analyses (intervention 253, 7 pharmacies; control 239, 8 pharmacies). The intervention had no effect on medication adherence (-0.01; 95%CI -0.59 – 0.57; P= .96), neither in the post hoc per protocol analysis (0.19; 95%CI -0.50 – 0.89; P=.58). CONCLUSIONS This study showed no effectiveness of a risk stratification and tailored intervention addressing personal barriers for medication adherence. Various potential explanations for lack of effect were identified. These explanations relate for instance to high medication adherence in the control group, study power and fidelity. Process evaluation should elicit possible improvements and inform the redesign of intervention and implementation. CLINICALTRIAL The Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR5186. Date: May 18, 2015 (http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=5186)

scholarly journals Benefit of a pharmacist-led intervention for medication management of renal transplant patients: a controlled before-and-after study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062232110052
Author(s):  
Jeremy Chambord ◽  
Lionel Couzi ◽  
Pierre Merville ◽  
Karine Moreau ◽  
Fabien Xuereb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Medication Management ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Knowledge Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Patient Knowledge ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Before And After ◽  
High Level

Aims: To assess the effect of a pharmacist-led intervention, using Barrows cards method, during the first year after renal transplantation, on patient knowledge about their treatment, medication adherence and exposure to treatment in a French cohort. Methods: We conducted a before-and-after comparative study between two groups of patients: those who benefited from a complementary pharmacist-led intervention [intervention group (IG), n = 44] versus those who did not [control group (CG), n = 48]. The pharmacist-led intervention consisted of a behavioral and educational interview at the first visit (visit 1). The intervention was assessed 4 months later at the second visit (visit 2), using the following endpoints: treatment knowledge, medication adherence [proportion of days covered (PDC) by immunosuppressive therapy] and tacrolimus exposure. Results: At visit 2, IG patients achieved a significantly higher knowledge score than CG patients (83.3% versus 72.2%, p = 0.001). We did not find any differences in treatment exposure or medication adherence; however, the intervention tended to reduce the proportion of non-adherent patients with low knowledge scores. Using the PDC by immunosuppressive therapy, we identified 10 non-adherent patients (10.9%) at visit 1 and six at visit 2. Conclusions: Our intervention showed a positive effect on patient knowledge about their treatment. However, our results did not show any improvement in overall medication adherence, which was likely to be because of the initially high level of adherence in our study population. Nevertheless, the intervention appears to have improved adherence in non-adherent patients with low knowledge scores.

Motivational Interviewing to Support Oral AntiCoagulation adherence in patients with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (MISOAC-AF): a randomised clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Tzikas ◽  
A Samaras ◽  
A Kartas ◽  
D Vasdeki ◽  
G Fotos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Motivational Intervention ◽  
Clinical Events ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Abstract Background Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is paramount to effective thromboprophylaxis; yet adherence to OAC remains largely suboptimal in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Purpose We aimed to assess the impact of an educational, motivational intervention on the adherence to OAC in patients with non-valvular AF. Methods Hospitalised patients with non-valvular AF who received OAC were randomly assigned to usual medical care or a proactive intervention, comprising motivational interviewing and tailored counseling on medication adherence. The primary study outcome was adherence to OAC at 1-year, evaluated as Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) by OAC regimens and assessed through nationwide prescription registers. Secondary outcomes included the rate of persistence to OAC, gaps in treatment, proportion of VKA-takers with labile INR (defined as time to therapeutic range&lt;70%) and clinical events. Results A total of 1009 patients were randomised, 500 in the intervention group and 509 in the control group. At 1-year follow-up, 77.2% (386/500) of patients in the intervention group had good adherence (PDC&gt;80%), compared with 55% (280/509) in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 2.84, 95% confidence interval 2.14–3.75; p&lt;0.001). Mean PDC±SD was 0.85±0.26 and 0.75±0.31, respectively (p&lt;0.001). Patients that received the intervention were more likely to persist in their OAC therapy at 1 year, while usual medical care was associated with more major (≥3 months) treatment gaps [Figure]. Among 212 VKA-takers, patients in the intervention group were less likely to have labile INR compared with those in the control group [21/120 (17.1%) vs 34/92 (37.1%), OR 0.33 95% CI 1.15–0.72, p=0.005]. Clinical events over a median follow-up period of 2 years occurred at a numerically lower, yet non-significant, rate in the intervention group [Table]. Conclusions In patients receiving OAC therapy for non-valvular AF, a motivational intervention significantly improved patterns of medication adherence, without significantly affecting clinical outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Chemical, Mechanical, and Heat Cleaning to Decontaminate Hospital Drains Harboring Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriales

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s466-s467
Author(s):  
Alainna Juliette Jamal ◽  
Rajni Pantelidis ◽  
Rachael Sawicki ◽  
Angel Li ◽  
Wayne Chiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Brain Heart Infusion ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Comparator Group ◽  
Carbapenemase Gene ◽  
Cleaning Intervention

