Impact of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) on survival in patients with ypN1 breast cancer that receive regional nodal irradiation (RNI): A national cancer database (NCDB) analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 572-572
Author(s):  
Michael Kharouta ◽  
Nicholas Damico ◽  
Eleanor Elizabeth Harris ◽  
Janice A. Lyons
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Invasive Breast Cancer ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Regional Nodal Irradiation ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Propensity Matching ◽  
The Impact

572 Background: The innovation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has allowed many patients with invasive breast cancer to forego ALND. However, the benefit of ALND is unclear in patients with pathologic N1 disease detected on SLNB following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, particularly in patients who receive adjuvant regional nodal irradiation. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for women ages 18-75 with cT1-3N1, and ypT0-T3N1M0 invasive breast cancer who underwent definitive surgical resection with axillary staging and also received adjuvant RNI. Patients treated from 2012 – 2015 were included to allow for appropriate coding of extent of axillary surgery. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between patients who received SLNB alone and ALND with or without SLNB utilizing log rank testing. Propensity matching was performed to reduce the impact of potential confounders and balance sample bias. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of overall survival. Results: A total of 1411 women were identified who met inclusion criteria. The median age was 52 (23-75) years. 206 (15%) women had SLNB alone and 1205 (85%) had ALND with or without SLNB. Five year OS was 73% in patients who underwent ALND compared to 76% in those who had SLNB alone (p =0.39). Following propensity matching by age, race, Charlson Deyo Comorbid Condition score, pT stage, grade, ER status, and HER2 status, 5 year OS was 79% in patients who underwent SLNB alone vs. 69% in patients who had ALND performed (p = 0.33). On Cox regression analysis, none of the variables predicted for 5 year OS. Conclusions: ALND in addition to RNI did not improve survival in patients with cT1-3N1M0 and ypT0-3N1M0 breast cancer compared to SLNB and RNI. We await results of the Alliance 011202 randomized trial for prospective validation of ALND omission in a similar subset of patients. [Table: see text]

Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer Who Refuse Treatment: An Analysis of Associated Factors and Impact on Survival

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110241
Author(s):  
Jackelyn J. Moya ◽  
Ashkan Moazzez ◽  
Junko J. Ozao-Choy ◽  
Christine Dauphine
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Invasive Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Breast Cancer Treatment ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Optimal Outcomes ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
The Impact

Background Completion of surgical resection and adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatments (chemotherapy, radiation, and endocrine therapy) is necessary to achieve optimal outcomes in invasive breast cancer. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics of patients refusing treatment and to analyze the impact of refusal on survival. Study Design A retrospective cohort study of invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed 2004-2016 was performed utilizing the National Cancer Database. Results Of 2 058 568 cases comprising the study cohort, .6% refused recommended surgery, 14.1% refused chemotherapy, 5.5% refused radiation, and 6.3% refused endocrine therapy. Patients refusing therapy were older and more likely uninsured; they did not live farther from the treating hospital. Racial disparities were also associated with refusal. Surgery refusal had the highest hazard ratio for mortality (2.7; 95% CI: 2.5-3.0, P < .001) compared to chemotherapy (1.3; 95% CI: 1.3-1.4, P < .001), radiation (1.8; 95% CI: 1.7-1.9, P < .001), and endocrine therapy (1.5; 95% CI: 1.4-1.6, P < .001) independent of race, insurance, receptor status, and stage. Conclusion This study demonstrates significant associations with refusal of breast cancer treatment and quantifies the impact on mortality, which may help to identify at-risk groups for whom interventions could prevent increases in mortality associated with declining treatment.

Surgery provides survival benefit over systemic therapy alone for stage IV triple negative breast cancer: A propensity matched analysis of the National Cancer Database.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13054-e13054
Author(s):  
Lifen Cao ◽  
Jonathan T. Bliggenstorfer ◽  
Kavin Sugumar ◽  
Christopher W. Towe ◽  
Pamela Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Propensity Matching ◽  
N Stage ◽  
Metastatic Sites

e13054 Background: Conflicting data exist regarding benefit of surgery of the primary site for stage IV breast cancer, in which systemic therapy is standard of care and patient characteristics may bias treatment decisions. Metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype with limited therapy options and poor prognosis. Our aim was to assess whether surgery for the primary tumor in stage IV TNBC provides a survival advantage over systemic therapy alone. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with de-novo stage IV TNBC who received systemic therapy alone or systemic therapy and surgery of the primary breast site 2004-2016. Patients receiving surgery for metastatic tumor sites or with incomplete follow up data were excluded. 1:1 propensity matching was performed for demographics, comorbidities, clinical T and N stage, and metastatic sites to minimize confounding factors. Survival outcomes were analyzed using a stratified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Results: Of 2989 patients, 782 (26.21%) underwent surgery plus systemic therapy and 2207 (73.84%) were treated with systemic therapy alone. The majority of all patients were aged 51-70 with low co-morbidity, and treated in metropolitan areas. Patients treated at academic facilities (OR = 0.67, p = 0.025), with multiple metastatic sites (OR = 0.59, p < 0.001), or advanced clinical N stage (OR = 0.55, p < 0.001) were less likely to undergo surgery. Of those who completed surgery, 58% had unilateral mastectomy, and 63% had axillary lymph node dissection. Propensity matching identified 507 ‘paired’ patients with similar characteristics in the surgery and systemic therapy alone groups. After multivariable adjustment, surgery was associated with superior overall survival compared with systemic therapy alone (HR 0.73, P < 0.001). Older age (HR = 1.47, p < 0.001), greater comorbidity (HR = 1.28, p < 0.001) and multiple metastatic sites (HR = 1.53, p < 0.001) significantly decreased overall survival in the matched cohort. Median survival was shortest in the systemic therapy alone group (12.8 months, 95% CI 11.3-14.5) and longest in those undergoing systemic therapy plus simple mastectomy (18 months, 95% CI 14.3-21.2), though approximately 4 months of median survival was added for all patients undergoing any surgery vs. systemic therapy alone (p = 0.0001). Conclusions: In stage IV TNBC, surgical resection of the primary tumor site in addition to systemic therapy may provide a survival benefit in selected patients. Though in this retrospective study the sequence of treatment was unknown, surgery could be considered for low disease burden as in other malignancies with oligometastatic disease. Additional research is needed to determine if these findings persist in prospective studies and for other hormone-receptor subtypes.

The role of radiotherapy in elderly women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariacarla Valli ◽  
Simona Cima ◽  
Paola Fanti ◽  
Barbara Muoio ◽  
Alessandra Vanetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Elderly Women ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Conservative Surgery ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Axillary Lymph Nodes ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Objective: To analyze the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) and overall survival (OS) in patients older than 69 years with early-stage breast cancer. Methods: From January 2007 to June 2015, we analyzed retrospectively 137 women with estrogen receptor–positive T1–2 invasive breast cancer, with negative axillary lymph nodes, dividing them into 2 subgroups: 70 to 79 years and older than 79 years. Results: After a median follow-up of 43.2 months, the 3-year IBR-free survival in patients treated with surgery plus RT was 98.8% and 92.1% in patients treated with surgery alone, with a significant difference ( p = .01). Radiotherapy did not impact overall survival ( p = .10). A higher percentage of patients aged between 70 and 79 years received RT after conservative surgery if compared with the older subgroup ( p < .01). Conclusions: In elderly women, adjuvant RT reduced the IBR, but did not improve OS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document