Background: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriales (CPE) outbreaks have been linked to contaminated wastewater drainage systems in hospitals. The optimal strategy for CPE decontamination of drains is unknown. In this randomized controlled trial, we aimed to determine whether combining chemical, mechanical, and heat cleaning was superior to routine cleaning for drain decontamination. Methods: We enrolled CPE-contaminated hospital drains at 2 geographic locations. Eligible drains were those initially found to be culture positive in a 2017 study and that remained positive (by RT-PCR) when retested twice in August 2018. Drains were stratified by type (sink versus shower) and randomized with a 1:1 allocation ratio (as per computer-generated randomization) to standard-of-care cleaning (comparator) or combined chemical, mechanical, and heat cleaning (intervention) on day 0. Drain tail pieces were swabbed on days 0 (before administration of the intervention), 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14, and at months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Swabs were placed into brain heart infusion with 10% Dey-Engley neutralizing broth and incubated overnight. Direct RT-PCR was performed to detect KPC, VIM, NDM, OXA-48–like, IMP, GES, and SME genes. The primary outcome was drain decontamination, defined as no detectable carbapenemase gene in the drain from day 1 to 7 (inclusive). Results: Overall, 33 CPE-contaminated drains were enrolled (7 sink and 26 shower); 17 and 16 drains were randomized to the intervention and comparator, respectively. Moreover, 12 (36%) drains met the primary outcome of decontamination, 18 (55%) remained contaminated, and 3 (9%) could not be assessed. Among drains that could be assessed, 11 of 15 (74%) in the intervention group met the primary outcome of decontamination compared to 1 of 15 (7%) in the comparator group (P = .0005). Of the 11 drains in the intervention group that were decontaminated, the carbapenemase gene present at enrollment was subsequently detected in 10 (91%): 1 (10%) at day 14, 3 (30%) at month 1, 4 (40%) at month 3, 1 (10%) at month 4, and 1 (10%) at month 6. The median time to a swab yielding CPE was 1 day in the comparator group versus 14 days in the intervention group (Fig. 1). Overall, 24 drains (73%) had a carbapenemase gene (that was not detectable at enrollment) appear in the follow-up. Of patients identified as CPE colonized or infected during this study, none occupied rooms with these drains. Conclusions: Chemical, mechanical, and heat cleaning were superior to standard cleaning for CPE decontamination of hospital drains at 7 days, but these trends were not sustained. Such cleaning may be useful if applied repeatedly.Funding: NoneDisclosures: Allison McGeer reports funds to her institution for studies for which she is the principal investigator from Pfizer and Merck as well as consulting fees from Sanofi-Pasteur, Sunovion, GSK, Pfizer, and Cidara.

scholarly journals POS0058-PARE INCREASING PREECLAMPSIA KNOWLEDGE IN SLE WITH A SPECIFIC EDUCATIONAL TOOL: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 235.2-235
Author(s):  
J. Y. E. Lee ◽  
A. Mendel ◽  
I. Malhamé ◽  
S. Bernatsky ◽  
E. Vinet
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Vulnerable Population ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Educational Tool ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Systemic Lupus

Background:Pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at high risk of preeclampsia, leading to substantial maternal and fetal morbidity. Aspirin reduces preeclampsia risk but recent studies suggest aspirin is used only in a minority of SLE pregnancies. There is an urgent need to improve preeclampsia counselling and management in this vulnerable population.Objectives:We are conducting the PREPARE (PREeclamPsia knowledge & Aspirin adheRence in lupus prEgnancies) trial, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating an educational tool on preeclampsia knowledge and aspirin adherence among pregnant women with SLE. We present preliminary analyses of the effect of this tool on preeclampsia knowledge.Methods:Consecutive pregnant SLE women are recruited until the 16th gestational week at 5Canadian Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics centres (i.e. Montreal, Halifax, Quebec, Winnipeg, and Calgary) since 05/2018. Subjects are randomly assigned to receive either the specifically-designed educational tool (intervention group) or standard of care (control group). At baseline (i.e. first trimester) and second trimester visits, the participants complete self-administered preeclampsia knowledge questionnaires (scored out of 30 by the research team blinded to the intervention). We restricted the current analysis to participants enrolled in Montreal (accounting for nearly half of the total planned sample size). We performed a univariate linear regression analysis to assess the effect of the educational tool on preeclampsia knowledge (i.e. mean score difference between the two groups from baseline to second trimester visit).Results:Thirty-three pregnant SLE women were included in the study, among which 16 were exposed to the intervention and 17 were unexposed. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups with similar mean maternal age between intervention group (32.2 years, standard deviation, SD, 4.6) and control group (34.1 years, SD 4.2) and identical proportion of subjects with post-secondary education (i.e. 80%). The difference in mean preeclampsia knowledge scores between second trimester and baseline visits in the intervention group was 4.4 points (95% CI -0.1, 9.0) and in the control group was 1.5 points (95% CI -2.7, 5.7). The mean difference in knowledge scores (from baseline to second trimester) for those receiving the educational tool was 2.7 points higher (95% CI -1.5, 6.9) than those receiving standard of care.Conclusion:Approximately midway into the PREPARE trial, we observed a trend for improvement in preeclampsia knowledge from the baseline to the second trimester visit in pregnant women with SLE who received a specifically-designed educational tool compared to the control group, although the CIs included the null. Our RCT is well-poised to provide a new evidence-based approach to improve preeclampsia knowledge in pregnant women with SLE, which could help to optimize aspirin use and outcomes in this vulnerable population.References:[1]Schramm AM, Clowse ME. Aspirin for prevention of preeclampsia in lupus pregnancy. Autoimmune Dis. 2014;2014:920467. doi:10.1155/2014/920467[2]Bujold E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y, et al. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):402-414. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e9322a[3]Andreoli L, Bertsias GK, Agmon-Levin N, et al. EULAR recommendations for women’s health and the management of family planning, assisted reproduction, pregnancy and menopause in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Mar;76(3):476–85. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209770.[4]Mendel A, Bernatsky SB, Hanly JG, et al. Low aspirin use and high prevalence of preeclampsia risk factors among pregnant women in a multinational SLE inception cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(7):1010-1012. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214434Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

scholarly journals Impact of simple, specific, verbal instructions on the quality of bowel preparation in hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. E378-E387
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Triantafyllou ◽  
Paraskevas Gkolfakis ◽  
Alexandros Skamnelos ◽  
Georgia Diamantopoulou ◽  
Athanasios Dagas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bowel Preparation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Verbal Instructions ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and study aims Bowel preparation for colonoscopy is frequently inadequate in hospitalized patients. We explored the impact of specific verbal instructions on the quality of inpatients bowel preparation and factors associated with preparation failure. Patients and methods Randomized (1:1), two strata (mobilized vs. bedridden; 3:2) trial of consecutive inpatients from four tertiary centers, who received either specific, verbal instructions or the standard of care (SOC) ward instructions about bowel preparation. The rate of adequate bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Score [BBPS] ≥ 6, no segment < 2) comprised the primary endpoint. Mean BBPS score, good (BBPS score ≥ 7, no segment score < 2) and excellent (BBPS = 9) were among secondary endpoints. Results We randomized 300 inpatients (180 mobile) aged 71.7 ± 15.1 years in the intervention (49.7 %) and SOC (50.3 %) groups, respectively. Overall, more patients in the intervention group achieved adequate bowel preparation, but this difference did not reach statistical significance neither in the intention-to-treat [90/149 (60.4 %) vs. 82/151 (54.3 %); P = 0.29] nor in the per-protocol analysis [90/129 (69.8 %) vs. 82/132 (62.1 %); P = 0.19]. Overall BBPS score did not differ statistical significantly in the two groups, but the provision of specific verbal instructions was associated with significant higher rates of good (58.1 % vs. 43.2 %; P = 0.02) and excellent (31.8 % vs. 16.7 %; P = 0.004) bowel preparation compared to the SOC group. Administration of same-day bowel preparation and patient American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2 were identified as risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation. Conclusions Provision of specific verbal instructions did not increase the rate of adequate bowel preparation in a population of mobilized and bedridden hospitalized patients.

scholarly journals 83 A Medication Self-Management Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence For Older People with Multimorbidity: A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
C Yang ◽  
Z Hui ◽  
S Zhu ◽  
X Wang ◽  
G Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Older People ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Medication Knowledge ◽  
Management Intervention ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Introduction Medication self-management support has been recognised as an essential element in primary health care to promote medication adherence and health outcomes for older people with chronic conditions. A patient-centred intervention empowering patients and supporting medication self-management activities could benefit older people. This pilot study tested a newly developed medication self-management intervention for improving medication adherence among older people with multimorbidity. Method This was a two-arm randomised controlled trial. Older people with multimorbidity were recruited from a community healthcare centre in Changsha, China. Participants were randomly allocated to either a control group receiving usual care (n = 14), or to an intervention group receiving three face-to-face medication self-management sessions and two follow-up phone calls over six weeks, targeting behavioural determinants of adherence from the Information-Motivation-Behavioural skills model (n = 14). Feasibility was assessed through recruitment and retention rates, outcome measures collection, and intervention implementation. Follow-up data were measured at six weeks after baseline using patient-reported outcomes including medication adherence, medication self-management capabilities, treatment experiences, and quality of life. Preliminary effectiveness of the intervention was explored using generalised estimating equations. Results Of the 72 approached participants, 28 (38.89%) were eligible for study participation. In the intervention group, 13 participants (92.86%) completed follow-up and 10 (71.42%) completed all intervention sessions. Ten participants (71.42%) in the control group completed follow-up. The intervention was found to be acceptable by participants and the intervention nurse. Comparing with the control group, participants in the intervention group showed significant improvements in medication adherence (β = 0.26, 95%CI 0.12, 0.40, P &lt; 0.001), medication knowledge (β = 4.43, 95%CI 1.11, 7.75, P = 0.009), and perceived necessity of medications (β = −2.84, 95%CI -5.67, −0.01, P = 0.049) at follow-up. Conclusions The nurse-led medication self-management intervention is feasible and acceptable among older people with multimorbidity. Preliminary results showed that the intervention may improve patients’ medication knowledge and beliefs and thus lead to improved adherence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document